First direct flight from US to Greenland since 2008 lands on Trump's birthday
The United Airlines-operated Boeing 737 Max 8 departed from Newark International Airport in New Jersey at 11:31 a.m. EDT (1531 GMT) and arrived a little over 4 hours later, at 6:39 p.m. local time (1939 GMT), according to the flight-tracking website FlightAware.
A seat cost roughly $1,200.
Saturday's flight marks the first direct passage between the U.S. and the Arctic Island for nearly 20 years. In 2007, Air Greenland launched a route between Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport and Kangerlussuaq Airport, some 315 kilometers (196 miles) north of Nuuk. It was scrapped the following year due to cost.
The United Airlines flight took place on U.S. President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, which was being celebrated in Washington with a controversial military parade that's part of the Army's long-planned 250th anniversary celebration.
Trump has repeatedly said he seeks control of Greenland, a strategic Arctic island that's a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, and has not ruled out military force.
The governments of Denmark, a NATO ally, and Greenland have said it is not for sale and condemned reports of the U.S. stepping up intelligence gathering on the mineral-rich island.
United announced the flight in October, before Trump was re-elected. It was scheduled for 2025 to take advantage of the new Nuuk airport, which opened in late November and features a larger runway for bigger jets.
'United will be the only carrier to connect the U.S. directly to Nuuk — the northernmost capital in the world, providing a gateway to world-class hiking and fascinating wildlife under the summer's midnight sun,' the company said in a statement at the time.
Saturday's flight kicked off the airline's twice weekly seasonal service, from June to September, between Newark and Nuuk. The plane has around 165 seats.
Previously, travelers had to take a layover in Iceland or Copenhagen, Denmark, before flying to Greenland.
The new flight is beneficial for the island's business and residents, according to Greenland government minister Naaja Nathanielsen.
Tourists will spend money at local businesses, and Greenlanders themselves will now be able to travel to the U.S. more easily, Nathanielsen, the minister for business, mineral resources, energy, justice and gender equality, told Danish broadcaster DR. The route is also an important part of diversifying the island's economy, she said. Fishing produces about 90% of Greenland's exports.
Tourism is increasingly important. More than 96,000 international passengers traveled through the country's airports in 2023, up 28% from 2015.
Visit Greenland echoed Nathanielsen's comments. The government's tourism agency did not have projections on how much money the new flights would bring to the island.
'We do know that flights can bring in much more than just dollars, and we expect it to have a positive impact -- both for the society and travellers,' Tanny Por, Visit Greenland's head of international relations, told The Associated Press in an email.
__
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Taiwan Semiconductor Stock Tumbled Today
Key Points The U.S. government wants to take a 10% stake in Intel. It also wants to convert the free grant money that it already promised Intel into payment for Intel shares. The government may do the same thing to TSMC. 10 stocks we like better than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing › Contract semiconductor manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) stock slid 2.2% through 12:22 p.m. ET Wednesday. Why? As you may have heard by now, President Trump is planning to take an equity stake in Intel (NASDAQ: INTC). All the cool kids are doing it Following passage of the Biden administration's CHIPS Act supporting the U.S. semiconductor industry, Intel was awarded $10.9 billion in grants. But as Bloomberg reports, the Trump White House is now negotiating with Intel to convert those grants into a 10% stake in Intel stock. But Intel wasn't alone in winning CHIPS Act grants. As CNBC points out, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) was awarded $6.6 billion in U.S. government semiconductor subsidies. And now it seems U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick may want to convert that grant into an equity stake as well. What does this mean for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing stock? That's the question investors are pondering today: What does this mean for TSMC? If Commerce converts its $6.6 billion grant into a $6.6 billion investment in TSMC stock, it will effectively remove $6.6 billion in "free money" from TSMC's balance sheet. But TSMC would still get to keep the $6.6 billion -- in exchange for handing shares over to the government. It might also be better positioned to win further government subsidies. But what if the rumors prove false? What if the government invests only in Intel, and not in TSMC? That would seem to give the government a big incentive to make sure Intel "wins" the semiconductor market, perhaps at TSMC's expense. This is bad news for TSMC. Should you invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing right now? Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $654,781!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,076,588!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,055% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Intel and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Taiwan Semiconductor Stock Tumbled Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Wire
4 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Haig Partners Q2 2025 Haig Report ®: Dealer Profits Grow 20% Thanks to One Time Events; Buy-Sell Volume Declines but Values Remain Strong
