Ex-minister Grant Shapps says Afghan data leak super injunction prevented murder of Brits - as it is revealed MI6 and special forces names were on list
In his first interview since the a super injunction was raised the former defence secretary said he would do it again, amid a major row over the unprecedented two-year cover-up.
Speaking to the BBC he justified the decision to withhold details of the major security breach from the public, saying he would rather explain the secrecy than why 'people were murdered' on his watch.
Special forces, MI6 spies and government officials were among more than 100 Britons on the lost Afghan dataset, it is understood.
'It seemed to me that if there was any doubt at all, that erring on the side of extreme caution, a super injunction meant that that was entirely justified,' Mr Shapps told Radio 4's Today programme.
'And I'll tell you what, anybody sat behind the desk that I was sat in as defence secretary and faced with the choice of whether that list would get out and people would be pursued, murdered and executed as a result of it, or doing something to try and save those lives, I'd much rather now be in this interview explaining why a super injunction was required, than being in this interview explaining why I failed to act and people were murdered.'
But he also questioned why Labour did not get the super injunction lifted sooner, adding: 'I don't think it should have carried on as long as it had.'
The database at the heart of the super-injunction scandal, seen by the Daily Mail, contains details of more than 100 Britons including senior military officers and government officials
The High Court was told the draconian gagging order was necessary to protect 100,000 Afghans the UK had put 'at risk of death'.
The Daily Mail has seen the list and can now reveal that details of scores of UK operatives were among the 18,800 Afghans on the list that sparked a major security crisis.
Ministers fought for two years to hush-up the data blunder with an unprecedented super-injunction that silenced the Mail and other media.
The High Court was told the draconian gagging order was necessary to protect 100,000 Afghans the UK had put 'at risk of death'.
But after we were able to get access to the database and analyse it, it became clear that dozens of senior British military officers including a brigadier and government officials were also exposed.
The Mail's investigation triggered a massive secrecy row yesterday as security-cleared parliamentarians erupted in fury at being kept in the dark.
Asked whether he backed calls from the Intelligence and Security Committee for the report to be released, Mr Shapps said: 'Yes I would.
'And secondly, this injunction, the superinjunction, was in place for longer than I was defence secretary, right?
'So it's been in place a lot longer under the current Government than it was under us, and I'm surprised it's lasted quite so long.
'My expectation was, as the risks start to lessen over time and people are removed from the theatre, from Afghanistan, and measures are taken to protect the Brits on the list… I'd thought that it was probably going to come to an end last summer, the autumn perhaps at maximum.'
He insisted he would 'do the same thing all over again' to protect Afghans and Brits involved and said he thinks 'the public understands that there are times where you simply have to act in the most maximalist way in order to stop people from being murdered and executed, and that is, quite simply, what properly happened in this case.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Police not ready for summer of unrest
Police have said that they are not ready for a summer of unrest as they warn they will have to divert officers away from neighbourhood duties to tackle protests over migrants. After days of protests against mass migration outside asylum hotels, and with more planned in the coming weeks, there are fears the UK could be heading for another summer of violent disorder. Writing for The Telegraph, below, Tiff Lynch, the head of the Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, said officers were being 'pulled in every direction' and commanders were 'forced to choose between keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps'. Unrest in Epping was a 'signal flare' for more to come, she said. The federation said that already-underfunded police forces would be forced to take officers away from neighbourhood policing duties to manage anti-migrant protests that turned violent. Official figures released by the Home Office show that the number of bobbies on the beat has already fallen to a record low. The number of officers in local policing has dropped from a peak of 67,785 in 2023 to 58,002 in 2025, according to the data. It comes after Essex Police came under fire for escorting anti-racism protesters to the Bell Hotel in Epping, where violence subsequently broke out. The force later took some of the anti-racism protesters away in police vans as they were 'clearly at risk of being hurt'. Demonstrations had taken place outside the hotel after a migrant, who has since been arrested, allegedly sexually assaulted a teenage girl just days after arriving in the UK. Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, claimed the Essex force had 'directly facilitated the unrest we saw' and added: 'Heads must roll.' Ms Lynch said that if violent protests spread throughout the summer, it would be 'dangerous to assume' officers would be able to 'hold the line indefinitely'. She said: 'It would be comical if it weren't so serious – and so familiar. Local commanders are once again being forced to choose between keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps.' The rioting that broke out in the wake of the Southport killings last year had 'exposed the deep fragility within our public order policing system', she said, adding: 'The gaps were plain to see: mutual aid stripped to the bone, co-ordination between forces lacking, and a total failure to anticipate how disorder is now sparked and fuelled online. 