Australia's 'tough conversations' about diversity are yet to happen
In her thoughtful and beautifully written memoir, Hunger Like a Thirst, Rodell writes of her 14-year-old son's first days of school " … baffled by the teenage customs and prejudices of his Australian classmates. 'They tease people here for being poor' … racism and homophobia were thrown around casually, as banter, in a way that would never have flown in the Los Angeles public schools he'd attended."
In her book about food, journalism and a life trying to find home, this wasn't the sentence I expected would stop me dead.
With a son in middle school myself, in a socio-demographic setting in Melbourne almost identical to Besha's, we had also been grappling with reports of the "roasting", trash-talking and general jeers and banter that came home from our son's school. Some of the stuff — racist, homophobic and sexist — was just appalling. It seemed almost impossible for any of the kids to avoid being swept up in it, especially the younger ones.
I couldn't figure out if it was commonplace, a generational thing, or specific to certain demographics — "class" is something you just can't talk about in Australia. But then of course I remembered the disgusting public chants of various private school kids that I'd covered over the years, and I remembered all the way back to my childhood, when the preferred insults of "dyke", "lezzo" and "poofter" were common at my state school.
Whereas a certain aspect of the commentariat would have you believe that fears of "cancellation'" have not only eradicated any non-inclusive language, but made us painfully too cautious, the reality seems far more troubling: how common is this kind of talk among our young students?
And why is the contrast with America so significant?
I asked Besha. She said she could not suggest that her son's experience was universal, but Felix, now in his early 20s, went to a huge school in the middle of Los Angeles, "about the most liberal place you could be". And the socially similar school her son went to in Melbourne — an inner north high school — was not somewhere she expected to encounter bigoted viewpoints as part of the accepted culture.
"We live(d) at the top end of Carlton and kids would tease him that he probably lived in the commission flats — in LA there was absolutely no shame in being poor, and in fact his wealthy friends were the ones who felt the need to defend themselves," she said.
Besha said that half the kids he knew in the US were black, Asian, Latino, had gay parents.
"One of his best primary school friends was trans and everyone just accepted it like it was no big thing. The schools he went to here were much, much whiter, and where there were Asian or black kids, they were socially fairly segregated."
Besha's writing life has bounced her back and forth between Australia and the US for decades: her comparative analytical skills are well-honed when it comes to considering the two cultures. She is under no illusions about the horrors of the US school system — like thousands of other American parents on that day in 2012, she rushed to her son's school just to be near him and to take him home when she heard about Sandy Hook.
But she can, perhaps more clearly than many of us, see the cracks in the stories we tell ourselves.
"I do think Australia suffers from this idea that we're basically an equitable society, and to talk about our deficiencies is to stir trouble, miss the point or be ungrateful. That has definitely changed over the last 10 to 15 years, or is beginning to, but we still haven't had a lot of the tough conversations, publicly, that America has had to have."
This week I heard the journalist Jan Fran — who with Antoinette Lattouf has an excellent news podcast called Ette — reflect on something similar: she wondered if we really were as successful a multicultural country as we like to think. The faces, the food, the surnames that dominate modern Australian culture comfortably lead us to believe that we've "done" multiculturalism better than anyone else: when "every Australian town has banh mi" how could you think otherwise?
But Fran isn't buying it anymore. Talking about diversity in newsrooms, including at the ABC, she said that Australia's multiculturalism is "peripheral: 'dots' of cultures and ethnicities that orbit the monoculture like satellites, hoping to get close, but never quite at the centre".
It's an analysis that stings, particularly when the slang comes home from the schoolyard and all the epithets are — still — about the assumed outsiders. When our parliaments, newsrooms, judicial benches and many other institutions all look a certain way, the satellite theory lands.
In this weekend's reads we have scams, frauds and the secret life of chauffeuring pets — which actually sounds like the dream.
Sailors to bikies — How tattooing became mainstream
INXS's Hottest 100 win: How worlds collided for Never Tear Us Apart
I quit my 30-year career as a flight attendant and became a chauffeur for petsResentment doesn't have to mean the end of a relationship
One week in the NT's Youth Justice Court shows effects of tough bail laws
The ATO learned it was being scammed, then paid out millions more to fraudsters
Have a safe and happy weekend: I'll be at the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra's live performance of one of my favourite films of all time — yes, it's even in my Letterboxd — How to Train Your Dragon. I'm taking all the tissues with me to get through this scene, and its immortal music by the composer John Powell, in one piece. If you're in Melbs, I hope to see you there. Go well.
