logo
Jury watches surveillance videos at trial of 2 men accused of killing Regent Park youth worker

Jury watches surveillance videos at trial of 2 men accused of killing Regent Park youth worker

CBC27-03-2025

A jury in a Toronto courtroom watched surveillance videos on Wednesday at the trial of two men charged with first-degree murder of a Regent Park youth worker.
The Crown alleges Noah Anderson, 23, and Junior Jahmal Harvey, 23, were among four masked men who fired dozens of bullets in Regent Park on the evening of Sept. 18, 2021, killing Thane Murray, 27, and injuring his two friends.
Murray, of Toronto, was shot several times in the area of Oak and Sumach streets. He died at the scene. His two friends also suffered gunshot wounds. An advocate for Regent Park's youth, Murray worked at several recreational facilities in Toronto and was an employee of the Regent Park Community Centre.
The videos that were shown to the jury focus on a sedan considered a key part of the evidence in the case being heard at the Superior Court of Justice.
The Crown has been reviewing surveillance videos to show how it believes the four alleged shooters travelled to Regent Park on the day of the shooting. The jury has spent days watching videos of a sedan that the Crown believes the four men used to carry out the murder.
One video shows the sedan of interest on a side street near the Chelsea Hotel on Gerrard Street W.
Video shows four masked men leaving the hotel. The Crown alleges the four walked to the sedan and drove it to Regent Park to carry out the shooting. The Crown used video to track the vehicle returning to the same street near the hotel half a hour later.
Video also captured masked men walking back into the Chelsea hotel.
On Wednesday afternoon, the Crown presented images of the alleged shooters in the hotel wearing masks after the shooting.
The Crown told the jury that Anderson, before the murder, had rented a 2012 beige Nissan Altima sedan and a room at the Chelsea Hotel. Both were rented for a week.
According to an agreed statement of facts, Anderson rented the sedan on Sept. 15, 2021, parked it outside the hotel on Sept. 17 and conducted a transaction at the front desk of the hotel on Sept. 20 for $304.04.
The Crown alleges the Nissan he rented closely resembles the sedan captured on video, but the defence is challenging that argument.
According to the agreed statement of facts, Toronto police forensic identification officers found 59 shell casing at the homicide scene on Sept. 18 and 19.
A year later, on Sept. 12, 2022, during an unrelated drug investigation, police recovered a firearm from a residence and it was determined to be a Glock 48.
The firearm was sent to the Centre of Forensic Sciences for more testing. On Oct. 26, 2022, a firearm expert determined at least one of the shell casings found from the homicide scene was fired by the Glock 48 seized by police during the drug investigation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence given time to review Crown case against N.S. woman accused of stabbing child
Defence given time to review Crown case against N.S. woman accused of stabbing child

Global News

time5 hours ago

  • Global News

Defence given time to review Crown case against N.S. woman accused of stabbing child

See more sharing options Send this page to someone via email Share this item on Twitter Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Facebook The defence lawyer for a Halifax woman charged in the stabbing of a child has been granted additional time to review the Crown's case. Nineteen-year-old Elliott Chorny briefly appeared in provincial court today with her lawyer Kelly Rowlett, who asked the judge to put the matter over until Aug. 15. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Chorny has been charged with attempted murder and a weapons offence for the Feb. 23 stabbing of a six-year-old boy on a downtown Halifax street. Crown lawyers confirmed outside court that Chorny had undergone a psychiatric assessment to determine whether she should be held criminally responsible for the attack, but they didn't disclose the results. Prosecutor Amin Helal said the Crown provided additional evidence to Rowlett on Thursday. Judge Alonzo Wright set Aug. 15 as the next date for Chorny to potentially enter a plea in the case. Story continues below advertisement

Crown expected to finish submissions in world junior sex assault trial
Crown expected to finish submissions in world junior sex assault trial

Global News

time9 hours ago

  • Global News

Crown expected to finish submissions in world junior sex assault trial

Prosecutors are expected to finish their closing submissions Friday in the sexual assault trial of five former members of Canada's world junior hockey team. Prosecutor Meaghan Cunningham argued Thursday that the complainant's actions should not be judged based on what others believe she should have done that night. The Crown has previously argued the woman did not voluntarily consent to the sexual acts that took place in a London, Ont., hotel room in the early hours of June 19, 2018, and that the accused did not take reasonable steps to confirm her consent. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote have pleaded not guilty to sexual assault, while McLeod has also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of being a party to the offence of sexual assault. 2:28 World junior defence wraps closing submissions, Crown begins final pitch Defence lawyers representing the players made their closing submissions to the judge earlier this week, focusing largely on the complainant's credibility and reliability as a witness. Story continues below advertisement Lawyers for McLeod, Hart, Formenton and Dube argued their clients had consensual sexual contact with the woman, while Foote's lawyer argued he didn't touch her, sexually or otherwise. Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia is expected to deliver her ruling in the case on July 24.

