Singapore skies may sparkle with two meteor showers in coming weeks
The Delta Aquariids and the Perseids, both annual occurrences, could be visible over the next few weeks, said The Observatory at Science Centre Singapore.
The Delta Aquariids, which peak around July 30, originate from Comet 96P/Machholz and appear to radiate from the constellation Aquarius.
The comet was discovered in 1986 by American amateur astronomer Donald Machholz, a prolific comet hunter with more than a dozen discoveries to his name.
Though not known for high meteor counts, the Delta Aquariids produce a steady stream of two to five meteors per hour, flashing into view at speeds of 40km per second. Some may leave glowing trails of gas in the sky.
If cloud cover obscures the meteor shower as it peaks, stargazers may still see Saturn in the east after 11pm, according to the observatory.
The Perseids – one of the best and most anticipated meteor showers of the year – will peak on the nights of Aug 12 and 13. It is best viewed during the pre-dawn hours between 3am and 6.45am, says the observatory.
The Perseids are known for their high activity rate and fireballs, which leave a long glowing trail of light and colour across the sky. Under ideal conditions, up to 100 meteors may be seen in an hour.
However, the 2025 Perseids may be harder to spot, as moonlight from a waning gibbous moon – a bright phase between a full and half moon – could outshine the meteors.
The moon will also be near the radiant point, which is the area in the sky from where the meteors appear to emerge, making them less visible, according to the observatory.
Both showers return each year as the Earth passes through dusty trails left behind by ancient comets.
No special equipment is needed to view the meteor showers. The best views are expected from dark, open areas such as parks, beaches or reservoirs.
The observatory will not hold special viewing events for either shower, but its regular Friday night stargazing sessions will continue. These offer telescope views of stars and planets to the public.
More details are available at science.edu.sg.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction
Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Scientists Did NOT Agree That 3I/ATLAS Is Alien Spacecraft Approaching Earth For 'Surprise Attack' In November 2025
Does the scientific community as a whole share the notion that a newly discovered interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is an alien spacecraft heading to Earth for a "surprise attack" in November 2025? No, that's not true: The NASA website says that it's a comet and that it doesn't pose any risk to Earth. Three astronomers told Lead Stories that, as of this writing, the scientific community overwhelmingly shares this view. The scientist proposing the alien theory said he did so to challenge people to think, while, nevertheless, implying an interest in an influx of government money to fund that line of inquiry. The claim appeared in a post (archived here and here) on TikTok on July 27, 2025, under the following caption: Scientists at Harvard discovered an unknown object headed towards the Earth at 130,000 mph and its 15 miles in diameter and apparently is very unusual and possibly a space craft. #space #aliens The narrator in the video continued: Now they're saying it's going to be here by the end of November. They don't just think it's an object. They think it's a spacecraft coming to attack the Earth. It's called 3I/ATLAS, and they're worried about a surprise attack. This is what the post looked like on TikTok at the time of writing: According to the NASA website (archived here), 3I/ATLAS was first discovered on July 1, 2025. The shape of its path, differentiating from orbit around the Sun, allowed astronomers to conclude that it's an interstellar object, the third known of that class. While some of its characteristics are yet to be determined, the scientific community agrees that 3I/ATLAS is a comet, reads the NASA website: ...it has an icy nucleus and coma (a bright cloud of gas and dust surrounding a comet as it approaches the Sun). This is why astronomers categorize it as a comet... The space agency additionally clarifies that, contrary to the posts on social media, 3I/ATLAS poses no danger to Earth: Although the trajectory of the object brings it into the inner solar system, it won't come close to Earth. As the comet 3I/ATLAS journeys through the solar system, it won't come closer than 1.6 au (about 150 million miles, or 240 million kilometers) to our planet. Despite this information being publicly available on a government website, many other posts were trending under the keywords "massive alien mothership approaching Earth": for example, here (archived here and here), here (archived here and here) and here (archived here and here). Some of them, specifically professor Avi Loeb (archived here), of Harvard University's Astronomy Department. Talking to a CBS affiliate (archived here and here) in late July 2025, he implied that the newly discovered object can be anything, including being a technological product of another civilization. On August 1, 2025, Lead Stories contacted Loeb via email to clarify his views. On the same day, he wrote back, suggesting, among other things, that "3I/ATLAS might be an alien probe based on its unusually rare trajectory". Loeb, however, went on to explain the alien theory was a kind of thought experiment, saying: I laid out this possibility in order to encourage observers who are convinced that 3I/ATLAS is a comet to collect as much data as possible in an attempt to prove me wrong... Even if 49 out of the next 50 interstellar objects to be discovered by the Rubin Observatory will turn out to be comets or asteroids, the one outlier of technological origin might change the future of humanity. He also pointed out that a draft version of one of his papers that has yet to undergo a peer review process -- "Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?" (archived here) -- reads: We strongly emphasize that this paper is largely a pedagogical exercise, with interesting