
Japan and China commemorate World War II anniversary on different dates
Japan remembers the victims in a solemn ceremony on Aug. 15, the day then-Emperor Hirohito announced in a crackly radio message that the government had surrendered, while China showcases its military strength with a parade on Sept. 3, the day after the formal surrender on an American battleship in Tokyo Bay.
Japan occupied much of China before and during WWII in a devastating and brutal invasion that, by some estimates, killed 20 million people. The wartime experience still bedevils relations between the two countries today.
A museum in the Chinese city of Benxi highlights the struggles of anti-Japanese resistance fighters who holed up in log cabins through fierce winters in the country's northeast, then known as Manchuria, before retreating into Russia.
They returned only after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and launched an offensive into Manchuria on Aug. 9, 1945 -- the same day the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki -- adding to the pressure on Japan to surrender.
Nowadays, it is China's military that raises alarm as it seeks to enforce the government's territorial claims in the Pacific. When Japan talks of building up its defense to counter the threat, its militaristic past gives China a convenient retort.
"We urge Japan to deeply reflect on its historical culpability, earnestly draw lessons from history and stop using hype over regional tensions and China-related issues to conceal its true intent of military expansion," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said last month.
Japan's surrender broadcast
Hirohito's prerecorded surrender broadcast on Aug. 15, 1945, was incomprehensible to many Japanese. He used arcane language and the sound quality was poor.
What was important, historians say, was that the message came from the emperor himself. Hirohito was considered a living god, and the war was fought in his name. Most Japanese had never heard his voice before.
"The speech is a reminder of what it took to end the wrong war," Nihon University professor Takahisa Furukawa told The Associated Press in 2015.
The current emperor, Hirohito's grandson Naruhito, and the prime minister are set to make remarks at the annual ceremony in Tokyo on Aug. 15, broadcast live by public broadcaster NHK.
At last year's event, Naruhito expressed deep remorse over Japan's actions during the war. But on the same day, three Japanese cabinet ministers visited Tokyo's Yasukuni shrine, drawing criticism from China and South Korea, which see the shrine as a symbol of militarism.
China marks Victory Day
Japan surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945, in a ceremony on board the American battleship USS Missouri.
The foreign minister, in a top hat and tails, and the army chief signed on behalf of Hirohito. The signatories on the other side were U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur and representatives from China and other nations that had fought Japan.
China designated the next day, Sept. 3, as Victory Day.
Eleven years ago, the Communist Party stepped up how China marks the anniversary. All of China's top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, attended a commemorative event on Sept. 3. The renewed focus came at a time of rising tension with Japan over conflicting interpretations of wartime history and a still-ongoing territorial dispute in the East China Sea.
The next year, China staged a military parade on the 70th anniversary of the end of the war.
A decade later, preparations are underway for another grand parade with missiles, tanks and fighter jets overhead. Russian President Vladimir Putin is among those expected to attend.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
24 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Putin and Trump discuss fate of Ukraine as summit gets underway
Discussions between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin stretched into a second hour at a summit in Alaska, as the American leader pushes to secure an end to the war in Ukraine. Reporters were ushered into a room at the start of the formal talks, but the two leaders did not take any questions. Alongside Trump were U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, while Putin was joined by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov. A prior summit between the two leaders in Helsinki in 2018 lasted roughly two hours. A joint news conference with Trump and Putin is planned to take place after their meeting. Friday's summit, being held at a military facility — Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson — opened with a highly-choreographed spectacle that saw the U.S. president greet Putin on American soil for their first face-to-face encounter of Trump's second term. The two leaders disembarked from their planes, walking across the tarmac to red carpets in a scripted opening. Trump clapped as he watched Putin approach and then greeted him with a warm handshake and pat on the arm. The two leaders paused for a moment to watch a flyover and the U.S. president was seen putting his hand on the Russian leader's back as they walked down a set of steps. Trump and Putin appeared to be engaged in friendly conversation as they entered the Beast, as the U.S. president's armored limousine is known, and departed. The Russian leader was seen laughing in the vehicle as he began a visit that marked his first invitation to the U.S. in nearly a decade. The haphazard nature of the quickly arranged meeting — only announced last week — was apparent from the start. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that a previously planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin would be a three-on-three session with aides participating. Still, the ride in the presidential vehicle to the summit site allowed Putin time to speak directly to Trump without aides present, giving him valuable one-on-one time with the U.S. leader. U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin meet during a U.S.