logo
Fact Check: Context missed from comparison touted as evidence of UK's two-tier religious freedom

Fact Check: Context missed from comparison touted as evidence of UK's two-tier religious freedom

Reuters26-06-2025
A side-by-side comparison of two videos - one showing police taking a street preacher's microphone and another of a man reciting the Islamic call to prayer from a London landmark – misses context in online posts that claim it is evidence of a two-tier system of religious freedom in Britain.
'British police take away Christian preacher's microphone because his prayers were causing anxiety to some,' said a June 9 post, opens new tab on Facebook sharing screenshots of the two videos.
'Muslims can do what they want, they don't seem to cause anxiety,' the post added, referring to the call to prayer. 'UK is lost.'
A similar post on X, opens new tab received 1 million views.
However, a spokesperson for Sussex Police said in an email the preacher had his microphone briefly removed so a police officer could talk to him.
The microphone was later returned to him, the spokesperson added, as evidenced by a fuller version, opens new tab of the video, at timecode 02:59., opens new tab
In a statement, Sussex Police said officers were called to London Road, Brighton, on March 10, amid reports of hate speech being broadcast. Officers spoke to a man performing a speech, but no offences were identified. Police left the scene without taking any action and the man was not arrested.
The European Convention on Human Rights, opens new tab guarantees freedoms of religion (article 9) and expression (article 10) in the UK, meaning street preaching is lawful.
However, if the speech is threatening or abusive or causes hatred, it may constitute an offence under the Public Order Act 1986, opens new tab. Nevertheless, the law does not make a distinction between religions, James Holt, an associate professor of religious education at the University of Chester, said in an interview with Reuters.
The second video - the subject of a separate Reuters fact-check article in 2021 - shows British-Bangladeshi entrepreneur Kazi Rahman reciting the call to prayer from Tower Bridge.
A spokesperson for Tower Bridge said in an email that organisers of the recital - which happened on May 7, 2021, to mark the last Friday of Ramadan - had sought permission from the City of London Corporation in April 2021.
The City of London Corporation declined to comment. The preacher in Brighton did not respond to a request for comment.
Missing context. Police temporarily removed the Brighton preacher's microphone, and a longer version of the video shows it was returned. Permission for the Tower Bridge Islamic call to prayer was sought and granted at least a week before the recital.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine
This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine

The UK is preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine as a reassurance force if a peace deal is reached with Russia. A meeting of the "coalition of the willing", co-chaired by Sir Keir Starmer, saw over 30 international leaders discuss further sanctions on Russia and security guarantees for Ukraine. Donald Trump has indicated the US is willing to provide security assistance, such as air support, but will not commit ground troops to Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelensky has welcomed the promise of security guarantees as a major step forward, expecting them to be formalised soon. Donald Trump stated he has spoken directly with Vladimir Putin to plan a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky, followed by a three-way meeting including Trump. UK preparing to send troops to Ukraine as part of 'reassurance force' if peace deal is struck

Constance Marten launches appeal against conviction for killing baby daughter
Constance Marten launches appeal against conviction for killing baby daughter

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Constance Marten launches appeal against conviction for killing baby daughter

Constance Marten will attempt to appeal against her conviction for killing her baby daughter Victoria. The 38-year-old aristocrat and her partner Mark Gordon, 51, were found guilty of the gross negligence manslaughter of the baby at the Old Bailey last month after a retrial. Marten has now applied to appeal against the conviction at the Court of Appeal, according to the BBC. The couple went on the run with the baby after Marten gave birth in secret in December 2022, and slept rough in freezing temperatures in January 2023. Victoria was found dead, hidden in an allotment shed, two months later. A previous application by Marten to appeal against a conviction of cruelty to a child from her first trial was rejected in February. Her four other children whom she shared with Gordon, a convicted rapist, were previously taken into care and put up for adoption. The couple went off-grid in the lead up to baby Victoria's birth in a bid to keep her from being put up for adoption. They became the subject of a manhunt when their burnt-out car was discovered on the M62 near Bolton, in Lancashire. Police found a placenta in the vehicle and realised that Marten had given birth in secret. The baby died while she and her parents were sleeping rough in a freezing-cold tent on the South Downs. Marten and Gordon were eventually arrested in Brighton at 9.35pm on Feb 27 2023 on suspicion of child neglect, but Victoria was not with them. The couple refused to tell police where she was, but on March 1, following a huge search of the areas where the couple had been sleeping, her body was found in a disused shed. It is unknown how Victoria died. The prosecution alleged that she died from hypothermia or was smothered while co-sleeping in the 'flimsy' tent. Marten maintained in court that the baby died by accident when she fell asleep while holding her. Marten and Gordon will be sentenced on Sept 15.

Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out
Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out

Labour 's asylum policy was left in chaos after a judge ordered a controversial migrant hotel to shut. The High Court ruling gives The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, just 24 days to close after it became the focus of violent protests. Epping Forest District Council's victory could open the floodgates to a series of similar legal actions against other migrant hotels across the country. Ministers scrambled to respond after an 11th-hour Home Office bid to block the action was thrown out. Government lawyers warned the court that granting the injunction on a planning technicality 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Intensifying the pressure on Labour, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he hoped it gave 'inspiration to others across the country'. Some 32,000 migrants are in about 210 hotels, according to the Home Office, and discontent is building. The injunction left Sir Keir Starmer in an even more woeful position after he scrapped the Tory government's Rwanda asylum deal, in which illegal migrants would have been sent on a one-way ticket to East Africa. The Prime Minister's pledge to 'smash the gangs' was already in tatters, with more than 51,000 small-boat migrants having reached Britain since the election. The legal challenge to The Bell was brought by the local council after a small-boat migrant there was accused of sexual offences. Hadush Kebatu, from Ethiopia, was charged last month with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl of 14 to engage in sexual activity. Eight days after he arrived in the UK, Kebatu, 41, allegedly tried to kiss a schoolgirl as she ate pizza, and the next day tried to kiss a woman in the town and put his hand on her leg. He then encountered the girl again and tried to kiss her, Colchester Magistrates' Court was told. Kebatu denies the offences and is in custody. Protesters descended on the hotel following news of his arrest and court appearance, leading to violent scuffles between those opposed to the migrant hotel and 'anti-racism' demonstrators. Recent protests against the hotel have mainly been peaceful, with a group of women nicknamed the 'Pink Ladies' leading marches. Mohammed Sharwarq, 32, a Syrian at the 80-bed hotel, has been charged with seven offences, including kissing a man on the neck on July 25. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the injunction was 'a victory for the mums and dads in Epping who just want their children to be safe'. She added: ' Putting a hotel full of young, male illegal immigrants in the middle of a community like Epping was always going to lead to issues. They need to be moved immediately. 'But Epping is just one of many towns struggling with asylum hotels. 'Labour have no solution, they're not smashing any gangs and small-boat arrivals are at record highs.' Mr Farage said: 'This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far-Right, and have won. 'Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should not be free to walk the streets. They must be detained and deported.' Corina Gander, Tory leader of Broxbourne Borough Council in Hertfordshire, said she was considering similar action. She added: 'It's just given us this massive boost and precedent that we can do something now.' The 12 councils in which Reform UK is the largest party are also said to be exploring the prospect. The legal action was the first to succeed in getting a migrant hotel shut down. Epping Forest council was granted a temporary injunction by Mr Justice Eyre at the High Court in London after arguing that The Bell's owners, Somani Hotels, broke planning rules by changing its use to house migrants. The judge said the firm had 'sidestepped public scrutiny and explanation', writing in his judgement: 'Although the defendant's actions were not flagrant or surreptitious they were deliberate. 'The defendant acted in good faith but chose to take its stand on the position that there was no material change of use.' Home Office lawyers who claimed The Bell's closure would breach asylum seekers' 'fundamental human rights' failed to block the legal challenge. A hearing on a permanent injunction will take place later. Speaking at the Royal Courts of Justice after the ruling, Epping Forest council leader Chris Whitbread said: 'This is a decision that's important to Epping Forest, but also important to councils up and down the country, and it shows that the Government cannot ignore planning rules.' Welcoming the 'fantastic news', Sarah White, 40, one of the protest leaders, said: 'We will start protesting with towns up and down the country. This is bigger than Epping, it is impacting the whole country.' Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government would consider the ruling, and would close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store