Israeli prison releases Palestinian with Star of David shaved on to his head
Following three years in Israeli detention, Palestinian prisoner Musab Qatawi faced one final ordeal before being released on Thursday.
Israeli prison guards shoved his head into a rubbish bin and shaved part of his hair, drawing the Star of David on to his head.
In an interview with Middle East Eye in his hometown of Qalqilya, in the occupied West Bank, Qatawi said he was released in the same batch as Ahmad Manasra, who spent a decade behind bars after being arrested at the age of 13 and suffered a similar treatment before his release.
'They gathered us after dawn, counted us and took us,' Qatawi said.
'At that moment, I found Ahmad Manasra among the people. We reached the Ramon area. They took our pictures, had us sign papers," he added.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"The moment we were to be released, they brought a rubbish bin, held our heads and put them in while they beat us. [A guard] drew the Star of David on my head.'
Israeli forces have previously been accused of using the Star of David, a religious Jewish symbol featured on Israel's flag, to mistreat Palestinians.
In August 2023, Israeli forces imprinted the Star of David on to a Palestinian man's cheek in the occupied West Bank.
Since the start of Israel's war on Gaza in October 2023, conditions for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails have severely worsened and led to several accusations of human rights violations.
Dozens of prisoners have been killed, while others have described severe beatings, torture and sexual abuse.
Some Palestinian prisoners released in recent months also had numbers branded on their foreheads.
Itamar Ben Gvir, Israel's national security minister, boasted in July that he had made conditions for Palestinian prisoners much worse.
"Since I assumed the position of minister of national security, one of the highest goals I have set for myself is to worsen the conditions of the terrorists in the prisons and to reduce their rights to the minimum required by law," Ben Gvir said at the time.
Musab Qatawi is seen in his occupied West Bank home of Qalqilya (MEE/Mohammad Ahmad Nazal)
Qatawi was being held at the Nafha Prison, where he says he and his cellmates were beaten daily by guards.
'We were severely beaten,' he said. 'They insulted us a lot, stepped on us, used dogs against us. It was very hard.'
Qatawi also described a 'lack of food, lack of hygiene, diseases', among other issues.
He called on Palestinian and international organisations to act in order to protect detainees, saying their situation is 'more than dangerous'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Labour's bruising road to sanction Israeli cabinet extremists
After almost a year of pressure to take action against Israel's more extreme government members, Britain sanctioned two cabinet ministers whose actions 'led to the deaths' of Palestinians. In the hardest-hitting statement from the British government to date, Middle East minister Hamish Falconer outlined the case against Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. To supportive shouts from Labour MPs, Mr Falconer stated that the ministers incited occupied West Bank settler violence 'which has led to the deaths of Palestinians civilians and the displacement of whole towns and villages'. Britain, along with Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway, would 'not sit by while they wreck the prospects of future peace'. The path to sanctioning Israel's hardline cabinet members over Gaza has been arduous, bruising and, for many in the UK's Labour government, long overdue. Former Conservative foreign secretary David Cameron was exasperated at Israel's intransigence over aid to Gaza and almost sanctioned the pair in the spring of last year but the July general election intervened. In opposition, Labour had been rattled after Keir Starmer admitted in a radio interview shortly after the October 7 attacks that Israel had the 'right' to cut off power and water to Gaza to enforce a siege. That affected heavily in the July election when Labour lost four stronghold seats to Muslim independents standing on a pro-Gaza platform. Shaken and outraged by reports of death and human misery in Gaza, Labour MPs have since berated the government at every opportunity for not sanctioning the pair. The path to that action has been tentative, and for the Labour front bench, quite painful. Initially in September, it hoped to quell the disgruntled voices – and pressure Israel – by imposing a partial arms embargo on 30 weapons export licences to the country. The first hint of sanctions came in October after Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that action was being considered following new incendiary comments from the pair. Mr Smotrich had stated that starving two million people in Gaza 'might be justified and moral', while Mr Ben Gvir's labelled illegal occupied West Bank settlers who killed a teenage Palestinian as 'heroes'. But with the diplomatic push for a ceasefire with Hamas and release of Israeli hostages in the new year, the pressure for action receded. That was until Israel resumed its latest grim offensive with MPs in March accusing the British government of double standards on its position towards the country. A beleaguered foreign secretary was sent by Downing