logo
Police defied court order, failed to probe Dutch model's death, lawyer claims

Police defied court order, failed to probe Dutch model's death, lawyer claims

Daily Express18 hours ago

Published on: Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Published on: Tue, Jun 10, 2025
By: Ho Kit Yen, FMT Text Size: Dutch model Ivana Smit was last seen with Alex Johnson and Luna Almaz on Dec 7, 2017 at their apartment, before she died. (Instagram pic) Kuala Lumpur: The High Court here was told today that the police had failed to conduct a thorough probe into the death of Dutch model Ivana Smit eight years ago, despite a court order directing an investigation. Lawyer SN Nair, appearing for the family, said another High Court judge had in 2019 ruled that Smit's death had been caused by 'persons known or unknown' and directed the police to take further steps in the matter.
Advertisement Despite that, Nair said the subsequent investigation was done 'half-heartedly', pointing out that the police had not sought the extradition of the two main suspects, Alex Johnson and Luna Almaz. Smit was last seen with the American-Kazakh couple at their apartment on Dec 7, 2017, before she died. 'The investigating officer even conceded that (an Interpol) blue notice issued was not effective in tracking down Alex and Luna,' said Nair. Smit's family is suing the police and government for breach of statutory duties and negligence in her death probe. Nair said the issuance of the blue notice cannot be considered sufficient action in the probe into Smit's death. He said the police ought to have secured the extradition of Johnson and Almaz, taken further witness statements, and re-examined the available forensic evidence. 'This case is a sobering reminder of what happens when those charged with protecting justice are themselves negligent,' Nair added. In reply, senior federal counsel Nur Ezdiani Roleb, appearing for the government and police force, told the court that investigations into Smit's death are still ongoing. She insisted that the police had not breached their statutory function but had performed their investigative duties properly. 'The police were entitled to probe this case as a sudden death in 2017, based on the findings of the pathologist (Dr Nurliza Abdullah),' said Ezdiani. She also told the court that Smit's family was not entitled to seek damages over a purported breach of statutory duties and negligence. Trial judge Justice Roz Mawar then asked Nair to quantify the damages the family was seeking—in the event the court ruled in their favour. Nair said previous decisions indicated that RM500,000 would be an adequate sum, but left the matter for the court to determine. Ezdiana said the government will file additional submissions to address the quantum of damages issue. The court then fixed July 15 for decision. Dutch ambassador Jacques Werner was present at the hearing today. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Security tight at Tan Sri's residence as sukuk probe deepens
Security tight at Tan Sri's residence as sukuk probe deepens

New Straits Times

time40 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Security tight at Tan Sri's residence as sukuk probe deepens

KUALA LUMPUR: The residence of a businessman bearing the title "Tan Sri", who has been linked to the alleged misappropriation of sukuk funds amounting to millions of ringgit for the construction of a highway in the Klang Valley, was heavily guarded by auxiliary police this morning. Checks by the New Straits Times revealed that several members of the media attempted to enter the gated compound where the highway concessionaire resides, but were turned away. Auxiliary police stationed at the location also instructed members of the press to leave the vicinity. This comes a day after the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) said that it would be recording the statement of the individual in question regarding the ongoing investigation into the alleged misuse of sukuk proceeds. According to sources, the businessman was initially scheduled to appear at the MACC headquarters in Putrajaya. "Yes, it has been confirmed that he will be present tomorrow (today) at 9am. He has been discharged from hospital after completing medical treatment," a source said. The investigation concerns sukuk funds that were raised for the development of a major highway project in the Klang Valley. Further details are expected following the MACC's questioning. MACC Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki had confirmed that the highway concessionaire was the key witness in the investigation. Previously, it was reported that 45 witnesses who had earlier provided statements were called in again to assist with the case by furnishing additional information. On June 3, the MACC disclosed that assets worth approximately RM143 million had been seized in connection with the sukuk fund misappropriation involving the Tan Sri. Investigators are also tracing several luxury vehicles and properties belonging to the businessman, both in Malaysia and abroad — including assets located in London and Switzerland. The Tan Sri is believed to be the central figure in the MACC's probe involving the seizure of high-value assets, which include RM37.5 million in cash from personal and company accounts; properties worth RM24.5 million; nine luxury cars valued at RM7.65 million; exclusive watches (RM25 million); jewellery and diamonds (RM6 million); branded handbags (RM3 million); alcoholic beverages (RM3 million); and four horses valued at RM400,000. Authorities have also traced foreign assets exceeding RM15 million, in addition to suspected gambling activities linked to the Tan Sri totalling RM20 million.

