Streets Of Avalon's $350,000 half-brother Bradford to debut at Sale on Thursday
Streets Of Avalon won two Group 1 races among six stakes successes as a result of the union between stallion Magnus and the Black Minnaloushe mare Kamuniak.
The breeding match also produced city-class gallopers Eugenius and Orlando Grove.
However, Streets Of Avalon's breeders decided to change this for Kamuniak's 2022 stud season, sending the mare to champion stallion Written Tycoon.
Nichols paid $350,000 for the resulting colt, Bradford, which will debut at Sale on Thursday.
'It's a great mix of owners, a few new clients and some old clients that have been with me for years so it should be good,' Nichols said.
The trainer said the different sire brought a superior specimen to Bradford's half-siblings.
'He's bigger, stronger and has more length than all the others,' Nichols said.
'He's a better type than Streets Of Avalon, Eugenius, Orlando Grove and Kentucky Woman, better than all of them.'
Bradford is a $26 in early betting on the Vale Peta Tait Maiden Plate (1210m), a race named in honour of a stablehand that died in a Cranbourne stable tragedy earlier this month.
The rising three-year-old finished third and fourth in jumpouts leading up to his race debut but Nichols said the results were a secondary consideration.
'We're just trying to educate him in his jumpouts because there's no money in jumpouts,' Nichols said.
'He'll definitely be competitive first-up'.
Meanwhile, Nichols said his sole Flemington acceptor Fenestella was all but certain to miss Saturday's TAB We're On (1410m) in preference for a provincial maiden.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 minutes ago
- ABC News
Swimming development funding shortfall threatens Olympic dreams, coaches say
As Australia celebrates its World Championship swimming success, there are fresh warnings that the next generation of winners is not getting the support it needs. Swimming Queensland's chief executive Kevin Hasemann said there were about 600 teenagers in the state's development programs, but the majority were not receiving any financial support to cover competition and training costs in the lead-up to Brisbane's 2032 Olympics. "I expect the Australian public would be as mystified and disheartened as we are that several billions of dollars will be spent on Games-related infrastructure, including a new aquatics facility," Mr Hasemann said. "But little, if anything, is going to the junior swimmers who face the herculean challenge of replacing our current batch of Olympic and Paralympic medallists." Mr Hasemann said government funding was available, but it was mostly limited to elite athletes. He said Swimming Queensland was relying on donations from Australia's richest woman, Gina Rinehart, to run development programs. Mr Hasemann said he asked the Queensland government for about $500,000 a year to help young swimmers in the lead-up to the Brisbane Games. But he has not had any luck. "The sad thing about this is that when the penny drops, it can be far too late," he said. "Because the work needs to be happening right now. Seven years for a young athlete is a very short period of time. You can't afford to get it wrong." Luca Widmer, 17, is one of the athletes in Swimming Queensland's development program. He trains for 18 hours a week with his club at Caloundra, north of Brisbane, juggling that with year 12 studies. "I've had the dream of competing at the Olympics my entire life," he said. "I know that road ahead is long and it's tough, but I know that if I want it badly enough and I have the right support, anything is possible." For up-and-coming swimmers like Luca, travelling to competitions and paying for top trainers is crucial. But his mother Leanne Bullemor said proud parents like her were doing most of the financial heavy lifting. "Over the last 12 months, just looking at the financial side of things, with my two boys competing in development programs, it would have cost $20,000 for me to support them," she said. "That's just the training fees, the membership fees, the competition fees I have to pay." Ms Bullemor said local clubs and Swimming Queensland were doing the best they could with what they had. But she said state and federal governments should do more to help. "Our state is very proud. We're an extremely proud swimming state," she said. Luca is training in the same pool that launched Olympic gold medallist Kaylee McKeown's career. His swimming coach Theo Fuchs, who trained for the Olympics in France, pointed out Australia's toughest opponents in the pool, the United States and China, would not be waiting for us to catch up. "We need more money for swimmers, we need more money for coaches," he said. "If you look at the top countries in the world, they are supported by money, and if you want to be doing good consistently, then you have to have that support." The Queensland government didn't respond to questions about whether it would deliver on Swimming Queensland's development funding request. But, in a statement, a spokesperson for the state's Minister for the Olympic and Paralympic Games Tim Mander said more than $5 million would be spent on high-performance swimmers in the lead-up to the Los Angeles Olympics and Paralympics in 2028. The federal government didn't respond.
