Big Bang Theory to bring back iconic characters with huge twist for new spin-off
Writers are said to be putting a "completely fresh twist" on the Big Bang Theory for a spin-off. Details about the show have been announced this week, including its title and whether fans can expect to see their favourite characters.
It was previously reported that a spin-off of the CBS sitcom, which ran for twelve seasons from 2007 to 2019, was in the works. HBO Max has now announced that it has given a series order to the show, Stuart Fails to Save the Universe.
The show will see Kevin Sussman reprise his role as comic book store owner Stuart Bloom. The character was first introduced in the second season of the Big Bang Theory and made numerous appearances prior to its final episode.
Stuart won't be the only returning character. He will be joined on a "quest" by his partner Denise (played by Lauren Lapkus), geologist Bert Kibbler (Brian Posehn) and quantum physicist Barry Kripke (John Ross Bowie) in the new show.
It's yet to be revealed whether any other former cast members will reprise their roles in the upcoming spin-off. It's been confirmed that "alternate-universe versions" of some characters from the Big Bang Theory will feature in it though.
A synopsis for Stuart Fails to Save the Universe teases that the title character is tasked with restoring reality after he breaks a device built by Sheldon Cooper (Jim Parsons) and Leonard Hofstadter (Johnny Galecki). He's said to accidentally bring about a multiverse Armageddon as a result.
He's aided by Denise, Bert and Barry in his quest. According to HBO Max, along the way, the group meet "alternate-universe versions of characters we've come to know and love" from the original show. It adds: "As the title implies, things don't go well."
The comedy series is being executive produced by Chuck Lorre, Zak Penn, and Bill Prady. Chuck said in a statement: "I wanted to do something radical that would take me out of my comfort zone. Something the characters on The Big Bang Theory would have loved, hated, and argued about."
Bill added: "The process of writing this show with Chuck and Zak has been damn fun, and I'm certain that joy will come through the screen. Putting characters we loved from The Big Bang Theory into a complex science fiction story with the kind of mythology that those characters love while maintaining the comedic elements is incredibly satisfying."
Zak said: "I was on a vision quest in the most remote parts of the Amazon Rainforest when a carrier pigeon arrived with a note from Chuck Lorre asking if I wanted to help make a show that the characters from Big Bang Theory would watch. I couldn't resist that idea, so I packed up my yurt and hailed the next dirigible out.
"At the same time, Chuck sent an expedition to locate Bill Prady, who had been frozen with his shield across his chest in a block of arctic ice. The team assembled, we set out to make this insane show, which lives in a universe created by Chuck and Bill. I couldn't be more honored to be working with these amazing people."
Channing Dungey, Chairman and CEO, Warner Bros. Television Group and WBD US Networks, said: "Chuck and Bill have given us one of the most enduring comedies of our time with The Big Bang Theory, and we can't wait to see the universe continue with this new series. With the help of Zak - a masterful storyteller - this next iteration promises to capture the essence of what fans loved about the original series, but with a completely fresh twist. We thank our partners HBO Max for joining us on this next adventure."
Alongside Sheldon and Leonard, the Big Bang Theory focused on Howard Wolowitz (Simon Helberg), Rajesh Koothrappali (Kunal Nayyar) and Penny Hofstadter (Kaley Cuoco) among other characters. It has already been followed by prequel series Young Sheldon, which launched back in 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
CBS News names '60 Minutes' veteran Tanya Simon as broadcast's new top producer
CBS News said Thursday it has selected Tanya Simon as the top producer at '60 Minutes,' elevating a respected insider in a closely-watched appointment given the turmoil that enveloped the newsmagazine with the settlement of President Donald Trump 's lawsuit. Simon, daughter of the late '60 Minutes' correspondent Bob Simon, becomes only the fourth executive producer of the influential newsmagazine since it was invented by Don Hewitt in the late 1960s. She's been executive editor of the broadcast, and running it on an interim basis since her predecessor Bill Owens quit in April, saying he questioned whether he'd be allowed to lead the program as he saw fit. Owens had opposed settling Trump's lawsuit over the editing of last fall's interview with Kamala Harris. CBS News parent company Paramount Global agreed earlier this month to pay Trump $16 million to end their dispute. Simon has worked at '60 Minutes' for 25 years, and was strongly supported by many at the famously insular broadcast to take over for Owens. 'Tanya Simon understands what makes '60 Minutes' tick,' said Tom Cibrowski, president and executive editor of CBS News. 'She is an innovative leader, an exceptional producer, and someone who knows how to inspire people.' In May, seven '60 Minutes' correspondents signed a letter to Paramount Global management urging that Simon be appointed. 'As much as we will miss Bill Owens, we believe — no, we know — that his long-term successor must come from within,' the correspondents wrote. Crucially, Simon's appointment came before the Trump administration's approval of Paramount Global's proposed merger with Skydance Media, a takeover that is expected to result in changes at CBS News. ___ David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dem. Sen. Elizabeth Warren pens Steven Colbert conspiracy theory for Variety...but omits important fact
