logo
Why Everyday Development Is Crucial To Closing The Skills Gap

Why Everyday Development Is Crucial To Closing The Skills Gap

Forbes16 hours ago

The companies that will thrive aren't those with the most sophisticated training catalogs, they are ... More the ones whose managers can turn everyday interactions into accelerated learning experiences.
Research by the World Economic Forum suggests that skill gaps are the "biggest barrier to transformation" as new AI and robotics technologies automate the workplace in the next five years—with 59% of workers needing upskilling or reskilling. Leaders face a challenge of cultivating the mindset, skills and organizational culture to support learning. But are their managers equipped to support this development effort?
The Development Dilemma Hiding in Plain Sight
Managers are expected to drive performance, deliver results and guide their teams toward organizational objectives. But in today's pressure-cooker environment, where deadlines dominate and resources are constrained, employee development can often feel like just another item on an already overcrowded to-do list. Even well-intentioned managers find development work squeezed out of congested schedules and relegated to quarterly reviews, formal training sessions and the occasional feedback conversations.
The result? Inefficient and slow skill development that is bad for business and bad for morale. Employees struggle to apply what they've learned, managers become bottlenecks for problem-solving, and organizations fail to build the adaptive capacity they need to thrive.
But what if development didn't require separate meetings or additional time blocks? What if the conversations already happening—team check-ins, problem-solving sessions, project debriefs—became powerful learning moments?
This is the core insight behind everyday development: transforming routine managerial interactions into opportunities for growth. Rather than adding new responsibilities, it's about bringing developmental intention to existing conversations. The goal isn't more meetings or separate meetings for learning and development; it's making everyday interactions matter more.
The Research Behind How People Actually Learn
The idea of everyday development aligns with the 70-20-10 model, an observation dating back to the mid-1980s about how humans acquire skills. The model suggests that about 70% of our development comes from what we learn while doing our jobs, 20% through our engagement with peers and only about 10% from formal training. Many organizations focus their development efforts (and budgets) on the 10%—courses and training—while neglecting the 90% where most learning happens. It's not an argument against formal training; it's an argument for reinforcing formal training by incorporating its lessons into the routine of how we work, from putting things into practice, how we interact with others and the feedback we receive naturally as we get things done.
The Manager's Critical Role in Learning Transfer
Research by Professors Brian Blume, J. Kevin Ford, and Jason Huang confirms what the 70-20-10 model suggests: managers play a crucial role in whether learning translates into improved performance. Their comprehensive review of studies on informal learning found that managers who effectively support employee development typically provide three types of support:
Direct Assistance: Managers provide resources and remove obstacles to learning. They can hold casual conversations or formalized reviews where they discuss gaps in skills and help employees develop learning plans. Managers can then create opportunities where these new skills will be used and conduct regular check-ins on how skills are being put into practice.
Guidance: Managers offer feedback, help employees reflect on their experiences and provide advice on how and where to apply new learning. They coach employees through the learning process, making room for failure and encouraging experimentation. Managers can boost motivation by discussing how a new skill will benefit the team member and the company.
Emotional Support: Managers should foster a safe environment where employees feel valued and motivated to learn. Throughout their discussions with team members, managers should also respect the employee's current abilities and agency. Finally, managers can play a role in boosting employees' confidence as they learn new skills by showing interest in their development.
The researchers say managers are 'a key source of support for employees and assist employees in navigating the opportunities for informal learning that exist in their environment. Managers can inspire and encourage learners to be self-driven in learning the information they need, which fosters curiosity.' Without this support, even the best training programs fail to translate into improved performance.
Everyday Development in Practice
Managers and leaders constantly give feedback, from notes on an active task to long-term strategic guidance. Sometimes an employee comes to the manager for help. At other times, the manager notices an area for improvement. In both cases, the default is to "fix and tell." This approach can occasionally resolve the immediate issue, but it ensures that when an employee encounters a future problem, they'll return to you to solve it. That takes up your time and takes away an opportunity for growth. Everyday development is as simple as switching a directive to a question. So the next time an employee asks for help, instead of saying "Here's what you should do," you can ask "What are the barriers getting in your way?" or "What do you think we should do next?"
That's it! That question becomes an invitation for the employee to share what's really going on—and for the manager to really listen. The difference isn't more training, it's developmental intention in everyday interactions.
Building Learning Velocity: Three Core Skills
Organizations that master everyday development create the ability to acquire and apply new skills faster than change happens around them. This requires managers to develop three foundational capabilities:
1. Listening to Learn
Move beyond listening-to-respond or solve problems. Focus on understanding what's really happening for the other person. Practice asking "What else?" to go deeper into their thinking.
2. Powerful Inquiry
Ask questions that expand possibilities rather than narrow them. Replace "Did you follow my suggestion?" with: "What options are you considering?" or "What's your take on this situation?"
3. Practical Empathy
Acknowledge the emotional reality of learning something new. Sometimes the observation, "That sounds challenging," provides more value than immediate technical advice.
Three Questions That Transform Any Conversation
Here are three questions that can turn routine interactions into development opportunities:
These questions work because they respect the other person's thinking while creating space for growth.
Making It Work: Start with Your Next Conversation
The beauty of everyday development is its accessibility. You don't need budget approval or formal programs to begin. You need intention and practice with the three core skills.
Feedback is an abundant entry point for everyday development, but there are other routine interactions:
The Competitive Advantage Hidden in Plain Sight
In a world where AI can automate routine tasks faster than organizations can retrain workers, the companies that will thrive aren't those with the most sophisticated training catalogs, they are the ones whose managers can turn everyday interactions into accelerated learning experiences.
This isn't about adding more to managers' plates. It's about being more intentional with conversations they're already having.
The 59% of workers who need reskilling won't develop new capabilities through training programs alone. They'll grow through thousands of everyday interactions with managers who understand that development doesn't require special occasions—it requires special attention to ordinary moments.
Your next conversation is an opportunity. Will it be just another status update, or will it be a moment that helps someone grow?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'
Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'

