MK Party wants secret ballot for Ramaphosa no-confidence vote
The party's parliamentary leader, Dr John Hlophe, wrote a formal request to the Speaker of Parliament, Thoko Didiza.
He believes that a secret ballot will ensure that Members of Parliament (MPs) can exercise their constitutional duty freely, without fear of intimidation.
According to Hlophe, the request aligns with Rule 129 of the National Assembly Rules. Given the sensitive nature of the motion, the MK Party believes a secret ballot is necessary to protect the integrity of the process.
Hlophe said the ballot must reflect principles of accountability and transparency, and protect MPs' freedom to vote according to their conscience.
'A secret ballot will safeguard the integrity of the voting process and ensure that the outcome reflects the true will of the MP,' said Hlophe.
Hlophe further called on Speaker Didiza to consult with relevant stakeholders and to make an urgent decision on the matter.
The MK Party filed the motion on Tuesday, 22 July. The party cited President Ramaphosa's dismissal of Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and the appointment of Acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia as the basis for its action.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
South Africa braces for hefty 30% export tariff from the US
South Africa will be hit with a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States from August 1, following a formal letter from US President Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and long-standing market restrictions. Image: Lee Rondganger/IOL South Africans are bracing themselves for the ramifications of the hefty 30% export tariff to the US that is expected to come into effect on Friday. South Africa exports billions of rands' worth of goods to the US each year, including fruit, vegetables, meat, and wine. These sectors employ thousands of workers, and the 30% tariff will render their products uncompetitive in the American market, placing immense pressure on producers and exporters. South Africa has been trying to negotiate a trade deal with the US since May but is yet to agree on terms. The US tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resiliency. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) said it remains committed to the cause and awaits substantive feedback from the US on the final status of the country's framework deal. The department said it has been in a period of intense negotiations with the US and had signed a condition precedent document and 'have readied our inputs for entry into the template which is to follow from the US'. 'Despite the challenges that have been presented by this period, we have put our best foot forward, bringing together the subject specialists within our ranks that have dug deep to ensure that our country is adequately prepared for a number of potential scenarios,' DTIC said. According to estimates, the tariffs will add roughly $3.5 billion (R63bn) to the cost of exports to the US, based on South Africa's 2023 export value. The DTIC's proposed deal features a number of areas, including importing 750-100 petajoules of Liquified Natural Gas for a 10 year period, unlocking $12 billion; and enabling agricultural market access by simplifying US poultry exports under the 2016 tariff rate quota and unlocking approximately $91m million in trade. South African firms committed to invest $3.3bn in US industries such as mining and metals recycling, while both governments agreed to pursue joint investment in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and agri-machinery. Thys van Zyl, CEO of Everest Wealth Advisory, said South Africa was facing severe economic consequences without any formal agreement in place with its second-largest bilateral trading partner. 'It is almost unthinkable that, on the eve of such far-reaching tariffs, we still do not have a formal agreement – or even a timeline for when one can be expected. This is not only deeply concerning – it is negligent,' Van Zyl said. Despite discussions between the relevant stakeholders, there are no confirmed exemptions, no concessions, and no sign of progress in negotiations with the US government. The government has denied claims of a trade imbalance between South Africa and the US, maintaining that the 30% reciprocal tariff was not an accurate representation of available trade data. Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, this week said they were working with other government departments on a response plan that also focuses on demand side interventions in the impacted industries. Meanwhile, Foord Asset Management portfolio manager Farzana Bayat said a 30% tariff wall on South African exports to the US would be catastrophic and escalate trade risk. 'That would be a seismic shock. Even traditional US allies like the EU and Japan have negotiated reduced 15% tariffs - South Africa may not be so lucky,' Bayat said. She said the stakes were high as the expiry of the African Growth and Opportunity Act in 2025 was already clouding the medium-term trade outlook. Bayat said the immediate risk was acute as the South African Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago recently warned that up to 100 000 jobs were at risk, and the automotive and citrus industries were especially exposed. Car exports to the US have already collapsed by more than 80% due to earlier tariff pressures. 'This economic stress comes at a time when South Africa is already contending with low growth, power insecurity, and shaky investor confidence,' Bayat said. 'Losing preferential access to the US - our third-largest trading partner - could be devastating.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Cachalia to be sworn in as police minister after ConCourt dismisses Zuma and MK's application