discoveries and strange serendipities, worthy of a record in the scientific literature. By far the most likely outcome will be that 3I/ATLAS is a completely natural interstellar object, probably a comet... At the same time, Loeb, who made similar claims rejected by the scientific community before (archived here), said: Committees of mainstream scientists who decide how to allocate federal funds often resist investments in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence by arguing that it is too risky and might result in wasting taxpayers' money. But if these reviewers were humble enough to ask the taxpayers what they wish to spend their tax money on, they would find the search for extraterrestrial intelligence to be at the top of the priority list. Gatekeeping and ridicule are not the landscape I wished for when I started my scientific career 45 years ago... Earlier, on July 31, 2025, Chris Lintott (archived here), a professor of astrophysics at the University of Oxford, referred to Loeb's theory of alien involvement as "absolute nonsense", continuing: It's a comet, and no danger at all. It's exciting enough we get to study an object that formed before the Sun was born, and there's no need to invent stupid stories to get attention. Two more astronomers told Lead Stories: The existing consensus among the members of the scientific community is that 3I/ATLAS is a comet. Jane Luu (archived here), a professor of astrophysics (archived here) at the University of Oslo, emphasized in a phone conversation with Lead Stories on August 1, 2025, that it's not just her or a few other people but many scientists who are currently studying 3I/ATLAS. She said there is no evidence to support speculations about the nature of 3I/ATLAS: Our observations have shown it's a comet. It doesn't come close to Earth: It's not on a collision course. On August 1, 2025, David Jewitt (archived here), a UCLA professor of astronomy, told Lead Stories via email: I've seen a lot of comets, and all I can say is that 3I looks to me like a comet. When asked to evaluate the potential risks posed by the comet, he said: There's more danger that your toaster oven will explode, assuming you have a toaster oven.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Just Found Something Very Weird About the Mysterious Object Hurtling Into Our Solar System
As evidence continues to mount that the mysterious object with interstellar origins currently speeding toward the inner solar system at a breakneck speed is a comet, not everybody's convinced quite yet. Harvard astronomer and alien hunter Avi Loeb raised the far-fetched, yet tantalizing possibility that the object, which was first spotted by astronomers earlier this year, could have been sent by an extraterrestrial civilization. While he admitted in a blog post last month that it's most likely that "3I/ATLAS is a completely natural interstellar object, probably a comet," a letter to the editors of the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics has Loeb questioning that conclusion once more. At the heart of the conundrum is the purported comet's tail. The glowing globs of icy particulates conventionally leave a trail of gas and dust in a comet's wake, resulting in their distinctive shape. However, there's a slim chance that 3I/ATLAS may be an outlier. According to the paper, which was authored by an international team of astronomers, 3I/ATLAS "exhibits increasing dust activity and reddening colors during the observation period, with no visible tail detected." The lack of a tail could be "likely due to viewing geometry and low dust production," they posited. The researchers, therefore, called on the astronomy community to continue monitoring the unusual object to glean more "insights into the evolution of interstellar materials under solar radiation." Loeb agreed with the sentiment, arguing in a recent blog post that the "more data we collect, the more difficult it would be for scientists to shove anomalies of 3I/ATLAS under the carpet of traditional thinking." "We are used to finding icy rocks which exhibit familiar cometary tails in the solar system," he added, "but an encounter with objects from interstellar space is a blind date on astronomical scales." To Loeb, it's still too early to definitively conclude that 3I/ATLAS is a comet. To the astronomer, who previously authored a book about the possibility that 'Oumuamua, an interstellar object first observed in 2017, may have been an sent to us by an alien civilization, there's still enough compelling evidence suggesting otherwise. In a follow-up blog post, he pointed out a separate paper, showing that the first images taken of the object by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope showed a nucleus "surrounded by a much larger cloud of dust," and a "diffuse emission ahead of its motion towards the Sun rather than a trailing tail as expected from a typical comet." Loeb has also suggested that 3I/ATLAS' highly unusual trajectory is "fine-tuned to get unusually close to Jupiter, Mars and Venus," an exceedingly improbable path. Loeb and his colleagues have also posited that the object's large size — roughly 12.4 miles in diameter, according to his calculations — makes it an immensely rare, once-in-only-10,000-years encounter. To neatly summarize his stance on the chance that we're looking at a visitor from an interstellar civilization, Loeb and his colleagues constructed the "Loeb Scale," which ranks the chance of a given object being alien technology on a scale of one to ten, where one is "likely natural," and 10 is "confirmed technology" of "extraterrestrial artificial origin." The scale takes "incorporates multiple observable characteristics, including trajectory anomalies, spectroscopic signatures, geometric properties, and other observable characteristics that could distinguish natural from potentially artificial objects" into account. This week, Loeb gave 3I/ATLAS his "Loeb Scale" rating. "As of now, I give 3I/ATLAS a rank of 6, but note that this rank is time-dependent as it reflects the limited data we have so far," he wrote in his blog post. He also took the opportunity to once again warn that the scientific community shouldn't dismiss the possibility of a first encounter, no matter how far-fetched. "The scientific method allows for all possible questions, which are later answered by collecting data and ruling out possibilities," he wrote. "It is anti-scientific to suppress curiosity-driven questions about anomalies before conclusive data is gathered to explain them." More on the object: Existing NASA Spacecraft Could Intercept the Weird Interstellar Object Cruising Into Our Star System