Mark Zuckerberg is stacking the deck in the AI race, betting that unlimited capital, top talent, and raw computing power will ensure victory. If the winning hand Zuckerberg is chasing—AI 'superintelligence'— is still very much a vague and theoretical concept, the Meta CEO's remarkable series of moves unveiled Monday instantly changed the reality for everyone else in the game, particularly the pioneering AI startups without Meta's resources. Zuckerberg announced a major revamp of its AI operations on Monday, putting the company's collection of AI businesses and projects under the umbrella of a newly created organization called Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL, and appointing Alexandr Wang, the former CEO of data-labeling startup Scale AI, as Meta's first ever Chief AI Officer. 'As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' Zuckerberg wrote in an internal memo obtained by Fortune. 'I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way.' He added that the details he would share were about building towards a company vision of 'personal superintelligence for everyone.' The new superintelligence lab, Zuckerberg wrote, 'includes all of our foundations, product, and FAIR teams, as well as a new lab focused on developing the next generation of our models.' He also confirmed that former GitHub CEO and investor Nat Friedman has also joined Meta to partner with Wang to lead MSL, heading Meta's work on AI products and applied research. 'Nat has served on our Meta Advisory Group for the last year, so he already has a good sense of our roadmap and what we need to do,' Zuckerberg wrote. Fortune reported last week that Friedman is also connected with Wang and Scale – he is a longtime and active Scale investor and co-hosted the secretive Scale AI Security Summit in Utah in November 2023. Meta has embarked on an extraordinary hiring spree in recent weeks, bringing Wang on board as part of a $14.3 billion deal with Scale, and recruiting top researchers from OpenAI with rumored $100 million compensation offers. In Zuckerberg's internal memo on Monday, he named eleven top researchers who had joined Meta from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. For OpenAI, which kicked off the generative AI craze with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, Meta's aggressive hiring spree represents a critical threat. OpenAI's chief research officer Mark Chen described the situation as feeling like someone 'breaking into our home,' calling the talent loss 'theft.' OpenAI said it had begun recalibrating compensation and crafting 'creative' retention packages to stay competitive. While OpenAI has a longstanding partnership with Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, the relationship between the two companies has reportedly grown strained over the past year. As Meta increasingly seeks to move into OpenAI's territory however, the Sam Altman led startup may need to find allies with deep pockets. OpenAI recently began using AI chips made by Google, according to media reports, signaling a growing bond between the two companies, even though Google's Gemini LLMs compete directly with OpenAI. With an internet advertising business that generates more than $40 billion every quarter, Meta can afford to bankroll a no-holds-barred AI batter even it doesn't immediately deliver a profit. Still, Meta's latest moves carry plenty of risks. In making Wang chief AI officer, Meta has chosen someone who is not a computer scientist to lead all of its AI efforts—a choice that may not go over well with Meta's deep bench of AI scientists and PhDs, many of whom have already decamped. Zuckerberg noted in his memo that he and Wang had worked together for several years and said 'I consider him to be the most impressive founder of his generation.' There is also no agreed-upon formal definition of 'superintelligence,' though it is typically refers to an intelligence that vastly surpasses human capabilities in virtually all domains, including scientific creativity, general wisdom, and social skills—exceeding human cognition across the board. Superintelligence is generally perceived as going beyond artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which, though also vague, typically refers to an AI system with human-level intelligence across a wide range of work-related tasks. That is, it can reason, plan, solve problems, understand language, and learn in a generalizable way, much like a human. Zuckerberg claimed that Meta is 'uniquely positioned to deliver superintelligence to the world,' pointing to its efforts to build out data centers supporting more computing power than smaller labs – it is currently spending tens of billions on data centers and is raising more. The Financial Times reported last week that Meta is seeking $29 billion from private capital firms for its all-in push to build AI data centers. Of course, Microsoft and Google are also spending tens of billions of dollars in cap ex to build out their AI infrastructure. And OpenAI has said it intends to invest $500 billion with partners including Softbank in the coming years to build out its Stargate network of AI datacenters. If the race to Superintelligence is a test of wills and capital, Zuckerberg seems to be betting that he can outlast the competition. This story was originally featured on

NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens
NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens

New York Times

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Times

NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens

The Hawks' Dejounte Murray trade with New Orleans keeps on paying dividends. Not only did Atlanta obtain the pick that went to the Celtics for Kristaps Porziņģis and defensive stopper Dyson Daniels, but also the $25 million trade exception that deal generated now has been used to acquire Nickeil Alexander-Walker from the Minnesota Timberwolves. Atlanta will still have several million of that exception left over, as well as its full $14.1 million nontaxpayer midlevel exception and a $13 million exception from the Bogdan Bogdanović trade. But as a practical consequence, a hugely productive offseason in Atlanta is now down to smaller moves. Atlanta sent only a second-round pick to Minnesota in the sign-and-trade to assure it topped every other team on the market, ultimately going a shade over the nontaxpayer midlevel exception to get Alexander-Walker. The Hawks still have roughly $13 million remaining below the tax line with at least two more roster spots to fill, and seem likely to target another guard based on current needs. For its trouble, Minnesota will receive a trade exception for roughly $14.4 million. The Wolves are hugely unlikely to use it this season because they're way over the first apron, but it's a possibility for next summer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store