logo
The calculated cruelty targeting the U.S. legal system

The calculated cruelty targeting the U.S. legal system

Yahoo14-04-2025

We come from different corners of the legal world: one of us a trial lawyer in Los Angeles, the other a federal judge in New Jersey. But we've both reached the same conclusion: The legal system in the United States is under attack, literally and figuratively. And if we don't speak out now, we may lose the very institution that holds democracy together.
That's why we created Speak Up for Justice, a national forum taking place Tuesday. It's not a conference. It's a line in the sand.
Political violence has becoming alarmingly frequent in recent years, with the arson at Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence this weekend just the latest example. The legal system has not been spared. For years, we've watched as threats against judges and attorneys became more common and more dangerous. Court rulings are dismissed as partisan. Law firms are harassed for doing their jobs. Judges are vilified and, in some cases, targeted with violence. We have both experienced the fear and vulnerability that comes with doing our work in this increasingly hostile climate.
In 2020, Esther's son, Daniel, was murdered by a man who came to their home with a gun, looking for her. The killer was enraged by the idea that judges could rule independently and wanted to send a message. That message cost Daniel his life.
We wish we could say that was the last time judges were personally threatened. But it wasn't.
Just this month, pizzas have been sent to judges' homes across the country with the message 'I know where you live.' Some recipients were the children of judges. In a horrifying twist, some of these deliveries were ordered using Daniel's name. It's not just cruelty, but its also calculated intimidation.
These are not isolated events. They are part of a broader pattern of fear-based tactics aimed at silencing legal professionals and undermining the independence of the courts. And they're working: many in the legal community are afraid to speak up.
We understand that fear. We've lived it. But if we let it silence us, we risk losing far more than our voices — we risk losing the very foundation of justice in this country.
Speak Up for Justice was born from that urgency. We wanted to create a space in which judges, lawyers, advocates and everyday citizens could come together and say: Enough. Enough with the threats. Enough with the harassment. Enough with letting fear dictate how justice is carried out. The rule of law still matters.
We know the legal system isn't perfect. We both work inside it every day and we've seen its flaws. But we've also seen the good it can do. When it functions freely and fairly, the legal system protects the most vulnerable, resolves disputes peacefully and keeps power in check. That only works if people believe that the courts are independent and that legal professionals can do their jobs without fearing for their lives — or their children's lives.
We're not asking for praise. We're asking for protection. We're asking for acknowledgment that legal professionals shouldn't be collateral damage in ideological or political battles.
Most of all, we're asking for people to care.
This is not just about judges and lawyers. It's about whether we as a nation still believe in justice — not as a buzzword, but as a process that must be defended and made accessible to all.
If you care about democracy, if you care about fairness, if you care about the kind of country we're leaving for the next generation — then we ask you to stand with us. Share our message. And commit to pushing back against the normalization of intimidation and violence in our legal system.
We didn't want to create this event. We needed to. And we need you, too.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro among leading candidates in 2028 presidential poll
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro among leading candidates in 2028 presidential poll

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro among leading candidates in 2028 presidential poll

(WHTM) – Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is among the top Democratic Party candidates for president in 2028, according to a new Emerson College Polling survey. The poll of over 400 Democratic Primary voters nationwide showed Shapiro with 7% support, tied for fourth among a crowded field of potential candidates. Josh Shapiro responds to 'noise' regarding potential 2028 presidential bid Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg led the poll with 16%, followed by former Vice President and 2024 presidential nominee Kamala Harris at 13%. California Governor Gavin Newsom came in third at 12%, and Shapiro tied with New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at 7%. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer each received between 3-5% support. Five candidates received 2% or less, and another 2% said they were undecided. Twenty-three percent of Democratic Party voters said they were undecided, with candidates unlikely to declare for at least two more years. Shapiro, a one-term governor in a critical swing state, has long been suggested to be a candidate for president. He was also a finalist to be Kamala Harris's running mate in 2024. House Democrats targeting 35 Republicans in 2026 Shapiro faces re-election in 2026 with Republican Congressman Dan Meuser, Treasurer Stacy Garrity, and State Senator Doug Mastriano all saying they are considering a run. A plurality of Republican primary voters surveyed in the Emerson College poll (46%) support Vice President JD Vance to succeed President Donald Trump in 2028. Secretary of State Marco Rubio received 12% support, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis received 9%, and 5% said they'd support Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ECP_National_6 Methodology The Emerson College Polling national survey was conducted June 24-25, 2025. The sample of U.S. active registered voters, n=1,000, has a credibility interval, similar to a poll's margin of error (MOE), of +/- 3 percentage points. The data sets were weighted by gender, education, race, age, party registration, and region based on U.S. Census parameters and voter file data. It is important to remember that subsets based on demographics, such as gender, age, education, and race/ethnicity, carry with them higher credibility intervals, as the sample size is reduced. Survey results should be understood within the poll's range of scores, and with a confidence interval of 95% a poll will fall outside the range of scores 1 in 20 times. Data was collected by contacting a voter list of cellphones via MMS-to-web text (list provided by Aristotle) and an online panel of voters provided by CINT. Panel responses were matched to the Aristotle voter file using respondents' full name and ZIP code. The survey was offered in English. All questions asked in this survey with the exact wording, along with full results, demographics, and cross tabulations can be found under Full Results. This survey was funded by Emerson College. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Former Supreme Court Justice Warns Freedom and Democracy 'At Risk'
Former Supreme Court Justice Warns Freedom and Democracy 'At Risk'

