logo
"You can't get rid of us...": How Microsoft employee bypassed 'Palestine block' to send email to thousands of employees in protest

"You can't get rid of us...": How Microsoft employee bypassed 'Palestine block' to send email to thousands of employees in protest

Time of India26-05-2025

FILE - Microsoft Chairman and CEO Satya Nadella speaks during a presentation of the company's AI assistant, Copilot, and 50th Anniversary celebration at Microsoft headquarters, in Redmond, Wash., April 4, 2025. (AP Photo/Jason Redmond, File)
A
Microsoft
employee successfully circumvented the company's controversial email restrictions to send a mass protest message to thousands of colleagues, escalating tensions over the tech giant's contracts with the Israeli government.
Nisreen Jaradat
, a senior tech support engineer at Microsoft, sent the email on May 23rd with the subject line "You can't get rid of us," according to a copy obtained by The Verge. The message came just one day after Microsoft implemented blocks on emails containing words like "
Palestine
," "Gaza," and "Genocide" in subject lines or message bodies. It remains unclear exactly how Jaradat circumvented the technical restrictions, though her email specifically noted that Microsoft leadership was "aware that this 'short term solution' is easily bypassable."
"As a Palestinian worker, I am fed up with the way our people have been treated by this company," Jaradat wrote in her email to staff. "I am sending this email as a message to Microsoft leaders: the cost of trying to silence all voices that dare to humanize Palestinians is far higher than simply listening to the concerns of your employees."
Protests escalate during Microsoft Build conference
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Nagelpilz-Innovation: Dieses Lasergerät ist ein Wunder
Heilratgeber
Weiterlesen
Undo
The email block was instituted during Microsoft's Build developer conference, which became the focal point for multiple protest actions. Employee
Joe Lopez
disrupted the opening keynote on May 19th before being fired the same day. A Palestinian tech worker then interrupted Microsoft's CoreAI head during his presentation, followed by additional disruptions from former employees.
Microsoft spokesperson Frank Shaw defended the email restrictions, stating that mass emailing colleagues "about any topic not related to work is not appropriate." The company claims it has "taken measures to try and reduce those emails to those that have not opted in."
Hossam Nasr
, an organizer with the No Azure for
Apartheid
(NOAA) group, called Microsoft's word blocking "particularly egregious," arguing that employees speaking through "appropriate channels" are consistently "silenced or ignored."
The protests follow Microsoft's acknowledgment of its cloud and AI contracts with Israel, though the company maintains an internal review found "no evidence" its tools were used to harm Gaza civilians.
Read the full email from the Palestinian employee
Yesterday, Microsoft chose to utterly and completely discriminate against an entire nation, an entire people, and an entire community by blocking all employees from sending any outbound email containing the words "Palestine", "Gaza", "genocide", or "apartheid". Microsoft leaders justified this blatant censorship by saying it was to prevent you from receiving emails like the email that you are reading right now. Even though Microsoft SLT are aware that this "short term solution" is easily bypassable, as this email clearly proves, Microsoft still doubled down, insisted on not rolling back the policy, and decided to continue targeting and repressing their Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and allied workers. They refused to revoke this censorship tactic, despite its potential illegality, dozens of employees expressing how racist of a decision it was, and even leaders admitting they see how it can be perceived as discriminatory and targeted. This further proves how little Microsoft values Palestinian lives and Palestinian suffering.
As a Palestinian worker, I am fed up with the way our people have been treated by this company. I am sending this email as a message to Microsoft leaders: the cost of trying to silence all voices that dare to humanize Palestinians is far higher than simply listening to the concerns of your employees. Had this useless and discriminatory policy been revoked, as I tried to request numerous times through so-called "proper channels"[1][2], I would not be sending you all this email.
Despite claiming to have "heard concerns from our employees and the public regarding Microsoft technologies used by the Israeli military to target civilians or cause harm in the conflict in Gaza" in a statement riddled with lies, admissions, and absurd justifications, Microsoft has shown that they are utterly uninterested in hearing what we have to say.
