'Peace is a fantasy when faced with a war machine addicted to dominance'
Image: JOHN WESSELS / AFP)
Dr. Reneva Fourie
Israel has gone completely rogue, making it the greatest threat to world peace. Having all but obliterated Gaza, it is now turning its aggression towards the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran is defiantly responding with its Iron Dome penetrating Fattah-1 hypersonic missiles.
Defiance is a characteristic of most in West Asia. Its people have paid dearly for daring to assert their political independence, safeguard their resources, and give their support to Palestine.
The cost has been staggering: millions of lives lost – victims of Western-instigated wars cloaked in the language of human rights, democracy, and counterterrorism.
Over the past few months, that same machinery of destruction has intensified its focus on Gaza. Israel, the United States' key proxy in the region, has unleashed devastation on a shocking scale. Tens of thousands of Palestinians have been massacred with impunity.
It began when Hamas, the governing party of Gaza and a key component of the Palestinian liberation movement, launched an attack in response to Israel's decades of repression. What followed was not proportional 'defence'. It was genocide.
Civilians – mostly women and children – were annihilated or buried under rubble. Survivors were starved and denied clean water. Humanitarian aid was blocked, hospitals were bombed, and neighbourhoods were razed.
While the world fixated on hostages taken by Hamas – many of whom were later killed by Israel's indiscriminate bombings – the real humanitarian catastrophe was being ignored. Israel detained thousands, including children, and subjected them to systematic torture and sexual violence as it continued its military rampage, emboldened by unconditional US and European support. International outcry, court rulings by the ICJ, and arrest warrants from the ICC were brushed aside. Nothing could stop the West's killing spree; not law, not diplomacy, not conscience.
But Israel's aggression extends beyond Gaza and the West Bank. It has steadily eroded Syrian sovereignty, assassinating Iranian advisors who were legally assisting the Syrian government. Together with the US and Turkey, Israel facilitated regime change in Syria, deposing the elected Ba'ath Party in favour of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), an extremist outfit with little public legitimacy.
Hezbollah, an unwavering defender of Palestine, saw key members of its leadership wiped out and much of southern Lebanon reduced to rubble under Israeli bombs. And then there is Yemen. When Ansar Allah declared solidarity with the Palestinians, their resistance was met with significant military force. The US, unashamedly, used its might to pummel one of the poorest nations in the world.
At the heart of Western aggression lies Iran – a country that has shown enormous restraint in the face of years of provocation, assassination, and sabotage. Its military and political leaders have been murdered, not on battlefields, but in targeted killings. Its scientists – brilliant minds working to advance nuclear energy for peaceful medical and industrial purposes – have been gunned down simply for daring to dream of self-sufficiency.
A Palestinian man carries a wounded child in Al-Bureij camp in the central Gaza Strip after the area was targeted by an Israeli strike, on June 17, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas.
Image: Eyad BABA / AFP
Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology is not a prelude to war. It is an assertion of dignity. Its nuclear programme powers homes, fuels hospitals, and propels research in oncology and aerospace fields. Yet that progress has become a threat to the West, not because of its military potential, but because it symbolises independence, ingenuity, and resilience. Washington cannot tolerate a West Asian power that surpasses it in science or dares to challenge its monopoly on influence.
It is conveniently ignoring the reality of Iran's nuclear programme, elevating its military capability above civilian use. Ironically, the US, as well as Israel, apartheid South Africa and others, produced significant nuclear military capability during the Cold War era.
Although Israel has not confirmed or denied having nuclear weapons, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported that Israel possessed 90 nuclear warheads in 2024. However, some analysts suggest a maximum of 300 warheads using the estimated amounts of fissile material. Furthermore, Israel possesses three types of delivery systems for military use of nuclear weapons: F-15 aircraft, ground-based missile installations, and German Dolphin I and II class submarines.
While democratic South Africa willingly signed and complied with treaties containing prohibitions on participating in nuclear weapon activities, Israel and the US are escaping accountability. In 2024, it was estimated that the US had 1,770 active nuclear warheads, 1,938 stored as reserves, and 1,336 that were retired and pending dismantlement.
It is the US that reneged on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on nuclear programmes with Iran, and it is the US that betrayed the current nuclear negotiation efforts.
History is being repeated. The US plays a double game – stalling negotiations while equipping Israel with the intelligence, weapons, and diplomatic cover to strike Iranian assets. Just as the US and allied forces invaded Iraq in 2003 on the pretext of disarming its non-existing weapons of mass destruction, Israel launched an unprovoked missile attack on Iran on 13 June.
