logo
‘Behind each figure is a vulnerable child in care': Court kept in dark about 400 without social workers

‘Behind each figure is a vulnerable child in care': Court kept in dark about 400 without social workers

Irish Times17 hours ago

Tusla's 'unprecedented' failure to notify the courts it had not allocated social workers to almost 400 children has broken trust in the agency, a District Court judge has said.
Tusla, the child and family agency, is obliged to notify the court if a child is not appointed a social worker.
Judge Conor Fottrell said 'shocking' and 'concerning figures' arising from a court-directed inquiry outline the extent of the agency's failure to comply with orders relating to children in State care.
Appearing before the judge at a sitting of Dublin District childcare court this week, Tusla chief executive Kate Duggan apologised for shortcomings that led to the agency's widespread noncompliance with court orders. She stopped short of accepting sole responsibility for the failings.
READ MORE
Last July, Judge Fottrell directed Tusla to carry out the inquiry to identify instances where the agency did not notify the court about children in State care due to court orders who were not allocated social workers. He directed that the review must also consider compliance with other court directions relating to children subject to care orders.
On foot of these directions, Tusla submitted a report to the court earlier this month. Citing the report, Judge Fottrell said the agency identified 395 cases of children subject to care orders and not allocated social workers that had not been flagged to the court.
During the inquiry, Tusla considered the cases of 1,052 children subject to care orders stretching back to 2009, the judge noted. He said 859 court directions were breached in relation to 471 children. He said the court was not notified of the breaches.
Judge Fottrell described Tusla's widespread failure to comply with court orders as 'unprecedented'. 'Behind each figure is a vulnerable child in care,' he said.
The judge said it was early 2024 when he first became aware of issues relating to Tusla's failure to notify the court of non-allocation.
It is 'regrettable' that the court had to raise questions to bring the information in the report to light.
Judge Fottrell said the court's trust in the agency 'has been broken'.
In a judgment published in March this year, following the court's inquiry into the matter, Judge Fottrell was heavily critical of the agency's 'extraordinary failure' to comply with orders relating to about 250 children granted over the last 15 years.
Led by David Leahy, senior counsel for Tusla, Ms Duggan told the court that in December 2022, she was informed by the agency's regional chief for Dublin Mid Leinster of cases relating to 40 children left without a social worker, and a failure to notify the courts of such.
Ms Duggan – who was then Tusla's director of services and integration – said her understanding at the time was that the issue was confined to a specific area.
Ms Duggan agreed with the judge that she did not escalate the issue with the then-chief executive. She suggested she would have escalated it if aware of its scale at the time.
While noting Tusla's position that no 'active' decision was made not to notify the court of the cases, Judge Fottrell said nobody brought the cases to the court's attention despite being aware of the issue since December 2022.
'That is a catastrophic failure at local, regional and national level,' he said.
Asked by the judge if she, as chief executive of Tusla, accepted responsibility for the agency's failure to comply with court orders, Ms Duggan said: 'I think this is an agency-wide responsibility.'
Ms Duggan said Tusla has commissioned an external review to examine how the situation arose.
She outlined to the court efforts to increase recruitment of social workers to Tusla, to digitise file-management systems and other protocols aimed at mitigating risk of further breaches of court orders.
She said everyone within Tusla is now aware breaches are not tolerated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gardaí arrest man in his 20s in Finglas after seizing drugs worth an estimated €119,000
Gardaí arrest man in his 20s in Finglas after seizing drugs worth an estimated €119,000

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Gardaí arrest man in his 20s in Finglas after seizing drugs worth an estimated €119,000

A man in his 20s was arrested after gardaí seized drugs with an estimated value of €119,000 in west Dublin on Friday. Gardaí from the Dublin Crime Response Team carried out a search in Finglas as part of a continuing operation targeting the sale and supply of controlled drugs. During the course of the search gardaí seized cannabis herb valued at €114,940, cocaine with an estimated value of €3,010, and ketamine valued at €1,500. Gardaí also seized €9,500 in cash, believed to be the proceeds of crime, along with drugs paraphernalia. READ MORE A man, aged in his 20s, was arrested and is currently being detained under section two of the Criminal Justice (Drug Trafficking) Act 1996 at a Garda station in Dublin. The seized drugs will be sent to Forensic Science Ireland for examination and analysis. Investigations are continuing.