Microsoft claims that they "provide many avenues for all voices to be heard". However, whenever we try to discuss anything substantial about divesting from genocide in the "approved channels", workers are retaliated against, doxxed, or silenced. Microsoft has deleted relevant employee questions in AMAs with executives and shut down Viva Engage posts in dedicated channels for asking SLT questions. Managers have warned outspoken directs to stay quiet and have even openly retaliated against them. When my community tries to flag issues and concerns to HR/GER/WIT, we have been met with racist outcomes with double standards. Throughout all this, Microsoft has sent a clear message to their employees: There are no proper channels at Microsoft to express your concerns, disagreements, or even questions about how Microsoft is using your labor to kill Palestinian babies.
Over this past week, Microsoft has shown their true face, brutalizing, detaining, firing, pepper spraying, threatening and insulting workers and former workers protesting at Microsoft Build. This email censorship is simply the latest example in a long list of recent extreme and outrageous escalations by Microsoft against my community. Enough is enough.
It has become clear that Microsoft will not listen to us out of the goodness of their hearts.
Microsoft will not change their stance just because it is the moral or even legal thing to do. Microsoft will only divest from genocide once it becomes more expensive for them to kill Palestinians than not. Right now, Microsoft makes a lot of money from genocide-profiteering, so we must make support for genocide even more expensive.
The situation in Palestine is more urgent by the minute. More and more Palestinians are being killed of starvation under the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF)'s bombing campaign, invasion, and siege that has martyred an estimated 400,000 Palestinians. The IOF have kidnapped over 16,000 Palestinians and placed them in torture and rape camps. 1.93 million Palestinians in Gaza have been displaced, and over 40,000 Palestinians have been displaced in the West Bank.
While a hostile work environment is difficult, it cannot compare to the horrors taking place in Palestine - horrors that we as Microsoft employees are complicit in. These futile attempts to silence our community, while painful at times, are evidence that the pressure we are applying is working. This is not the time for baby steps or gradual progress. Starving infants cannot wait any longer. We, as a company of over 200,000 employees, are providing the technological backbone for Israel's genocidal war machine in Palestinian. We, as employees of this company, have a responsibility to end our employer's complicity in this AI-assisted genocide! Now is the time to escalate against Microsoft and end this Microsoft-powered genocide!
I am calling on every employee of conscience to:
Sign No Azure for Apartheid's petition calling for a termination of all Microsoft contracts with the Israeli military and government: https://noaa.cc/petition
Strongly consider whether you want to stay in the company and fight for change from within, or if you want to leave and stop contributing labor to genocide.
If you choose to leave Microsoft to no longer be complicit in genocide, do not go quietly. The No Azure for Apartheid campaign is ready to help you make an impact on your way out for Palestine, and we will also do our best to provide you support before leaving. Reach out to us expressing your interest to leave here.
If you choose to stay, continue to fight from the inside to end Microsoft's, and your own, complicity in war crimes, join the No Azure for Apartheid campaign. If you are worried about being public with your affiliation, rest assured that as a worker-led grassroots movement, we have members with all levels of anonymity and risk level. Some of our members are publicly visible and will even publicly confront our war-criminal executives, such as
Satya Nadella
,
Mustafa Suleyman
, and Jay Parikh at major Microsoft events like the 50th Anniversary celebration and Microsoft Build. Other members choose to stay completely anonymous and still contribute to the critical work of the campaign. There is room for everyone: https://noaa.cc/join
While I do understand that as Microsoft employees, we cannot fully boycott Microsoft, most of us can focus on the priority targets set by the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement, which recently set Microsoft as a priority target. The main target of the boycott is
Microsoft Gaming
, especially X-Box. We can also encourage our friends and family to boycott Microsoft where possible.
To Microsoft Senior Leadership team specifically:You cannot silence Palestine.You cannot silence Gaza.You cannot hide your involvement in genocide and apartheid.
Fre e Palestine Nisreen Jaradat
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Quick commerce job growth outpaces ecommerce, modern trade
Quick commerce job growth outpaces ecommerce, modern trade