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The U.S. auto retail industry just closed one of its most profitable quarters in years — but the driving forces may surprise you. According to the newly released Q2 2025 Haig Report ® from Haig Partners, public dealer group profits per store jumped 20% year-over-year, fueled in part by two unique, short-term tailwinds: "...The fundamentals remain healthy, demand to buy dealerships is strong, and dealers have shown again and again that they can adapt to whatever the market throws at them.' Favorable comparisons to June 2024's CDK dealer management systems outage, which crippled many dealers' operations during Q2 last year. A pre-tariff buying surge after President Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement, pulling forward sales at strong margins. 'These unusual boosts have made Q2 look stronger than it may prove to be for the rest of the year,' said Alan Haig, President of Haig Partners. 'But the fundamentals remain healthy, demand to buy dealerships is strong, and dealers have shown again and again that they can adapt to whatever the market throws at them.' Additional highlights from the Q2 2025 Haig Report ®: Franchise Valuation Changes – Toyota, Kia, and Hyundai/Genesis saw multiple increases this quarter, reflecting strong demand and buyer appetite. Audi suffered a sharp valuation cut as prolonged sales declines and inventory imbalances eroded buyer interest. Blue Sky Values at Record Levels – Average dealership blue sky values remain about twice pre-COVID, a figure bolstered by steady multiples and strong earnings despite slower buy-sell volume. Market Momentum Shifts – Private buyers are showing broader appetite, while public groups are increasingly selective — favoring top-performing brands or strategic bolt-ons. Pipeline Strength – Haig Partners is advising on 67 dealership transactions signed or closed in 2025, 18% more than last year, outpacing the market's overall slowdown. Dealership Buy-Sell Market: Slower First Half, Set to Rebound? 192 U.S. rooftops changed hands in 1H 2025 — down 39.4% from last year's pace. Drivers of the slowdown: dealership buy-sell activity was still healthy in Q2, but more delayed closings experienced due to election-year uncertainty, tariff headlines, and a value gap between buyer and seller expectations. Outlook: A clearer political and economic landscape is expected to reignite activity in the second half, though volumes may be shifting back to a volume of 300-400 dealership sales per year compared to the 550-700 sales per year we experienced during the COVID era when valuations exploded. Economic & Operational Outlook Tariffs will have an impact in Q3. The OEMs have absorbed the cost of the tariffs so far, but we expect this will begin to change in Q3 as higher prices are subtly passed on to dealers and customers. Some brands will be hurt more than others, which could reshuffle dealership valuations. Interest rate cuts are increasingly likely later in 2025, which could boost more dealership buy-sell activity in the second half, not mention increased vehicle affordability for customers. EV mandates are gone, reducing risks for dealers in former CARB states. Now that dealers can sell the vehicles that consumers want to buy, dealers in CARB states can rest assured that their businesses will remain viable and valuable. The regulatory changes are likely to have an impact on everyone in auto retail. During an interview with Alan Haig, Senator Bernie Moreno stated, 'And I think right now, if I was in the car business today, I would be investing, I'd be buying, I'd be growing, because you take advantage of the fact that some people don't know how to manage change.' Haig Partners is seeing this spirit among the many dealership buyers it speaks with every week. Alan Haig said, 'Public and private buyers are trying to expand in this environment. Despite the unknown impact of tariffs, most of the larger groups are seeking to expand, and many smaller ones as well. And no one is calling us desperate to sell.' At Haig Partners, we are deeply grateful to the dealers, industry partners, and clients who place their trust in The Haig Report ® as a resource for navigating the dynamic automotive retail market. We recognize that selling a dealership is not only one of the most significant financial decisions in a dealer's career, but also one of the most personal. It is an honor to be invited into that process, to provide both the market insights that inform strategy and the expert guidance that helps our clients achieve the outcomes they deserve. Our team takes great pride in serving as a trusted advisor, combining decades of transaction experience with a deep respect for the legacy and future of each business we touch. We invite dealers considering a sale or acquisition to connect with us and explore how we can help maximize value and ensure a smooth, successful transition. About The Haig Report ® The Haig Report ®, the longest-published quarterly report tracking trends in auto retail and their impact on dealership values, includes data and analysis on the performance of auto dealerships, discusses noteworthy events impacting the automotive retail industry, identifies trends in the M&A market for dealerships, provides guidance on estimated value ranges for different franchises and shares an outlook for the automotive retail buy-sell market. The Haig Report ® is based on data gathered from reputable public sources and interviews with leading dealer groups and dealers, bankers, lawyers and accountants who specialize in auto retail. About Haig Partners Haig Partners is a leading buy-sell advisory firm that helps owners of higher-value dealerships maximize the value of their businesses when they are ready to sell. The team at Haig Partners has advised on the purchase or sale of more than 525 dealerships with a total value of over $10.6B. It has represented 30 dealership groups that qualify for the Top 150 Dealership Groups list published by Automotive News, more than any other firm. Clients of Haig Partners benefit from the group's collective experience as previous executives with leading companies such as Ally Financial, AutoNation, Bank of America, Credit Suisse, Deloitte, FORVIS, J.P. Morgan, the Sewell Automotive Companies and Toyota Financial Services. Leveraging its unmatched expertise and extensive relationships, Haig Partners guides clients to successful outcomes through a confidential and customized sales process. The firm authors The Haig Report ®, the leading industry quarterly report that tracks trends in auto retail and their impact on dealership values, and co-authors NADA's Guide, 'Buying and Selling a Dealership.' Haig Partners team members are frequent speakers at industry conferences and are regularly quoted in reputable media outlets, including Reuters, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, CNBC, BBC, Automotive News, Wards, CarDealershipGuy and CBT News. For more information, visit