Virginia Trioli is presenter of Creative Types and a former co-host of ABC News Breakfast and Mornings on ABC Radio Melbourne.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
9 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘What a joke': Tradie's video highlights grim new Aussie housing trend
As more homes continue to be built in some of Australia's biggest cities, a new trend has emerged – prioritising value over space. More homes are being squeezed in to create suburbs in urban sprawl corridors, with developers really making the most of every inch of land, resulting in new builds that are practically touching. Melbourne-based carpenter, Judd Johnston, recently left Aussies gobsmacked after sharing a video from a site he was working on, showing mere centimetres between the house that was being built and the neighbouring home. 'So you're telling me it is going to take me 13 years to save for a house that's this close to the neighbour,' he captioned the clip. The TikTok has accumulated more than 264,000 views, sparking comments from horrified social media users. 'How is that legal?' was one of the top questions people were asking. Local council and state zoning regulations typically determine how close a house can be built to the boundary line. There are also cases where zero-lot boundary developments can be approved, meaning a structure can be built directly on or very close to the boundary lines. 'I love hearing my neighbours breathe 24/7,' one person wrote on the video. 'This is insane,' another said, with a third adding: 'Might as well share a bedroom at this point.' Others questioned why, at that point, you wouldn't just join the homes. 'At that point it should've just been a duplex. What a joke,' one person said. Mr Johnston has seen a rise in these types of developments, believing this housing trend is wiping out the Australian dream of having a big backyard with a clothes lines and a cubby house. 'Once the house is actually finished in terms of the frame, there's only enough room for brick and whatever material is going on the outside,' he told Yahoo News. 'By the time that's finished, I've seen a lot of them literally touching.' The young tradie said housing is being maximised for profit – as house sizes continue to go down, prices go up. John Brockhoff, national policy director for the Planning Institute of Australia, believes the pattern reflects wider issues in Australia's housing system. 'Australia is seeing growing pressure to increase housing supply in our cities, but this must be matched by a commitment to good planning and urban design,' he told 'We're seeing a growing mismatch between the size of our households and the type of housing that's being built. 'And, while the types of household sizes on average have been getting smaller, we continue to build some of the biggest homes in the world and this really raises concerns about how efficiently we use our land, and our infrastructure, and how affordable and sustainable our housing is.' Mr Brockhoff said the phenomenon centres mostly around capitalising on the detached block – with homeowners wanting to get a return on the asset value of their land through an investment in a detached home. Many Aussie families continue to have a preference for a freestanding property on a suburban block, he said. According to recent building activity data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), the average size of Australian dwellings has been on a steady decline over the past 15 years. In 2022/23, detached homes comprised 64 per cent of all new dwelling completions, though lot sizes continue to shrink. The median capital city lot size was 391 metres squared in late 2023, while the national average for a new detached house was 250 metres squared as of March 2024. 'We tend to see that higher density in places where you can trade off that internal amenity for having a better living environment outside,' Mr Brockhoff said. 'There is also a risk of reducing trade canopy and amenity on the individual sites, but good planning makes … good access to public transport and community facilities.' Newer builds, especially those in areas like Western Sydney, need to be constructed to manage the heat, he said. 'Planning has a really important role, not just about building more homes, but building the right types of homes and the right type of places with access to services, transport and green space,' Mr Brockhoff said. 'And where that planning is done, we've got much more potential for people to make a choice.' Pictures of suburbs, such as The Ponds in Sydney's west, have emerged over the past few years showing blocks of identical freestanding homes all extremely close together. The homes pictured are crammed in with small setbacks and street verges, tiny backyards and black roofs and driveways. In many images, there are also no nearby public parks or open green spaces visible. They are mostly four-bedroom, three-bathroom properties, boasting about 280 square metres of internal living space on 300 square-metre blocks. In promotional materials, outside spaces are referred to as courtyards, not backyards, and they measure six metres by nine metres.