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Quick commerce job growth outpaces ecommerce, modern trade

The growth of quick commerce has led to the creation of many new jobs, especially in last-mile delivery and operational roles. A report by TeamLease estimates that the sector will employ up to 5.5 lakh people by next year. Currently, there are 2.5 to three lakh outdoor delivery workers and 70,000 to 75,000 employees working in dark stores and warehouses. Employment generation Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo A report by Kearney breaks down employment into two categories: direct and indirect. Direct jobs include essential day-to-day roles such as warehouse and fulfilment centre staff, delivery workers, and employees in stores and dark stores. Live Events Last-mile delivery is the most labour-intensive part of quick commerce, with over 46 workers employed per Rs 1 crore of monthly gross merchandise value (GMV), making it the most demanding in terms of workforce among retail types. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Indirect jobs cover roles in corporate offices, IT, and packaging companies that support the quick commerce sector. While important, these roles are smaller in number compared to operational positions. Qcomm vs other retail channels When comparing workforce: General trade ( kirana stores , local grocery stores) leads with 63 to 66 jobs per Rs 1 crore of monthly GMV Quick commerce is close behind with 62 to 64 jobs Modern trade (supermarkets, hypermarkets) follows with 41 to 42 jobs Ecommerce comes last with 25 to 29 jobs. In quick commerce, last-mile delivery alone accounts for 46 out of 62 jobs, a sharp contrast to ecommerce, which employs only 13 to 15 in this area. In modern trade, these roles are minimal. Future job growth in qcomm The report claims that quick commerce mainly draws demand from other retail formats: about 92–93% of its sales come from modern trade, general trade, and ecommerce. However, 6–8% of its sales are new, which helps stimulate additional consumer demand and generate new jobs. By 2025, the sector is expected to see a 60% rise in gig worker hiring , fuelled by the rising need for faster deliveries. This expansion is expected to create 15 to 18 new jobs per Rs 1 crore of monthly GMV, with about five jobs coming purely from increased demand. These roles will mainly be in last-mile delivery, warehouse management, and operations — the areas where job growth is most closely linked to order volume.

Intern to CEO overnight? Bengaluru youth's ‘AI startup got funded' exit sparks LinkedIn buzz on ambition and arrogance
Intern to CEO overnight? Bengaluru youth's ‘AI startup got funded' exit sparks LinkedIn buzz on ambition and arrogance

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Intern to CEO overnight? Bengaluru youth's ‘AI startup got funded' exit sparks LinkedIn buzz on ambition and arrogance

What started as a routine check-in became a viral sensation after a Bengaluru intern casually informed their employer that they were quitting the internship—because their AI startup had just received funding. The straightforward WhatsApp message, shared widely across platforms, especially LinkedIn, has ignited conversations around the ever-evolving dynamics of startup ambition, tech culture, and the unpredictable arc of modern careers. The now-viral screenshot was posted by entrepreneur Aashish Jhunjhunwala, who distilled the incident into three punchy observations: anything will sell if it mentions 'AI'; today's intern could be tomorrow's CEO; and Bengaluru continues to wear the crown as India's undisputed startup capital. The one-line exit that said it all In the screenshot, an employer checks in with a message: 'Hey, what happened to you last Friday? I didn't see you in office.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo The intern's reply was as brief as it was bold: 'Hey, sorry I took a leave because I had a meeting with a VC. My AI startup got funded. I don't need the internship anymore.' That single line has since taken on a life of its own, sparking both admiration and scepticism online. Some hailed the intern's courage and timing, while others questioned the maturity and tone of the abrupt departure. You Might Also Like: Too 'founder-y' to hire, not corporate enough to fit in: Former startup owner's candid job hunt post strikes a chord on Reddit LinkedIn turns into a commentary board Reactions to the post have ranged from celebratory to sarcastic. One user quipped, 'The next answer by the manager to the ex-intern could be—'Can you hire me for a role please!'' Another offered a dose of realism: 'You mean to say shallow arrogance? I'm sure he'll be back as an intern, and this time he might be okay with it being unpaid.' A third comment drove the point home: 'The fourth takeaway is that we can never predict when the CEO or Founder might become an intern again. So maybe don't burn bridges with 'I don't need the internship anymore.'' The blurred lines of ambition and humility The viral episode is more than just internet amusement. It reflects a deeper truth about the Indian startup ecosystem—particularly in Bengaluru—where ambition can flip scripts overnight. The allure of AI, the influx of venture capital, and the energy of young innovators are creating an environment where career paths no longer move in straight lines. But the internet also seems to be asking a valid question: Does success—especially early and sudden—excuse tone-deafness? Or is it just a new brand of confidence shaped by a digital-first, hustle-heavy generation? You Might Also Like: 'Loyalty does not guarantee safety': Laid-off engineer's viral LinkedIn post exposes the brutal truth about modern corporate layoffs As India's startup scene continues to mature, perhaps it's not just about funding or titles anymore, but also about how gracefully one navigates the ride—both on the way up and, possibly, on the way down.

