logo
Carpet maker Bremworth reverses wool only policy

Carpet maker Bremworth reverses wool only policy

RNZ News12-05-2025

Photo:
Bremworth
Carpet maker Bremworth has reversed its wool only policy and will soon start making synthetic carpets again.
The NZX-listed company, which
stopped producing synthetic carpets in 2020 in favour of a wool-only policy
, will restart production of synthetic carpets at its Auckland facility in the next financial year.
It comes following a recent shake-up of the Bremworth board, with
group of unhappy shareholders, led by new chair Rob Hewett, prompting the departure of three sitting directors
. Its chief Executive Greg Smith has also stepped down after four years.
Hewett earlier said the coup was prompted by the
company's slumping profits
, with revenue falling from $148.1m in 2018 to $80.3m in 2024.
The dissenting group said the decision to stop selling synthetic carpets in favour of wool-only products had not resulted in improved sales, while operating costs remained high.
Hewett, who replaced former chair George Adams, said there was strong demand from major New Zealand and Australian carpet retailers for Bremworth to produce both synthetics and wool.
He said by not having synthetics in their portfolio they had made things more difficult.
"The challenge that we have with the business is about 85 percent of the carpet floor covering market is not wool and we're missing out on it. We need to spread our costs across a wider base. Our customers are clearly looking for a synthetic product."
He said they were also very mindful of stakeholders.
"I am a farmer of wool and I do this with a heavy heart but the company's viability quite frankly is at stake here."
It also follows Bremworth settling with rival carpet maker Godfrey Hirst, settling court proceedings in relation to a past marketing campaign Bremworth initiated in 2020 when it ceased producing synthetic carpet and moved to manufacturing wool carpets only.
Godfrey Hirst alleged that aspects of that campaign mischaracterised the relative environmental and health impacts of synthetic and wool carpets and breached the Fair Trading Act.
Bremworth denied breaching the Act, but acknowledged certain parts of its past advertising from the 2020 marketing campaign may have misled some consumers. These had been removed and would not be used again.
The new synthetic range, which will initially comprise a small, but carefully curated, number of products, will be distributed under a separate brand to distinguish these products from its Bremworth-branded all-wool products.
No new capital expenditure is required and the company anticipates a minor increase in headcount to support the additional volume.
Hewett expected having a complete portfolio will actually help them grow wool product sales.
However, Federated Farmers meat and wool chair Toby Williams said the wool industry was teetering and this would further knock farmer confidence.
"It's a tough pill to swallow for the industry."
He said it was disappointing but understandable.
Williams acknowledged Bremworth was a business though and shareholders had a right to expect returns.
He said it was important for people to start recognising the environmental benefits of wool, especially with
declining sheep numbers
and
farmland being converted to carbon forestry
.
Andy Caughey, chief executive of industry group Wool Impact, said Bremworth manufacturing synthetic carpets again didn't minimise their commitment to wool or their wool carpet offering.
"This range extension, which includes synthetics, will strengthen the company's operating model by optimising its manufacturing capacity and generating more revenue as it continues to invest and expand its wool business," he said.
"The world needs more wool."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scott Morrison receives Australia's highest honour for leading Australia through Covid-19
Scott Morrison receives Australia's highest honour for leading Australia through Covid-19

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Scott Morrison receives Australia's highest honour for leading Australia through Covid-19

