logo
Woman, 22, convicted of abusing 21 babies at nursery where she worked

Woman, 22, convicted of abusing 21 babies at nursery where she worked

The Guardian16-06-2025
A 22-year-old nursery worker has been convicted of abusing 21 babies, including kicking one little boy in the face and stepping on his shoulder during a harrowing campaign of abuse.
Roksana Lecka, from Hounslow, admitted seven counts of cruelty to a person under the age of 16 and was convicted of another 14 counts by a jury at Kingston crown court.
Her crimes were discovered in June last year after she was sent home for pinching a number of children and appearing 'flustered' at the Riverside Nursery in Twickenham, south-west London, the Crown Prosecution Service said.
Detectives from the Metropolitan police went through CCTV from the nursery that showed her pinching and scratching children under their clothes on their arms, legs and stomachs.
She pinched several children dozens of times in the course of one day, causing them to cry and flinch away from her, the CPS said.
In one incident she kicked a little boy in the face several times. She was also seen to push babies headfirst over cots and cover a toddler's mouth when he started to cry.
The Met said she had abused children at two nurseries between October 2023 and June 2024 – one of the counts related to Little Munchkins in Hounslow, with the remainder linked to Riverside, which has since closed.
DS Geoff Boye said: 'Footage showed Lecka carrying out multiple assaults on the children in her care which included repeatedly pinching and grabbing children, dropping babies into their cots and, on one occasion, she delivered several kicks to a young boy to the face and stepped on his shoulder.'
Lecka told police she smoked cannabis before her shifts, and at one point was seen vaping a metre away from a young baby.
DI Sian Hutchings said: 'These families left their children in Lecka's care, trusting her to protect their children as well as the other staff at the nurseries clearly did.
'The footage of her offences against defenceless children was disturbing.
'I would like to praise the strength of the victims' families who have had to sit in court and watch footage of the abuse which Lecka inflicted on their children.'
Lecka worked at Riverside Nursery between January and June 2024, with a number of parents reporting unusual injuries and bruising in March and May that year.
She will be sentenced at Kingston crown court on 26 September.
Senior crown prosecutor Gemma Burns said: 'Lecka repeatedly showed exceptional cruelty in her appalling treatment of these babies. No parent should have to fear leaving their child in the care of professionals, but the sheer scale of her abuse is staggering.
'The CPS put forward compelling evidence that clearly showed her targeting children when colleagues were either out of the room, or had their backs turned. We also called on experts to prove that the injuries Lecka's victims sustained were consistent with pinch marks.
'Lecka was placed in a position of trust and her job required her to provide safety and protection. Instead, she kicked, scratched and pinched these young children, with this vile abuse of vulnerable victims continuing for many months.'
A number of parents contacted lawyers after Lecka's abuse emerged.
Solicitor Jemma Till, from Irwin Mitchell, said: 'The families we represent are not only deeply shocked but also traumatised by what their children have endured.
'This is sadly yet another devastating case where children have suffered at the hands of someone in a position of trust.
'Whilst Lecka's actions have been stopped, the consequences of those actions are likely to affect families for many years. Nothing can undo what has happened, but it's now vital that lessons are learned and, where appropriate, measures introduced to prevent other children being harmed.
'In the meantime, we're focused on supporting the families and helping them come to terms with Lecka's dreadful actions.'
Munira Wilson, the Liberal Democrat MP for Twickenham, said it was 'incredibly important that families see justice done and the children get all the support they need to recover from this trauma'.
She claimed there was a need for 'urgent reforms to make nurseries and early years settings safe for our children'.
She added: 'Nurseries must be subject to no-notice Ofsted inspections where safeguarding concerns can be raised and CCTV footage is reviewed.
'I will be working with colleagues to make sure these tragedies never happen again – every parent should know their child is safe when left at nursery.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I'm proud to have made this stand': over-60s arrested at Palestine Action ban protest explain their decision
‘I'm proud to have made this stand': over-60s arrested at Palestine Action ban protest explain their decision

The Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘I'm proud to have made this stand': over-60s arrested at Palestine Action ban protest explain their decision

In recent weeks, hundreds of people have been arrested for taking part in demonstrations organised by the campaign group Defend Our Juries. Their alleged crime is calling for an end to the ban against Palestine Action, which has been proscribed as a terrorist organisation by Yvette Cooper, the home secretary. One striking detail among those detained is their age. Half of those arrested at the largest protest yet, in Parliament Square in London on Saturday, were 60 or older. Some said they had taken part to give a voice to younger people who have more to lose by breaking the law, some simply felt they must challenge the government's stance. The Guardian has spoken to some of these protesters. 'The government is looking [like] such idiots,' said Deborah Hinton, a former magistrate. 'I mean when people say, 'What's your status?', and then I say, 'Well, I'm on bail for terrorism', they look at me as if the situation is farcical. I think they [ministers] are making themselves look an absolute joke.' Hinton was arrested at a 19 July demonstration in Cornwall arranged by Defend Our Juries (DOJ). A former member of the Parole Board, she was awarded an OBE in 1994 for services to the community. She said she was already involved with DOJ because she was worried about the erosion of free speech and the right to protest, but the banning of Palestine Action was a 'red line'. She said: 'In my view, Palestine Action is not a terrorist organisation. I lived through the IRA and the bombing in London when you had to leave shops and leave museums because bombs might go off any minute. Frankly, that is what a terrorist organisation is. This is not a terrorist organisation, it's a direct action organisation, like the suffragists, like the Greenham Common women, like many other organisations. 'If people do direct action and they cause criminal damage, then you arrest the people, you charge them [under existing laws], and that's that.' As well as free speech concerns, her longstanding support for the Palestinian cause led her to risk arrest. 'What's going on in Gaza has gone beyond anything that one could possibly have imagined,' said Hinton. 'I can't even think about it, it's too awful.' Hinton said she was shaking as the officers moved down the line of placard holders arresting each person as they went. An officer then told her that if she put down her placard she could leave without further action. 'I knew I couldn't do that, but it was such a temptation because it was so terrifying,' said Hinton. 'I've been a very law-abiding citizen and very respectful of authority all my life but I knew I had to do this and it was my duty to do this.' Hinton said it was right that her generation were putting themselves on the frontline. 'Young people are going to jeopardise their careers,' she said. 'They won't get a visa to go to the [United] States. They won't get a visa to go to most other countries because they'll have terrorism on their record. 'People like me, who are elderly, we can afford it. I'm very sorry not to go and be able to visit my niece in America but it's not the end of the world. Young people shouldn't be doing this, we should be doing this. We should be taking the responsibility.' John McGowan, a Catholic priest, said that when Yvette Cooper was in opposition he felt she 'spoke for me'. But asked what he would say to the home secretary now, he replied: 'For goodness sake, don't call these people terrorists because they're not terrorists. 'The focus shouldn't be on Palestine Action. The focus should be on what the government isn't doing for the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.' McGowan, a Carmelite and parish priest of St Joseph's in Chalfont St Peter, was one of 532 people arrested at the demonstration in Parliament Square on 9 August, the largest against the proscription of the organisation to date. He said he had written in his diary a week or two before the protest that he would like to be arrested in support of the cause, so when the demonstration was announced it was the opportunity he was looking for. He attended wearing his Roman collar, identifying himself as a priest, and met a Baptist minister there who was also arrested. After being detained, McGowan was placed in a police van where there were two female officers that he said were 'polite, and almost apologetic. I sat down, and I felt very calm and almost serene.' When the van drove away, he said people cheered in support of him and the two other protesters in the vehicle, banging on the van and making the heart sign to them. 'It was a strain, but exhilarating as well. It was an extraordinary day, I've never had a day like it in my life but I'm glad I did it. In my conscience, I was clear it was the right thing to do so I take that as my guiding light. If I get a criminal record, I don't care.' He said he was not expecting any recriminations from the Catholic church and had experienced a moving response from his congregation. 'I was in two minds whether to tell the people in my church what I'd done but I'm the kind of person that likes to share these things and so I did,' he said. 'I was really nervous but at the end of mass I said: 'Look, I went to the demonstration, I got arrested' and they applauded me. I was almost in tears.' A former British army colonel and ex-military attache, Chris Romberg cut an unlikely terrorism suspect even among hundreds of other retirees arrested in Parliament Square in relation to Palestine Action. Yet it is this background – along with the fact that his father and grandparents fled Nazi Germany in 1938 – that motivated him to join the protest, leading to his arrest under the Terrorism Act. 'This year saw the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp by British forces. What they found shocked the British people,' said Romberg, who himself saw action in the Falklands war with the commando regiment and was mentioned in dispatches. 'What we are seeing now in Gaza, 80 years on, is equally shocking. As a former officer in the British army, I am horrified that the government is misusing our armed forces to be complicit in the genocide rather than to end it.' Claims by Cooper that those protesting 'don't know the full nature' of Palestine Action have also struck a nerve. 