logo
Still doing the work: How DEI leaders are adapting to political pushback

Still doing the work: How DEI leaders are adapting to political pushback

Technical.ly2 days ago

As national pressure mounts against DEI programs, some organizations are removing terminology, rewriting job descriptions or folding initiatives altogether.
But others are adapting, embedding DEI principles throughout their work and refusing to walk away.
Experts addressed these themes during 'What Happens to DEI Strategies Now?,' a panel at the 2025 Technical.ly Builders Conference.
Sylvie Gallier Howard, founder of Equitable Cities Collaborative, said she's seen organizations across sectors retreat from public-facing DEI branding.
Some, particularly those reliant on federal funding, have even received direct warnings: Don't list DEI as a line item, or risk losing support.
'It's this weaponization of DEI,' Howard said. 'A lot of people I know are saying they're scrubbing those words from their websites, from their literature, because they're afraid of losing funding or becoming a target. They consistently tell me, 'We're still doing the work, we're just not using the words publicly.''
That rebranding might mean swapping language on websites or external communications, explained Alyssa Vasquez from the professional training firm Cultured Enuf. Just because the wording changes doesn't mean the mission is different, she said. These moves are made out of necessity and fear of losing funding from the federal government.
Vasquez emphasized that these shifts don't have to signal a retreat — but leaders must be intentional in how they implement work policies.
'My hope is that [companies] shift from 'token' to real strategies integrated into talent management. We help them integrate real questions in interviews about experiences: 'Have you been led by a woman of color? Have you had a Black woman as a supervisor?'' Vasquez said. 'Because if [the answer is] never, that may cause issues. Focusing on day-to-day, making it about competencies, not token hires — that's the direction I'd like to see.'
Embedding DEI across operations
Vasquez and Howard shared how they're navigating this moment with their own businesses. Howard, whose firm includes 'equitable' in the name, said she's had potential clients question whether she'll rebrand. Even if she won't, she admits that not everyone can make such a firm choice.
'What's the opposite of 'diversity, equity, inclusion?' 'Homogeneity, inequity, exclusion?'' she said. 'Is that what we want? I think we who can stand up, must. But some can't. We have to acknowledge that.'
Vasquez, who works nationally across sectors, said she chooses her clients carefully. In early conversations, she's upfront about the kind of work she does — and if an organization can't integrate with it, she walks away. But she acknowledged not everyone has that ability.
'If we're not aligned, that's a red flag,' Vasquez said. 'If you have the privilege, you can do that. Not everyone does.'
Howard noted that in her economic development experience, strategies like supplier diversity or equitable small business funding are being reframed around geography, income or disinvestment — still equity, just with a different lens, she said.
There are organizations that are doubling down. Vasquez praised the School District of Lancaster as an example of leadership in DEI.
'Maybe they shift job titles, but they're not retreating from the actual pillar of equity. That's real leadership,' she said.
If DEI is seen as a standalone program — or a quick post-2020 fix — it will always be vulnerable to political shifts. But when it's baked into operations, it becomes part of how an organization functions and survives. Vasquez cited the interview process and retention strategy as examples of where this integration matters.
It's also important organizations and companies work together toward these goals.
'A big part of this is forming coalitions for advocacy,' Howard said, 'to do it carefully but not give up.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The other approach to ‘government efficiency': How digital teams serve the public
The other approach to ‘government efficiency': How digital teams serve the public

Technical.ly

time13 hours ago

  • Technical.ly

The other approach to ‘government efficiency': How digital teams serve the public