Sen. Elizabeth Warren has peddled a scathing conspiracy theory claiming that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert 's late night show to appease President Donald Trump. The Democrat published an op-ed Wednesday in Variety Magazine alleging Trump bullied CBS parent company Paramount into cancelling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert - but voters were left unamused by her analysis. Warren cited how Trump hit CBS with a lawsuit that the firm branded 'meritless' during the 2024 election, but quickly reached a $16million once he took office. She also highlighted how Colbert called the settlement a 'big, fat bribe' and saw his show canceled just three days later. 'Was it a coincidence that CBS canceled Colbert just three days after he spoke out? Are we sure that this wasn't part of a wink-wink deal between the president and a giant corporation that needed something from his administration?' she wrote. She also pointed to how Trump celebrated the show's cancelation, adding: 'If CBS made this decision for "purely financial" reasons, why the timing? And why did Trump say "I hope I played a major part in" getting Colbert fired?' But her scornful opinion piece - which fails to address the embarrassing fact that the show was losing $40million each year - was not well-received by Americans who are now questioning 'why are you so concerned about Stephen Colbert?' Warren has tweeted about the show's axing at least four times, which voters allege should be the least of her worries. 'This is what your senator is spending time on. Really? Primary her,' one furious X user urged. 'You fight harder for illegal aliens and millionaire celebrities than you do your constituents. Why is that Liz?' another wrote. 'I am so glad you are focused on what will really help people in need,' one echoed. Another added: 'This just implicates you further. Congrats.' 'Only if you put this kind of effort into your constituents. But a little bit of connection with people, you would know that late night TV is not something people do anymore. People are more into streaming platforms these days,' one user said. Others branded her a 'buffoon' and called her out for not acknowledging the financial turmoil the show was facing. 'We know you're not too business savvy so let's try it slowly. $40M losses per year is not good for business,' one X user wrote. 'When a politician can't figure out why a business would dump an activity that loses $40million a year, you understand why our government is $36trillion in debt,' another criticized. Others called for her removal, penning tweets like: 'Hopefully you will be canceled In your next election.' Warren's op-ed alleges Paramount settled the lawsuit with Trump and axed the talk show to ensure its merger with Skydance, a deal she cites to be 'worth $8billion' and 'can only go through if it's approved by the Trump administration' Warren alleges Paramount settled the lawsuit and axed the talk show to ensure its merger with Skydance, a deal she cites to be 'worth $8billion' and 'can only go through if it's approved by the Trump administration'. 'Instead of fighting Trump on his "meritless" lawsuit, Paramount settled, handing to Trump's presidential library. This looks like bribery in plain sight, and that's exactly what Stephen Colbert said on his show,' she wrote. The senator further claimed the 'Paramount payoff' - as she calls it - demonstrates the president's 'corrupt pattern' of 'exploiting' his office to 'profit personally' and 'punish his perceived enemies'. She highlighted how ABC News provided $15million to Trump's presidential library to settle 'another questionable defamation lawsuit'. Warren also claimed that Trump told Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg he would only be 'brought in the tent' of his administration if he settled a separate lawsuit. Zuckerberg ultimately contributed $22million to Trump's library and ended Meta's fact-checking program, the senator said. She argued 'Trump is running the same play again' with Paramount and will continue to do so with other media outlets that question him. 'The pattern is the same: Trump threatens to bring down the weight of the federal government on a single institution, and, too often, the targets feel they have no option but to bow down to an all-powerful Trump,' she wrote. But she failed to acknowledge a recent report revealing The Late Show costs $100million a year to produce, with Colbert, 61, getting paid between $15million and $20 million annually to host. Voters were left frustrated by Warren's op-ed and multiple tweets about the show's cancellation, alleging she should be more focused on the needs of her constituents than on the status of a TV program The Late Show's cancelation was announced last Thursday. Colbert, who will broadcast his final show in May 2026, was reportedly first informed his show was on the chopping block around July 4. Paramount Co-CEO George Cheeks made the decision, Puck journalist Matthew Belloni revealed last week. Belloni outlined Colbert's astonishing lack of profitability just hours after CNN first broke the news that the show was canceled because it was in the red. Late night shows have slumped in profitability in recent years as viewers shun the format in favor of streaming services or watching content on their phones. Colbert beats ABC and NBC rivals Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon in the ratings, but that still wasn't enough to save him. Advertiser revenue has slumped sharply even in the last three years, Puck reported, making it harder to pull Colbert's show out of the red. The show's axing delighted Trump, who posted about it on his TruthSocial network. All three major late night hosts - Colbert, Kimmel and Fallon - have become notorious for their regular rants about Trump, which many viewers have complained are boring and off-putting. But Belloni said he didn't believe the famously anti-MAGA Colbert was axed to appease Donald Trump, who recently won a $15million payout from CBS after suing them over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris he said was deceptively edited. Colbert was reported to be 'not angry, actually' about his cancelation, Puck reported.