International law is failing. It has become a selective tool, weaponised against the weak and ignored by the powerful. The principles of sovereignty, justice, and human rights lie in tatters as the US-Israel-Europe axis champions their compulsive fixation on warfare, dominance, and aggression. Reason no longer applies. Appeals to humanity fall on deaf ears. The corpses of children, the wails of mothers, and the ruins of ancient cities are met with silence, or worse, justification.
Iran, like many in the Global South, has drawn its conclusions.
Civilians died. Hundreds were wounded. Iran responded with precision – as allowed under international law – but was met with more indiscriminate Israeli bombing. Once again, innocent lives are the collateral damage.
As the US-Israel-Europe axis enforces the logic of war, Iran has accepted reality. The only way to avoid destruction and the blatant move towards regime change is to resist. Diplomacy is worthless when the other side bargains in bad faith.
Peace is a fantasy when faced with a war machine addicted to dominance. Iran has no choice but to mobilise its full military capacity. The fire that was ignited in Ukraine has now expanded to West Asia. A new front has opened, and Iran will not fight it with half-measures.
This moment is a wake-up call for the Muslim world and, indeed, for all oppressed countries and for the anti-imperialist peoples of the world. As Ayatollah Khamenei warned, 'The Zionist regime won't bring security for any government.' Those states collaborating with Israel in hopes of American favour are deluding themselves. The West respects no ally; it respects only obedience. You are discarded or destroyed when you cease serving their interests.
The solution lies not in appeasement but in self-reliance. The only protection against bullying is economic, military, and cultural strength. Domestic manufacturing must rise. Regional alliances with proven partners must be deepened. Nations that have weathered sanctions, sabotage, and siege understand the value of loyalty. Those are the partnerships worth investing in.
The people of West Asia deserve peace. They deserve to preserve their history, teach their children without fear of bombs, and build a future rooted in dignity and sovereignty. But peace cannot come from pleading with aggressors. Sometimes, unfortunately, it must be sought through force.
I share a poem written by Gail Van Breda in honour of my son, Sebastian, who died in a motorbike accident in Simonstown on 4 June. I, in turn, dedicate it to the people of West Asia.
Let us not crash, too many deaths.
How can we breathe, when breath ended for our loved ones.
Let us not crash, too many voices gone silent, all at one time
Let us not to crash, because how much more can this body take.
We have to absorb so much.
Let us not crash, because the living must now adjust to this new reality
Let us not crash, let us not fall apart,
How do we keep all together to grieve, loud or in silence.
Let us not crash, where is our hope, what can we hold on to, what would make this time of mourning better, how are we expected to get through this!
Let us not crash, maybe join hands, to keep this life together
Let us not crash, let us not fall apart
Because this life is teaching us how to die.
We have been dying. The walking dead.
Let us not crash, because we know, this life is not forever
Cry, feel, let us not crash
Let us find comfort.
But I don't know from where, because nothing makes sense.
Death, you remind us of the dualism of life.
Death and life.
In our lived experiences, we cannot even live.
Everyone is in a fight for survival.
And when death opens its coffin, we die again.
We are always dying.
Our children, our parents, our loved ones, dying
Let us not crash, because how much more must this body, this physical earth life experience take.
* Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Defence Minister Motshekga approves SANDF Chief's controversial Iran trip
Defence Minister Motshekga approved General Maphwanya's trip to Iran under a 2016 MoU, but his controversial remarks in Tehran have drawn criticism and prompted calls for disciplinary action. Image: Parliament of SA The Department of Defence said that SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya had ministerial approval for his recent trip to Iran, but controversy over his political remarks made during the visit continues to escalate. Spokesperson Onicca Kwakwa, speaking on behalf of Minister Angie Motshekga, told IOL News: 'The minister did give permission to the SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya, like she does with all other international trips of the Chief of SANDF. ''The permission was granted for him to travel with the understanding that we have bilateral cooperation with Iran, and we were responding to an invitation that was made.' Kwakwa emphasised that the visit was in line with a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with Iran in 2016, which requires ongoing engagement between the defence forces of both countries. 'The purpose was really for the Chief of the SANDF to honour the invitation, but to continue to strengthen bilateral defence relations with the Iranian government,' she said. However, Kwakwa also confirmed that there would be a response to General Maphwanya's controversial comments made in Tehran. Reports indicate that during his visit to Tehran, General Maphwanya pledged 'common goals' with Iran, supported its Gaza position, and called for deeper strategic alignment—actions that allegedly exceeded his constitutional and professional mandate. She noted that Defence Minister Motshekga would meet with Maphwanya to raise concerns, and that President Cyril Ramaphosa, as Commander-in-Chief, would ultimately lead the process of deciding any consequences. 'The minister will have an engagement with the Chief and express how she feels about the utterances that were made, that were outside of our purview as Defence. The Commander-in-Chief will meet with General Maphwanya, so it will be led by the President in terms of course of action,' Kwakwa said. Meanwhile, the Democratic Alliance (DA) has demanded immediate disciplinary action, including a court-martial. DA MP and spokesperson on Defence and Military Veterans Chris Hattingh said Maphwanya's statements amounted to 'gross misconduct and a flagrant breach of the SANDF Code of Conduct.' Hattingh said the General's political pronouncements were unconstitutional and violated the SANDF's duty of neutrality. 