Changi Airport T5: Construction contracts worth about $4.75b awarded
When operational in the mid-2030s, T5 will be able to handle up to 50 million passengers a year, on top of Changi Airport's current capacity of 90 million. ST PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI
SINGAPORE - Two contracts worth a total of about $4.75 billion have been awarded for the building of the substructure and airside infrastructure at Changi Airport Terminal 5 (T5) ahead of the start of construction later in May.
The airport's operator said on May 5 that the substructure includes the foundation and basements of the main passenger terminal.
Changi Airport Group (CAG) said the substructure contract, valued at about S$3.8 billion, was awarded to a joint venture between China Communications Construction Company (Singapore Branch) (CCCC) and Obayashi Singapore , a subsidiary of Obayashi Corporation, one of Japan's biggest general contractors.
The joint venture will be responsible for building the foundation and basements of the main passenger terminal and ground transportation centre , and a portion of the tunnels linking T5 and the existing Terminal 2.
Covering about 140 ha with a basement depth of up to 28m, the substructure site is equivalent to about 5,200 Olympic-sized swimming pools combined.
CCCC - the world's largest construction company for large-scale infrastructure - previously developed two aircraft taxiways connecting Changi Airport's Runways 2 and 3. It also developed two underground tunnel sections for vehicles beneath the taxiways.
Meanwhile, Obayashi Singapore was involved in the construction of the Changi Airport control tower and Jewel Changi Airport, a shopping complex at the airport.
A separate contract valued at S$950 million was awarded to Hwa Seng Builder , a civil engineering company, for airside infrastructure works at T5. The airside is the part of the airport beyond passport control and customs.
These works include the development of remote aircraft stands, connecting taxilanes and ancillary support buildings.
A taxilane is typically narrower than a taxiway, and is used by aircraft moving towards parking or storage areas.
The Singapore-based Hwa Seng Builder has been involved in various aviation projects in Singapore, including at Changi and Seletar airports, said CAG .
Mr Ong Chee Chiau, CAG's m anaging d irector for Changi East , said CCCC and Obayashi Singapore have a wealth of experience in civil engineering, construction and project management.
Hwa Seng Builder, meanwhile, has valuable local expertise and a deep familiarity with Changi Airport, added Mr Ong.
'The appointments of the contractors for substructure construction and airfield works bring us closer to the start of T5's construction,' he added.
T5 is part of the new Changi East development that includes Changi Airport's third runway, as well as cargo complexes and other supporting aviation and ground transport infrastructure. This is Changi Airport's largest expansion project to date.
When operational in the mid-2030s, T5 will be able to handle up to 50 million passengers a year , on top of Changi Airport's current capacity of 90 million.
Prime Minister Lawrence Wong had said in his May Day Rally speech on May 1 that construction on T5 will start in 'two weeks' time'.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Why China biotech is getting a DeepSeek moment too
Workers working at a Sinovac Covid-19 vaccine production line in Beijing in 2021. So far, the biotech industry is relatively insulated from Mr Trump's tariffs. PHOTO: XINHUA From artificial intelligence to military defence, China has offered a few DeepSeek moments in 2025 , showcasing that the country is more than just the world's biggest factory, and that it also can compete with the US on the technology front. Now biotech is having its own. In late May, Pfizer agreed to pay a record US$1.25 billion (S$1.6 billion) upfront to license an experimental cancer drug from Shenyang-based 3SBio, as well as making a US$100 million equity investment in the Hong Kong-listed biotech company. Two weeks later, Bristol Myers Squibb said it would pay BioNTech US$1.5 billion guaranteed to license a similar cancer asset. It was a win for BioNTech, which bought Biotheus, the Chinese company that developed the drug, late in 2024 for US$800 million. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


CNA
33 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: The Johor-Singapore SEZ will need a lot of energy – nuclear power might be the key
SINGAPORE: The Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) is set to become a defining project for industrial and economic collaboration between Malaysia and Singapore. What the new economic corridor will need is stable, 24/7 carbon-free energy. Both countries face energy challenges that could undermine the long-term viability of the JS-SEZ. It is an opportunity for a strategic nuclear partnership. Singapore relies heavily on imported natural gas for electricity, exposing it to volatile prices and supply risks. It aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, but electricity demand is expected to grow by 3 per cent to 5 per cent every year. Malaysia intends to increase its renewable energy capacity to 40 per cent by 2035, but intermittency (how consistently supply can be generated) and dispatchability (how supply can be adjusted to meet off-on demand) are challenging at a large scale. Current clean energy solutions can't quite keep up with the energy-intensive sectors like heavy manufacturing and data centres the JS-SEZ counts on attracting. Solar energy cannot provide round-the-clock reliability even with battery energy storage, while hydrogen is expensive and lacks infrastructure and regulations for large industrial applications. