
B.C. landlord must pay evicted tenants $65K, court rules
Justice Anita Chan ruled on the dispute Friday, upholding a decision of B.C.'s Residential Tenancy Branch awarding $65,000 in compensation to the former renters.
In 2022, Mohan Sull, the landlord, was renting the North Vancouver home to Thomas and Rozette Trevitt for $5,650 a month, the court heard.
Sull entered into an agreement to sell the property and served the tenants with a two-month notice of eviction because 'the buyers intended to occupy the property,' according to the decision.
But the buyers never moved in.
'The buyers undertook extensive renovations. The city in March 2023 issued a stop-work order. The buyers did not obtain the proper permits until May 2024. I understand the property is still fully gutted with no one residing there currently,' the judge wrote.
The ousted renters successfully challenged their eviction on the grounds that the 'stated purpose of the notice to end tenancy was not accomplished,' the decision said.
Buyers were not 'purchasers;' sale was conditional
Sull was seeking a judicial review of the arbitrator's decision on a number of grounds, including that it was the buyers – not him – who should have to pay.
'The buyers had possession of the property and did not occupy it. The landlord argues he has no control over the property and he ought not to be held liable,' Chan wrote, summarizing the crux of Sull's submission on that point.
The judge's decision explained that the arbitrator had already considered and dismissed this argument, finding that the buyers did not 'meet the definition of purchasers' in the Residential Tenancy Act.
The legislation defines a purchaser as someone who has agreed to purchase 'at least half of the full reversionary interest in the property' and the arbitrator found that criteria was not met in this case, according to the judgment.
That was because the deal was a five-year 'option to purchase' agreement. The buyers put down $100,000 and agreed to pay a monthly interest fee of $5,800 for the next five years or until they decided to complete the purchase of the property.
'If there was an agreement to terminate the contract, the down payment and any additional payments were to be returned to the buyers,' the decision explained.
Even if the buyers were 'purchasers,' the arbitrator found the landlord was not legally entitled to evict the tenants.
A landlord who has sold a property can end a tenancy but only if 'all the conditions on which the sale depends have been satisfied,' the decision explained. Because of the nature of the agreement, the sale of the property was 'at its core' a conditional sale unless and until the option to purchase was exercised.
'The arbitrator emphasized that the wrongful act was not that the buyers had not occupied the property, but rather that the tenants ought not to have had their tenancy terminated in the first place,' the decision said.
The judge agreed on this point.
'The landlord was not entitled to provide the two-month notice to end tenancy, as there was no unconditional sale of the property,' Chan wrote.
Unenforceable clause
Sull also argued to the arbitrator and again to the judge that the eviction was legal and justified because of a clause written into the lease that read 'tenant and owner both agree to give two full calendar months written notice, when they plan to end the lease.'
The problem with that argument, the judge noted, was that it was an 'impermissible opting out of the mandatory provisions of the (Residential Tenancy Act) because 'a landlord cannot end a tenancy by providing two months' written notice for any reason.'
The legislation lays out specific circumstances in which a landlord can end a tenancy and leases which 'attempt to avoid or contract out' of those legal obligations are 'of no effect,' according to the decision.
'The arbitrator found that (the) clause was an attempt by the parties to increase the circumstances by which the landlord can end the tenancy,' the decision said.
The judge agreed with this assessment and found the arbitrator's decision, as a whole, was reasonable in the circumstances.
Wrongfully evicted tenants in circumstances like these are generally entitled to compensation equivalent to 12 months of rent. In this case, that worked out to $67,800 but the judge noted an award of $65,000 as the maximum allowable for a dispute settled by the Residential Tenancy Branch.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CBC
23 minutes ago
- CBC
The U.S. economy is thriving in spite of tariffs. Will it last?