'Such political statements are explicitly prohibited for serving officers, violate the SANDF's duty of political neutrality, and undermine the constitutional principle of civilian control over the military,' he said. Both DIRCO and the Defence Ministry have publicly distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, stressing they do not reflect official government policy. Still, the DA criticised what it called the Minister's 'deafening silence', accusing her of failing to uphold military discipline. At a media briefing on Thursday, presidential spokesperson Vincent said the comments were troubling. 'Yes, there is concern. At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions and conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill-advised,' he said. 'There is an expectation that the general should have been more circumspect with his comments, particularly those that touch on foreign policy — a domain strictly reserved for the President and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO). This is not within the purview of the military or senior military officers.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Magwenya noted that South Africa is currently undertaking a sensitive diplomatic effort to reset its relationship with the United States. 'We are in the process of managing a very delicate exercise of resetting political and diplomatic relations with the US, and more importantly, balancing the trade relationship in a manner that is mutually beneficial,' he said. 'It is not helpful when, during this process, senior government or military officials participate in visits and make statements that risk inflaming tensions. In managing the US relationship, we are also countering significant disinformation—from Washington and, sadly, from some quarters within our own country. It's crucial that the government speaks with one voice.' Hattingh warned that the comments were part of a broader pattern of 'foreign policy adventurism' that harms South Africa's international relationships. 'The only appropriate response is an immediate court-martial to restore discipline, reaffirm the SANDF's apolitical character, and send a clear message that no one, regardless of rank, is above the Constitution or the law,' Hattingh said. The DA said it would formally request that Motshekga direct the Adjutant General to initiate proceedings against Maphwanya without delay. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics

The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
Ramaphosa unaware of SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit
Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 5 hours ago The Presidency on Thursday night said President Cyril Ramaphosa was unaware of the 'ill-advised' visit by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) Chief Rudzani Maphwanywa to Iran. Addressing the media, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit. He stated that it was Defence Minister Angie Motshekga, not Ramaphosa, who approved Maphwanya's travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander-in-chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the president did not know.' Maphwanya was quoted by Iranian media as pledging 'common goals' with Iran and said his trip carried 'a political message'. Magwenya said there was a concern about Maphwanya's trip. 'At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions as well as conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill advised and more so the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes, which delve into the area of foreign policy that only the president, as well as the Department of International Relations, are responsible for.' Maphwanya's trip took place amid tensions between South Africa and the US President Donald Trump imposed 30% tariffs on South African goods, which were implemented this month. Magwenya said South Africa was in a process of resetting diplomatic and political relations with the United States, as well as balancing the trade relationship in a mutually beneficial manner between the two countries. 'Of resolving the relationship or resolving issues around the relationship with the US, you then have senior government or military officials in statements that will further inflame the situation. It is not helpful at all,' he said. Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and DIRCO were custodians of foreign policy. Magwenya said Ramaphosa will meet Maphwanya within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip. 'I can't say when that meeting will happen, but there will be an engagement between the president and the general. So it's still early to say what the outcome of that engagement will be.' He would not comment on the possible consequence, if there was to be any, for the defence's chief amid calls by the DA for him to be hauled before a court martial. 'It is also difficult to speak to. One must consider what constitutes the grave nature of charges or accusations that would require a court-martial ,' Magwenya said. Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa told Newzroom Afrika that he was unaware of the visit. 'I don't know what the purpose of his visit was. It is only the minister who will be in the know. If he did not ask for permission to leave from the minister, then he will have to swim in his stew,' he said. Holomisa also said such visits outside the country were authorised by Motshekga. 'The last word has been said by the Presidency, and the Presidency is the custodian of our foreign policy. There is nothing one can contest on that, but what we should be waiting for is either to hear the minister herself addressing this issue or alternatively wait for General Maphwanya to come back and tell the nation how he went there, what was the purpose.' He said since the matter was in the open, Maphwanya should be allowed to respond openly and be transparent about it. Holomisa added that it was too early to say what would happen to Maphwanya. 'If he went abroad without permission from the president or the minister, he will have to face the music and explain on what basis he had to utter such words, which are creating controversy,' he said. [email protected]


Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Journalism is not a crime' — SA journalists demand justice for slain colleagues in Gaza
In the wake of the targeted killing of six journalists in Gaza on Sunday, 10 August 2025, media workers around the world have held protests and vigils condemning the attacks on their colleagues in the occupied territory. Earlier this week, the world woke up to the news that six more journalists had been killed in an Israeli airstrike that targeted their media tent near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City on Sunday, 10 August. Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh were killed in the attack, alongside Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, who were both camera operators for the Middle Eastern publication. Mohammad Al-Khaldi, a local freelance reporter, and Moaman Aliwa, a camera assistant, were also killed in the airstrike. The Israeli military released a statement claiming it had targeted Al Sharif because he allegedly headed a Hamas cell and had a role in advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF (Israeli) troops. However, the Israeli government has not provided evidence to back up these claims. Since then, protests and vigils have taken place around the world, from London to Manila, in Cape Town and most recently in Johannesburg. Journalists, activists and members of civil society have gathered in public spaces to show support for Palestinians under siege in Gaza and pay tribute to the journalists and media workers who lost their lives documenting the crisis unfolding in the occupied territory. On Thursday, 14 August 2025, dozens of journalists gathered outside the Al Jazeera offices in Johannesburg for a vigil in honour of the slain journalists and the hundreds of others killed since 7 October 2023. The vigil was organised by Journalists Against Apartheid to denounce the targeted killing of journalists and call for increased solidarity among media workers across the world. During the vigil, both local and international journalists carried placards that read 'Journalism is not a crime', and wore Palestinian flags and keffiyeh scarves, which have become symbols of solidarity with the people in Gaza. The gathered media workers placed candles and flowers near pictures of al-Sharif and his slain colleagues and held a moment of silence to honour their sacrifice. 'These journalists are models to us, they have been working in the harshest conditions for the past 22 months with no break. Despite the lack of significant international actions, despite the genocide unfolding, the forced starvation, they keep reporting tirelessly on the horrors they are, themselves, victims of,' Journalists Against Apartheid said. Al-Sharif and his colleagues were among many Palestinian journalists who have been documenting the devastation wrought by Israel's attacks on the Gaza Strip in the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas assault on Israel that killed 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage. Since then, Israeli forces have killed more than 60,000 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza. This includes a large number of journalists working on the frontline. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), more than 190 journalists and media workers have been killed in the Israel-Gaza war from 2023 to 2025, more press members than were killed worldwide in the previous three years (2020 to 2022). Targeting of journalists Speaking to Daily Maverick, Mohammed Zahid Hassan, one of the organisers of the vigil, said that Sunday's airstrike marked a paradigm shift for many people around the world. 'Normally, when journalists die, it is like a freak accident, but when journalists are targeted, it changes things completely and dramatically. It is a worry and concern, especially for the rest of the journalists and citizen journalists who are in Gaza covering the story. It raises the question of whether they will be next,' Hassan said. To illustrate the rate at which media workers are being killed in the Gaza Strip, Hassan told the story of a Syrian-Palestinian journalist who wears a shirt with the picture of friends and colleagues who have been killed covering the genocide. 'Recently she changed the T-shirt, she's got a T-shirt of six colleagues, former Al Jazeera, who have been killed. We had a call earlier in the week, and she said she needs to change the T-shirt again to add more photos and more names to remember these people and who they were,' Hassan said. Qaanitah Hunter, a seasoned South African journalist and founder of the Debrief Network, said that the killing of Al-Sharif and the hundreds of other journalists since October 7 2023, should serve as a wake-up call not just for the media fraternity, but also for government officials and world leaders. 'These colleagues didn't just die; Israel killed our colleagues. They did not just die; it is part of a systematic effort to silence the voices of those there and those around the world, because when they are done there, it is going to continue,' said Hunter. Hunter added that it was important for journalists to call out their newsrooms when they perpetuated narratives primarily from the Israeli government that normalised the killing of journalists and the people living in Gaza. 'For two years, narratives led to this list getting longer. This list was half the size when we gathered 18 months ago,' Hunter said. Daily Maverick reached out to Al Jazeera but had not received a response at the time of publishing. In a statement issued on 11 August, Al Jazeera Media Network condemned the targeted assassination of its correspondents in Gaza, calling it a 'blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom'. 'This attack comes amid the catastrophic consequences of the ongoing Israeli assault on Gaza, which has seen the relentless slaughter of civilians, forced starvation, and the obliteration of entire communities,' stated Al Jazeera. 