
More people are being priced out of the housing market. These non-profit groups are trying to help
Today, her mission is to pick up four cans of primer and paint in a neutral beige with a creamy eggshell finish.
It's all for a renovation at a six-unit building just bought in February by the Community First Guysborough County Housing Association. The building is in Boylston, N.S., a rural area about 270 kilometres from Halifax. O'Regan is chair of the board.
"It was pretty exciting," she said of the purchase, which came about six months after the organization officially incorporated.
"We were successful against all odds."
Community First is now the proud landlord for seven people, offering stable rents at between $800 and $850 a month for one- and two-bedroom apartments — about 60 to 70 per cent of what market rent would be.
As Nova Scotia grapples with a shortage of tens of thousands of homes, non-profits are trying to shoulder the load of housing people who've been priced out of the private market. But the high cost of managing their properties means organizations must balance the number of affordable units they offer against long-term sustainability.
That's especially challenging for small organizations like Community First, which are depending on volunteers to keep everything running.
"I worry about board member burnout," O'Regan said.
Without those organizers, meeting the goal of increasing the availability of low-cost housing in her area might not be possible, she said.
Sleepless nights over money
Community First incorporated in July 2024 because of the deep need for housing in the Guysborough area, which was short at least 300 homes in 2022, according to a provincial needs assessment. That's in an area with a population of roughly 4,600 people.
Technically, O'Regan is retired from her job in community development. So are many of the 13 other volunteers on the organization's board.
There's no money for the organization to hire an executive director, or even a property manager. Instead, the volunteers take on that work. It's a situation O'Regan said is "not sustainable."
In fact, the lack of money for organizational costs almost tanked the deal on the Boylston building.
"We had some sleepless nights," she said, recalling a moment when the board realized it needed to find money for an environmental assessment that had to be done before the sale.
"I said, if push comes to shove … I'd pull out my credit card," she said. "And the rest of the board members said, 'We're not there yet.'"
WATCH | What's the real cost of affordable housing?:
Long-term sustainability
In the last few years, there's been widespread interest in affordable or non-market housing, and different levels of governments have created programs to help non-profits buy or build homes.
In communities across the country, similar groups are stepping in to try to meet the need for affordable housing.
But once the non-profits become property owners, long-term financial sustainability is largely up to them.
And because non-profits deliberately charge less rent than private landlords, this leaves them with less cash to maintain and grow their organizations.
To deal with that, some non-profits choose to charge market rent for some of their units, which subsidizes the low rent in the remaining units.
Others opt to make up the difference with labour-intensive fundraising.
O'Regan is concerned about this choice; she's worried it might threaten how long Community First can keep going.
The organization is currently looking for loans to build more units, so the choice will have to be made soon, O'Regan said.
"This is a decision our board is going to be faced with, you know, within the next half year."
A pivotal expansion
The same decision is facing the volunteer board of the Antigonish Affordable Housing Society.
The AAHS already operates 28 units with rents between $640 and $938 a month, utilities included. It houses families and seniors who are unable to afford anywhere else in the competitive university town.
But paying the mortgage and the operations costs the AAHS roughly $1,000 a month per unit.
"Our operation is not breaking even with the rental income that we have," said Colleen Cameron, the AAHS board chair.
"So, that's being supplemented through fundraising and grants."
The society is looking forward to opening 17 brand new units on Aug. 1, which will range in rent from between $911 for a one-bedroom to $1,350 for a three-bedroom. Some new two-bedroom townhomes in the area are advertised at upwards of $2,595 a month.
Those new units are pivotal, because operating costs like snow removal, maintenance, and property taxes will be split between more apartments.
"We're hoping to break even because we're at that level of scale. But our goal is to break even, which is not leaving us any other room or contingencies," Cameron said in a recent interview.
"Sustainably, we have to think longer term in the future."
They know some of their tenants already have a hard time affording the non-profit apartments, so they're fighting to hold down rents. But as construction costs rise, that's getting harder.
The AAHS board members say their construction costs have ballooned from approximately $200 per square foot to $400 per square foot over the last 10 years.
They made a decision in mid-May that their next development must charge a higher rent on some of the units in order to subsidize the rest.
Cameron said it was a decision the board has been "struggling" with for more than a year.
"We cannot build affordable housing and be sustainable without having market rents included. It's just not working out," she said.
"We've been working at this for over 10 years, and the writing's on the wall; we have to consider doing a mix and that would be to help support affordable [units] by charging some market rents."
The mixed-income model
Like all building owners, non-profits are dealing with increasing costs like insurance, electricity, and construction materials, said Trish McCourt, the executive director of the Nova Scotia Non-Profit Housing Association.
"Non-profits really don't have any access to anything less expensive than private development does," she told CBC News. "And in some cases, it costs them more because they're not as scalable."
Dealing with those costs by charging market rents on some units to subsidize others is called the "mixed-income" model.
McCourt said that can lead to healthy neighbourhoods for families of all income levels.
"If we build neighbourhoods that are accommodating everyone in the community and what their needs are, it's just better for everyone," she said.