Government efficiency is a hot-button issue this year, with masses of federal workers having lost their jobs in its name. But when it comes to state and local government, efficiency-based reform is all about making things work smoothly, with the help of tech. 'The Other Approach to Government Efficiency,' a session at the 2025 Builders Conference, featured two civic innovators: Eliza Erickson, who leads permit reform efforts in Pennsylvania's Governor's Office, and Max Gigle, a digital product leader in Connecticut. Moderated by Kaela Roeder, the panel broke down how government can better serve people, even when the results don't make headlines. 'In some ways, government is 15 years behind the arc of technology and innovation in the private sector,' Erickson said. 'But we're recognizing more and more the need for real, high-quality technology in the public sector — and we're finding ways to invest in that talent.' Rather than focus on flashy apps or front-facing dashboards, both panelists stressed that the most meaningful work starts much deeper in the process. Gigle, who leads digital efforts for Connecticut's Department of Administrative Services, described how his team redesigned the state's approach to business licensing. What seemed like a simple task — building a new website — actually required collaboration with more than a dozen agencies, deep process mapping and a culture change in how services are delivered. 'If someone said, 'We made a website and it took eight months,' I think most folks in the tech world would be like, 'What in the world are you doing with their money?'' Gigle said. 'But in order to really get to the core of the challenge, it took a lot of time to ask questions of what's important here, how do we work across a ton of different stakeholders that have different interests, how do we centralize brands and work through tough challenges?' In Connecticut, that meant understanding that the real barrier to entrepreneurship wasn't the form itself, but the knowledge gap around what to do when, and with whom. Sustainability over splash Both Gigle and Erickson emphasized that true government innovation is measured in staying power, not just short-term wins. Erickson stressed that at its core, 'successful government innovation … has to be sustainable,' so it lives on after the specific tech team that led that initiative leaves. Her own team builds from the ground up, empowering the frontline staff who will be there long after an administration changes, making sure they have ownership over new systems and practices. Making lasting change also means being honest about progress: If a new permit system isn't fully rolled out yet, talk about the education campaigns, the translation work and the user testing that's already reshaping the process. Those behind-the-scenes steps may not sound exciting, but they're often the reason a teacher can get certified faster, or a barber can open shop a few months earlier. Narrative, Erikson said, is also important. Government work is often invisible unless it fails, so part of the challenge is sharing success in ways people actually understand, whether that's via TikTok, community meetings or just clearer metrics. She pointed to Pennsylvania's push to reframe permit reform as a tangible quality-of-life issue, not just red tape. 'If you are a teacher looking for a job and it takes you six months to get your certification, that's six months that you're not allowed to work,' Erickson said. 'If we shorten that time to two months, that's four more months of income. That is really impactful.' Inviting more people into public service Civic technologists — a group that once meant mostly IT staff — now include designers, product managers, data analysts and software engineers. Both panelists encouraged students and career switchers to consider public-sector roles, even if they've never seen themselves in government. 'If you care about your city and your state, get involved,' Gigle said. 'Government … can look toxic on the surface. It's not sexy every single day, but, I promise you, the outcome is fantastic.' The skills you build in government — navigating complexity, managing risk, scaling services — translate directly into roles in big tech and beyond, he added. Erickson agreed, especially when it comes to the early career opportunity. 'You can put your skills to positive use in such a tangible way,' she said. 'You do two or three years in the public sector, and it puts you on a really impactful career path.' What innovation really looks like During a wide-ranging Q&A, attendees asked about risk, disruption and why the government seems so slow to change. Gigle offered a clear-eyed take: The real risk is not changing. And disruption can come in many forms, from COVID's sudden shift to remote service delivery to a renewed focus on equity and inclusion within government ranks. Erickson noted that meaningful change often comes from within, when agencies empower the right people to ask why. 'A lot of the bureaucracy and the red tape that exists in government is because someone at some point really believed that it was the right thing,' she said. 'The problem is that we just build bureaucracy and regulations on top of bureaucracy and regulations without unpacking what's been done.'

How startup leaders are navigating the new normal of remote and hybrid work
How startup leaders are navigating the new normal of remote and hybrid work

Technical.ly

time14 hours ago

  • Technical.ly

How startup leaders are navigating the new normal of remote and hybrid work

Remote work may be here to stay, but that doesn't mean startup leaders have figured it all out. One session at the 2025 Builders Conference tackled the question of how startups can balance the flexibility of remote work with the need for culture-building and engagement. Titled 'Remote vs. Hybrid for Startups: Recruiting & Ecosystem Engagement,' the session featured Raymond Magee of BloomCatch, Jake Stein of Common Paper and Dan Winston of BalancedWork, with Tally Wolff of Arlington Economic Development moderating. With a mix of fully remote, hybrid and in-person experiences among them, the panelists offered candid insights about what's working — and what isn't — in this evolving era of work. 'There are things we got for free in person that we didn't appreciate until they were gone,' Stein said. 'Bumping into each other, building rapport so you give someone the benefit of the doubt on an ambiguous Slack.' One key theme was how founders engage with their local startup ecosystems. Magee pointed to the conference itself as a powerful example: In-person gatherings offer value that remote work can't replicate, but the fact that sessions are recorded makes them more accessible to founders who can't make the trip. 'If you can't physically drive … three hours to get this knowledge firsthand and in person, the ability to watch the recording is key,' Magee said. 'Hybrid and remote work have changed how we engage in conferences and with the local community.' Winston's company, BalancedWork, helps organizations make data-informed decisions about when to meet in person or remotely using calendar data to analyze meetings. The tech then recommends which setup is best suited for the situation. He also noted that local innovation groups like incubators have become less about daily coworking and more about regular, intentional meetups. 'The day-to-day 'we're just sitting next to each other' isn't happening as much,' Winston said. 'Something is different — maybe lost. Whether that matters varies case by case.' Designing new norms, not chasing old ones Though the founders praised the benefits of flexibility, including being able to hire specialized talent from across the country, they were candid about the downsides of distributed teams. But Stein from Common Paper is finding ways to remotely recreate experiences that often take place in person. 'Junior folks learn by eavesdropping; remote loses that,' Stein said. To fill that gap, Common Paper has implemented recurring 'scheduled unscheduled' Zoom calls — intentionally agenda-less spaces where employees can talk about anything from dogs to deal flows. Magee said he regularly meets with his junior team members, often daily, for their first few months and starts every meeting with 5 to 10 minutes of personal small talk because it deepens relationships. 'Once they see you invest in them on their terms,' he said, 'they'll work hard for you.' Leadership behavior sets the tone, Winston noted, and actions matter more than words. 'People sense how a leader feels,' he explained. Ultimately, each panelist stressed that remote and hybrid work can be effective — but only with intention. 'Remote work is a privilege, not a right,' Magee said. 'It's on both the employer and the employee to make it work.' Asked whether they would recommend a remote job to a recent college graduate, the panelists agreed that in-person experience offers value early in a career. 'Take an in‐person one,' Winston said. 'We humans absorb more than screens can show.'