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Louisiana scraps coastal erosion project designed to rebuild the state's wetlands
New Orleans — Louisiana's coast is under threat as a quarter of the state's wetlands, an area about the size of Delaware, have disappeared in the last 100 years, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The wetlands are a critical buffer that shield Louisiana communities from monster hurricanes. While massive flood walls and human-made marshes are helpful, coastal scientist Alisha Renfro and campaign director Simone Maloz with the nonprofit group Restore the Mississippi River Delta say say those projects alone are not enough to rebuild and counteract future projected land loss. "You can reduce storm surge up to a foot with just a mile of coastal wetlands," Renfro told CBS News. "A tough lesson that we learned after Katrina: we have to think long term. We also have to think bigger," Maloz added. It's been 20 years since Hurricane Katrina exposed the extent of the state's coastal erosion. It was the largest residential disaster in U.S. history, killing more than 1,300 people and displacing one million others across the Gulf Coast, according to the Louisiana independent research nonprofit The Data Center. Since Katrina, satellite images from the NASA Earth Observatory show that the Louisiana coastline has lost even more marsh land — an estimated 200,000 acres, according to the USGS. Land loss is caused by a number of factors, including sea level rise, shipping channels, levees, natural subsidence, invasive species and severe storms, according to Restore the Mississippi River Delta. Without the protection of wetlands, Maloz and Renfro say the future would be unsustainable for coastal Louisiana communities. "I think that's a future we don't want to think about," Maloz said of the impact on the region if the wetlands were to disappear. "It is a loss of culture," Renfro said. "It is a loss of place and it is a loss of home for a lot of people." Last month, Louisiana officials canceled a $3 billion project — known as the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion — that sought to rebuild the marshes. Renfro and Maloz spent years planning the diversion project with other state and federal leaders and scientists. The project was unique, because instead of a human-made marsh built by dredged sediment, it would have diverted sediment flowing down the Mississippi River to naturally rebuild wetlands, the way the Mississippi River Delta was first formed centuries ago. Renfro and Maloz saw it as the best solution to save Louisiana. They argue that other projects wouldn't be nearly as effective, nor would they have rebuilt as much land. "If you don't change the forces that took that away from you in the first place... if you don't have a systemic change, then you're going to lose this too," Maloz said. "And so that's what Mid-Barataria represented. It represented that systemic change that returned back to how we were created that gave us that long-term future. If you want to talk about dollars and cents, you're talking about investing money over 50 years, rather than investing X amount of money over 10 years or 20 years. But really it's the time and scale." The project would have diverted Mississippi sediment to rebuild 17,000 acres of land over the next 30 years, enough to potentially absorb up to 10 feet of storm surge, according to Restore the Mississippi River Delta. "We are very short on money," Maloz added. "We're short on natural resources. And we are short on time." Regardless, Louisiana's Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority scrapped the project this summer, at the direction of Republican Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, even though about $600 million of the $3 billion had already been spent. The project faced stark opposition from many community members in Plaquemines Parish, a small parish south of New Orleans. Mitch Jurisich, a third-generation oysterman, local businessman, and Plaquemines Parish councilman, filed a lawsuit to stop the project. He told CBS News he did so "because I know what it would have done to our fishing industry, our commercial fishing industry here. And when you look around at this harbor, full of commercial boats, full of life, it would have just totally wiped us out." Documents for the project published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers show it would have had some negative impacts on fisheries near the project site at first. But Renfro says that, down the road, the fisheries would have come back stronger. Government records also showed the project would have increased flooding and storm surge to some homes south of the project site. The project would have compensated those impacted, but Jurisich believes there are better solutions that wouldn't sacrifice his community for the rest of the state. "I tell them all, 'It's not my fault that y'all wasted money,'" Jurisch said of state officials. "'It's your fault, because you pushed this down our throat knowing we didn't want it.'" Jurisich says smaller, human-made marshes could be cheaper and wouldn't sacrifice his fishing community for the rest of the state. But Renfro argues that is only a temporary fix and that the fishing industry will ultimately pay a steep price for the continued loss of the wetlands. "They (the fishing industry) are dependent on those coastal wetlands that are disappearing," Renfro said. "And once those wetlands are gone, the fisheries collapse. Doing nothing isn't an option."