Street to make a statement in the Commons largely to placate the anger of Labour backbenchers fed up with the government's position on Israel. David Lammy admitted there had been an 'appalling loss of life', and said the UK is working with France and Germany to send Israel a 'clear message' that they 'strongly oppose' the resumption of hostilities. By April, The National had been told in confidence that Mr Lammy was now actively pushing for the pair to be sanctioned – as well as Palestinian state recognition – such was the anger felt in London over the humanitarian blockade and continued loss of life. But it became clear last month that relations with Israel had reached breaking point. Suddenly Mr Lammy's language had changed, condemning the country's actions in Gaza as 'intolerable' and 'repellent'. 'We must call this what it is. It is extremism. It is dangerous, it is repellent,' Mr Lammy told Parliament. 'I condemn it in the strongest possible terms.' Throughout last year, Labour back bench MPs have been outspoken in putting pressure on the government to change its stance. Joined by the Lib Dems, and a handful of Conservatives, their voices have been listened to with action now taken. But the pressure will not stop there. Calls will intensify for recognition of a Palestinian state and a full arms embargo. And a new line of attack emerged on Tuesday, with Mr Lammy asked why sanction the ministers but not Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself. His response was that the pair had used 'horrendous extremist language', indicating that their boss had not. Britain's and its allies' actions has affected the Israeli government which condemned them as 'outrageous'. Yet it will probably take its strongest ally, the US, to change its position for a significant impact on Israel's actions. Mr Falconer also warned that the two state solution 'is in peril' due to the 'catastrophic conflict in Gaza and a shocking deterioration in the West Bank'. Israel's actions were 'an attempt to entrench a one state reality where there are no equal rights', he stated.
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
US ambassador to Israel says he does not think Palestinian state is US policy goal
Washington's ambassador to Israel said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remains a US foreign policy goal, prompting the State Department to say he spoke for himself while the White House referred to past comments from President Donald Trump expressing doubts about a two-state solution. "I don't think so," US Ambassador Mike Huckabee said in an interview with Bloomberg News published on Tuesday, when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy. Asked about Huckabee's comments, the White House referred to remarks earlier this year by Trump when he proposed a US takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights groups, Arab states, Palestinians and the UN as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." The White House also referred to remarks by Trump from last year before he won the 2024 election when he said: "I'm not sure a two-state solution anymore is going to work." . Asked whether Huckabee's remarks represented a change in US policy, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce declined to comment on Tuesday, saying policy-making was a matter for Trump and the White House. "I'm not going to explain them or really comment on them at all. I think he certainly speaks for himself," Bruce told reporters. Huckabee, an evangelical Christian, is a staunch pro-Israel conservative. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying by Bloomberg. Those probably won't happen "in our lifetime," he said. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy. Trump has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. "Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?" Huckabee said, using the biblical name the Israeli government favors for the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where some 3 million Palestinians live. Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor, has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career and a longtime defender of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue. The United States has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023, when Palestinian Hamas militants attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, according to Israeli allies. US ally Israel's subsequent military assault on Gaza has killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, while internally displacing nearly Gaza's entire population and causing a hunger crisis. The assault has also triggered accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu faces biggest government crisis yet