By just about every indicator, the U.S. economy is holding up remarkably well. When Donald Trump launched his global trade war, economists and markets said his tariff policy would slow the economy, drive up prices and dramatically reduce global trade. And yet, stocks are at all-time highs, the country's employment is strong, its economy is expanding and the expected surge in inflation hasn't materialized. Canada's economy has shown surprising resilience, as well, with consumer spending starting to pick up last month and unemployment declining. Economists told CBC News it's unclear whether the tariffs' impact was overestimated, or if further pain lies ahead. But they say resilience in both countries is fragile, and could be quickly upended if the trade war worsens or expands. A lack of retaliation BMO's chief economist Douglas Porter says two key factors are driving the recent U.S. resilience. "Other nations have not really been retaliating against the U.S., so their own exports are not facing that much pressure. And on the flip side, the U.S. consumer has been pretty heavily sheltered so far from this," said Porter. In the meantime, American businesses have not passed on the costs of tariffs. General Motors, for example, released earnings last week that said Trump's tariff policies drove down profits by 35 per cent in the second quarter. The automaker said tariffs on cars and parts led to a $1.1-billion US loss in its quarterly earnings. But still, it has not increased prices. Royce Mendes, managing director at Desjardins Capital Markets, says that's becoming a trend among affected American companies. "Some companies may choose to just eat the tariff increase in costs rather than draw the ire of President Trump," said Mendes. GM stock fell on the news, but has since rebounded, paring losses and climbing almost all the way back to where it was before it published its earnings. Financial markets have had some pretty volatile sessions, including steep sell-offs when tariffs are announced, and big rallies when exemptions are made. But stock markets in both Canada and the U.S. are at or near record highs — which investors believe is a sign that the resilience we're seeing will last. A stockpile of products The question, though, is whether the impact of the tariffs has simply been delayed. When the levies were first announced last spring, businesses around the world scrambled to get product out the door and into the United States. That has led to a huge stockpile of products — and it means American importers have not yet had to bear the worst of the tariffs. WATCH | The future of Canada-U.S. free trade: Is Canada-US free trade dead? | About That 4 days ago North American free trade is teetering on the edge of uncertainty as U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs continue to complicate how goods come and go. Andrew Chang explores signs that free trade — as we've come to know it — is on its way out, and challenges that may lie ahead in renegotiating the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters. "There was a lot of front-running and that may be one of the big reasons why we haven't seen much impact yet," said BMO's Porter. "There's probably some pain to come, but I don't think it's going to be as bad as many economists were fretting about earlier this year, at least for the U.S." Canada's economy has shown resilience, too But both economists point to the fact that Canada's economy has also fared better than almost anyone had expected. Economic growth shrank in April, but only by 0.1 per cent. Statistics Canada says another 0.1 per cent decline is likely for May. (Those numbers will be confirmed on Thursday.) The unemployment rate has actually begun to decline since peaking in May at seven per cent. And last week's retail sales figures showed consumer spending had started to pick up again in June. "We've been pointing to this broader resilience in consumer spending," said Claire Fan, a senior economist with RBC. She says consumer sentiment plunged in the spring, at the height of the uncertainty. But since then, RBC crunched U.S. customs data and found exemptions for CUSMA-compliant products have dragged the average effective tariff rate all the way down to as low as 2.3 per cent. "It's a reflection of President Trump's overall strategy of coming out very aggressive early on, but then walking things back. I mean, the tariffs have not been as punitive for Canada as initially believed — nowhere close to it," said Mendes of Desjardins. Sector-specific pain However, real damage has been done in sectors like auto, steel, aluminum and lumber. The concern now is that the carve-outs Canada has secured for CUSMA-compliant products won't last. "Unless a trade deal is reached to significantly reduce U.S.-Canada tariffs by Aug. 1, when new U.S. tariffs are set to come into effect, we expect job losses and higher prices from tariffs to squeeze disposable income and cause households to tighten their purse strings," wrote Michael Davenport, senior economist at Oxford Economics in a note to clients. WATCH | Negotiations continue between Canada and the U.S.: Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C., said Canada will only accept a deal when there is one in the best interest of workers and the Canadian economy on the table. On the one hand, some in the Trump administration will look at the U.S. economy's relative resilience as a reason to double down and push harder for more and more punitive tariffs. But escalation wouldn't just be bad for the Canadian economy. Right now, most businesses and consumers on both sides of the border have been sheltered from the worst impacts of the tariffs. That shelter depends on a fine and tricky balance of importers eating some costs, exporters dropping some prices and countries limiting retaliatory measures. Upending that balance further comes with risks on both sides of the dispute.


CBC
23 minutes ago
- CBC
Montreal community organizations facing eviction after school service centre terminates leases
Two community education centres, the Carrefour d'éducation populaire de Pointe-Saint-Charles and the Comité d'éducation aux adultes de la Petite-Bourgogne et de Saint-Henri (CÉDA), both located in Montreal's Sud-Ouest borough, are facing eviction after receiving lease termination notices last week. Their landlord, the Centre de services scolaire de Montréal – the province's largest school service centre – is asking the groups to pay $300,000 in unpaid rent and vacate their respective locations in the next 30 days. Adult literacy is a core component of the programs offered by the centres, but after more than 50 years of existence, their services have expanded and they function as community centres, playing an important role in the communities they serve. Hélène Gadoury, director of the Carrefour d'éducation populaire de Pointe-Saint-Charles, described those spaces as "free" and "[where] you can have community, [where] you can have services all at the same place." "It's really important," she said, adding there's a daycare and services for seniors too. WATCH | Montreal community groups want stable source of funding: Montreal community groups try to pressure government for more stable funding 3 minutes ago Community groups are speaking out over what they describe as unstable and unreliable funding from the Quebec government. Alix Marchaut, who works at CÉDA in human resources and accounting, worries about what will happen if the groups are forced out. "If we close, what happens to the food bank? If we close, what happens to the