"But it will also be better for that development if they're able to count on having some people come in at higher levels of rent."
However, under the mixed-income model it takes longer to gather all the affordable units an organization needs. She said that's why some organizations make the "absolutely valid" choice to go a different way.
"I understand why some are going to continue to be dedicated to only offering affordable rents, but they will also need to do a lot of other fundraising in order to make that happen," she said.
50-50 split between affordable, market
With 295 apartments in the Halifax-Dartmouth area, the Housing Trust of Nova Scotia is one of the largest non-profits in the province.
The Trust bought the apartments in 2022 and began extensive renovations while keeping the tenants in place. They do not do renovictions, said executive director Angela Bishop.
Right now, about 70 per cent of their units cost either $750 a month for a one-bedroom or $860 for two bedrooms.
However, the Trust's operating expenses can be at least $400 per unit a month, plus a monthly mortgage Bishop said is even more costly.
"As interest rates drop, and we're able to refinance at better rates, the picture improves every single day," Bishop said.
"But in the meantime, it's the case that those lower [priced] units, if you take them, isolate them just on their own, they do. indeed, lose money."
To compensate for this, the trust has increased prices on some units as tenants move out.
About 30 per cent of the units cost $1,350 for a one-bedroom and $1,600 for a two-bedroom, which is below the average market rate of $1,707 for a Halifax two-bedroom, listed by the CMHC last fall.
"We kind of take an overall look at the buildings," said Bishop. "That's why we want that mixed income model, so we can continue to support people who can only afford to pay $750 a month rent."
The goal for the trust is to have 50 per cent affordable units and 50 per cent market units.
Bishop said they hope this will leave money to buy more buildings from the private sector and convert them to non-profit status.
WATCH | How can we break the cycle of rising house prices:
Will we ever break the cycle of rising home prices? | About That
1 year ago
Duration 11:19
The federal government has promised to make nearly 3.9 million homes available by 2031. Andrew Chang explains why bringing prices down is so fraught, and how addressing the housing crisis might require a radical shift in how we view home ownership.
'I'm not making a brownie to create housing for people'
Back in Guysborough County, Community First is planning to build another six units on the vacant land beside its Boylston building.
If the board charged market rent on a few of them it would have more income; other landlords in the Guysborough area are renting for as much as $1,400.
But O'Regan is not sold yet on the mixed-income model.
"I'm concerned about it because I know we need a lot of affordable housing," O'Regan said.
"It means that we have more money in our operating costs, but it's going to take us so much longer to get there if we have to do that."
Still, she can't see her board fundraising to make up the difference. They're volunteers who are already working full tilt, and adding more to their duties seems unreasonable.
"I'm not making a brownie to create housing for people," she said.
The board is exploring all kinds of options for community investment, and O'Regan said she's keeping an open mind on all of them.
But she also has a sense that time is short.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
10 hours ago
- CTV News
Parks Canada honours retired lieutenant general as ‘Hometown Hero'
Retired Lieutenant-General Larry Ashley gives a speech at the event honouring him as a "Hometown Hero." (CTV/Hafsa Arif) Parks Canada has recognized retired Lieutenant-General Larry Ashley as a 'Hometown Hero,' celebrating his pioneering role in Canadian naval aviation, distinguished leadership in both the Royal Canadian Navy and Royal Canadian Air Force, and lasting contributions to the country's aerospace industry. The ceremony took place in Dartmouth and was attended by a number of dignitaries including the Minister of National Defence, David J McGuinty and Nova Scotia Lieutenant Governor, Mike Savage. Ashley, who spent much of his career on the East Coast and at 12 Wing Shearwater, said the recognition left him 'a little overwhelmed.' 'I'm just an ordinary guy who had a wonderful career and tried to do my best at all times,' he said. 'I'm very proud, very happy today, and very honoured by the hometown hero recognition.' Ashley served 37 years in the military, commanding thousands of men and women. His career began through the regular officer training plan, a decision he says was driven by a desire for education and an eagerness to serve. He credited the military with helping him develop self-confidence, leadership skills, and a deep understanding of teamwork. 'The armed forces is a great vehicle to achieve your dreams, to develop your education, and to discover yourself and what this great country is all about,' Ashley said. Ashley also shared a message for younger generations, including his own great-grandchildren: set ambitious goals, pursue education, and don't let obstacles stand in the way. Parks Canada's Hometown Heroes program recognizes individuals whose achievements have helped shape Canada's heritage and cultural fabric. For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page


National Post
21 hours ago
- National Post
'Outside is a privilege, not a right': The imagined thoughts of the Nova Scotia wilderness ban