ABC News
35 minutes ago
- ABC News
Tassie's top tap water supplier named with nationals now in sight
Dean Barnett The main criteria that the judges are looking for is visually. Is it a nice, clear sample? Smell comes into it, so ideally something with very little odour. And then I guess the most important criteria is taste. Is it nice and fresh and crisp, something you can drink all day? Kylie Baxter Now, let's compare quality. How does Tasmanian water rank, for example, compared to other states? Dean Barnett Well, what I can say about the IXOM Best Tasting Tap Water competition is that Tasmania has certainly held its own with two national winners in the last five years. So you're definitely producing a good drop in Tasmania, that's for sure. Kylie Baxter And so then what happens now? Does Rocky Creek compete for a national title? Dean Barnett Yeah, absolutely. So they'll go up in the national title later in November, early December. Like I mentioned before, Tasmania's got a really good track record over the last five years, the only state to have two national winners. So if I was a betting man and just going off those odds, Tasmania's in a really good position for another national title. Kylie Baxter So just for clarity, we had Fern Tree. So run us through those wins in the nationals. Dean Barnett Yeah, definitely. So Fern Tree was in 2023. They were the national winner. Rossarden, water treatment plant, 2020 national winner. And then all the states will go up against each other again in November, early December. You might go, oh, so what happens after the national competition? Once we have a winner, we submit that into a international competition. And we also use that same sample to go up against the New Zealanders because we like beating them on any occasion.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
How parents and guardians can help kids reduce YouTube use before the ban
Tilly is a "pretty strict" parent when it comes to screen time, electronic devices and social media. Despite this, she says YouTube has caused issues in the home she shares with her husband and young son and daughter in Geelong, on Wadawurrung country. About a year ago, her son accidentally used the regular YouTube app — instead of YouTube Kids — on their TV. As a result, he saw a preview for a horror film. "He is still talking about [it] and being frightened and wanting to come into our bed," says Tilly, who asked us not to use her full name for privacy reasons. While the family does not post on social media, she is relieved to now be able to say, "and the government also said that you guys won't be allowed to have it until you're 16". But, Tilly says "the struggle is real" when it comes to managing screen time and social media use. With the social media ban for under-16s set to come into effect later this year, experts share ways to effectively manage YouTube use in preparation. The federal government's social media ban for under-16s is set to come into effect on December 10. After some back and forth, the government says it will include YouTube. Kids will still be able to access the site's content, but they will not be able to have an account. Without one, they will be unable to view age-restricted content, leave comments or upload their own videos. YouTube Kids is exempt because accounts cannot upload content or comment on videos. Behaviour support practitioner Anne Dobson works with children through the NDIS, and says "boundaries need to be set in anything". A former teacher, she advises parents to support kids to understand and access "appropriate content", which might look like transitioning from a YouTube account to a YouTube Kids profile. Ms Dobson says setting clear time limits on screen time and internet access can also help. Parental controls can be set up on some wi-fi routers and devices. Parenting expert and father to six, Justin Coulson says, "the first thing that I would be doing is having the kids sign out of YouTube [on any accounts they have]". Beyond that, it comes down to monitoring and supervising, says Dr Coulson — who holds a PhD in psychology. He advises being in the same room, making sure a device screen is facing into the room and keeping devices out of bedrooms and bathrooms. "These are basic things. They're not high-tech things." Dr Coulson recommends using the three E's of effective discipline — explain, explore and empower — to investigate how children are feeling about the upcoming changes to social media use. "We need to explain where we're coming from and help them recognise that their perspective is just one … we want to explain by providing really clear rationale." As a parent or guardian, he says to explore your child's perspective, with "empower" meaning "we work on a solution together". "If they make a decision that is inconsistent with our values, the framework or rules that we're trying to work within, we explain that. "Ideally, our children will come up with a solution that they can feel good about that meets with our expectations." Dr Coulson says: "The government is doing every family a favour with this legislation … parents can literally say 'I agree with it but it's not actually me, it's the government.'" Carol Markie-Dadds is the country director of Triple P International, which delivers education and support for parents. She says it is best to have these conversations as soon as possible. It is likely to be most challenging for those teenagers who have or had social media accounts, she says. Frustration and disappointment may come up and she recommends making time "to process those emotions with our children and find out what it is that they think they're missing out on as a result of the change". "Are there other ways in which we can provide a solution for them to meet the need?" Ms Dobson says if you are setting boundaries for the children in a household, the adults ought to have some, too. "That needs to be a commitment for the whole family … parents need to model what those boundaries look like". Ms Markie-Dadds acknowledges that it can be hard for parents to be good role models, as they can struggle with time away from devices too. She says this could look like no-go zones for devices in the home (such as the dinner table) and keeping devices out of bedrooms. "Having a really good routine about when and where we use devices and when and where we don't." She says each family will need to come up with a plan that suits their individual needs.