'My university course made me who I am - now it's being cut'
Universities across the UK are struggling with their finances.
From job cuts to course closures, many are now having to make tough decisions.
Most universities will still be facing financial struggles next year, even with tuition fees in England and Wales rising from £9,250 to £9,535, after years of stagnation.
Before that, fees had only increased by £250 since 2012, when they tripled to £9,000.
Costs, including staff salaries and building works, have continued to rise in that time - meaning budgets have been getting tighter and tighter.
And the issues are not just limited to England and Wales. Queen's University Belfast has faced criticism this week over its decision to open a campus in India while planning to cut up to 270 jobs.
The government says it is "committed to fixing the foundations of higher education", while Universities UK, which represents 141 universities, says the sector has been "doing more with less for years".
For Cardiff University final-year languages student Darcie James, 23, the headlines hit close to home after her university last month announced plans to cut 400 jobs and close some courses.
Her faculty, which she says "feels like a little family", is now at risk of closure. Nursing and music courses are also under threat.
The University and College Union (UCU) branch says it will have a no-confidence vote in the leadership team at the university over the plans.
Branch president Joey Whitfield, senior lecturer in Hispanic studies, says there is "a lot of anger and uncertainty", and that some students have reported staff crying to them during lectures.
The university's vice-chancellor, Prof Wendy Larner, says the university's final plans "will be shaped by our community" in a 90-day consultation.
"The scale of the challenge will remain, but the way that we address it will certainly be refined and developed over the next 90 days," she says.
Student Darcie says she was "really shocked" by the announcements, and that, as someone who has lived with anxiety, her course - in particular her year abroad in France and Spain - has "made her as a person".
She says it is "so important others have that available too".
In January, the University of Kent said more jobs would be cut in a bid to save nearly £20m.
Last February, the university announced proposals to cut 58 jobs and "phase out" six subjects - art history, anthropology, health and social care, music and audio technology, journalism, and philosophy and religious studies - in response to its "financial challenges".
Third-year journalism student Brendan Papp, 21, is being "taught out" - meaning students currently on the cancelled course are seeing it through until completion.
When he applied, he says the course ranked in the top five in the country. Now, he says, it's fallen to "dead last".
An international student from Virginia in the US, Brendan came to the UK to chase his dream of becoming a sports reporter. Now, he's keen to complete his course so he can move to Madrid to do sports management instead.
He says the class lost "two really good teachers because of the cuts".
Now he says "it feels like you're running into a wall" and, with engagement in the course dipping, he's struggling to see the results from his hard work.
Brendan says the staff have been "excellent", though, trying to provide an experience that's "as good as possible".
One staff member from a different department, who asked not to be named, says they believe the previous cuts have had a knock-on effect on student recruitment, leading to further cost-saving measures and damaging staff morale.
A university spokesperson says that sentiment is not reflected in its staff surveys.
They say "sector finances are under severe pressure and, like many other institutions, we have been making wide-ranging changes" in order to "reflect what students and government are looking for from universities".
Staff at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have announced plans to strike this week over the university's proposed cuts to 170 full-time positions.
UEA says those "incredibly challenging decisions" - made in an effort to save £11m - were not taken lightly.
Nathan Wyatt, 23, the student union's welfare officer and a former politics student, says he led the charge against previous cuts in 2023.
He says there is a feeling of "fatigue" about facing more cuts.
"The consensus on campus is that people are feeling drained, and they don't have the energy to go out and say 'no cuts' as loudly as they did before."
Nadine Zubair, a digital humanities manager and co-chair of the university's UCU branch, says students and staff are affected by the cuts "in every aspect of their experience here: their morale, their workloads - everything is taking a hit".
"We are a world-leading sector, but the world is watching us crumble under our own managerial panic or desperation."
A university spokesperson says UEA is still committed to "high-quality student education and experience, and we will work hard to limit any impact on students".
They say "compulsory redundancies will always be a last resort".
Durham University says it wants to save £10m in staff costs by cutting about 200 professional services roles this year.
Further savings could include cuts to academic staff next year, it says.