people who want to learn French?" she wondered. "If we close, what happens to the people who just need a space to live and to share and to be supported?" Where it started Rent became an issue after the CSSDM, under financial pressure itself, decided in 2017 to increase the rent of its surplus buildings to reflect market value more closely. However, there was a five-year grace period, so up until 2022, the CSSDM only charged the centres a symbolic rent of $1 per year. Under the lease agreement, the amount for the following year was set at $3.23 per square foot, or $3,082.77 a month for the Carrefour d'éducation populaire de Pointe-Saint-Charles, and $13,459 a month for CÉDA. But since then, it has been indexed annually, with the CSSDM setting the price to be in line with the Consumer Price Index. CÉDA's monthly rent is now $15,084, Marchaut told CBC News, but like the Carrefour d'éducation populaire de Pointe-Saint-Charles, it says it can't afford it. In Quebec, school service centres and school boards receive funding from the government for their school buildings, including for maintenance, renovation or construction of new schools, but that doesn't include surplus stock. Earlier this year, though, Quebec school service centres and school boards were told by the provincial government to put renovation projects on hold due to budget cuts. In the notices served to the Carrefour d'éducation populaire de Pointe-Saint-Charles and CÉDA, the legal team for the CSSDM reiterated the school service centre is a public body responsible for the largest public school network in the province and that it doesn't receive any funding for the maintenance of its surplus buildings. "Although accommodating, our client must account for its finances and act expeditiously in the administration of its income properties," the notices indicated in French. "You will therefore understand that it cannot tolerate, in its income properties, a tenant who refuses or neglects to remedy this situation." Educational mission must remain top priority, Quebec says Last year the Education Ministry came through with emergency funding for the centres, but this year they said they haven't heard anything from the government. "We're just here, stuck in a very bad situation because we don't have the money, but we need to keep going. We need to keep going for the community," Marchaut said. The Comité Social Centre-Sud (CSCS), another community education centre located in the Ville-Marie borough, is facing a similar situation with the CSSDM. The CSCS received a formal notice at the same time as the other centres saying that its lease could be terminated if it failed to pay rent within 10 days. In a statement to CBC News, Bryan St-Louis, a spokesperson for the Education Ministry, said the CSSDM is the owner of the buildings and is therefore responsible for their use. St-Louis also said that school services centres, whose main raison d'être is to educate students, are facing more pressure as the number of students continues to grow, "in particular due to the increase in temporary immigration." If the service centres need the space for students, he wrote in French, their educational mission must always take precedence. St-Louis added, however, that the ministry is in contact with the CSSDM to ensure the best solutions are put in place. But all three groups say it's up to the education minister to fix this. They argue that they are recognized by the government as educational centres and want to be treated like other educational institutions and have access to a space. "It's a right for all adults to keep learning all through their lives," said Gadoury. The community education centres are hoping to sit down with Education Minister Bernard Drainville to find a lasting solution, but are prepared to go to court if necessary. The CSSDM is already embroiled in a legal battle with 13 community organizations in Ahuntsic-Cartierville, which are housed in another of its surplus buildings.


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Hyper Bit Advances Funds for Purchase of an Additional Ten ElphaPex DG1+ Crypto Miners
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 28, 2025) - HYPER BIT TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (CSE: HYPE) (OTCID: HYPAF) (FSE: N7S0) (the "Company" or "Hyper Bit") announces it has advanced funds to DogeCoin Mining Technologies Corp. (" DogeCoin Mining") for the purchase of an additional ten (10) ElphaPex DG1+ miners for the mining of Dogecoin ("DOGE") and Litecoin ("LTC") bringing the total number of DG1+ miners purchased to date to twenty (20). These miners will be installed and professionally managed at the third party owned, 11 MW renewable energy powered facility in Quebec, Canada. The Company has secured preferential pricing of USD $5,400 per unit for a total purchase of USD $108,000 for the twenty mining units. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: Mr. Dallas La Porta, President, CEO and Director of Hyper Bit Technologies Ltd., stated:"We have now forwarded the necessary funds to complete our initial DG1+ Miner purchase order of twenty units and look forward to the installation of these mining rigs at the purpose built and professionally managed,11 MW renewable energy powered facility in Quebec, Canada. These high efficiency ASIC mining rigs will be deployed and optimized to commence Dogecoin and Litecoin mining operations." About Hyper Bit Technologies Ltd. Hyper Bit Technologies Ltd. is a forward-thinking, diversified technology company specializing in the acquisition, development, and strategic deployment of crypto mining operations and blockchain-based innovations. As global interest in digital assets accelerates-driven by the rise of blockchain, decentralized finance (DeFi), and increasing institutional and retail adoption-Hyper Bit is committed to unlocking value across the crypto ecosystem while delivering growth for our stakeholders. Hyper Bit Technologies Ltd. is a member of the Blockchain Association of Canada and the American Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Association. Stay informed on our latest developments by subscribing to Company updates at and follow us across our social media channels: TikTok, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Hyper Bit Technologies Ltd. is publicly listed in Canada (CSE: HYPE), the USA (OTCID: HYPAF) and in Europe (FSE: N7S0). ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD Dallas La Porta, President, CEO and Director FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Telephone: 1-604-602-4935 Facsimile: 1-604-602-4936 e-mail: team@ FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This news release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this new release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that the Company expects to occur, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "potential" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could" or "should" occur. Forward-looking statements in this news release includes statements related to the Proposed Transaction and related matters. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. No investment is without risk. Crypto currencies are particularly volatile and therefore particularly risky. Companies that are developing technologies and investing in crypto mining can potentially be adversely affected by its inherent volatility. Readers are cautioned to always consult an investment advisor to determine if an opportunity is right for you. Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.