This week, Nova Scotia announced that it was banning people from the wilderness as part of its anti-wildfire measures. While authorities will routinely ban campfires, fireworks, off-roading and other spark-heavy activities during fire season, there's not a lot of precedent for simply sealing Canadians off from the natural world altogether. Article content Until at least October, the mere act of hiking on public land in Nova Scotia could attract fines of up to $25,000. And even on private land, if a landowner hosts guests in the vicinity of a forest, that's also a potential $25,000 fine. Article content Article content Article content Monday Article content I like to look at society as like a large school classroom. When students are quiet, orderly and devoted to their task, a classroom is an ideal environment for civic betterment. But when chaos and delinquency are allowed free reign, it becomes a vortex of destruction and wasted potential. Article content It is reasonable that these principles should also apply in the macro sense. If Nova Scotians remain selfishly devoted to inherently flammable activities such as fishing, camping and walking in the general presence of trees, then corrective action is in order. Article content Tuesday Article content Even when human activity is successfully purged from a wilderness environment, there is still the risk that fires can be ignited by human activity. An abandoned glass bottle can concentrate the sun's rays in the same way as a magnifying glass, causing a pinpoint of light exceeding 200 degrees Celsius. A nine-volt battery can spontaneously spark without any humans present. We must even assume that an unattended laptop could feasibly be stolen by deer, bears, crows or other wildlife and employed in such a way as to combust the machine's internal lithium-ion battery. Article content Thus, until we can receive a significant amount of rain, beverages will be limited to plastic and/or metallic drinking vessels, standard cell batteries will need to be surrendered to the nearest peace officer and public usage of laptops, mobile phones or other devices will be strictly prohibited. Violators can expect fines of up to $40,000. Article content Article content If you see something that looks like a violation of the burn ban or woods restrictions, please report it to us by calling 1-800-565-2224. Please remember that some people will have travel permits to go into the woods, primarily to work. — Natural Resources (@NS_DNR) August 6, 2025 Article content Wednesday Article content Article content The Government of Nova Scotia appreciates the public's cooperation with these measures, and remains devoted to the various guarantees enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Article content With that said, these remain extraordinary emergency circumstances, and the normal guarantees of free association and other such civil liberties do not apply in instances of restricted travel zones being invoked under the Forest Act (see Section 25). Article content Until hot, dry conditions can subside, we will be prohibiting any further discussion of this matter, as well as mentions of the words 'liberty,' 'freedom' or 'autonomy.' The penalty for violating these restrictions is a $50,000 fine and/or a jail term not to exceed five years. Article content Thursday Article content Despite this government's extremely reasonable measures taken to preserve the integrity and safety of our forested areas, we continue to receive reports of violations. In one particularly corrosive excuse, these violators asserted that 'this is Canada, it's literally all forest, and you're probably going to have to enter the forest at some point if you're doing almost anything.'


National Post
a day ago
- National Post
Jamie Sarkonak: COVID attitudes live on in Nova Scotia's inconsistent forest ban
Article content Permits are obtainable, of course, but the usefulness of this system depends on the sensibility of the bureaucrats tasked with reviewing applications. A spokesperson for Nova Scotia's Department of Natural Resources told the Post that the number of permits issued so far couldn't be pinpointed, as the work is ongoing. Permits are not being issued for recreational purposes, however. Article content Private property considerations aside, the ban is undermined by its many exceptions: not everyone is being kept out, and not all igneous activities are being banned. Nova Scotia is still open to commercial activity, like forestry and mining, with permits, and applications by tour operators will be considered, too. In other words, the sawdust-spewing tree harvest may very well continue, and perhaps some guided hikes, even though walking your dog to a blueberry patch on a friend's land is an absolute no-go, as is horseback riding, as is cycling to work on a trail system. Article content At the same time, multiple fireworks displays have been greenlit across the province: Halifax will be having a fireworks show on Saturday, as will the town of Digby on Sunday. In an X post, the province explained that professional firework companies can still operate with local approval. Article content Whether First Nations can still use provincial and private forests for traditional reasons, the Department of Natural Resources wouldn't say by press time. That might take a dispute between a bold Indigenous trapper and enforcement officers to find out. Article content The province could defend this by stating that commercial operations are required to have some degree of fire suppression capability on remote sites, and that pyrotechnics companies are trained to ensure that their miniature rockets don't accidentally light the place on fire. The exemptions, they might say, allow for a healthy balance between human activity and risk reduction. But if the conditions are so dire that mere birdwatchers must be barred from the woods, well, why take the risk with Caterpillars and John Deeres? Article content Article content Of course, Nova Scotia's forest bans predate the COVID years, but the similarities are clear, and that's probably why so many onlookers have their hackles up. During the pandemic, the public was put under extreme restrictions on movement to control the spread of what turned out to be a not very dangerous virus. Authorities erred on the side of control and risk reduction, likely because they lacked the competency to properly assess risk, and because the health care system was on thin ice. Article content The rules were enforced with intensity — but officials looked the other way for politically correct causes: in 2020, back when the entire population was unvaccinated, thousands of people packed Halifax streets in a George Floyd demonstration with no government fuss; in 2021, as the vaccine rollout began, Nova Scotian authorities banned vaccine-mandate protests. The inconsistent virus response mirrors the irregular caution now being taken in the woods: rather than using regional and activity-based restrictions, pushing for stronger and swifter punishments for firestarters and bolstering firefighting capacity, the province is simply locking out the public. Article content