Professional services staff support the running of the university, while academics are responsible for research and teaching.
"Strenuous efforts" will be made to ensure these are voluntary redundancies, says Durham, adding that it "remains a world-leading university".
Student Lily Gershon, 22, co-editor-in-chief of the student newspaper, says the cuts are making her reconsider whether she wants to go on to do a postgraduate course at Durham.
She says the professional services staff who are facing cuts this year make up the "backbone" of the university.
Lily, from Hong Kong, says her mum "sacrifices" to pay for her to go to university as she is not entitled to a student loan and lives on about £50 per week.
But she says being the cohort whose exams were cancelled due to Covid means "we're quite a resilient bunch, so we know we can adapt".
Katie Muth, assistant professor in digital humanities and modern literature - and a member of Durham's UCU Committee - says colleagues are "pretty worried across the board" by the university's announcements.
She says "there's a lot of anxiety" and colleagues are concerned about their workloads increasing as people leave.
"People are already working at or above capacity," she says.
She believes "band-aid" solutions are not going to fix a higher education sector in need of systemic changes.
A university spokesperson says all departments are being asked to find savings, and the university is engaging with staff "in an open and transparent way".
They say any voluntary staff departure "would be considered in relation to the likely workload impact and opportunities to reduce workload".
After the freeze on fees, universities say finances have been getting tighter for years.
Then there was the shock of new visa restrictions on international postgraduates coming to the UK bringing their partners and children.
International students pay higher fees, but the introduction of those restrictions in January 2024 has led to a drop of around 16% in applications.
That, in turn, has led to more competition between universities to secure places for UK students.
The body which regulates higher education, the Office for Students (OfS), has warned that without change on a scale not seen before, 72% of universities could slide into financial deficit - where a university spends more than it is bringing in - by 2026.
"We have called for universities and colleges to take bold, transformative steps to address the challenges, and we know that many are taking action already," an OfS spokesperson said.
It is also nearly impossible to tell if a university will go bust.
That is because universities borrow money from banks based on the value of the assets they own, like buildings and land. If they get into financial trouble, they will renegotiate the terms of their loan with the bank - and no bank wants to see a university which owes them money failing financially.
The Department for Education says the government inherited a "dire economic situation" and has taken "tough decisions to bolster universities' financial sustainability".
"The Office for Students is rightly refocusing its efforts on monitoring financial sustainability, to help create a secure future for our world-leading sector," a spokesperson said.
"Whilst institutions are autonomous, we are committed to fixing the foundations of higher education to deliver change for students."
Additional reporting by education editor Branwen Jeffreys
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mayor of Monroe blames social media post for low attendance at Latin Festival
Low attendance at a Latin Fest in Monroe is causing controversy among residents and city leaders. 'I'm having a good time, but I miss my Spanish people,' one attendee said Sunday. 'I don't know what's going on, but this world needs to be in peace so everyone can reunite and be together.' ALSO READ: Group says increase of ICE arrests in Charlotte is leading to more calls for help Both the festivalgoer and Monroe's mayor, Robert Burns, noticed the lack of Hispanic people at the festival, but Burns blamed a social media post made on Facebook for the low turnout. The post said Monroe is not a safe place for immigrants, adding that attending the Latin Fest could place you and others in potential danger. 'I would challenge those individuals who post that type of stuff,' Burns said. 'You genuinely don't care about the Hispanic community, because that affected the businesses of our city. Regardless of what nationality they are, they are businesses and individuals who pour into this city.' The originators of the post, Monroe Immigrants, responded to the mayor in a statement to our partners at Telemundo. 'The City of Monroe needs to make capital from its Hispanic constituents; that's all they care about,' they said. 'The City of Monroe doesn't not care about anything except increasing the profits of capital.' In response, Burns said he was upset by the low turnout at the festival. 'We care about families, we care about the economy, low taxes, education,' he said. 'Not only was I surprised, I was hurt because the Hispanic community has had such an incredible effect on our city.' In May, Monroe City Council approved a statement about public safety and immigration enforcement, stating 'Monroe is not a sanctuary city.' City council passed an additional statement on Tuesday that removed that sentence and says Monroe Police do not enforce federal immigration law. Mayor Burns voted against last night's version. VIDEO: Bakery owner says ICE sparks fear in neighborhood, hurts local businesses