'Officers were left to face missiles with little more than a shield and a short briefing. The risks were there in black and white – yet little has improved since.' Ben-Julian Harrington, the Chief Constable of Essex Police, refused to resign over his handling of the protests and denied his officers had given a higher level of protection to anti-racism activists. Residents, who were protesting peacefully, said violence had been made inevitable by the decision to escort counter-protesters towards the hotel. Mr Harrington insisted that the only protection that officers were providing was to 'lawful and law-abiding people'. He argued that the 'irresponsible and criminal behaviour' of a minority of people at the protests was drawing officers in Essex away from investigating other crimes. Demonstrations outside hotels housing migrants have taken place in Norfolk and London in recent days, with more planned in other cities, including Bournemouth and Southampton, over the coming weeks. Tommy Robinson, the far-Right activist, called for his supporters to attend another demonstration outside a hotel in Norwich this week, stating that 'local communities have had enough'. Officers 'pulled in every direction' Ms Lynch said: 'Public order requires planning, investment and leadership. But officers are being pulled in every direction, asked to do more with less, and left in the dark about their future – all while being quietly sacrificed for short-term convenience. 'They will turn up. They always do. But it is dangerous to assume that they can continue to hold the line indefinitely, without the support they need or the recognition they deserve. 'A summer of further unrest is not inevitable. But it becomes far more likely if we once again fail to prepare.' The federation said that police pay had fallen by more than 20 per cent in real terms since 2010, but Ms Lynch added that 'this goes far beyond pay'. 'This is about whether the country still values the men and women who step forward when everything else breaks down. Right now, many of them feel utterly abandoned', she said. Labour is aiming to put 3,000 more bobbies on the beat by next spring and has pledged that every community will have dedicated teams that will spend their time in the community. From this month, all forces will be expected to guarantee police patrols in town centres and other 'hotspot' areas at peak times, such as Friday and Saturday nights in town centres or market days in rural communities. Writing for The Telegraph, Mr Farage said that counter-protest groups such as Stand Up To Racism had been given the 'red carpet treatment'. 'There's no doubt in my mind that, through their actions, Essex Police directly facilitated the unrest we saw', he added. Exhausted officers cannot continue to hold the line indefinitely By Tiff Lynch The disorder in Epping – where police officers were pelted with bricks and bottles outside an asylum hotel – was not just a troubling one-off. It was a signal flare. A reminder of how little it takes for tensions to erupt and how ill-prepared we remain to deal with it. Last summer's civil unrest exposed the deep fragility within our public order policing system. The gaps were plain to see: mutual aid stripped to the bone, co-ordination between forces lacking, and a total failure to anticipate how disorder is now sparked and fuelled online. Officers were left to face missiles with little more than a shield and a short briefing. The risks were there in black and white, yet little has improved since. Instead of strengthening our front line, we are continuing to sap its energy. More than 1,500 officers have been pulled from local forces to police a private visit by the US president. This was not a state occasion; it was a leisure trip. While he plays golf, communities hundreds of miles away are left without coverage, and already exhausted public order units are stretched even further. It would be comical if it weren't so serious – and so familiar. Local commanders are once again being forced to choose between keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps. Meanwhile, anger is building. Every other public sector profession – from NHS staff to teachers and the Armed Forces – has had its annual pay award confirmed. Police officers, alone, are still waiting. With just weeks before the new pay period begins, there has been nothing but silence. It's hard not to see that delay as calculated; an attempt to avoid fuelling discontent in a workforce already under strain. If that's the plan, it is both cynical and dangerous. Officers don't need a message of reassurance. They need action and respect. Through our Copped Enough campaign, we hear from officers who are at breaking point. Working relentless overtime, not as a choice but as an expectation. Taking second jobs to keep up with rising costs. Watching friends and colleagues walk away because the personal toll has become too great. Behind each uniform is a person, someone with a family, responsibilities, and limits. When officers are stretched to breaking point, the effects ripple far beyond the front line. It impacts home lives, mental health and long-term wellbeing. These are not just statistics or headlines. These are real people carrying the weight of a system in crisis. This goes far beyond pay. This is about whether the country still values the men and women who step forward when everything else breaks down. Right now, many of them feel utterly abandoned. Policing cannot function on goodwill alone. Public order requires planning, investment and leadership. But officers are being pulled in every direction, asked to do more with less, and left in the dark about their future – all while being quietly sacrificed for short-term convenience. They will turn up. They always do. But it is dangerous to assume that they can continue to hold the line indefinitely, without the support they need or the recognition they deserve. A summer of further unrest is not inevitable. But it becomes far more likely if we once again fail to prepare.
