Archaeology Scotland and volunteers investigate lost North Lanarkshire community
Archaeology Scotland, local volunteers and school pupils have been investigating the lost community of New Orbiston in North Lanarkshire in a first in British archaeology.
The New Orbiston community was established in 1825 by two men inspired by Robert Owen's success in creating a better system of living and working at the New Lanark mill site.
Abraham Combe and Archibald Hamilton of Dalzell, with the support of Owen, took up the mission of creating a new community based on the principals of co-operation developed at New Lanark.
A parcel of picturesque land along the South Calder River was purchased was purchased from Archibald Hamilton's father. There had been a settlement in the area named 'Orbistoun' since at least the 16th century which had developed into the Orbiston Estate in the 18th century and was owned by the Douglas family.
The land purchased by the Orbiston community lay to the north of the Orbiston Estate.
Construction of 'Liberty Hall' the large accommodation block which housed the apartments began in 1825 and by the following year around 250 people had moved to call Orbiston their home.
However, fallings out over the co-operative system and materials and tokens being used instead of monetary wages, Abrahm Combe's illness and financial trouble contributed to the failure of the project by 1828.
The archaeological team have started by surveying the sites associated with the community, the manufactory and also the Holm Forge, where buildings are hidden in the undergrowth.
These sites have not been surveyed before and it is important they are added to the National Monuments Record so they, and the story of New Orbiston, can be passed onto future generations.
The survey was followed by a small-scale evaluation dig at the manufactory in July this year to determine the survival of any archaeological features and to offer a glimpse into the use, phasing and chronology of the building.
The excavation revealed the interior wall faces of the main building and detail on the construction methods used in the small annex on the northern side of the building.
These sites have never been looked at before by archaeologists and the involvement of the local community in researching, surveying, excavating and telling this story is of vital importance.
The Orbiston community did not last long but it set out to achieve a better and fairer set of working and living conditions for all who were part of it.
Keiran Manchip, Project Officer, said: 'We are really happy with our excavation at the manufactory site of the Orbiston community (1825-28).
'This site has offered us an exciting glimpse into the material culture and architecture of a Utopian community which set out to make a better, fairer and more equal society.
'This movement formed during a time of economic and social challenges that mirror challenges we face today, such as technological advances which bring changes to our working lives, by exploring the archaeology of this community we can better understand how workers tried to challenge these developments.
'This lost story has been uncovered through a programme of surveys and excavations by our team and we'd like to say a massive thank you to the volunteers from across Lanarkshire and the Our Space group and Phoenix Futures for getting involved and creating such a fun environment on-site.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
SNP set to write off £36m owed by benefit claimants... out of 'fairness'
Benefit overpayments worth tens of millions of pounds could be written off due to the 'values and ethos' of SNP ministers. The Scottish Government has ensured a UK-led crackdown will not apply to around £36million owed by welfare claimants north of the Border. Social Security Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said Labour's plans were 'not compatible' with the 'fairness, dignity and respect' she required. She has yet to say if SNP ministers will claw back any overpayments from devolved benefits, once the UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) stops doing it on their behalf from next spring. The Scottish Tories said not even trying was an 'insult' to hard-working taxpayers. Social security spokesman Alexander Stewart said: 'SNP ministers appear to have thrown in the towel at trying to recover these huge outstanding debts, which is an insult to hard-pressed taxpayers. 'It is a complete dereliction of duty to not even bother clawing back millions that have been overpaid or fraudulently claimed. 'No wonder Scotland has a ballooning and unaffordable benefits bill when the SNP Government won't even try to recoup money fraudulently claimed or overpaid.' The Scotsman published details of correspondence between the UK and Scottish governments containing profound disagreements over the issue. Earlier this year, the UK Government announced the 'biggest fraud crackdown in a generation' aimed at the cheats who steal around £7billion from taxpayers each year. The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill also gives the DWP powers to recover money paid out by mistake. As a last resort, it can recover cash directly from people's bank accounts or suspend their driving licence to make them pay. The SNP rejected the methods as too harsh, and the UK Government changed the Bill to make sure they did not apply to devolved benefits. In June, UK minister Andrew Western told Ms Somerville the DWP would stop recovering devolved debts in 2026, leaving SNP ministers to do it themselves or write off £36million. 'The Scottish Government will need to consider whether these debt records should be transferred for further action or the remaining debt balances be written off,' he wrote. In the Holyrood chamber at 9pm on the second last day before summer recess began on June 28, Ms Somerville told MSPs what was going on but did not state the sum involved. She said: 'I recognise the duty of governments to ensure that overpayments are recovered, wherever it is reasonable to do so, but that cannot be at the expense of our values and ethos. 'It would not be appropriate to recommend consent for the overpayment recovery provisions and I do not consider them compatible with the ethos of fairness, dignity and respect.' She has yet to set out an alternative recovery plan – or even say if there will be one. In January, Social Security Scotland chief executive David Wallace admitted his agency has 'the powers to enforce deduction from ongoing benefits, but we have not yet used them'. The Scottish Government said: 'Social Security Scotland will always seek to recover overpayments wherever it is economic and reasonable to do so.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
B&M to shut popular store in blow to high street as shoppers mourn loss