By Maani Truu , ABC News Scott Morrison. Photo: AFP Scott Morrison has credited Australians for their "courage and resilience" in the face of crises, including the Black Summer bushfires and a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, as he receives the country's highest honour for his leadership. The 30th prime minister has been appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) for his "eminent service" to the country and direction of the national Covid response, as part of the King's Birthday honours. Morrison was prime minister for just over three-and-a-half-years - between 2018 and 2022 - a period in which he said, "we were hit with pretty much every crisis you can imagine". "From natural disasters to a global pandemic, once in a hundred years, and of course the threats we faced in our region, and a recession caused by that global pandemic," he said in a sit-down interview before his appointment was publicly announced. "Through all of this Australians were just incredible and the one assumption I made is that that's how they would be - their character would pull them through and that's the basis on which we built the policies that helped us to achieve that." The AC is the highest award in the King's Birthday Honour List, designed to recognise achievements "in service to Australia or humanity at large". Former prime ministers are typically appointed, but the time between their service and the recognition varies. Morrison's appointment - three years after he lost the prime ministership - also notes his contributions to international engagement, economic initiatives and national security, particularly through his role in securing the AUKUS agreement . The latter was named by the former prime minister as one of his proudest achievements in office, among other work he said his government undertook to strengthen Australia's sovereignty. "The resilience and sovereignty of the country, whether it was building our resilience against disasters of the future, having dealt with them at the time, our economic resilience, incredibly important, the way we bounced back after Covid was incredible, and we had invested heavily in our small business sector in particular," he said. "It really was about protecting our sovereignty and building that up so we could deal with the significant challenges into the future." Morrison with then-Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern. Photo: RNZ / Dan Cook Morrison's term coincided with the height of the Covid pandemic, when international and state borders were slammed shut, Australians were locked down in their homes, and thousands of businesses were forced to close. Just months after the emergence of the virus in China, the former Liberal leader made the at-the-time unprecedented call to ban international travellers from entering Australia - a decision that likely staved off the crisis locally but also left many Australians stranded overseas and others separated from friends and family abroad. International borders remained closed for almost two years, only reopening to vaccinated travellers in early 2022 after the Omicron variant had swept the country. During the pandemic, Morrison, along with then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg, also oversaw the creation of the almost AU$90 billion JobKeeper scheme wage subsidy scheme, one of the largest economic support programs ever introduced. Asked if he had any regrets from that era this week, Morrison said you "don't get everything right, particularly when you face that many challenges". "But I tend not to dwell too much on that, because frankly there was just the next challenge coming the next day," he said. "You do the best job you can on the day and then you shake yourself off the next day and you do it all again." Morrison left Parliament at the start of 2024 , more than a year after losing the 2022 election to Labor prime minister Anthony Albanese. The end of his prime ministership was mired in scandal, after it emerged he had secretly sworn himself into five additional ministries during the pandemic . This week he described those secret positions as a "latent redundancy that was never active". "These were unusual times and there were many things we did that were unusual," he said. Since retiring from politics, Morrison has continued to advocate internationally for the AUKUS partnership, which he said remains "as strong today as the day it was announced" despite the arrival of the second Trump administration in the United States. He declined to comment on the current direction of the Liberal Party, which suffered one of the worst election defeats on record last month . But on its future, he said the party's principles remain "as important as they ever have been". "And they are ensuring a strong economy, a strong defence force, guaranteeing those services, responsible financial management - all of those things over the last 70 years and more have meant that Australia is in the strong position it is today," he said. "And for most of that time it has been Coalition governments that have been in government." Some 830 Australians - including Hollywood heavyweights, journalists, and community advocates - will be recognised in this year's King's Birthday Honours List. - ABC News

Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines
Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines

Photo: 123RF Means testing is being introduced on a wide range of benefits. Questions are being asked over how long it will be before superannuation is targeted. Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in Kiwisaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. "There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means tested with one big exception." Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. "You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. "Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation." Means testing superannuation is also not as straight forward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing "which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire". Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of "two horrible options" and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is "more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age". "But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well thought through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about Kiwisaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners," Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. "The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected." The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a Kiwisaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well off, "because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age ... you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. "This is not what's happened here." Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

New Zealand's mean testing creep
New Zealand's mean testing creep

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

New Zealand's mean testing creep

Photo: 123RF Means testing is being introduced on a wide range of benefits. Questions are being asked over how long it will be before superannuation is targeted. Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in Kiwisaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. "There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means tested with one big exception." Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. "You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. "Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation." Means testing superannuation is also not as straight forward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing "which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire". Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of "two horrible options" and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is "more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age". "But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well thought through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about Kiwisaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners," Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. "The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected." The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a Kiwisaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well off, "because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age ... you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. "This is not what's happened here." Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store