In only a matter of days it has become clear that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's far-right government is the closest it has come to collapse. It is not because of the catastrophic security failure of the October 7 attacks; the Israeli hostages still languishing in Gaza; nor the unprecedented international isolation facing Israel as anger mounts over its war in the strip. Instead, Israel could be on the cusp of new elections because of an internal dispute tearing apart Mr Netanyahu's coalition, which turns on its failure to exempt ultra-Orthodox young men from being conscripted into the military. Passing such a law is a priority of certain parties, and a demand they made of Mr Netanyahu when joining his coalition. The army is viewed as a melting pot of secular and religious, men and women, in which young ultra-Orthodox men are highly likely to drift from the conservative ways. Many ultra-Orthodox people are ambivalent about nationalism and the state of Israel, some even anti-Zionist, viewing the state as a man-made enterprise and not the true Israel to be brought about only by God. The crisis is hardly a surprise. How ultra-Orthodox Israelis interact with wider national life is a question that has dogged the country for decades. The community's leaders try guard their people from anything that might interrupt their secluded, strict way of life. That mission is becoming harder to pull off as the group's numbers have grown by more than 500 per cent since 1979, according to a 2023 report by the Haredi Policy Research Institute. While the question of military service was always a part of the debate, it also extended to issues like participation (particularly by men) in the general workforce, how the community educates its children, and the subsidies it receives. But with the Israeli military suffering a manpower shortage during the Gaza war, new security problems on the horizon and major fatigue in reservist troops, the ultra-Orthodox absence from duty is enraging all other Israelis, from left to right. How did the crisis begin? Last week, United Torah Judaism, one of the two ultra-Orthodox parties in Mr Netanyahu's coalition, backed dissolving the Knesset to pave the way for elections. On Monday, the other party, Shas, announced that it backed the same. Shas's involvement means that Mr Netanyahu would no longer have a majority in the Knesset, a devastating blow as opposition parties would easily have the numbers to topple the government. A way out of the crisis could lie with the ultra-Orthodox parties and Yuli Edelstein, chairman of the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee, who have not been able to find a compromise, despite last-ditch talks. Mr Edelstein, a member of Mr Netanyahu's Likud party, previously vowed to find a solution that 'significantly increases [the military's] conscription base,' echoing frustration by many in the ultranationalist, hawkish coalition at the ultra-Orthodox refusal to serve. Last week a spiritual leader in the Shas party said Mr Edelstein's 'soul is an abomination'. Is there room for compromise? An enlistment bill being drafted by Mr Edelstein's committee reportedly includes major financial sanctions against ultra-Orthodox men who ignore draft orders, including the loss of tax benefits and subsidies. There are even reports that the sanctions would prevent dodgers from travelling abroad. While it is possible some of these sanctions could be negotiated on, the main disagreement about whether the community should be drafted at all appears insurmountable. 'I don't see that they'll find a compromise regarding the scope of sanctions,' said Aviv Bushinsky, a former spokesman for Mr Netanyahu. 'What they want to do is to find a way that the sanctions will be implemented not immediately but within a year from now … but again you hear the spiritual leaders say no way by all means,' he added. What could happen next? Opponents of Mr Netanyahu now have to decide how to best approach a possible bill to dissolve parliament. Such a bill would have to pass a preliminary vote and then three readings. If it does not compete these steps then there is a delay until the same bill can be voted on again, giving Mr Netanyahu months to continue negotiations with coalition partners for a solution. How likely are the ultra-Orthodox parties to topple the government? While the rage of the ultra-Orthodox parties is palpable, many commentators note that they are unlikely after new elections to find a government even close to as sympathetic as Mr Netanyahu's. Emphasising the unjustness of ultra-Orthodox exemptions while sympathising with the sacrifice of soldiers is a crucial tactic of opposition parties, whose voters are unlikely to tolerate supporting a government that gives the ultra-Orthodox leeway on the issue. Despite this, the anger and threats of the community's political and spiritual leaders have never been so strong. It is also uncertain the extent to which the leadership views triggering elections as a matter of worldly tactical politics or God's will. What does this mean for Mr Netanyahu? Mr Netanyahu is by far the most successful politician in Israeli history, serving several terms in office. He is viewed as a truly gifted political survivor and has so far weathered the scandal of the October 7 attacks, despite many believing he would not last six months after at first, and a continuing corruption trial. However, Mr Bushinsky said that his current position is very bad. 'As things are at the moment, Netanyahu is being dragged, not leading, not controlling the situation,' he said. 'His approach now is to hug his allies and say everyone is having good conversations. This is not customary to him. He is usually very aggressive and tries to keep control. 'Netanyahu wants to reach something more tangible – a flag he can wave, be it a strike on Iran, total victory in Gaza. At the moment to go to elections without such tangible successes would be devastating.'
