White House Gets Touchy About Trump's ‘One Hit Wonder' Kennedy Center Pick
On August 13, President Donald Trump unveiled this year's Kennedy Center honorees, which include Gaynor, known for hit songs 'I Will Survive' and 'Eye of the Tiger.'
Tia Mitchell, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Washington bureau chief, told CNN's This Morning Weekend Saturday that Gaynor had been selected because of diversity considerations.
'I do believe as much as the Trump administration has attacked [diversity, equity, and inclusion], they wanted a person of color on the list of Kennedy Center Honorees,' Mitchell said. 'The fact that Gloria Gaynor is the one person of color on the list indicates that they struggled ot find a person of color to agree to be on the list.'
While the Center usually picks 'people who are icons in their genre of the arts' with 'a huge body of work,' Mitchell described Gaynor as 'basically a one-hit wonder.'
White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung took Mitchell to task on X.
'Some dipshit named Tia Mitchell went on CNN to say legendary singer Gloria Gaynor doesn't deserve to be a Kennedy Center Honoree and only chosen because she's Black,' Cheung posted. 'Liberal 'journalists' will twist an inspiring story because it involves Pres. Trump.'
'Total TDS,' he added, employing the oft-used acronym for 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.'
The other Kennedy Center honorees include action man Sylvester Stallone, the band KISS, country star George Strait, and English actor Michael Crawford.
The View's Anna Navarro encouraged Gaynor to turn down the award, saying on X earlier this week, 'Don't do it, Gloria!'
'Look, the woman is a goddess and deserves all the flowers that come her way,' Navarro said. 'But I wish she wouldn't accept an award from the hands of a man who has attacked the rights and history of women, people of color, and LGBTQ.'
Tom Cruise also reportedly turned down a lifetime achievement award from the Kennedy Center, The Washington Post reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Judge to decide Trump appointee Alina Habba's fate as US attorney
A federal judge is set to decide this week if President Donald Trump's appointee Alina Habba is the rightful acting U.S. attorney in New Jersey after the president sidestepped the Senate confirmation process to keep Habba in the job. Judge Matthew Brann did not indicate how he would rule during a hearing on Friday, but he said he would make his decision by the middle of this week. Brann, an Obama appointee serving in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, is presiding over the matter after the chief judge of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers New Jersey and Pennsylvania, decided the case presented too much of a conflict for the New Jersey judges. The fight over Habba's authority was brought by a criminal defendant named Julien Giraud Jr., who is facing routine drug and gun charges in New Jersey. After Trump appointed Habba, the president's former personal defense attorney, as acting U.S. attorney, Giraud's attorney alleged that the move violated his client's constitutional rights because of the string of unusual moves it took to attempt to re-install Habba to the role. Habba, who does not have a clear path to Senate confirmation, was serving in the meantime as the interim U.S. attorney, which carries a 120-day tenure. New Jersey's federal judges, in an unusual move, decided against extending her term and instead appointed career attorney Desiree Grace to the job. Trump fired Grace, withdrew Habba's nomination as permanent U.S. attorney and then reinstated Habba as acting U.S. attorney, which keeps Habba in charge for at least another 210 days under federal statute. "It goes completely against what the statute is meant to protect," Giraud's attorney argued in court on Friday, according to the New Jersey Monitor. The DOJ argued that the president and Attorney General Pam Bondi followed all the proper protocols under federal vacancy laws to keep Habba in charge. "The Girauds invent a requirement that, to serve as an 'Acting officer' … one must already be the first assistant to that office when the vacancy arises," DOJ attorneys wrote in court papers. "That is dead wrong textually; it makes no sense practically; and it relies on a mistaken premise." The case comes as Trump has also made similar unconventional maneuvers in other blue states, including California and New York, because, like Habba, his appointees for those states have no clear path to Senate confirmation. Lawmakers and outside groups have also weighed in on Habba's appointment. The Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey said in an amicus brief ahead of the hearing that Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution with their "novel" orders on Habba. "To circumvent the laws that Congress passed to govern the appointment of U.S. Attorneys, the Attorney General did something unprecedented," the group wrote. They laid out how Bondi made Habba a "special attorney" before designating her as the office's "first assistant," the position previously held by Grace, which Bondi maintains allows her to deem Habba the acting U.S. attorney under the federal vacancy laws. "To our knowledge, no prior Attorney General has ever attempted this," the group said.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
N.J. lawmaker facing 2 decades in prison says she's been treated worse than Jan. 6 rioters
Attorneys for U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver say felony charges against her are part of a politically motivated effort by the Trump administration to punish her for overseeing immigration enforcement. In a series of court filings submitted late Friday, McIver's legal team called the charges unconstitutional and accused federal prosecutors of trying to silence congressional oversight of immigration policy. Her attorneys asked the court to dismiss the case or allow discovery and a hearing to investigate the government's motives. McIver was indicted on three counts related to a May 9 oversight visit to Delaney Hall, a privately operated immigration detention center in Newark under contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The charges include three counts of assaulting, resisting and obstructing federal officers. The indictment, issued June 10, accuses the congresswoman of striking and pushing federal agents during a chaotic encounter at Delaney Hall. If convicted, McIver could face up to 17 years in federal prison. McIver and fellow Democratic lawmakers Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez were conducting a legally authorized congressional inspection when ICE agents attempted to arrest Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, according to the filings. McIver's legal team says the situation escalated only after ICE and Department of Homeland Security agents entered a crowd of civilians to detain Baraka, triggering a scuffle. They argue McIver was performing her constitutional duties and reacted defensively in a chaotic scene instigated by federal agents. No officers were injured. In one motion, McIver's attorneys asked the court to dismiss the charges, citing legislative immunity under the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause. Another filing accuses the Department of Justice of selective and vindictive prosecution, pointing to the recent dismissal of more than 160 cases against January 6 defendants charged under the same statute. Unlike McIver, those defendants were accused of violently assaulting Capitol police with weapons and chemical sprays. The filings cite public statements from DHS officials and President Trump that allegedly show bias against McIver's political affiliation and oversight efforts. DHS issued multiple press releases accusing McIver of 'storming' the facility and endangering ICE personnel. McIver's attorneys say the U.S. Department of Justice bypassed its own internal procedures for prosecuting members of Congress and failed to turn over key evidence. In a separate motion, they asked the court to compel the government to produce missing body camera footage, internal ICE policies, communications among agents, and explanations for why some recordings were never made. Another filing seeks to bar DHS from making further public statements about the case, arguing that press releases and social media posts falsely portray McIver as guilty and violate her right to a fair trial. The motion cites violations of U.S. Department of Justice policy, local court rules and professional conduct standards. If the judge declines to dismiss the case outright, McIver's attorneys have requested an evidentiary hearing and additional discovery to explore the government's motives. A trial date has been set for Nov. 10. McIver is represented by Paul J. Fishman and Lee M. Cortes Jr. of the Newark-based firm Arnold & Porter. Both attorneys declined to comment on the latest court filings. Fishman served as U.S. attorney for New Jersey from 2009 to 2017, appointed by President Barack Obama. Cortes previously served as executive assistant U.S. attorney in the same office and led both the Health Care Fraud Unit and the Special Prosecutions Division. The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark J. McCarren. A request for comment from the U.S. Attorney's Office in New Jersey was not immediately returned. Colleen Murphy may be reached at cmurphy@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Digital Ad Tax ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican.