Graft: Ex-Ports boss fined
Graft: Ex-Ports boss fined

Daily Express

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Express

Graft: Ex-Ports boss fined

Published on: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 11, 2025 By: Cynthia D Baga Text Size: The charges stated that, while serving as JPDS director, Abel had accepted bribes ranging between RM33,098.62 and RM59,724.30 from two companies connected to his official duties between 2017 and 2018. Kota Kinabalu: A Former Sabah Ports and Harbour Department (JPDS) director was fined a total of RM700,000 for 15 counts of bribery involving towing services. Session Court judge Jason Juga meted out the sentence to Abel Ongkunik, 52, when the case was brought up for facts and sentencing as he had pleaded guilty to the 15 alternative charges on March 14 this year. Advertisement The alternative charges were offered by the prosecution following the acceptance of Abel's representation letter and the total amount involved in the 15 charges was RM632,296.03. The court had imposed the fines ranging from RM38,000 to RM58,000 for each charge and it was learnt that Abel had paid the RM700,000 fines. The charges stated that, while serving as JPDS director, Abel had accepted bribes ranging between RM33,098.62 and RM59,724.30 from two companies connected to his official duties between 2017 and 2018. The money was deposited into the accounts of three companies at several bank branches in Kota Kinabalu, Lido and Kota Belud. The offences were related to granting permission to a company for towing services in the Kimanis port limit area and approving towing work licences for another company. The alternatives charges fall under Section 165 of the Penal Code, which provides for imprisonment of up to two years or a fine, or both, upon conviction. The court heard that Abel had the authority to grant approvals for towing services provided by JPDS. He met with the owners of the two companies and arranged for the approvals to be granted by JPDS to both companies for providing towing services. Investigations also revealed that Abel received money from the company owners, with funds transferred from the accounts of both companies into the accounts of three other companies. The accounts and financial dealings of these three companies were under Abel's control. In mitigation, counsel Dominic Chew who represented Abel, requested the court to impose a fine between RM650,000 and RM690,000 for all 15 charges. Chew informed the court that Abel, who has three children, is the sole breadwinner of the family and that it was his first offence. 'In addition, our client has expressed genuine remorse and wished to move forward with his life through his new employment in Terengganu, while providing for his family through lawful means,' he said. However, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Deputy Public Prosecutor Nurul Izzati Sapifee proposed at least RM50,000 fine per charge, taking into account the facts of the case, serving public interest and acting as a deterrent to potential offenders. She said Abel, as a director in JPDS at the material time, held the highest position in the department. As such, he should have upheld a high moral standard when dealing with businesses involving JPDS, and in maintaining the image of the public service in the eyes of the public. 'The fact that when he performed such offence, he as a public officer holding the highest position in JPDS, might as well prevent other companies from being granted the same permit for work from JPDS. 'As a director also he should not have personal side dealings with any person or company which are known to him being connected to his official duty,' she said. Abel was originally facing 29 charges involving RM1.29 million of bribes under Section 17 (a) of the MACC Act 2009 which is punishable under Section 24 (1) of the same act. He claimed trial to the charges on March 15, 2022. The 15 original charges were withdrawn, while the remaining 14 main charges were taken into consideration by the court in accordance with Section 171A of the Criminal Procedure Code. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

Intense Russian drone attack on Kharkiv kills 2, injures 54, Ukraine says
Intense Russian drone attack on Kharkiv kills 2, injures 54, Ukraine says

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Intense Russian drone attack on Kharkiv kills 2, injures 54, Ukraine says

Flames rise from a building following a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv, Ukraine, in this handout released on June 11, 2025. STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE OF UKRAINE IN THE KHARKIV REGION/Handout via REUTERS KHARKIV (Reuters) -A nine-minute-long Russian drone attack on Ukraine's second largest city of Kharkiv in the middle of the night killed at least two people and injured 54, including five children, regional officials said on Wednesday. The intense strikes with 17 drones sparked fires in 15 units of a five-storey apartment building and caused other damage in the city close to the Russian border, Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov said. "There are direct hits on multi-storey buildings, private homes, playgrounds, enterprises and public transport," Terekhov said on the Telegram messaging app. "Apartments are burning, roofs are destroyed, cars are burnt, windows are broken." A Reuters witness saw emergency rescuers helping to carry people out of damaged buildings, administering care and firefighters battling blazes in the dark. Nine of the injured, including a 2-year-old girl and a 15-year-old boy, have been hospitalised, Oleh Sinehubov, the governor of the broader Kharkiv region, said on Telegram. He added that the strikes hit also a city trolley bus depot and several residential buildings. There was no immediate comment from Russia. Kharkiv, in Ukraine's northeast, withstood Russian full-scale advance in the early days of the war and has since been a frequent target of drone, missile, and guided aerial bomb assaults. The attack followed Russia's two biggest assaults of the war on Ukraine this week, a part of intensified bombardments that Moscow said were retaliatory measures for Kyiv's recent attacks in Russia. Both sides deny targeting civilians in the war that Russia launched on its smaller neighbour in February 2022. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. "We are holding on. We are helping each other. And we will definitely survive," Terekhov said. "Kharkiv is Ukraine. And it cannot be broken." (Reporting by Lidia Kelly in Melbourne; Editing by Chris Reese and Lincoln Feast.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store