Your Galaxy might soon warn you about voice phishing – and Samsung's AI is already testing it
On its Korean Community, Samsung has announced it will offer a "Voice Phishing Suspected Call Alert" feature with the stable One UI 8 update. The feature will try to detect and notify you in real time with the help of AI whether there is a suspicion of voice phishing with an unknown number. The company says that your Galaxy phone will show you a "detecting" alert when calling an unsaved number. Then, if voice phishing is suspected or detected, you'll get a warning message.
Image Credit - Samsung
Apparently, according to Samsung, the feature detects voice phishing by using data from Korea's National Police Agency, and also from the National Institute of Scientific Investigation. As you can probably tell, it's unfortunate, but the feature is limited to Korea at this point. I'd assume it's a bit more difficult to bring it to global users, but I do hope Samsung is able to do that in the future. Curiously enough, the feature seems to be working on outbound calls at the moment, even though arguably it will also be super useful for inbound calls as well. Voice phishing attacks are a newer threat. Those are calls where the attacker pretends to be a close relative of yours in a dire situation, usually asking for money. Nowadays, it's become even more sophisticated, as some criminals even use AI to copy someone else's voice to try to trick you.
In my opinion, it's great that as a whole, the tech industry is working to combat scammers and the like. Apple also recently introduced some new features in iOS 26 aimed at protecting you from scammers, such as the Call Screening feature.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Samsung's browser adds AI option to keep your tabs under control
Samsung is adding a handy tool to its Internet Browser that could help you keep your tabs under control. The new option, found in version 29.0.0.27 of the beta app, is called "Auto close settings." It lets you set unused tabs to close automatically after a certain amount of time. By default, the browser will keep every tab open. But if you turn this feature on, you can choose to close inactive tabs after seven or 30 days. There is also an option called "With smart tab management," which uses AI to decide when a tab is no longer needed. The description says it will close tabs as soon as it detects you are not using them. Many people are careful about managing their tabs, but for others, it is easy to forget how many are open. Having dozens or hundreds of tabs running can slow things down and make browsing less efficient. This update gives users an automated way to keep things tidy. Other browsers have tried to address similar problems. Google Chrome offers a "Memory Saver" that reduces resource use for inactive tabs but does not close them. Apple's Safari on iOS lets you automatically close tabs after one day, one week, or one month. Samsung's addition of an AI-driven closure option is a unique twist, though it will need to be accurate to avoid shutting something you still need. Samsung Internet app's "Auto close unused tabs" with smart tab management setting. | Images credit — SammyGuru Right now, Auto close settings is only available in the beta version of Samsung Internet. Samsung has not shared a release date for the stable version, but most features tested in beta eventually roll out more widely. If that happens, this could become a useful tool for users who do not want to manage tabs manually. From a user perspective, the AI-powered option is both promising and risky. It could save time for people who often forget to close old tabs, but it might also close something important before you are ready. Anyone using it for work or research may want to stick with the timed closure options instead of relying on AI. In the end, this is a small but thoughtful update that could help make Samsung Internet a bit more convenient to use. With mobile browsing often involving multiple tasks at once, features like this can help keep performance smooth and navigation easier. How well it works in practice will likely determine whether it becomes a standard part of Samsung's browser. Get 50% off – try it for 3 months today! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
6 hours ago
- Phone Arena
The budget Galaxy Tab A11 shows up in first real-life photo ahead of launch
Referential image of the Galaxy Tab A9. | Image credit — Samsung Samsung is getting ready to expand its tablet lineup once again. Alongside the Galaxy Tab S10 Lite, Galaxy Tab S11, and Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra, a fourth model is on the way - the Galaxy Tab A11. Now, the first real-life image of the device has surfaced, giving us a small glimpse of what to expect. Safety Korea has listed a Samsung tablet under the model number SM-X135N. Based on earlier reports, this device is believed to be the Galaxy Tab A11. The listing does not include specifications, but it does feature a photo showing the front of the tablet. The image reveals a front-facing camera positioned for portrait use, a design choice that Samsung often uses for its more affordable tablets. First real life image of the Galaxy Tab A11. | Image credit — Safety Korea So far, confirmed details about the Galaxy Tab A11 are limited. Previous leaks suggest the device will have a 5,000mAh battery, the same capacity as the Galaxy Tab A9. This points toward an entry-level position in Samsung's lineup, likely aimed at casual browsing, streaming, and basic productivity. There are also unconfirmed reports of a Galaxy Tab A11+ variant in development. While no official proof has surfaced for this model, one source claims that both the A11 and A11+ could launch in India as soon as next month. If this happens, the release would come ahead of Samsung's expected unveiling of the premium Tab S11 lineup later this year. Looking at Samsung's past approach, the Galaxy Tab A series focuses on affordability and essential features rather than high-end specs. The Galaxy Tab A9, for example, offered a straightforward design, an LCD screen, and enough performance for everyday use. If the A11 follows the same formula, it could become a cost-effective choice for students, families, or those seeking a secondary device. However, Samsung faces strong competition in this segment. Brands like Lenovo often include slightly larger batteries or higher-resolution displays in their budget-friendly models. For the Tab A11 to stand out, Samsung will need to offer solid value, even if it cannot match rivals on every specification. The new image confirms that the Galaxy Tab A11 is moving closer to launch, and while the design may be simple, that could be exactly what its target audience is looking for. If Samsung combines the expected battery capacity with reliable performance and keeps the price competitive, the A11 could find a place in a crowded market. But with budget tablets improving rapidly, the company will have to get the balance right to hold its ground. Get 50% off – try it for 3 months today! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