-Russia summit on Ukraine at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. | Sputnik / POOL / VIA AFP-JIJI The summit is laden with peril for Trump, who campaigned on a pledge to quickly end Europe's deadliest war in decades — but also opportunity for a president who has repeatedly cast himself as the only leader who can deliver peace. The president has downplayed expectations for the summit, claiming that he envisions it as a "feel-out' discussion laying the groundwork for a second more important meeting that could include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and potentially European allies and where Moscow and Kyiv could "make a deal.' And he's sought to dispel anxiety in European capitals that he may concede too much to Putin or strike a deal that involves exchanging territory or Ukraine ceding land without the input of Kyiv. In an interview earlier Friday with Fox News' Bret Baier aboard Air Force One, Trump insisted he would "walk away' if the talks with Putin did not go well. The U.S. president also told reporters that he may provide security guarantees to Ukraine "along with Europe and other countries,' but added "not in the form of NATO.' Trump has long said that Ukraine may need to agree to swap land with Russia, but said it was not his decision to make. "I've got to let Ukraine make that decision,' Trump said of land swaps. "I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine. I'm here to get them at the table.' For Putin, the visit has already delivered a win. An international pariah since he launched the full-scale invasion of his neighbor in 2022, Putin is being welcomed on U.S. soil without having made any concessions, giving him his best chance to reset ties between Washington and Moscow in recent years. The Russian president has had little incentive to stop the fighting, confident that his military holds a dominant position on the battlefield as it slowly advances in a brutal, grinding war. Russian leader Vladimir Putin shares a laugh with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Beast, as the U.S. president's armored limousine is known, ahead of a high-stakes summit at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday in this image taken from video. | Pool / via REUTERS Putin launched a full-court charm offensive ahead of the summit, praising the U.S. leader for "energetic and sincere efforts' to stop the war and floating the prospect of renewed economic cooperation and a new arms control treaty, playing to Trump who regularly casts himself as a peacemaker and dealmaker. Putin's entourage is expected to include finance ministers. The Russian president has been eager to divide the U.S. from Europe and seek sanctions relief for an economy at home that may be on the verge of slipping into a recession. "I noticed he's bringing a lot of business people from Russia, and that's good. I like that because they want to do business,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One. "But they're not doing business until we get the war settled.' Trump's team is set to also include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Still, the risk for Ukraine and others in Europe is that Putin makes a sales pitch Trump finds hard to dismiss, or shifts the attention from Ukraine to improving U.S.-Russia economic ties. Another potential challenge would be if Putin extends an invitation for Trump to meet with him in Russia, placing Zelenskyy and other allies with the difficult choice of being sidelined or rewarding the Kremlin by traveling there. The last summit between the two leaders — a 2018 meeting in Helsinki — has cast a shadow over Friday's gathering and highlighted what has been at times an imbalanced relationship. At that time the two leaders spent time alone without aides. At the news conference wrapping up that summit, Trump publicly sided with Putin over his own intelligence officials, drawing bipartisan condemnation for saying he believed the Russian leader's assurances that Moscow had not meddled in the 2016 U.S. election.


The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
New Zealand Tightens Defense Ties With Australia
The Luxon government is shoring up its relationship with its only ally, while also expanding its role in security groupings like NATO and the Five Eyes. New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met in Queenstown, New Zealand, on August 9 to discuss closer cooperation between their militaries. This meeting, following the December 2024 bilateral meeting between their defense ministers, took place in the context of Australia and New Zealand feeling more directly threatened by China. In February, a Chinese naval flotilla fired weapons in the Tasman Sea and the Chinese naval mission partially circumnavigated Australia. In the section on security and resilience, the joint statement recognized that the two countries 'face the most unpredictable and dangerous strategic environment in decades and affirmed the critical role of [their] alliance.' In that context, the two leaders welcomed the Joint Statement on Closer Defense Relations from last December and noted that New Zealand was still consulting about potential future collaboration opportunities under AUKUS Pillar II. The joint statement expressed specific concerns about threats from foreign interference, espionage, economic coercion, malicious cyber activity, and transnational crime. It also clarified that a cyberattack would constitute an armed attack under the ANZUS treaty. The two prime ministers also commended their countries' intensifying defense cooperation and integration of Anzac forces – including star-ranked officer exchanges and an increased tempo of exercises, operations, and presence together in the Indo-Pacific. They noted the alignment of Australia's National Defense Strategy and New Zealand's to-be-confirmed Defense Capability Plan to drive interoperability through combined procurement and co-sustainment of common platforms and systems. These steps will 'better position us to promote our shared security, deter actions inimical to our interests, and respond with decisive force if necessary,' the joint statement said. As others have pointed out, perhaps the most significant development out of the joint statement is the passing reference to the ANZUS treaty. The New Zealand-United States leg of the Australia-New Zealand-United States (ANZUS) alliance was suspended in 1980s due to Wellington's refusal to admit U.S. naval vessels that were nuclear-powered or might be carrying nuclear weapons. Although ANZUS is the basis of continued Australia-New Zealand bilateral security relations (as well as Australia-United States bilateral security relations), 'ANZUS' has been rarely referenced by name in New Zealand. Euan Graham also noted the lack of 'explicit caveats attached to Pillar I' of AUKUS in the joint statement. He argued that this suggests 'the Luxon government will approach Australia's acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines… pragmatically and in a low-key manner.' As Alex Bristow of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute noted, however, the