logo
With peace plan faltering, Asean calls two meetings on Myanmar conflict next week

With peace plan faltering, Asean calls two meetings on Myanmar conflict next week

Malay Mail21-05-2025
JAKARTA, May 21 — The South-east Asian grouping Asean will hold two meetings specifically on the civil war in army-ruled Myanmar ahead of its summit next week, the bloc's secretary-general said today, in a bid to advance its faltering peace effort.
The 10-member Association of South-east Asian Nations has repeatedly called for a halt in hostilities between rebels and the ruling junta that have displaced an estimated 3.5 million people since the military overthrew the elected civilian government of Aung San Suu Kyi in 2021.
Asean's peace proposal that same year, the 'Five Point Consensus', which calls for an end to violence and dialogue between warring groups, has made barely any progress, resulting in Myanmar's ruling generals being barred from its summits.
'This is something new that will specifically focus on Myanmar, that they will take no other issue,' Asean Secretary-General Kao Kim Hourn told Reuters in an interview, referring to the two meetings in Malaysia on Myanmar.
Kao Kim Hourn did not specify the issues up for discussion or if there were new proposals to be made.
He said the first meeting would involve the current, previous and next Asean chair nations, namely Malaysia, Laos and Philippines, respectively. The second gathering would be of the bloc's foreign ministers, he said.
Once seen as a promising frontier market following a decade of economic reform and tentative democracy, the 2021 coup plunged Myanmar into chaos, with the military struggling to govern and battling to contain a widening rebellion by ethnic minority rebels and a pro-democracy resistance movement.
The military has been accused of widespread atrocities, including air strikes on civilian areas, allegations it has rejected as western disinformation.
'We all are too impatient'
Asked about the lack of progress on Myanmar, Kao Kim Hourn defended Asean's plan, describing it as 'beautiful', but urged all stakeholders to implement it.
'It will be presumptuous for any party to expect a quick fix to this issue. For us, we stay engaged,' he said. 'But it may take time. You see, the thing is that we all are too impatient.'
'And as long as we bring down, you know, large-scale fighting to a smaller one, as long as we can bring people to the table, that's progress.'
He declined to comment on the military launching multiple airstrikes and artillery assaults, as reported by Reuters, despite a ceasefire after a major earthquake in March. Kao Kim Hourn said it was unclear who had violated the ceasefire.
He also reiterated Asean countries and China were committed to finalising a protracted code of conduct for the hotly disputed South China Sea by next year, stressing the need to support that effort by maintaining peace.
'What is important for us in this region, number one, is to de-escalate the tensions and to prevent any possible risk of miscalculation, misperception that gives rise to unnecessary tension and maybe conflict,' Kao Kim Hourn said.
He also cited good progress towards admitting an 11th member to Asean — East Timor — which he said had fulfilled a number of required criteria.
'More likely, it could take place maybe later this year,' he said. — Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deputy minister: Boeing aircraft deal won't push up national debt
Deputy minister: Boeing aircraft deal won't push up national debt

Malay Mail

time34 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Deputy minister: Boeing aircraft deal won't push up national debt

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 19 — The second phase purchase of Boeing aircraft valued at US$9.5 billion (US$1 = RM4.22) will not impact Malaysia's debt levels nor affect its fiscal deficit, said Deputy Finance Minister Lim Hui Ying. Lim said that the aircraft purchase is part of the plan outlined in the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). 'At present, everything is within our expectations,' Lim said during a question-and-answer session in the Dewan Rakyat today. She was responding to a supplementary question from Datuk Nik Muhammad Zawawi Salleh (PN-Pasir Puteh), who asked about the government's contingency measures to control the national debt burden after Malaysia committed to buying aircraft from the United States (US. In response to Nik Muhammad's initial question about the government's justification for allowing the national debt to remain high amid geopolitical uncertainties, Lim stated that the increase in government debt is due to the need to finance the fiscal deficit to cover development expenditures (DE). 'This financing will directly increase the government's debt level as long as the government's financial position remains in deficit,' she elaborated. Lim also clarified that the government does not rely solely on debt to finance DE, which is also funded by various other sources such as tax revenue and non-tax income. 'To date, the government has never borrowed beyond the statutory limits allowed under the relevant federal government debt laws. As of the end of June 2025, Malaysia Government Securities, Government Investment Issues, and Malaysian Islamic Treasury Bills stand at 62.7 per cent, which does not exceed the 65 per cent Gross Domestic Product (GDP) limit set under Act 637 and Act 275,' she said. Lim added that offshore borrowings amounted to RM22.8 billion and remained below the RM35 billion limit set under Act 403, while Malaysian Treasury Bills totalling RM2 billion are within the RM10 billion limit set under Act 188. — Bernama

Malaysia still criminalises ‘grossly offensive' online remarks, but here's why today's ruling on ‘offensive' speech was lauded
Malaysia still criminalises ‘grossly offensive' online remarks, but here's why today's ruling on ‘offensive' speech was lauded

Malay Mail

time34 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Malaysia still criminalises ‘grossly offensive' online remarks, but here's why today's ruling on ‘offensive' speech was lauded