8 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Galaxy A17 vs Galaxy A16: Minor upgrades but welcome to the 120Hz party
The affordable Samsung Galaxy A16 has been a go-to backup Android phone for many people out there, and for a good reason. This sub-$200 device offers a great display, a decent camera system, and six years of software support, covering the most important smartphone pillars. Now, Samsung has quietly launched the successor, the Galaxy A17, and it's very interesting to see what upgrades the new model brings to the table. And there are some pretty substantial ones, such as the 120 Hz display refresh rate, which is crazy to see on such a budget phone when the iPhone 16 is still stuck at 60 Hz. But let's not get ahead of ourselves. Samsung Galaxy A17 vs Galaxy A16 differences: Table of Contents: Design Display Performance Camera Battery Specs Summary The last A-series phones took design cues from the Galaxy S lineup, offering a sleek and stylish look, with the same separate cutout for the cameras on the back pioneered by the Galaxy S Ultra some time the Galaxy A17 brings a change to the design, going back to an elongated, pill-shaped camera housing, similar to the one Sony has been using on Xperia phones for the past couple of generations. We don't find the change too appealing, as we were fond of the stylish look of the Galaxy A16, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The front of the two phones looks almost identical, with quite a substantial bezel around the screen, a hefty chin, and a teardrop cutout for the selfie camera. In terms of materials, there are some differences. The Galaxy A16 uses a plastic frame and back and Gorilla Glass Victus over the screen, while the Galaxy A17 is listed with a glass-fiber back material and the same plastic frame and Victus-protected dimensions are almost identical, but the A17 is 0.4 mm thinner and 8 grams heavier than its successor. This is almost imperceptible when holding the phone in your hand, so for all intents and purposes, these two feel almost exactly the same. The color options are pretty similar. The new Galaxy A17 is available in Black, Gray, and Blue, while the previous generation offers Light Green in place of the Blue option. Display Differences 120Hz for the masses It's crazy how a $200 phone can get you a 120 Hz refresh rate while Apple still rocks 60 Hz on its premium iPhone 16 . But that's the way it is, the Galaxy A17 comes with a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display that's able to go up to 120 Hz. The resolution is FHD+ (1080 x 2340 pixels) resulting in 358 PPI pixel density. Now, in terms of brightness, the Galaxy A17 still lists 800 nits support in HBM (high brightness mode) but we need some tests to verify this. The Galaxy A16, on the other hand, features a very similar display panel, rocking the same resolution and brightness figures and the same pixel density, and the only difference lies in the refresh rate—it can only go up to 90 Hz. In our display test, the A16 managed 733 nits maximum brightness at 100% APL and 1.6 nits minimum, which is admirable. Stay tuned for lab results soon. The one key area where we found the Galaxy A16 lacking was its chipset. The Exynos 1330 was and still is a very modest chip, and we say "still is" because the Galaxy A17 still features the same silicon. No upgrades in that department, we're afraid. This octa-core processor managed just below 1000 points in the Geekbench 6 single-core test and around 1900 points in multi-core performance. The 3DMark scores were also not very impressive—360 points. We don't expect the Galaxy A17 to perform radically better, given it uses the same chipset, but we have to run the tests to compare how this silicon performs inside the new phone. In terms of RAM, both phones mirror their respective configurations. We have a base 4GB/128GB version, and it goes up from there in 2GB steps. The highest variant features 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, bringing both phones into midrange territory. No one expects wonders from a $200 phone, especially when it comes to the camera. But the Galaxy A16 took us by surprise, scoring 124 out of 158 in our composite camera benchmark. The main 50MP camera scored 71 (out of 85), which, all things considered, is a pretty decent score. The selfie camera also performed admirably, with a score of 25 out of 30. The Galaxy A17 features the same camera system with the same 50MP main camera (this time around supported by optical image stabilization), the same 5MP ultrawide, and the same almost useless 2MP macro camera. It will be interesting to see whether or not Samsung has tweaked the image processing algorithms to improve the camera quality or left everything untouched on the Galaxy A17 compared to the previous model. We're doing the review as we type this, so stay tuned for a side-by-side sample comparison soon. In the battery department, there are no changes whatsoever. For all intents and purposes, the Galaxy A17 and its predecessor should be viewed as the same phone. At least when it comes to battery and charging. Now, the 5,000 mAh battery and the Exynos 1330 aren't the best pair when it comes to efficiency; the A16 was able to get 6 h 12 m on a single charge in our composite battery test, which ranks it 101st among phones tested in the past 2 years. Given the modest power and the beefy battery, we expected more. The test will tell us if Samsung has improved the situation on the Galaxy A17. The same goes for charging—both phones cap at 25W wired and don't support any wireless charging. It's a slow charging speed by any standard, and the A16 took 1 h 43 m to fully charge, which, in a world where a midrange Motorola can charge in half an hour, is just not fast enough. Here's how the Galaxy A17 vs Galaxy A16 compare. Head to the link for a detailed specs comparison. We're planning on doing a full review of the Galaxy A17, so this comparison will soon be populated by benchmarks, display tests, and camera samples. But even at this point we can draw some Galaxy A17 is largely the same phone as its predecessor, except for a few minor updates. The 6.7-inch screen can now refresh with up to 120 Hz, while the previous model was capped at 90 Hz. There's a slight design change concerning the camera housing, and the A17 is a tad lighter and a case to be made for the software situation. Both phones offer up to six years of major Android updates, which is amazing for this budget segment, but the Galaxy A17 will outlive its predecessor by one year, being if you're looking for a budget phone or a backup phone, the Galaxy A-series and both the A17 and A16 in particular are decent options. The phone is on pre-order for 239 euros right now (we expect US availability and pricing soon), and for that kind of money, it's a no need to upgrade if you already own the Galaxy A16, as the differences are miniscule. We'll update this comparison with all the benchmark results once we finish the review of the Galaxy A17.