joint statement has 'not reset the nuclear clock.' Although New Zealand in recent years has allowed port visits by conventionally powered and armed U.S. naval vessels, anti-nuclear sentiment is still strong. Bristow pointed out that Luxon's predecessor, Jacinda Ardern, made clear that Wellington's nuclear ban will covers Australia's new nuclear-powered submarines, even if they are only conventionally armed. The discussion between Albanese and Luxon last week was bilateral and put a spotlight on cyber issues. As Bristow argued, however, any discussion of deterring China will eventually need to involve the United States and discuss thorny nuclear issues. At his speech to the Lowy Institute in Sydney today, Luxon mentioned 'ANZUS' by name again and shared his desire to strengthen New Zealand by engaging with the world, saying: 'my government is bringing more energy, more urgency, and a sharper focus to our external engagement.' Luxon's words are backed by actions, as his government has engaged with not only Australia and the United States, but also China, India, Japan, Southeast Asian countries, and the Pacific Island countries. With regards to New Zealand-United States relations, Luxon mentioned annual foreign ministers talks and a Technology Dialogue. 'Strategically, we are strongly supportive of the indispensable role played by the United States in the region, and the broader array of alliances and partnerships that buttress the region's prosperity and security,' he affirmed. On AUKUS, Luxon clarified, 'New Zealand is not involved in Pillar I of AUKUS' – the part of the pact that centers on nuclear-power submarines. 'Australia understands that our nuclear policy remains unchanged,' Luxon added. However, he once again raised the prospect of New Zealand joining Pillar II,' which 'involves cooperation on advanced technologies.' 'New Zealand is exploring with the AUKUS partners how we could potentially participate in Pillar II,' Luxon said, 'including to understand what this means for our focus on ensuring interoperability.' Beyond AUKUS and ANZUS, Luxon was the only leader of the Indo-Pacific Four (IP4) to attend the NATO summit this year after U.S. strikes on Iran led to last-minute cancellations by Japan, South Korea, and Australia. Luxon is also more publicly supportive of the Five Eyes group. Alongside this diplomacy, in April, the prime minister announced that New Zealand would double defense spending to more than 2 percent within eight years. Judith Collins, New Zealand's defense minister, expressed a desire for New Zealand to raise defense spending even higher than 2 percent, but did not specify by how much or when. Unlike with other allies, including Australia, the U.S. administration has not made any demands on New Zealand yet. New Zealand is also building new relationships in the region. A day before the Albanese-Luxon summit, Japanese navel vessels docked in Wellington for the first time in almost 90 years. The ceremonial visit brought together two Indo-Pacific countries that each only have one formal ally: New Zealand has Australia, and Japan has the United States. In July, New Zealand officials announced that they were beginning work on a defense logistics agreement with Japan to make Japan-New Zealand military cooperation easier.


Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
Australian and Philippine forces launch largest military exercises near disputed South China Sea
By JIM GOMEZ Australia on Friday launched its largest military exercises with Philippine forces, involving more than 3,600 military personnel in live-fire drills, battle maneuvers and a beach assault at a Philippine town on the disputed South China Sea, where the allies have raised alarm over Beijing's assertive actions. The exercises are called Alon, meaning wave in the Philippine language Tagalog, and will showcase Australia's firepower. The drills will involve a guided-missile navy destroyer, F/A-18 supersonic fighter jets, a C-130 troop and cargo aircraft, Javelin anti-tank weapons and special forces sniper weapons. Military officials said defense forces from the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and Indonesia will join as observers. 'This exercise reflects Australia's commitment to working with partners to ensure we maintain a region where state sovereignty is protected, international law is followed and nations can make decisions free from coercion,' Vice Admiral Justin Jones of the Royal Australian Navy said in a statement. The combat exercises are 'an opportunity for us to practice how we collaborate and respond to shared security challenges and project force over great distances in the Indo-Pacific,' Jones said. The exercises will run until Aug. 29. Australia is the second country after the U.S. with a visiting forces agreement with the Philippines, allowing the deployment of large numbers of troops for combat exercises in each other's territory. The Philippines has signed a similar pact with Japan, which will take effect next month. It is in talks with several other Asian and Western countries including France and Canada for similar defense accords. China has deplored multinational war drills and alliances in or near the disputed South China Sea, saying the U.S. and its allies are 'ganging up' against it and militarizing the region. China claims most of the South China Sea, a busy global trade route, where it has had a spike of territorial faceoffs with the Philippines in recent years. Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also lay claims to the resource-rich waters. On Monday, a Chinese navy ship collided with a Chinese coast guard ship while trying to drive away a smaller Philippine coast guard vessel in the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea. The Australian Embassy in Manila expressed concern over 'the dangerous and unprofessional conduct of Chinese vessels near Scarborough Shoal involving the Philippine Coast Guard' and said the incident 'highlights the need for de-escalation, restraint and respect for international law.' In response, the U.S. deployed two warships off the Scarborough on Wednesday in what it called a freedom of navigation operation to protest China's expansive claims, restrictions and its demand for entry notifications in the disputed waters. In February, a Chinese J-16 fighter jet released flares that passed within 30 meters (100 feet) of an Australian P-8 Poseidon military surveillance plane in daylight and in international air space, Australian defense officials said at the time. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.