'The impression I get is that people are now extremely distrustful of the government,' said Romberg, who left the army in 2007. 'That the home secretary should speak like that and say that she has information but can't tell us what it is reminds me of the Monty Python sketch about the Piranha brothers, where there is a man who had his head nailed to a coffee table because he had broken an unwritten law but they wouldn't tell him what it was.' The former diplomat's last two appointments were as defence attache at the British embassies in Jordan and Egypt, and he speaks knowledgeably about the region. Since leaving the army, he became active in supporting the Palestinian cause. Recently, he joined the group Holocaust Survivors and Descendants against the Gaza Genocide, other members of which stood together under a banner during the protest on Saturday. It was the first time that he has been arrested in his life. Before taking part, he reflected a lot on what he was about to do. 'It wasn't a decision I took lightly and the organisers, Defend Our Juries, made absolutely sure that everybody realised the implications of what they were doing, and yet people felt strongly enough that they were able and were prepared to take that risk.' Richard Whitmore-Jones readily admits he 'doesn't particularly approve' of the methods deployed by Palestine Action, the direct action group proscribed last month. 'I was brought up to respect property,' he said. Yet in his next breath, the retired company director makes an argument few might expect from a former executive at the multinational beverage company Diageo. 'I was certainly in horror of vandalism but I have to admit that people have not been listened to on Gaza. There have been enormous marches in London and they have not been reported accurately or were kept off the front pages. 'Palestine Action's methods sit very uneasily with me. It's difficult to accept that vandalism is the only way to go. However, I feel we have to do something and I support their stand against genocide.' Whitmore-Jones, from East Sussex, was arrested on Saturday having also been previously arrested at another protest organised by Defend Our Juries, returning with the same placard stating: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' He has been bailed to appear at a police station in October. As for the decision to put himself in line for arrest not once but twice, Whitmore-Jones cites being part of a generation whose parents fought fascism in the second world war, which in his own case included an RAF father who became a prisoner of the Japanese. 'I am astonished that we now have a government that has been supporting exactly the sort of actions, in Gaza, which Britain sought to prevent 80 years ago. My father's sacrifice, which he saw as being to prevent other peoples from being invaded and treated badly, appears to be contrary to what our government is doing,' he said. For much of his working life, Whitmore-Jones was with Diageo, rising to become a property manager and office services manager at the company, retiring in 2003 shortly after it was taken over. He 'came late' to activism for Gaza, going on his first ever march when he was 72. 'I felt better for doing something, though I realised I was doing very little really,' he said, before the proscription of Palestine Action changed everything again for him. He shrugs off the suggestion that he was now making a sacrifice by facing a potential terrorism conviction and the life-changing limitations that come with it, insisting: 'Look, I'm 74, I don't have a mortgage to get, I don't have a job. I will be a little bit upset about not being allowed to go to America, but I really will live with that. It's the young people that are brave.' As for his family's views of what he is doing, Whitmore-Jones said: 'It's gone from amusement to absolute firm support and I'm very pleased with the attitude of my children.' Family, in a way, is also at the heart of his motivation for seeking to oppose Israel's actions in Gaza: 'This is about children the age of my grandchildren having their limbs and their lives taken away.' After leading a 'wonderful, full life', the TV screenwriter Trevelyan Evans, who has written for a number of BBC sitcoms, is unafraid of being called a terrorist in the courts. 'I'm very proud to have made this stand, whether I'm convicted or not,' he said. He was among the 532 people, many of them 'old fogies', arrested last Saturday. 'People in my demographic are standing up for those people who can't risk having a conviction on their records for a terrorism offence,' he said. He felt compelled to take part in the protest to stand up for 'the people of Gaza and Palestine who are being massacred' and to oppose the group's proscription, which he called an 'obviously ridiculous judicial overreach on behalf of the government'. 'They just slapped this ban on them in order to suppress opposition,' he added. Before the demonstration began last weekend, he jokingly said he got his 'materials for terrorism' ready on the green in Parliament Square. His tools of choice? A pen and piece of paper. 'I never realised being a terrorist could be so much fun,' he said. 'Being out in the open air and meeting new people in a nice central location … it was a convivial atmosphere.' After the silent portion of the protest ended, Evans said people were 'handing out sandwiches and sun cream' until an officer with 'seven of his friends came round' and told him he was being arrested. They then started to carry him out of the square. 'I hadn't been carried around like that since I was at school,' he said. 'The policeman said: 'You're a bit heavy.' He had to call one of his friends over to help carry me. I thought that was a bit of a liberty.' After this, he was placed in a police van, which he had all to himself. 'I think, on behalf of the Metropolitan police, it was quite generous.' Evans is on bail awaiting charge. He said the government's decision to ban Palestine Action represented a 'kind of creeping authoritarianism [which is] eventually going to hit a wall, because it's inherently contradictory'. 'If you extend draconian laws, eventually you're going to look pretty stupid. I can see that the government laid itself a trap and walked straight into it.'