News.com.au
36 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Family leaves newly-made dream home after 'scary' build prices
An interstate family was able to build their dream home on a rare patch of land in one of Queensland's most popular suburbs – but the price was heavier than they expected. Sarah and Marlon Cornell said they realised they and their two kids were outgrowing their Melbourne home, and begun searching for a new place. 'Our babies were Covid babies; they're now 5,' Mr Cornell said. 'We wanted to move somewhere warm, have that outdoor lifestyle. During Covid, winter with kids was really tough, especially in a small home.' After settling on Queensland, the family felt Nundah was one of the best options in their price range. In 2021, two managed to find a patch of land at $750,000, and set to work remotely building their new home. But when they did, they found rising build costs drove up their build by a sizeable fee of 25 per cent. 'When we were dealing with our builder, I wasn't expecting the end price of the build to be the amount that it was,' Mr Cornell said. 'But the builder very quickly reminded us that trades, building materials were all going up, and we were a part of that wave.' 'That time was a bit scary, because you had all these builders every week being announced to be liquidised.' Despite this, the family were glad to buy in Nundah. 'Our research [looked for] crime stats and flood information and school zones,' Ms Cornell said. 'We knew that we wanted Nundah based on that.' 'We built, then we moved up and just went straight in … we were just really lucky we bought on the street that we did. The neighbours are amazing, we've got so many good things.' Now, Nundah is one of Queensland's most popular-selling suburbs. The area saw more sales in the last year than they were days, sitting at 374 apartment sales within those 12 months. Currently, Nundah sits at a median unit price of $666,000 and a median house price of $1,242,500. Place Nundah Agent Jonathan Tesese said with land space limited and 'extremely valued', there was a strong demand for turnkey homes in Nundah's current market. 'We're not making any more land,' he said, 'so for someone to be able to come in and custom build something that fits their lifestyle to a T, it's just what buyers are wanting.' He added that despite rising build prices, Nundah's popularity meant investors were still keen on homes to turn into new projects. 'What we're seeing now is a lot of demand for knockdown homes, post-war homes, or places that can be subdivided,' he said. Seeking a home with a smaller mortgage to get some money back, the Cornell family have decided to sell their place at 1 Villeroy St – but plan to stay in Nundah if possible. 'Nundah's ideal,' Mr Cornell said. 'We wanted to choose a suburb that was relatively close to the CBD … [and] we're pretty spoiled for choice when it comes to schools.' 'Nundah definitely has that family feel. There are heaps of parks, markets and whatnot, people are out and about … you get a sense of community.'
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Negative gearing reform is back on the agenda, but younger voters now hold the power
It's time to put the 2019 election to bed, along with the messages we pretend were sent from voters from that disastrous campaign for Labor. It has been six years since Labor leader Bill Shorten took what were quite radical proposals to the voting public, including negative gearing reforms. Since that election, Australia has changed profoundly. We have endured a global pandemic with consequences we are only beginning to realise, and an acute housing crisis that has changed us. We have seen the biggest change to the demographics of the dominant voting bloc, with millennials and Gen Z now being the largest voting group in Australia, outnumbering boomers. By the next election, that shift will be even more profound. Voters younger than their mid-40s are consistently telling pollsters they believe the system is stacked against them. They have made it crystal clear they are hungry for change. The treasurer's productivity roundtable has now morphed into something much broader than simply delivering productivity reforms, and this is both worrying and exciting some stakeholders. Some in business circles believe it is increasingly being used to push for higher taxes. Those who want the tax conversation say it's about more effective taxes. Even fairer taxes. Remember fairness? Senior government sources strongly contest that this is an excuse to raise taxes. They say they are keen to cut taxes too, but need to pay for it somehow. That can't be from spending cuts alone. A reconfiguration of that tax system is the only answer. The Australian Council of Trade Unions yesterday declared they will use the productivity platform to call for bold reform to negative gearing and the capital gains tax at the government's productivity roundtable this month, proposing that the tax breaks be limited to one investment property. Sally McManus, the union's secretary, told