Newsweek

time17 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Former Supreme Court Justice Warns Freedom and Democracy 'At Risk'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Amid an uptick in threats to judges, former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy warned that the current hostility in America's political discourse imperils freedom and democracy. Why It Matters Rhetoric by President Donald Trump, including calls on social media for the impeachment of judges who have ruled against his policies, has triggered urgent warnings from current and former members of the Supreme Court about the stability of the country's legal systems. These attacks, which have included labeling judges as "troublemakers" and "monsters" in public posts, have raised concerns about undermining the independence of the judiciary, an institution considered essential to protecting American democracy. Current Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, a Republican appointee, also referenced the public attacks on judges in a rare statement, saying, "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose." What To Know In a virtual forum on Thursday for the event "Speak Up for Justice," with other judges from around the world, Kennedy said that "We should be concerned in this country about, as I've already indicated, the tone of our political discourse," according to Reuters. The Ronald Reagan appointee continued: "Identity politics are used so that a person is characterized by his or her partisan affiliation. That's not what democracy and civil discourse is about." Kennedy noted that the rest of the world seems to monitor how things operate in the United States "to see what democracy ought to be." "And if they see a hostile, fractious discourse, if they see a discourse that uses identity politics rather than to talk about issues, democracy is at risk," the retired justice said. "Freedom is at risk." He urged for judges and their families to have protection, and said they are best protected "when the public and our nation realize how central they are to our discourse." Kennedy did not mention Trump by name during the event, Reuters reports. Former U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy speaks at the World Law Congress at U.N. headquarters in New York City on July 21, 2023. (Photo by YUKI IWAMURA/AFP via Getty Images) Former U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy speaks at the World Law Congress at U.N. headquarters in New York City on July 21, 2023. (Photo by YUKI IWAMURA/AFP via Getty Images) Trump has sharply criticized jurists who have ruled against his administration's key policies—most notably U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg—whom he described as a "troublemaker and agitator" while calling for his impeachment after the judge blocked usage of the Alien Enemies Act for deportation flights. According to Politico, U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, whose family was targeted in a fatal attack in 2020, noted during the same virtual event that the U.S. Marshals Service has recorded over 400 threats against federal judges so far this year. Salas attributed the rise to disinformation and inflammatory rhetoric "from the top down." What People Are Saying Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in May on threats to judges, in part: "The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law." Trump, during his 100th day in office speech in Michigan, in part: "We cannot allow a handful of communist radical left judges to obstruct the enforcement of our laws and assume the duties that belong solely to the president of the United States. Judges are trying to take away the power given to the president to keep our country safe ... it's not a good thing." Former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg, to Newsweek when asked if Kennedy's comments were a poke at Trump: "It's clearly a poke at the President, especially because Justice Kennedy's exit from the Court allowed Trump to shift it to the right with the appointment of Justice [Brett] Kavanaugh." What Happens Next As threats continue to be tracked by law enforcement, congressional debate and judicial responses are expected to intensify as the Supreme Court approaches the conclusion of its current term.

Retired Justice Kennedy urges civil political discourse at legal forum
Retired Justice Kennedy urges civil political discourse at legal forum

The Hill

timea day ago

  • The Hill

Retired Justice Kennedy urges civil political discourse at legal forum

Retired Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on Thursday urged a more civil American discourse modeled after judges at a legal forum established to defend the judiciary against attacks. 'We should be concerned in this country about the tone of our political discourse,' Kennedy said during a virtual event held by the nonpartisan group Speak Up for Justice. The retired justice suggested that identity politics, or characterizing a person by their partisan affiliation, is not conducive to democracy and civil discourse. Treating others with decency and respecting their dignity is, he said. 'This is what judges do, and this is why judges are of central importance,' Kennedy added. The virtual event marked a rare public appearance for the former justice, who retired from the bench in 2018. His remarks come as the courts have faced a barrage of attacks from President Trump and his supporters, as his sweeping second-term agenda is delayed by legal challenges. Though Kennedy did not directly mention Trump, he focused on America's fragile perception as a role model for other countries, particularly as conflict has roiled the Middle East. 'If they see a hostile fractious discourse, if they see a discourse that uses identity politics rather than to talk about issues, democracy is at risk; freedom is at risk,' Kennedy said. The former justice also briefly touched on threats against judges, which have drastically risen since Trump returned to the White House. The New York Times reported in May that 162 judges received threats in the six weeks after March 1, coinciding with harsh rhetoric criticizing judges who have ruled against the administration. In the five months prior, only 80 judges had received threats, the Times found. Kennedy said that 'another way' judges can protect themselves is by 'showing they are engaged day in and day out of resolving disputes in a civil, decent way.' But ultimately, all Americans' goal should be to 'preserve freedom and enhance freedom' for generations to come, he said. 'We must always say no to tyranny and yes to truth,' the retired justice added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store