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘South Park's most furious episode ever': the jaw-dropping Satanic takedown of Donald Trump
It hasn't been a particularly great few weeks for Paramount. Thanks to its decision to pay Donald Trump $16m rather than fight a lawsuit that many predicted it would win – a move that happened just as they needed federal approval of an $8bn merger – all hell has broken loose. Stephen Colbert (whose Late Show airs on Paramount-owned CBS) called the settlement a 'big fat bribe', precipitating the cancellation of his show. In response, Jon Stewart (whose Daily Show airs on Paramount-owned Comedy Central) aired a segment in which he and a gospel choir led the studio audience through a repeated chant of 'fuck you' directed at his paymasters. And now, in what might just be the worst possible timing for both Paramount and Trump, South Park is back. Considering that South Park has always been known for its unvarnished satire, and for an extraordinarily responsive production process that allows it to comment on events almost until the moment of broadcast, the first episode of its 27th season always had the potential to sting. And since that first episode – entitled Sermon on the 'Mount – is a scorching critique of both Paramount's cowardice and Trump's eagerness to ride roughshod over his own voters, sting it does. Trump himself is a character, as is his talking micropenis. Even for a show like South Park, which has often been defined by its anger, this may well go down as its most furious ever. The episode's plot, such as it is, involves Cartman becoming distraught at Trump's cancellation of funding for public broadcaster NPR, which he only listens to because he finds its wokeness hilarious. 'The government can't cancel a show,' he rails early on. 'I mean, what show are they going to cancel next?' Very quickly answering its own question, we then meet South Park's version of Donald Trump. Presented – in terms of voice, behaviour and animation style – identically to Saddam Hussein in the South Park movie, the show's Trump brashly parrots the phrase 'Relax, guy' to anyone who takes issue with him, and is regularly seen in bed with Satan. He also keeps suing everybody, and removing his trousers to show off his tiny penis. In total, we see Trump's penis five times throughout the episode. Once is photorealistic, but we'll get to that. Trump is there to try to placate the residents of South Park, who are angry that the person they voted for has become a self-interested dictator who probably appeared in the Epstein files. In perhaps the best joke of the episode, the town's protests are covered by 60 Minutes (the show that caused Trump to sue Paramount), by hosts nervous that anything they say will spark more presidential lawsuits. 'Oh boy, oh shit, oh God,' they keep mumbling, over an image of a ticking timebomb. Then Jesus (last meaningfully seen on the show doing cocaine with Santa back in 2019) speaks to the residents. Having returned to fulfil the president's wishes to bring Christianity back to education, Jesus urges everyone not to upset Trump further. 'You guys saw what happened to CBS,' he whispered. 'You really want to end up like Colbert? Just shut up or we're going to be cancelled. If someone has the power of the presidency, and also has the power to sue and take bribes, then he can do anything to anyone.' Spooked by the sermon, the South Park residents decide that the only way to survive is to pump out a stream of pro-Trump messaging. Thus, the final moments of the show are given over to a short film of a realistic deepfake Trump staggering through the desert as he removes his clothes. Collapsing on to the sand naked, Trump looks down at his penis, which (since it has eyes and a mouth) says, 'I'm Donald J Trump and I approve this message.' A voiceover intones: 'His penis is teeny tiny, but his love for us is large.' End of episode. In other words, Sermon on the 'Mount is a grand dare. If Trump could get $16m by suing Paramount over an editorially acceptable edit on a news programme, then it stands to reason that he will try to go after a cartoon that depicts him trying to insert his microscopic penis into Satan. And if he does sue, will Paramount risk destroying its already damaged reputation by capitulating yet again? There's plenty of nuance to this battle, not least the fact that the programme's creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, have just signed a $1.5bn contract with Paramount+, ensuring that it will exclusively stream South Park for the next five years, but the battle lines have been drawn. Paramount finds itself caught in yet another bind. If push comes to shove, who will it side with: a president who might block its $8bn merger out of spite, or its most aggressively provocative show? The way things are shaping up, this could be a hell of a season.