‘I 100% didn't do this', Dublin firefighter accused of rape tells Boston court
‘I 100% didn't do this', Dublin firefighter accused of rape tells Boston court

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘I 100% didn't do this', Dublin firefighter accused of rape tells Boston court

The Dublin firefighter on trial for rape over St Patrick's Day weekend last year told a Boston jury on Friday, 'I 100 per cent didn't do this. I've done nothing wrong.' Terence Crosbie (38) took the stand as the concluding witness on the fifth day of trial. The complainant, a 29-year-old attorney, claims she was raped by Mr Crosbie while his Dublin Fire Brigade colleague Liam O'Brien slept in a separate bed in a shared hotel room. She says she had consensual relations with Mr O'Brien after meeting him at the Black Rose bar in Boston. She later fell asleep in a separate bed but then says she awoke to Mr Crosbie raping her. READ MORE Mr Crosbie denied this allegation on Friday. 'There was nobody in my bed, my bed was empty,' he told the court. 'I had no physical or sexual contact with her at all.' Mr Crosbie said that he 'said hello' to the complainant at The Black Rose and was in the hotel room when she and Mr O'Brien first entered. He stated that Mr O'Brien gave him a 'look' and that he 'read between the lines and left the room'. Approximately two hours later he returned. 'I knocked on the door and got no answer and I knocked a second time and still no answer,' he said. He claimed that he 'shouted' and called for Mr O'Brien two more times and 'heard no reply.' He said that the room was dark and 'even darker' after he shut the door and that he did not see Mr O'Brien or the complainant. Shortly after he got into bed he heard someone 'rummaging around the room'. The complainant previously stated that the bathroom light was on when Mr Crosbie returned. When she broke free from underneath Mr Crosbie and escaped to the bathroom to dress, he 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door. Under cross examination, defense attorney Daniel C Reilly had asked the complainant if she noticed if the assailant 'had body marks or tattoos.' 'I was trying not to look,' the complainant replied. On Friday, the defense submitted photos of tattoos on Mr Crosbie's upper arms and legs. Jurors previously heard that Mr Crosbie was arrested while boarding an early flight back to Dublin after being questioned by police. On Friday Mr Crosbie said that his 'head was spinning' and that he was 'scared like a rabbit in the headlights.' He stated that he reported the police interview to his superiors at the fire brigade and that when he returned to his hotel room, he found that the door was left open and packed his suitcase. 'I didn't like the fact that someone had been in my room and the nature of the allegations being made,' he stated. Mr Crosbie also denied insulting Mr O'Brien, claiming that he would not have used the word 'friend' as the complainant alleged. 'I would say mate or buddy,' he stated. Under direct questioning, Mr Crosbie stated he would not have used the word 'loser' either, as the complainant alleged he called Mr O'Brien. 'That's not an Irish term or anything I would use,' he said. 'Does the word 'stop' mean the same thing in Ireland as it does in the United States,' Suffolk County district attorney Erin Murphy asked Mr Crosbie under cross examination. 'Yes,' Mr Crosbie said. Dublin Fire Brigade member Terence Crosbie (right) with his defence lawyer Daniel C Reilly during his trial in a Boston court. Photograph: Susan Zalkind/The Irish Times Jurors previously saw video of Mr Crosbie with his head close to an unidentified blonde woman at The Black Rose bar, prior to the alleged assault. The state used this image to identify Mr Crosbie and a Dublin Fire Brigade emblem on his jumper. Mr Crosbie had previously stated he was married and has two daughters. 'What were you doing at the precise moment the [prosecution] decided to zoom in,' Mr Reilly asked Mr Crosbie in direct examination. 'I was kissing another woman,' he said. 'Is that what you're charged with in this case?' Mr Reilly asked. 'It's not, no,' said Mr Crosbie. Jurors previously saw video of the complainant leaving room 610 of the Omni Parker hotel 20 minutes after Mr Crosbie returned in the early hours of March 15th, 2024. Two minutes later she texted a friend: 'I woke up and a guy was inside of me.' In the text she alleged the perpetrator told her she 'wanted it' and that his 'friend' was 'pathetic.' The complainant reiterated this allegation on the stand, stating that she woke up to a man raping her and that Mr Crosbie called Mr O'Brien 'a loser'. Hours later she went to the hospital to report an assault. Jurors previously heard that in her initial reports the woman did not recall Mr O'Brien's name and did not recall meeting Mr Crosbie previously. Jurors also heard from an analyst who testified two male DNA profiles were collected from the complainant. Mr O'Brien was identified as one of the males. Jurors heard that it was unclear if the second set of male DNA was that of Mr Crosbie. The defense previously called Dr Chris Rosenbaum, the director of medical toxicology for Newton-Wellesley Hospital, as an expert witness. Dr Rosenbaum testified that the complainant reported a 'prior history of binge drinking' in her medical documents and that her blood alcohol level at the time she reported the assault the next morning can 'correlate with memory loss and impairment.' Mr Crosbie has been detained in the Nashua Street Jail since his arrest. Jurors will hear closing arguments on Monday.

BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams's defamation case victory
BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams's defamation case victory

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams's defamation case victory

The BBC will not appeal over Gerry Adams's defamation victory against the organisation. Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Féin , said there needs to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, that he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. READ MORE The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision.' 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences,' the spokesperson said. In a statement issued through the Sinn Féin press office on Friday, Mr Adams said the decision not to appeal by the 'British Broadcasting Corporation' has to be followed by a 'substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland'. He said the broadcaster must become 'more accountable to the public'. 'The Dublin court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest,' he said. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said, the damages will be donated to good causes,' he said. —Press Association

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store