Shady past of Virgin Atlantic passenger who threatened to 'gang rape' stewardess
Shady past of Virgin Atlantic passenger who threatened to 'gang rape' stewardess

Daily Mirror

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Shady past of Virgin Atlantic passenger who threatened to 'gang rape' stewardess

Salman Iftikhar launched a prolonged and vile verbal assault on a Virgin Atlantic flight attendant on a plane for Lahore, Pakistan, and the dad was jailed last week A yob who threatened to gang rape a Virgin Atlantic stewardess has had several brushes with the law, it has today emerged. ‌ Salman Iftikhar was sentenced to 15 months in jail last week after admitting making threats to kill and racially aggravated harassment. The judge took into account Iftikhar's six previous convictions, including a common assault, a record she described as "lengthy and appalling". These six previous convictions have arisen from 15 offences over the years. ‌ And now further details of these offences have come to light - days after Iftikhar, 37, began his time at HM Prison Brixton in south London. It is his first time behind bars despite his two counts of common assault in 2004, drink driving in 2008 and driving with excess alcohol that same year among other crimes. ‌ In 2021, father-of-three Iftikhar was fined £3,000 after he was caught drunk behind the wheel. When pulled over, police also found him in possession of cannabis. Iftikhar, who was two times over the legal limit, subsequently pleaded guilty to drink driving, cannabis possession and failing to stop a vehicle when required to by a constable. Neighbours in Iver, Buckinghamshire, this week said police had also been called to his six-bedroom home dozens of times in recent years. Iftikhar had lived there with one of his two wives - Erum Salman, who is the mother to his three children. She was described as a "nice lady" by neighbours, who branded Iftikhar "not very friendly" this week. "There's been so many rowdy late night parties that have ended up in fights in the early hours of the morning. At one point it felt like the police were here almost every day," said one neighbour who also described Iftikhar as "often spaced out". The father of three kept a range of expensive cars - from a Range Rover, Bentley and Rolls-Royce - on his driveway at the time of his arrest. He and his UK-based wife together the pair run a London-based staffing company which provides training to businesses working in customer service and manufacturing. Yet, according to those known to the Buckinghamshire couple, the pair had a "rocky marriage and would argue quite a bit". Daily Mail reports Iftikhar diversified his skillset in recent years into "exposure to cryptocurrencies," a project likely to prove tricky to manage from his cell in jail. When he was sentenced at Isleworth Crown Court, a judge described the episode as "a sustained incident" and felt she could only impose a custodial term. Ben Walker-Nolan, defending, had said his client "had a long-standing drug and alcohol problem which he has not addressed for many years".