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One - but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president. Installing capabilities equivalent to the decades-old 747s now used as Air Force One would almost certainly consign the project to a similar fate as Boeing's replacement initiative, which has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 새로 나온 '실비보험' 최적가 가입추천! "주요 보험사별 맞춤견적+가성비 굿"... 굿리치 보험대리점 (등록번호:제2006038313호) 가입하기 Undo Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers Thursday that those security modifications would cost less than $400 million but provided no details. Satisfying Trump's desire to use the new plane before the end of his term could require leaving out some of those precautions, however. Live Events A White House official said Trump wants the Qatari jet ready as soon as possible while adhering to security standards. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide details on equipment issues or the timeline. Trump has survived two assassination attempts, and Iran allegedly also plotted to kill him, so he's well aware of the danger he faces. However, he seems willing to take some chances with security, particularly when it comes to communications. For example, he likes to keep his personal phone handy despite the threat of hacks. He boasted this week that the government got the jet "for free," saying, "We need it as Air Force One until the other ones are done." Here's a look at what it would take to make the Qatari plane into a presidential transport: What makes a plane worthy of being Air Force One? Air Force One is the call sign for any plane that's carrying the president. The first aircraft to get the designation was a propeller-powered C-54 Skymaster, which ferried Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Yalta Conference in 1945. It featured a conference room with a bulletproof window. Things are a lot more complicated these days. Boeing has spent years stripping down and rebuilding two 747s to replace the versions that have carried presidents for more than three decades. The project is slated to cost more than $5.3 billion and may not be finished before Trump leaves office. A 2021 report made public through the Freedom of Information Act outlines the unclassified requirements for the replacement 747s under construction. At the top of the list - survivability and communications. The government decided more than a decade ago that the new planes had to have four engines so they could remain airborne if one or two fail, said Deborah Lee James, who was Air Force secretary at the time. That creates a challenge because 747s are no longer manufactured, which could make spare parts harder to come by. Air Force One also has to have the highest level of classified communications, anti-jamming capabilities and external protections against foreign surveillance, so the president can securely command military forces and nuclear weapons during a national emergency. It's an extremely sensitive and complex system, including video, voice and data transmissions. James said there are anti-missile measures and shielding against radiation or an electromagnetic pulse that could be caused by a nuclear blast. "The point is, it remains in flight no matter what," she said. Will Trump want all the security bells and whistles? If the Qatari plane is retrofitted to presidential standards, it could cost $1.5 billion and take years, according to a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details that aren't publicly available. Testifying before Congress this week, Meink discounted such estimates, arguing that some of the costs associated with retrofitting the Qatari plane would have been spent anyway as the Air Force moves to build the long-delayed new presidential planes, including buying aircraft for training and to have spares available if needed. In response, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said that based on the contract costs for the planes that the Air Force is building, it would cost about $1 billion to strip down the Qatar plane, install encrypted communications, harden its defenses and make other required upgrades. James said simply redoing the wiring means "you'd have to break that whole thing wide open and almost start from scratch." Trump, as commander in chief, could waive some of these requirements. He could decide to skip shielding systems from an electromagnetic pulse, leaving his communications more vulnerable in case of a disaster but shaving time off the project. After all, Boeing has already scaled back its original plans for the new 747s. Their range was trimmed by 1,200 nautical miles, and the ability to refuel while airborne was scrapped. Paul Eckloff, a former leader of protection details at the Secret Service , expects the president would get the final say. "The Secret Service's job is to plan for and mitigate risk," he said. "It can never eliminate it." If Trump does waive some requirements, James said that should be kept under wraps because "you don't want to advertise to your potential adversaries what the vulnerabilities of this new aircraft might be." It's unlikely that Trump will want to skimp on the plane's appearance. He keeps a model of a new Air Force One in the Oval Office, complete with a darker color scheme that echoes his personal jet instead of the light blue design that's been used for decades. What happens next? Trump toured the Qatari plane in February when it was parked at an airport near Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort. Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin was there, too. The U.S. official said the jet needs maintenance but not more than what would be expected of a four-engine plane of its complexity. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee , said it would be irresponsible to put the president and national security equipment aboard the Qatari plane "without knowing that the aircraft is fully capable of withstanding a nuclear attack." "It's a waste of taxpayer dollars," she said. Meanwhile, Boeing's project has been hampered by stress corrosion cracks on the planes and excessive noise in the cabins from the decompression system, among other issues that have delayed delivery, according to a Government Accountability Office report released last year. Boeing referred questions to the Air Force, which said in a statement that it's working with the aircraft manufacturer to find ways to accelerate the delivery of at least one of the 747s. Even so, the aircraft will have to be tested and flown in real-world conditions to ensure no other issues. James said it remains to be seen how Trump would handle any of those challenges. "The normal course of business would say there could be delays in certifications," she said. "But things seem to get waived these days when the president wants it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store