'As Al Jazeera Media Network bids farewell to yet another group of its finest journalists, who boldly and courageously documented the plight of Gaza and its people since the onset of the war, it holds the Israeli occupation forces and government responsible for deliberately targeting and assassinating its journalists.' 'Journalism is not a crime' Makhudu Sefara, chair of the South African National Editors' Forum (Sanef), encouraged South African journalists to participate in campaigns protesting against the killing of media workers in Gaza. 'The killing of Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues… is something to be abhorred, and is something that should be condemned in the strongest terms,' said Sefara. 'It's deplorable and correctly characterised as an evil assault on press freedom and human rights.' The targeting of journalists in Gaza placed them in a position where they may need to distance themselves from their families and even other journalists, for fear of loved ones and colleagues being caught in the crossfire, continued Sefara. 'It means as a journalist you must just be a lone ranger — working alone, staying alone. It's not possible. This industry, this craft, the work we do requires us to speak to people, to interact with people, to extract information from people. You can't live your life shielded or isolated from society because you must reflect what's happening in society,' he said. He added that 'journalism is not a crime'. Since 7 October 2023, no international journalists have been permitted entry to Gaza, other than a few controlled visits alongside Israeli soldiers that restricted independent reporting. Palestinian journalists working in the region have been the primary source of facts and stories about the effects of bombardments by Israeli forces and the growing threat of starvation among Gazans due to the blockade on aid. 'I think that Israel is not just mistakenly or without thought killing journalists in Gaza… I think the strategy is to eliminate journalists on the ground because when you do that, you are helping to deny the world factual accounts of what's happening. Israel can then unleash their own propaganda on the world… without any contradiction from journalists who are working in Palestine,' said Sefara. Sanef released a statement on 11 August expressing outrage at the ' continued assassination and brutal murder ' of journalists in Gaza. 'Sanef calls upon all relevant international bodies and governments to exert maximum pressure to ensure the immediate cessation of hostilities against journalists, guarantee their safety and hold accountable those responsible for these heinous crimes. The world relies on journalists to bear witness and report the truth, and their protection must be paramount,' it said. The 'crucial' role of international journalists Journalists in the international community have a crucial role to play in supporting their colleagues in Gaza, especially in the face of propaganda and misinformation aimed at discrediting their work, according to Sara Qudah, regional director for the Middle East and North Africa at the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). 'First and foremost, they must keep the stories of Gazan journalists alive, not only by amplifying their reporting, but by continuing to credit their work and name them even after they are silenced or killed. Too often, journalists in Gaza risk or lose their lives to report the truth, only to be discredited through unproven claims of militancy. Upholding their credibility is a powerful form of resistance to this erasure,' said Qudah. She also called on journalists to be persistent in advocating for unrestricted international media access to Gaza, adding that Israel's 'near-total ban' on foreign journalists entering Gaza since the start of the war had allowed a single narrative to dominate. 'Additionally, fact-checking and real-time debunking of propaganda is critical. When false narratives are pushed, particularly those accusing journalists of being militants without evidence, international journalists and newsrooms should actively work to verify information, challenge disinformation, and call out smears,' said Qudah. Before 7 October 2023, the Palestinian Journalists' Syndicate figures said that at least 1,500 journalists were working in Gaza. The Committee to Protect Journalists has no credible estimate of how many journalists are currently working, given that many citizen journalists are volunteering to cover the situation in areas of their residence. Qudah noted that there had been many hurdles to the Committee to Protect Journalists' documenting of the killing of journalists in Gaza. Investigators and international media were still blocked from entering the region, and there was no one to document and gather evidence in the aftermath of each strike 'We have to rely on media reports, which don't get into detail because killing is an around-the-clock story,' said Qudah. 'The grave reality of documenting attacks on the press in the Israel-Gaza war is that we have known of instances where whole families have been killed in strikes, leaving no one to contact to verify details of a journalist or media worker's case. Other times, we face challenges getting hold of the outlet, or remaining family members don't even have information about the outlets the journalists worked at.' The international media community had failed to advocate for Palestinian journalists amid the 'deadliest conflict on record for journalists', said Qudah. She condemned global news outlets that had 'largely remained silent or offered minimal condemnation' despite the unprecedented number of media workers killed. 'This lack of sustained outrage or demand for accountability has contributed to a climate of impunity. We have seen major networks rely on narratives shaped by Israeli statements while sidelining or discrediting local Palestinian reporting, with no or minimal verification,' said Qudah. 'Journalists in Gaza have not only faced extreme danger, but have also struggled to have their voices and experiences acknowledged as credible… At the very least, solidarity, visibility and consistent pressure for independent investigations should have been the norm, not the exception.' DM