Human rights watchdog warns police to rethink 'heavy-handed' Palestine protest clampdown amid fears it could have a 'chilling' effect on free speech
Human rights watchdog warns police to rethink 'heavy-handed' Palestine protest clampdown amid fears it could have a 'chilling' effect on free speech

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Human rights watchdog warns police to rethink 'heavy-handed' Palestine protest clampdown amid fears it could have a 'chilling' effect on free speech

Britain's human rights watchdog has warned against the 'heavy-handed policing' of Palestine protests amid fears it could have a 'chilling' effect on free speech. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Met Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, said the notion that a peaceful demonstration could attract disproportionate police attention 'undermines confidence in our human rights protections'. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, said the notion that a peaceful demonstration could attract disproportionate police attention 'undermines confidence in our human rights protections' Baroness Falkner also raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Kent Police confirmed it had 'received correspondence from a legal firm representing a person spoken to by officers in Canterbury on July 14 2025' after the Guardian reported the woman is taking legal action against the force. The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. Asked for their response to the EHRC letter, the Home Office referred to Ms Cooper's previous statement about last week's march, in which she said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation.' The Metropolitan Police declined to comment when asked for their response to the letter. It comes after a chaotic London march last Saturday saw more than a staggering 500 activists arrested - bringing the total to over 700 since July 7, when the group was proscribed. During a day of mayhem and farce, Left-wing protesters swamped London's Parliament Square on August 9 in support of the organisation, which was proscribed by the Government last month as a terrorist group. Hundreds held placards declaring 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action' in deliberate 'idiotic' acts of law-breaking designed to overwhelm police resources and the courts. Later that day, the Metropolitan Police announced more than 360 people had been detained following the scenes of disorder - at an estimated cost of about £3million. However, in an update on August 10, the Met said the number of total arrests had skyrocketed to 532 - with 522 of these being for people allegedly displaying placards supporting the proscribed terror group. Protesters were accused of a 'colossal' waste of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money after seemingly getting deliberately arrested by officers. Yesterday, the Metropolitan Police announced that a further 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support for the proscribed terrorist group Palestine Action. Stephen Parkinson, Director of Public Prosecutions, said: 'The decisions that we have announced today are the first significant numbers to come out of the recent protests, and many more can be expected in the next few weeks. We are ready to make swift decisions in all cases where arrests have been made. The public has a democratic right to protest peacefully in this country, and I understand the depth of feeling around the horrific scenes in Gaza. 'However, Palestine Action is now a proscribed terrorist organisation and those who have chosen to break the law will be subject to criminal proceedings under the Terrorism Act. 'When protest conduct crosses the line from lawful activity into criminality, we have a duty to enforce the law. 'People should be clear about the real-life consequences for anyone choosing to support Palestine Action. A terrorism conviction can severely impact your life and career – it can restrict your ability to travel overseas and work in certain professions. 'I urge people to think very carefully about their actions at protests. Anyone who chooses to disobey the law will have to face the consequences.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store