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, offers a more realistic solution. It has been proven to provide reliable baseload electricity with zero emissions, such as in France, Spain, South Korea and the United States. NUCLEAR ENERGY MAKES STRATEGIC SENSE Incorporating a nuclear energy partnership into the JS-SEZ framework would offer multiple benefits. Consider the Krsko Nuclear Power Plant, located in Slovenia near the Croatian border. Slovenia and Croatia each own a 50 per cent stake, sharing the electrical output and responsibility for nuclear waste equally. Krsko has delivered stable electricity to both countries for decades. A similar model could work for the JS-SEZ, bringing together Malaysia land availability and regulatory readiness and Singapore's financing capabilities and intention to import clean energy from the region. Malaysia and Singapore already have an electricity interconnector that allows energy to be transferred between the two national grids. It is currently used to import renewable electricity from Laos to Singapore, and from Malaysia to Singapore, with remaining capacity to carry more. There is also opportunity for collective technology transfer and supply chain development. Japan, South Korea and China have strengthened domestic nuclear industries, creating skilled jobs and new export options, through partnerships with established nuclear states. The JS-SEZ could do the same for Malaysia and Singapore. Talent development is already stated as a goal of the JS-SEZ. Nuclear energy requires a highly skilled and well-educated workforce. Both Malaysia and Singapore have the ability and the motivation to form academic and vocational training programmes supporting the nuclear energy sector. A joint nuclear project would also position Singapore and Malaysia as leaders within the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the area of civilian nuclear cooperation, which would shape the region's future and spur international investment. MOVING FROM CONCEPT TO REALITY Such an extraordinary partnership will not be easy to pull off. But there is a clear path to success that builds on the existing relationship between the two countries and past efforts. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in particular, are promising. They are safer, more flexible and require less capital investment than traditional large-scale reactors, as seen in countries that have already deployed or are actively pursuing deployment of SMRs. Singapore and Malaysia have the opportunity to benefit from their expertise and experience. Another critical step is to develop a transparent ownership and governance framework. Financing via public-private partnerships makes sense, in the context of JS-SEZ. And international best practices illustrate how to balance risk with reward while ensuring strict adherence to regulatory compliance. Most importantly, a bilateral task force could assess the feasibility of a shared nuclear facility and address concerns over nuclear safety, security and safeguards. A task force provides a platform to jointly engage all stakeholders, especially strategic international partners. This is critical: Engaging with established nuclear states, as well as independent technical organisations, experts and think tanks are necessary for success. This ecosystem approach would boost Malaysia and Singapore's access to the latest technology and maximise economic, social and environmental benefits. A BOLD STEP FOR THE FUTURE There are steps that both countries can take on their ends too. Singapore, as a global finance centre, could prioritise a policy and sustainable investment framework to allow a cross-border nuclear project, followed by a dedicated investment fund. It could accelerate research and regulatory development to shorten the runway to nuclear readiness. The need for a Singapore nuclear energy programme implementation organisation (NEPIO) will quickly emerge. MyPOWER, under the Malaysia Ministry for Energy Transition and Water Transformation, has been tasked as the country's NEPIO. Singapore could also expand education and training programmes to create a talent pool within the next decade, establishing its scientists, engineers, policymakers, and finance and legal professionals as leaders in the field. Malaysia could focus on its nuclear energy policy and regulatory environment. Establishing a clear roadmap for nuclear energy deployment that includes JS-SEZ is necessary to facilitate confidence. Malaysia could also build on the strength of the Malaysia Nuclear Agency to help establish the state of Johor as a regional hub for nuclear energy services attracting international technology and engineering companies and promoting local supply chains that support the nuclear industry. THE PUBLIC FACTOR As with all discussions around nuclear energy – and reasonably so – much attention is needed to address domestic social and political sensitivities and geopolitical considerations. Both nations should collaborate to address public concerns about nuclear safety and waste management. Again, there are international examples to follow. South Korea and Finland engaged with their citizens to build support for nuclear adoption. A Singapore-Malaysia endeavour would also need to proactively be transparent in communication and initiate public consultations and educational initiatives to help shape public attitudes. Singapore and Malaysia can take bold steps toward nuclear collaboration, ensuring a resilient, low-carbon future for the JS-SEZ and beyond.


Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Jetstar Asia to shut down after two decades, citing soaring costs and stiff competition
SINGAPORE: Singapore's skies will soon be a little quieter. After more than 20 years of flying budget-conscious travellers across Asia, Jetstar Asia—Singapore's homegrown arm of Australia's Qantas Group—will cease operations on July 31. The move comes amid what the airline describes as 'really high cost increases' and an inability to compete with regional low-cost carriers in an increasingly crowded market. A final descent The closure, announced by Qantas on June 11, is set to impact more than 500 employees and 16 regional routes, including links to Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, and emerging tourist hotspots like Wuxi and Labuan Bajo. Jetstar Asia's fleet of 13 Airbus A320s will be progressively redirected to Australia and New Zealand as part of Qantas' broader fleet renewal programme. Group CEO Vanessa Hudson said the airline's cost base had 'materially changed,' with some supplier costs surging by as much as 200 per cent. 'We are currently undertaking the most ambitious fleet renewal programme in our history,' she added, noting that nearly 200 new aircraft are on order. See also Govt says RTS Link fares will be determined by operator Jetstar Asia is expected to post a loss of A$35 million this financial year, adding pressure to Qantas' strategic priorities. Rising costs, rising competition Jetstar Asia's struggles didn't happen overnight. For months, it had been battling headwinds on multiple fronts: escalating airport charges, costly ground handling, rising fuel prices, and stiff competition from Southeast Asia's budget heavyweights like AirAsia and BatikAir. CEO of Jetstar Group, Stephanie Tully, told reporters the airline's Singapore base had become increasingly unsustainable. 'Double-digit cost increases in fuel, airport fees, ground handling and security have significantly undermined our ability to remain competitive,' she said. Compounding the pressure was Jetstar Asia's move to Changi Terminal 4 in March 2023—a shift the airline initially resisted. Tully admitted the relocation 'had an impact' on the business, noting that Terminal 4 is not linked to the others via MRT, making transfers more cumbersome. What happens next? Jetstar Asia has reported that it will continue flying for the next seven weeks. Passengers with tickets on cancelled flights will be offered full refunds, and efforts are underway to reroute affected travellers. Those holding Jetstar vouchers will be contacted in August for monetary reimbursement. See also We screwed up in Japan, says Tony Fernandes Qantas has said six of Jetstar Asia's planes will be used to replace leased aircraft in Australia, while four will take over ageing aircraft currently serving mining routes. Two more will be deployed to Jetstar in Australia and one to New Zealand, potentially opening new routes and creating over 100 local jobs. International operations of Jetstar Airways (Australia) and Jetstar Japan remain unaffected. What does it mean for Singapore Changi Airport may feel the turbulence. Jetstar Asia accounted for 3 per cent of Changi's traffic last year, serving key Southeast Asian cities as well as lesser-flown destinations. According to an aviation editor, Jetstar Asia's exit could leave some of these destinations without any direct links to Singapore, inevitably affecting the airport's ambition to grow its international city pairings. While airlines like Scoot—armed with a growing fleet of smaller Embraer jets—could potentially fill the gaps, the loss is nonetheless significant. The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) acknowledged the closure but reaffirmed Changi's resilience. It noted that in 2024 alone, the airport added 11 new city links and welcomed eight new airlines, including four low-cost carriers. Still, the impact on the broader landscape is undeniable. Smaller foreign airlines operating out of Changi face the same structural challenges—rising costs, less-than-ideal operating slots, and increased competition from national carriers and well-backed players. End of an era Jetstar Asia's closure marks the end of a uniquely Singaporean chapter in regional aviation. Born out of Qantas' vision to capture Asia's booming budget travel market, the airline played a pivotal role in democratizing air travel across the region. Now, it becomes a case study in the volatility of the low-cost carrier model—especially in high-cost, tightly regulated hubs like Singapore. As Jetstar Asia prepares for its final descent, one thing is clear: the economics of budget air travel in Southeast Asia are shifting, and even long-standing players aren't immune to the turbulence.