In a unanimous ruling, the Constitutional Court found that the MK party's challenge to the President's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave and appoint Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister did not fall within its jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court has cleared the way for Professor Firoz Cachalia to be officially sworn in as acting police minister on Friday, 1 August, at the Union Buildings. The court dismissed former president Jacob Zuma and the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party's case against President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave and appoint Cachalia as acting minister. In a statement following the ruling on Thursday, 31 July, the Presidency confirmed Cachalia would be sworn in on Friday. Cachalia (67) is a globally regarded scholar with expertise in constitutional law. Daily Maverick has reported that in 2024, he handed a comprehensive report to Ramaphosa in his capacity as chair of the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council. The in-depth report on South Africa's anti-corruption framework focused on improving coordination among law enforcement agencies and proposing an ideal institutional model to combat corruption effectively. Although Ramaphosa has yet to respond to or release the report publicly, Cachalia may soon have the chance to put its recommendations into action. Wrong forum The official opposition in Parliament had approached the Constitutional Court on an urgent basis to oppose the appointment, urging it to rule before Cachalia officially assumed the role on 1 August. At the heart of its argument was that Ramaphosa failed to meet his constitutional responsibilities by opting not to dismiss Mchunu outright, instead placing him on special leave with full pay and perks, and appointing Cachalia, who is not a Cabinet member, as acting minister. When the court heard the matter on Wednesday, the issue of the court's exclusive jurisdiction to hear the case emerged. Representing Zuma and the MK party, advocate Dali Mpofu argued the matter fell within the court's jurisdiction as Ramaphosa 'has failed to fulfil his constitutional obligation to uphold, defend and respect the Constitution as the supreme law of SA'. Ramaphosa's legal team argued that the matter should not have been brought before the Constitutional Court at all, but rather before the high court, which was the proper forum for such disputes under the Constitution. Advocate Kate Hofmeyr, for the President, warned that allowing such a case to be heard in the apex court would open the floodgates for any dispute involving presidential powers to go to the Constitutional Court. Handing down the unanimous judgement on Thursday, Justice Rammaka Mathopo said: 'The Constitutional Court has considered the application for exclusive jurisdiction and direct access. It has concluded that the application does not engage the court's jurisdiction and no case has been made out for direct access.' After the ruling, Mpofu said Zuma had expressed shock at the court's decision. 'I don't know what's going to happen in the future in relation to this matter. We might be back in this court. We might be in another court.' Mpofu argued that the idea of direct access had been misunderstood. 'That question could have been asked to us when we were here for the Nkandla case. It could have been asked when we were here for the secret ballot case. It could have been asked when we were here for the impeachment case and all cases that were against President Zuma. 'But most of all, it should have been asked by you when the Zondo Commission came here directly. What stopped it from going to the high court? And nobody seems to be asking those questions.' Madlanga Commission The court's decision also gives the green light for the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry to commence its work. The establishment of the commission was announced by Ramaphosa in July after the explosive allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi at a press conference on 6 July. Mkhwanazi claimed Mchunu had tried to disband the Political Killings Task Team to protect politically connected members of a criminal syndicate, which Mchunu has denied. The accusations led Ramaphosa to place Mchunu on leave. Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga retired from the Bench on Thursday. In conducting the work of the new commission, he will be assisted by advocates Sesi Baloyi SC and Sandile Khumalo SC as co-commissioners. The commission is expected to submit an interim report within three months and a final report within six months of its formation. On Monday, Madlanga told reporters the commission has commenced its work 'in earnest'. The MK party's Constitutional Court case also opposed the establishment of the commission. It argued that it was an unnecessary expense that would come in addition to the financial burden of maintaining multiple ministers. It has been estimated that the commission will cost R147.9-million over six months. MK's national chairperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, said the court's decision was a travesty of justice. 'This is a very serious issue, and we're going to consult. I need to consult with the national officials; obviously, with our legal team, as to what the next steps are. But in this country, quite honestly, this is more than anything else, just a travesty of justice,' he said. Ndhlela said the party was now looking at other avenues to challenge the President, including a motion of no confidence against Ramaphosa in Parliament, while continuing its 'Hands off Mkhwanazi' marches. DM
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Trade and Industry department counters against Trump's tariffs
This combination of file pictures shows US President Donald Trump (L) and President Cyril Ramaphosa. PRETORIA - The Trade and Industry Department has responded to US tariffs, by launching a support desk for affected companies. The intervention includes a newly established Export Support Desk, to help businesses with market guidance and alternative trading partners. This comes as US prepares to charge South African goods entering the US a 30% tariff. Minister Parks Tau has agreed that US tariffs will affect a number of South Africa's industries that have had a strong working relationship with the US.