The Court of Appeal's decision today only makes it no longer a crime in Malaysia to make 'offensive' online remarks, but it does not affect a newer version of the law, which was updated this year to criminalise 'grossly offensive' online remarks. But the Court of Appeal's decision today was still seen as 'progressive' as it that criminalising 'offensive' online remarks goes against the constitutional right to freedom of speech. ⁠Instead of trying to 'shoot the messenger', the Court of Appeal said the authorities should have investigated activist Heidy Quah's allegations in a Facebook post to see whether they were true or not. PUTRAJAYA, Aug 19 — The Court of Appeal's decision today which ruled that offensive online remarks made with intention to annoy another person is no longer a crime in Malaysia has been praised for being progressive and good for democracy. After activist Heidy Quah won her constitutional challenge against the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in the Communications and Multimedia Act's Section 233, her lawyer New Sin Yew said the decision vindicates his client and civil society who argued that both words are problematic and inconsistent with the right to freedom of speech. 'So it's a good decision and I think it's an early Merdeka celebration for many of us,' he told reporters, also saying it was a 'progressive' decision. Noting that the Malaysian government had recently amended Section 233 to replace the word 'offensive' with the word 'grossly offensive', New said this means the government also recognises the problems with the word 'offensive'. ''Offensive' is a much lower standard compared to 'grossly offensive', but that's not to say that 'grossly offensive' is not in itself problematic, it still is,' he said. New said the older version of Section 233 — which criminalises 'offensive' online remarks —- had been abused and was used against political dissidents, activists, civil society and human rights defenders, and that today's court decision only affects this older version. As for the new version of Section 233 — which criminalises 'grossly offensive' online remarks, New said civil society is expected to closely watch and observe how the government uses it. The Malaysian government had in December 2024 started the process in Parliament to amend Section 233, and this new version became law and took effect on February 11, 2025. The new version of Section 233 replaced the word 'offensive' with 'grossly offensive', but did not modify the word 'annoy'. Section 233 now also has higher penalties for making such online remarks, including increasing the original penalty (maximum RM50,000 fine or maximum one-year jail term or both) to a heavier punishment (maximum RM500,000 fine or maximum two-year jail term or both). Commenting on today's decision, Quah told reporters that the decision would mean a lot for democracy in Malaysia. 'For the longest time, we realise that the civil society space has been working in a place of fear, where they may get arrested or charged for speaking truth to power,' she said. 'I think it's really important that Malaysians are given the place to speak out against injustice, because as what the court has said, when we raise a concern — for example about issues of conditions of detention centres — you know it's really important then that we investigate the allegation and not the whistleblower,' she said, stressing the importance of freedom of speech for Malaysia to progress. Quah was previously charged in July 2021 under Section 233 for making a Facebook post that was alleged to be offensive with the intent to annoy, with her remarks in June 2020 revolving around matters such as alleged conditions in immigration detention centres amid the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2022, Quah was given a 'discharge not amounting to acquittal' (DNAA), which meant she was released from the charge but could be charged under the same law again. Today, the Court of Appeal noted that Quah's Facebook post should have prompted an investigation into her allegation, instead of being turned into a 'shoot the messenger' situation. 'The message communicated by the appellant would ordinarily sound the alarm for a full and thorough investigation into what is alleged, rather than an attempt to 'shoot the messenger',' judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng said when reading out the broad grounds of the court's unanimous ruling. The judge said a message cannot be offensive with intent to annoy if it was found to be true, and that there are already other existing laws to charge Quah if her message was found to be false. The judge later said treating the truth as offensive and annoying would risk 'rewarding opacity and cover-up rather than promoting transparency and accountability'. Ultimately, the Court of Appeal's decision to invalidate the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 is based on these four main legal reasons:

Overnight Russian attack shows Putin does not want peace, says Ukrainian mayor
Overnight Russian attack shows Putin does not want peace, says Ukrainian mayor

Malay Mail

time34 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Overnight Russian attack shows Putin does not want peace, says Ukrainian mayor

KYIV, Aug 19 — Russia attacked the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk with drones overnight, the city mayor said today, calling it a sign that Russian President Vladimir Putin does not want peace. The reported assault came a day after US President Donald Trump met European leaders and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington, saying the US would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. After the meeting yesterday, Trump said he telephoned Putin and had begun arranging a meeting between Putin and Zelensky, to be followed by a trilateral summit among the three presidents, with the aim of reaching a peace deal. 'At the very same time when Putin was assuring Trump over the phone that he seeks peace, and when President Volodymyr Zelensky was holding talks at the White House with European leaders about a just peace, Putin's army launched yet another massive attack on Kremenchuk,' Vitalii Maletskyi, mayor of the city that lies in the Poltava region, said on Telegram. 'Once again, the world has seen that Putin does not want peace — he wants to destroy Ukraine,' he said. The overnight attack on Ukraine was the largest so far in August, with Russia launching 270 drones and 10 missiles, according to the Ukrainian air force. Maletskyi said scores of blasts shook the city, targeting energy and transport infrastructure, leaving hundreds of people in the Poltava region without power. The Ukrainian air force said it downed 230 drones and six missiles but recorded strikes at 16 locations. Poltava Governor Volodymyr Kohut said that the attack damaged administrative buildings of a local energy infrastructure operation. 'Fortunately, there were no casualties,' Kohut said on Telegram. He said that in the Lubny district nearly 1,500 residential and 119 commercial customers were left without power. A morning drone attack by Russia on Ukraine's Chernihiv region also damaged infrastructure with power cuts reported in parts of the northern region, according to Governor Viacheslav Chaus. There was no immediate comment from Russia. Both sides have been targeting infrastructure key to the military in their strikes during the war on each other's territory, including energy infrastructure. Russia said today that Ukraine's overnight drone attack sparked fires at an oil refinery and a hospital roof in the Volgograd region. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store