The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Bonkers' UN court ruling may allow countries to sue each other for climate reparations
COUNTRIES could soon be able to sue each other for climate reparations after a 'bonkers' court decision. The International Court of Justice ruling paves the way for poorer nations to launch multi-billion Pound compensation cases against rich powers like Britain. 2 The move sparked fury last night, with the Tories branding the top UN court's proclamation 'insane' and Reform UK warning it hands a blank cheque to foreign governments. Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said: 'We have to put Britain's interests first. 'The Government must make clear it sees no basis for this ruling to be acted upon.' Reform UK's Richard Tice fumed: 'This is another bonkers non-binding advisory judgment by the ICJ. 'They absurdly said we should give up the Chagos islands. 'They just hate us.' The judges said governments can be held responsible for climate damage — even if it stems from historic emissions pumped out decades ago. The court's opinion is non-binding, but legal experts say it could trigger real-world lawsuits as early as next week. The legal case was cooked up by law students from Pacific islands who claimed wealthy countries failed them. Flora Vano from Vanuatu island, said: 'The ICJ has recognised what we have lived through — our suffering, resilience and right to our future.' Keir Starmer's deranged drive for Net Zero with eco-zealot Ed Miliband is a threat to UK's national security- here's why The UK and others argued deals, such as the 2015 Paris Agreement, were enough but the court rejected that. Judge Iwasawa Yuji ruled not hitting the toughest climate targets would breach international law and said even countries outside the Paris pact must still protect the planet. He admitted it would be hard to determine who caused which part of climate change. Natural disasters, such as the 6.5-magnitude earthquake in Colombia in June, have also been linked to climate change. The ICJ's previous advisory ruling to hand back the Chagos Island to Mauritius was followed by the UK. 2
The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
UK is drowning in debt but striking junior doctors want huge pay rises – patients died last time before 22% increase
TUESDAY brought yet more grim news for the public finances. The Office For National Statistics revealed that in June, the Government was forced to borrow £20.7billion. 4 4 That was £6.6billion higher than last June — and all this in spite of the £40billion of tax rises announced in last October's Budget. The Government is drowning in debt. Paying interest on its accumulated debts is costing the taxpayer £100billion a year — almost double what we spend on defence. There is little hope of improvement. Economic growth is virtually non-existent, productivity is flat-lining and tax rises are failing to raise as much revenue as the Chancellor hoped, as taxpayers choose to work less hard, rearrange their tax affairs or, in some cases, emigrate. But there is one place where you can be sure the news will not have sunk in: the offices of Britain's public sector unions. Lining pockets In fact, the BMA — which is rapidly inheriting the mantle of the country's most militant trade union from the Rail, Maritime And Transport union — chose the moment to request that its consultant members charge the NHS at least £188 an hour to provide cover during the junior doctors' five-day strike, which begins tomorrow, rising to £313 an hour for weekend work. It could mean some consultants lining their pockets with up to £6,000 this weekend. It isn't hard to see the BMA's logic: it wants to try to break the NHS's finances to force the Government to give in. In spite of the extravagant bills demanded by consultants, the NHS will still not be providing a normal service during the latest walkout. During the last set of strikes by junior doctors — who now demand to be called 'resident doctors' to disguise the fact they are still in training — more than a million treatments ended up being cancelled. Wes Streeting brutally slams Kemi AND Farage and demands Tories say sorry for how they ran the NHS in blistering attack It's been reported that coroners' findings mentioned the strikes in five deaths, but that is almost certainly a gross under-estimate. During the week of one 72-hour strike in March 2023, the ONS recorded 2,247 'excess deaths' — the number of deaths above what might have been expected from the average of the previous five years over that period. Deep down, the BMA's hard men seem to realise the harm that they are causing. Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, the co-chair of the BMA's Resident Doctors' Committee, told Times Radio yesterday that consultants who refused to cancel their normal clinics in order to man A&E departments would be guilty of a 'dereliction of duty'. Yet strangely, he did not seem to want to apply the same term to junior doctors who walk out on strike. We all appreciate what doctors do, of course — yet even miners' leader Arthur Scargill at the height of his pomp was not as unreasonable as the BMA is being. 4 Junior doctors received a 22 per cent pay increase last year and have already been offered an inflation-busting 5.4 per cent this year. Their claim that they need a 29 per cent increase this year to return their pay in real terms to 2008 levels is fallacious. They made that calculation using the Retail Prices Index, a long-discredited measure which has been criticised for exaggerating inflation. Some junior doctors can now earn £100,000 a year, including overtime. What's more, they have a generous pension scheme which involves the taxpayer contributing an extra 20.68 per cent of their pay to their pension pot. When they retire, their pensions will be linked to their lifetime earnings and will be inflation-proofed. Such deals are virtually unknown now in the private sector, where employers make average pension contributions equivalent to just 4.5 per cent of an employee's pay — and where in most cases pension payouts are dependent on the performance of underlying investments. And it is not just the BMA which has lost its grasp of fiscal reality. Public sector unions are living in a parallel, dream universe where there is an infinite pot of money to meet their demands. On their side of the looking glass, workers have a fundamental right to above-inflation pay rises year on year without ever having to improve their productivity. Bankrolled by unions On the contrary, many seem to think they could still enjoy inflation-busting rises if their working week was reduced from five days a week to four. Sorry, but it doesn't work. Societies grow richer by being more productive. And that is something which seems to have eluded Britain's public sector for the past three decades. 4 Astonishingly, according to ONS figures, the average worker in the public sector now produces less than they did when Tony Blair took office 28 years ago. That is an unparalleled era of non-achievement. The unions seem to be counting on the current Government being equally blind to the dire state of the public finances. Starmer's administration has shown itself so far to be a pushover — which is hardly surprising when you consider that the Labour Party is bankrolled by the unions. But no government will be able to ignore for much longer Britain's reckoning with its debts. What happened under Liz Truss was just a foretaste of what is to come if global bond investors lose confidence in the UK Government's ability to repay its dues. When that happens, Britain will be in the situation Greece was 14 years ago when public salaries and pensions had to be slashed to avoid national bankruptcy. Public sector unions will wail all they like, but they would have helped bring the disaster on themselves.