Still doing the work: How DEI leaders are adapting to political pushback
Still doing the work: How DEI leaders are adapting to political pushback

Technical.ly

time2 days ago

  • Technical.ly

Still doing the work: How DEI leaders are adapting to political pushback

As national pressure mounts against DEI programs, some organizations are removing terminology, rewriting job descriptions or folding initiatives altogether. But others are adapting, embedding DEI principles throughout their work and refusing to walk away. Experts addressed these themes during 'What Happens to DEI Strategies Now?,' a panel at the 2025 Builders Conference. Sylvie Gallier Howard, founder of Equitable Cities Collaborative, said she's seen organizations across sectors retreat from public-facing DEI branding. Some, particularly those reliant on federal funding, have even received direct warnings: Don't list DEI as a line item, or risk losing support. 'It's this weaponization of DEI,' Howard said. 'A lot of people I know are saying they're scrubbing those words from their websites, from their literature, because they're afraid of losing funding or becoming a target. They consistently tell me, 'We're still doing the work, we're just not using the words publicly.'' That rebranding might mean swapping language on websites or external communications, explained Alyssa Vasquez from the professional training firm Cultured Enuf. Just because the wording changes doesn't mean the mission is different, she said. These moves are made out of necessity and fear of losing funding from the federal government. Vasquez emphasized that these shifts don't have to signal a retreat — but leaders must be intentional in how they implement work policies. 'My hope is that [companies] shift from 'token' to real strategies integrated into talent management. We help them integrate real questions in interviews about experiences: 'Have you been led by a woman of color? Have you had a Black woman as a supervisor?'' Vasquez said. 'Because if [the answer is] never, that may cause issues. Focusing on day-to-day, making it about competencies, not token hires — that's the direction I'd like to see.' Embedding DEI across operations Vasquez and Howard shared how they're navigating this moment with their own businesses. Howard, whose firm includes 'equitable' in the name, said she's had potential clients question whether she'll rebrand. Even if she won't, she admits that not everyone can make such a firm choice. 'What's the opposite of 'diversity, equity, inclusion?' 'Homogeneity, inequity, exclusion?'' she said. 'Is that what we want? I think we who can stand up, must. But some can't. We have to acknowledge that.' Vasquez, who works nationally across sectors, said she chooses her clients carefully. In early conversations, she's upfront about the kind of work she does — and if an organization can't integrate with it, she walks away. But she acknowledged not everyone has that ability. 'If we're not aligned, that's a red flag,' Vasquez said. 'If you have the privilege, you can do that. Not everyone does.' Howard noted that in her economic development experience, strategies like supplier diversity or equitable small business funding are being reframed around geography, income or disinvestment — still equity, just with a different lens, she said. There are organizations that are doubling down. Vasquez praised the School District of Lancaster as an example of leadership in DEI. 'Maybe they shift job titles, but they're not retreating from the actual pillar of equity. That's real leadership,' she said. If DEI is seen as a standalone program — or a quick post-2020 fix — it will always be vulnerable to political shifts. But when it's baked into operations, it becomes part of how an organization functions and survives. Vasquez cited the interview process and retention strategy as examples of where this integration matters. It's also important organizations and companies work together toward these goals. 'A big part of this is forming coalitions for advocacy,' Howard said, 'to do it carefully but not give up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store