Insiders the current arrangements should continue for five years, but after that date, "we've got to bite the bullet". "Otherwise, we're just saying 'too bad, young people, you're not going to be able to ever own a home,'" she said. "Since 2019, the problem has just gotten worse. It's going to continue to get worse unless the government is brave enough to do something about it." When it was in opposition, Labor took negative gearing reforms to the 2016 and 2019 federal elections, at which they were defeated. But they were defeated for a myriad of reasons. Their tax policies were only part of the story of that defeat. The ACTU's manifesto for reform will be resisted by some quarters, but their proposals achieve one important thing. They have restarted a conversation that Australians have said they want their leaders to be having. The tax burden is not being shared fairly, and governments that continue to ignore this reality risk losing the trust of younger voters who are hungry for reform. At the same time, the Productivity Commission has called for a 20 per cent tax rate on profits for companies with revenue of up to $1 billion. The commission also called for a new 5 per cent tax on net cashflow rather than profits, which could see some large companies pay a higher rate but would provide immediate tax relief for smaller companies seeking to build their capital. Already, this is being fiercely resisted by the big end of town. But it's time to involve a wider range of Australians from across the tax scale to have an input on what is fair and what is just. Perhaps the proposal won't work — who knows — but we should ventilate big and radical ideas, and we should applaud the Productivity Commission for thinking radically and creatively. Returning to the negative gearing conversation, you'll recall this was a scare campaign Peter Dutton unsuccessfully tried to inject into the May campaign. At the time, it forced Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers to deny that Labor was preparing to make changes to negative gearing. The issue re-emerged during the leaders' debate on the ABC, when Mr Albanese said he had not commissioned Treasury modelling on the potential economic impact of changes to the policy. His response prompted Opposition Leader Peter Dutton to laugh and accuse him of lying. Reports first emerged last year that the federal Treasury had investigated a potential overhaul of the tax concessions awarded to property owners. "It certainly wasn't commissioned by us to do so," the PM said when asked during the second debate about the Treasury modelling. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers had publicly stated back in September that he had asked Treasury for "advice" about the subject, leading Dutton to claim in the debate that Albanese had a "problem with the truth". Chalmers then tried to draw a difference between that advice and "modelling". "I've said on a number of occasions now that I sought a view," the treasurer said. "Now that's different to commissioning modelling. The prime minister was asked about commissioning modelling. I sought a view." Chalmers said it was "normal practice" to seek advice on such a matter and that the Treasury's view was a change to negative gearing "wouldn't get the sort of improvement that we desperately need to see in our economy when it comes to supply". One thing is clear: the treasurer wants this debate. Whether the PM would be willing to champion this change is another matter. We do, however, have one precedent worth remembering. The PM was deeply resistant to changing the stage 3 tax cuts until the case had been made with the public, and then suddenly, he was into it. I suspect the same thing would occur on some of the bigger reform ideas. Kos Samaras, director at the political consultancy firm Redbridge, said there are profound generational shifts between the 2019 and 2025 elections. In 2019, Millennials and Gen Z made up just 26 per cent of the electoral roll, whilst Baby Boomers and older Australians still held sway, culturally and politically. But that was the last election where the latter group's decades-long dominance would be felt. "By May 2025, Millennials and Gen Z accounted for 42 per cent of enrolled voters, a generational bloc shaped by vastly different life experiences," he tells this column. "This is the first cohort since the Great Depression to believe their quality of life is worse than that of their parents. "They've come of age amid a housing crisis, climate anxiety, a global pandemic, inflation shocks, and broken career promises. "At the next federal election, this generational tide will become even more pronounced. "Millennials and Gen Z will be the most dominant voting bloc in the country, while Baby Boomers and older Australians will comprise just 27 per cent of the roll. "Hence, the ACTU-proposed negative gearing changes will resonate with younger Australians, and it would be a brave politician to ignore such a proposal." Over to you. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