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
The misery of auto tariffs is hitting families and factories
It's not as though we couldn't have seen it coming. Section 4.26 of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 made the case for tariffs on imported goods. The document argued that tariffs will force U.S. companies to onshore manufacturing. Trump's style of threatening and coercing U.S. trading partners with high tariffs has increased the toxicity of trade policy. This has all made for a rough start, with initial tariff announcements roiling the stock and bond markets and stoking consumer fear and uncertainty. But now, two things have become clear. First, the Trump approach to tariffs has confused companies and the financial markets. Since March, employment has plummeted in industries with increased exposure to higher tariff-related costs. Second, and more important, the price of the chaos has come due, and it's being paid largely by working Americans. The trade wars reveal just how much Trump has sold a bill of goods to his political base. Tariffs drive up prices to U.S. consumers, both directly and indirectly. Tariffs on imported finished goods, and components that are used in domestic manufacturing, are passed on to consumers directly through higher prices, as we've seen with coffee. Tariffs also stifle competition from abroad by making imports more expensive. This loss of competition can spur domestic price increases, as we've seen with tariffs on imported solar panels. Let's take the high-profile case of automobiles. Automakers produce some models in the U.S. for sale here, make others for export and import other models. With tariffs on auto parts jumping from 2.5 percent to 25 percent, on steel from an original 0 percent to 50 percent and finished cars from 2.5 percent to 25 percent, costs are rising in all three areas. Jeep maker, Stellantis, reported an expected $2.7 billion loss in the first half of 2025, partially due to tariffs. General Motors reported a $1.1 billion hit from tariffs on imported cars and parts in the second quarter of 2025. And Ford Motors estimates that tariffs will cost the company $1.5 billion in 2025. We will see working Americans absorb the full force of these tariff-related cost increases, tariffs on imported vehicles from Asia and Europe and, to some (still uncertain) extent from Canada and Mexico, in higher automobile prices. Because automobiles represent a sizable chunk of the average U.S. consumer's budget, higher prices will be an enormous hit to paychecks and pocketbooks. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that consumer spending on transportation between 2020-2023 accounts for about 17 percent of the average American's budget and new vehicles account for over 60 percent of that outlay. Transportation ranks second among the five largest necessities that account for 75 percent of total consumer spending, preceded by housing (first) and followed by food (third). Moreover, multiple cohorts depend heavily on cars for transportation. Over 90 percent of adults rely on personal vehicles for their commute to work. And in rural areas, for swing- and night-shift workers, and for families, car ownership is essential. Simply put, working Americans spend a lot on automobiles because they have to. And for many Americans, a car is an absolute necessity. Tariff-induced higher prices for automobiles carry a significant opportunity cost for consumers. Tariffs are expected to increase the price of a new automobile by between 6 percent and 22 percent. That's an additional $3,000 to $10,500 per new car purchase, piled onto the average automobile price of $48,000. By way of comparison, this incremental cost is the equivalent of about five weeks of the average U.S. family food budget or 14 weeks of rental housing or mortgage payments. Budget-constrained consumers make careful choices about how to spend their paychecks. For necessities like automobiles, higher tariff-induced prices will force them to cut back on spending in other important areas. The sheer size of this forced rebalancing stands, on balance, to further tighten budgets and lower working Americans' quality of life. The Trump administration's willful ignorance of how tariffs hit working Americans and is coming home to roost. In March, Trump stated that the administration did not care about whether automobile tariffs drive up consumer prices. And faced by complaints from Wal-Mart, Amazon and Mattel in May, Trump told U.S. companies to 'eat the tariffs' instead of passing them on to consumers through higher prices. The ultimate tariff hit to paychecks and pocketbooks will be painful. Moreover, even if Trump's draconian policy was remotely successful in spurring the onshoring of U.S. manufacturing, it would take far longer than the three and a half years left in Trump's final and devastating presidential term. So far, there's no sign that will happen. To the contrary, manufacturing has been shedding jobs and pulling back on investment this year. Democrats should be looking now to find ways to advertise that Trump's tariff policy puts working Americans in the cross-hairs, and to campaign on reversing the policy and mitigating the harm.