Hockey Canada trial: Woman in 'no-win' situation, Crown says
Hockey Canada trial: Woman in 'no-win' situation, Crown says

Toronto Sun

timea day ago

  • Toronto Sun

Hockey Canada trial: Woman in 'no-win' situation, Crown says

The Crown prosecuting five former junior hockey players accused of sexually assaulting a woman took aim at defence criticisms of her Jane Sims Published Jun 12, 2025 • 6 minute read Clockwise from top left: Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote and Alex Formenton enter the London courthouse on on April 22, 2025. (Derek Ruttan/The London Free Press) The 'myth of the ideal victim,' the Crown says, is at the heart of the Team Canada 2018 world junior hockey sexual assault trial. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account And so is 'why some people feel that victims aren't treated fairly in the criminal justice system,' said Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham during her closing argument Thursday at the high-profile Superior Court trial. Cunningham, who is in the second day of her closing argument, took aim at the criticisms, from the defence teams of five teammates from the gold medal team, that the 27-year-old woman, during her nine days of evidence, showed she came to court with an agenda and ultimately can't be believed. 'She can't win,' Cunningham said. 'She's either too emotional, she's combative. If she's not emotional enough, she's rehearsed. If she refuses to agree with suggestions, she's combative and difficult. But if she does agree, she doesn't know her own mind. If she uses the same language at multiple points it's contrived but if she uses different language, she's inconsistent.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Cunningham said this strategy by the defence 'finds its roots … in this myth of the ideal victim, that there is a right way for someone to look or sound when they're describing sexual assault, that's there's a correct way or a good way for a real victim to testify.' Cunningham argued the complainant, whose identity is protected by court order, has been consistent in her answers and that when Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia assesses all the evidence, she should find the woman has been forthright and truthful. The five players – Michael McLeod, 27, Carter Hart, 26, Dillon Dube, 26, Cal Foote, 26, and Alex Formenton, 25 – all members of the 2018 championship team who went on to professional careers – have pleaded not guilty to sexual assault. McLeod also has pleaded not guilty to a second sexual assault count for being a party to an offence. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. They were charged in early 2023 following a revived London police investigation into what went on in Room 209 of the Delta Armouries hotel in London where the team was staying for a Hockey Canada gala and golf tournament. The woman, whose identity is protected by court order, was 20 when she met McLeod at Jack's bar while the team was celebrating and returned to the hotel with him for consensual sex. She testified she was drunk and was shocked, after the sexual encounter with McLeod, when several teammates assembled in McLeod's room where she says she was sexually abused and assaulted without her consent. She said she was affected by alcohol and had a trauma response that caused her to separate her mind from her body to cope with the sexual demands of the players. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The defence contends the woman was the sexual aggressor, who begged and taunted the players for sexual activity. Some of them took advantage of her offers. Cunningham argued the woman was credible in her nine days of evidence that she was shocked to find men in the room when she came out of the bathroom naked after having sex with McLeod and she didn't know he had invited them to the room. Cunningham said the woman was drunk, naked and 'feeling really vulnerable' and was frightened and confused because she didn't know what direction the situation was heading. 'Feeling scared and confused, (the woman) … plays the role that she thinks is expected of her which, at this point in time, is being a good sport in the lighthearted approach in their presence,' Cunningham said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'But the events snowball from there. More and more men keep arriving. She finds herself in over her head because the men are being aggressive. They're telling her what they wanted her to do.' Cunningham said the men were 'goading each other into doing things, and they're saying what they want her to do and they're making her feel like an object. She is intimidated by the presence of these men, so she goes along with what she thinks is expected.' That's when the woman described 'just a weird feeling of my mind kind of separating from my body … I didn't feel I had any control. I didn't feel I had a choice,' Cunningham said. The Crown had planned to call an expert witness to explain the range of normal reactions to traumatic events such as sexual assault, including disassociation, Cunningham said, but recent appeal court rulings in one of the sexual assault cases of Hedley lead singer Jacob Hoggard dismissed the need for that expertise. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Instead of retreating back into the bathroom, the woman went to the bed, Cunningham said. The woman testified she didn't feel she had control at that point and wasn't thinking clearly. 'She's explaining very eloquently that she was experiencing a trauma response. There's nothing implausible about this evidence,' the Crown said. Cunningham said Carroccia should not conclude the woman returning naked to the bed 'is an indicator that she wanted to engage in sexual activity with the men.' Throughout a blitz of cross-examination by the defence, Cunningham said the woman 'remained calm, careful and fair. She certainly did not leave the impression she was just making things up. 'It is clear, listening to her testify, that she was trying to be accurate and precise when she could be within the limitation of her memory,' Cunningham said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But Carroccia noted there were times when she would have to direct the woman to answer questions directly instead of going on other tangents. At the time the jury was still hearing the case – it later was dismissed – and the judge said she would have interrupted the woman more if it was a judge-alone trial at that point. 'There's nothing wrong with a complainant wanting to stand up for themselves. The question is whether that impacts or colours the way that they give their evidence,' the judge said. Cunningham said most times, the woman would answer questions then give an explanation for her answer. 'If (the woman) had any agenda while testifying, it was to ensure that she was not misunderstood. It was to ensure that she had the opportunity to fully explain her experience.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. And, the Crown argued, it is natural her understanding about what happened evolved as she processed it. In June 2018, during her first interviews with London police, 'she as still very much grappling with what had happened to her, what she wanted to do about it, how she felt about it,' the Crown said. But the woman had no motive to lie about what happened in the hotel room, Cunningham said. Even though now-retired Det. Stephen Newton was concerned she was under pressure from her mother, there isn't any evidence she was, the Crown said. 'The fact that she changed her mind five times about proceeding is not evidence of pressure. It isn't evidence especially that she felt swept along with something outside of her control,' Cunningham said, but shows that she 'was in the driver's seat,' and still was when the investigation was reopened in 2022. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Her first police statement in 2018 'was measured' and never said she was forcibly restrained or threatened. The defence has asserted the woman 're-scripted her narrative' after London police closed its case. But Cunningham argued there was no fundamental change to her narrative. 'She did not specifically say she was afraid during the first interview with the detective… she also explained that she was still processing everything that had happened.' Also, the Crown said, the existence of the $3.55-million civil suit that was quickly settled by Hockey Canada in May 2022 is not relevant to the criminal case. The woman could have chosen not to participate in the criminal investigation. 'There is no connection between the money and her participation in this trial,' Cunningham said. The trial continues. jsims@ Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA Canada World

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store