Newsweek
34 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Is Slipping, Polls Show
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has slipped in a new Quinnipiac poll out on Wednesday compared to the pollster's survey in April. Why It Matters Trump has routinely touted positive approval ratings and polls during news conferences and campaign rallies throughout his political career. When the president returned to the White House in January, he coasted in with positive numbers. But his approval ratings then dipped significantly amid sweeping tariff announcements. Trump later walked back the tariffs by announcing a 90-day pause for the majority. Slipping in polls could ultimately hinder Trump's political clout in an already highly polarized climate and potentially hurt Republican chances in the coming 2026 midterms. What To Know According to the new Quinnipiac University poll, the president has a 38 percent approval rating and a 54 percent disapproval rating. The poll was conducted among 1,265 self-identified registered voters from June 5 to June 9. The poll's margin of error is 2.8 percent. In a Quinnipiac poll released on April 9, the president's approval rating was 41 percent with a disapproval rating of 53 percent. This shows the president dropping in a span of two months. In other recent polls, the president's approval marks improved among Hispanic voters. According to polls from CNN and CBS, Trump is also outperforming Democrats in a key administration pillar, immigration. He has a net positive approval rating on immigration, soaring from -21 back in June 2017 to +1 on Wednesday, CNN Chief Data Analyst Harry Enten reported. According to the Quinnipiac poll on Wednesday, the president has a 43 percent approval rating on immigration and a 54 percent disapproval rating, while 3 percent of those polled did not offer an opinion. This week's poll from Quinnipiac comes amid a social media feud with billionaire Elon Musk and protests erupting in major U.S. cities over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. President Donald Trump is pictured returning to the White House on June 9 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) President Donald Trump is pictured returning to the White House on June 9 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut last month on X, formerly Twitter: "Let me explain to you why Donald Trump's sinking approval ratings matter. His enablers and backers will get cold feet as they feel the country turning against him. And it's proof that our activism and our protest is working." Charlie Kirk, founder and president of conservative Turning Point USA, on X this week: "President Trump has a positive net approval rating, and no other issue contributes to his popularity more than immigration: 'He is begging for a fight on immigration because he knows what he's doing so far is working with the electorate.' Bring it on, Democrats." NBC Senior National Political Reporter Sahil Kapur posted to X on Wednesday: "Quinnipiac national poll: Trump's approval rating is 38/53. GOP's approval rating is 32/61. But they have one thing going for them — Democrats are even more unpopular. Dems' approval rating is 21/70. The congressional Democratic Party is under water with Democratic voters." What Happens Next Weekly polls charting the president's approval rating are published frequently by numerous pollsters and media outlets.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
EPA set to roll back rules that limit greenhouse gases and mercury from US power plants
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency is poised to eliminate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, part of a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations that Administrator Lee Zeldin has said would remove trillions of dollars in costs and 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also plans to weaken a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The planned rollbacks, set to be announced Wednesday, are meant to fulfill President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to "unleash American energy" and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' He said the actions would put a 'dagger through the heart of climate-change religion' and introduce a 'Golden Age' for the American economy. Environmental groups vowed to challenge the rules in court. 'Power plants are among the largest sources of dangerous pollution in the nation. We have modern technologies that allow these plants to reduce pollution with available and cost-effective solutions,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund. The clean-air standards targeted by the EPA under Trump, a Republican, "are protecting people across America today and will safeguard future generations,'' Patton said. 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,'' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'Our lawyers will be watching closely, and if EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules — the Biden administration's most ambitious effort to roll back planet-warming pollution from the power sector — would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or to climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Our research shows that EPA's power plant rules make substantial strides to protect human health and the environment,'' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,'' Bergman said in an email. 'And we also would have seen significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health."