B&M has announced the closure of one of its stores as shoppers mourn the loss of the budget retailer's popular branch. The bargain retailer will cease trading at one of its Scotland stores in a matter of months, in another huge blow to the high street. The Musselburgh branch will cease trading on January 9 2026, B&M has confirmed. Instead, the focus will switch to the nearby store at Fort Kinnaird. All staff at the East Lothian site will be relocated to alternative stores in the area. Customers were quick to share their disappointment on social media, as one user wrote: "Shocking news." While another saddened shopper added: "Such a shame." A spokesperson for the retail chain said: "All colleagues from this store will be offered employment at local B&M stores in the surrounding area after the closure on January 9. 'We're committed to bringing the best possible B&M stores to East Lothian and recently upgraded our nearby Fort Kinnaird store – now home to a garden centre and a much bigger range just two miles away, ensuring we continue to offer the best possible shopping experience and broadest range in the area.' This comes after The Sun reported another B&M store closure earlier this year. The retailer pulled down the shutters on a London location on March 29, after a closure notice was put up on the store window. Customers were left devastated after finding out the branch would be closing its doors for good. Lidl to sell handy garden tool in Middle Aisle and it's £65 cheaper than Bosch version One said: "All our neighbours are absolutely gutted; you can get everything there from Christmas decorations to food, toiletries, paint and garden plants. "It's a bit no-frills but it has some absolute bargains in there." Another dejectedly added on Facebook: "I love that shop, lots of nice things." B&M isn't the only popular retailer facing store closures. Poundland has also announced a string of closures this month, in another blow to the high street. The budget retailer has confirmed the locations of 48 store closures this month, with more planned for September. The closures come as Polish owner Pepco Group sold Poundland to US investment firm Gordon Brothers for £1 after a downturn in trading. Major restructuring plans have followed which include the closure of a whopping 68 stores by mid-October. Hobbycraft has also confirmed nine more closures this month, as it launched a major summer sale. The major retail chain has confirmed the closures as part of a restructuring effort, with big sales launched at branches. Hobbycraft has already shut more than 18 stores across the UK this year, and further closures are expected. It comes after Hobbycraft launched a strategic review of the business in May to look at balancing its books. RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
It's time to explode the Establishment myths against a wealth tax
This rebuttal largely goes unchallenged by the national media, yet it has at its heart a number of misleading premises. The first is that wealth creation ceases when the wealthy leave. This stems from the myth that the ruling class create wealth through their ingenuity and risk-taking, as opposed to all financial wealth originating from human labour. It would therefore take a mass exodus or nationwide risk to life for wealth creation in a country to cease – we need only look at the hit private profit would have taken during the pandemic had the state not stepped in to shore it up to see the primacy of human labour evidenced. Read more The second is that existing wealth itself is mobile and can "leave" with the wealthy. Some wealth is, of course, mobile, in the form of fine art, precious gems, other luxury items and the king of capital; cash, which is exactly why currency controls and export restrictions and limits exist. However, a significant proportion of wealth is in immobile assets like land, property and British-based businesses whose wealth is generated by, you guessed it, human labour. This wealth cannot up sticks and leave with an individual. The resources remain in the country and are subject to taxation. The third is the Laffer Curve itself which purports to visualise the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue, the idea being that there is an optimum rate of tax which raises the maximum revenue, above which revenue starts to decrease as taxpayers are deterred from remaining in the tax system. This theory, though influential, is unfounded. The concept of trickle-down economics, that tax cuts raise more revenue by encouraging investment and thus benefit society, has not been borne out in data. Tax cuts have not been found to reduce inequality. UK taxes are considerably lower than in most other western European countries, yet we face significant and persistent income and wealth inequalities. Research from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that in the UK the top 10% own a staggering 57% of the wealth, while 2 in every 10 adults and 3 in every 10 children, are in poverty. So, if wealth creation doesn't stop when the already wealthy leave, if the super-rich can't take their British resource-dependent wealth with them, and if tax cuts have not been found to reduce inequality, why is the Establishment so opposed to taxing wealth? The other half of their argument is on what may happen in future. Their fear, they say, is that if we make the country less profitable for wealthy individuals, even slightly so through a modest wealth tax, they will leave, and private interest as a whole will be less likely to invest in our economy. How likely this is has been contested by organisations like Tax Justice UK and Patriotic Millionaires UK, so it seems likely that at least some of the millionaires will stay, but regardless the important question is: what do the rest of us stand to gain from any potential risk of flight? We know that waiting for wealth to trickle down has not worked, that inequality has remained high while the rich get richer. We know we won't lose wealth creation as long as we have a fit and able population to do the work. We know we won't lose all existing wealth as long as we have natural resources, built heritage and, yes, a fit and able population to do the work. In fact, the greatest risk to wealth is workforce shortages caused by a public health service on its knees, an undervalued public education system and a cost-of-living crisis deterring new parents. In short, the greatest risk to wealth is continuing to let it go untaxed. Inequality has remained high while the rich get richer (Image: Getty) Yes, we may lose some wealthy individuals who don't want to pay their fair share, we may see fewer corporate lobbyists on their payroll and fewer freebies for the politicians in their pockets – I'll shed no tears for them – but what we stand to gain is a fairer system. A system that addresses inequality and says clearly and proudly, if your private interest has benefitted from our public services: our health, our education, our labour (in every sense!), you will contribute a proportion of that benefit back into the system. There would be no wealth without us, all we are asking is that we all receive our fair share. A wealth tax is a modest policy whose time has well since come. So let there be no shame in calling for one and in doing so declaring that we will not reward greed and excess, we will build a society in which we all have enough. This Labour Government has an opportunity like no other: a mandate, a majority, and a moral imperative. It must embrace it. Mercedes Villalba is a Scottish Labour MSP for the North East Scotland Region.
