logo
Ex-minister Grant Shapps says Afghan data leak super injunction prevented murder of Brits - as it is revealed MI6 and special forces names were on list

Ex-minister Grant Shapps says Afghan data leak super injunction prevented murder of Brits - as it is revealed MI6 and special forces names were on list

Daily Mail​18-07-2025
Grant Shapps today defended hiding the major Afghan data leak and subsequent decision to bring almost 20,000 people to Britain, saying the secrecy prevented Brits from being murdered.
In his first interview since the a super injunction was raised the former defence secretary said he would do it again, amid a major row over the unprecedented two-year cover-up.
Speaking to the BBC he justified the decision to withhold details of the major security breach from the public, saying he would rather explain the secrecy than why 'people were murdered' on his watch.
Special forces, MI6 spies and government officials were among more than 100 Britons on the lost Afghan dataset, it is understood.
'It seemed to me that if there was any doubt at all, that erring on the side of extreme caution, a super injunction meant that that was entirely justified,' Mr Shapps told Radio 4's Today programme.
'And I'll tell you what, anybody sat behind the desk that I was sat in as defence secretary and faced with the choice of whether that list would get out and people would be pursued, murdered and executed as a result of it, or doing something to try and save those lives, I'd much rather now be in this interview explaining why a super injunction was required, than being in this interview explaining why I failed to act and people were murdered.'
But he also questioned why Labour did not get the super injunction lifted sooner, adding: 'I don't think it should have carried on as long as it had.'
The database at the heart of the super-injunction scandal, seen by the Daily Mail, contains details of more than 100 Britons including senior military officers and government officials
The High Court was told the draconian gagging order was necessary to protect 100,000 Afghans the UK had put 'at risk of death'.
The Daily Mail has seen the list and can now reveal that details of scores of UK operatives were among the 18,800 Afghans on the list that sparked a major security crisis.
Ministers fought for two years to hush-up the data blunder with an unprecedented super-injunction that silenced the Mail and other media.
The High Court was told the draconian gagging order was necessary to protect 100,000 Afghans the UK had put 'at risk of death'.
But after we were able to get access to the database and analyse it, it became clear that dozens of senior British military officers including a brigadier and government officials were also exposed.
The Mail's investigation triggered a massive secrecy row yesterday as security-cleared parliamentarians erupted in fury at being kept in the dark.
Asked whether he backed calls from the Intelligence and Security Committee for the report to be released, Mr Shapps said: 'Yes I would.
'And secondly, this injunction, the superinjunction, was in place for longer than I was defence secretary, right?
'So it's been in place a lot longer under the current Government than it was under us, and I'm surprised it's lasted quite so long.
'My expectation was, as the risks start to lessen over time and people are removed from the theatre, from Afghanistan, and measures are taken to protect the Brits on the list… I'd thought that it was probably going to come to an end last summer, the autumn perhaps at maximum.'
He insisted he would 'do the same thing all over again' to protect Afghans and Brits involved and said he thinks 'the public understands that there are times where you simply have to act in the most maximalist way in order to stop people from being murdered and executed, and that is, quite simply, what properly happened in this case.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US and EU clinch trade deal to avert prohibitive US tariffs, Trump says
US and EU clinch trade deal to avert prohibitive US tariffs, Trump says

Reuters

time4 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US and EU clinch trade deal to avert prohibitive US tariffs, Trump says

TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - The United States has struck a framework trade deal with Europe, U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Sunday, averting a spiralling row between two allies who account for almost a third of global trade. The deal, that includes a 15% tariff on EU goods entering the U.S. and significant EU purchases of U.S. energy and military equipment, will bring welcome clarity for EU companies. However, the baseline tariff of 15% will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30% rate. The announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled to Scotland for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump to push a hard-fought deal over the line. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of "90 deals in 90 days." Trump has periodically railed against the European Union saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. His main bugbear is the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $235 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The EU points to the U.S. surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance.

Remembering victims of historical injustice
Remembering victims of historical injustice

The Guardian

time5 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Remembering victims of historical injustice

Campaigners are right to say that the miners' strike, which saw the violent repression of strikers at Orgreave in 1984, remains an enduring source of injustice (Government launches Orgreave inquiry, 40 years after clashes at miners' strike, 20 July). And Pete Wilcox, the bishop of Sheffield, who is to chair the Orgreave inquiry, is right to recognise that the acknowledgment of truth is essential for long-term community healing. Sadly, Orgreave is not the only example of where truth and justice have been forsaken when excessive violence has been used against people on strike. Two hundred years ago, on 3 August 1825, six people were seriously wounded and seven killed by soldiers at North Sands, Sunderland, during the 1825 seamen's strike. The killings were met with anger and outrage, with many local people believing that those who died had been wilfully murdered. Soldiers had fired like target practice into a crowd of 100 from a boat on the River Wear. The threat posed by the crowd, made up of a combination of women, children, strikers, workers and bystanders, was greatly exaggerated. The only inquiries were two short inquests into just two of the seven deaths. At the time, the killings were reported in national newspapers and were undoubtedly one of the most significant events of 1825. What happened at Sunderland is not so different from that six years earlier at Peterloo, on 16 August 1819, yet knowledge and awareness of these two massacres are vastly different. The Sunderland seafarers' union, the Seamen's Loyal Standard Association, stated that 3 August 1825 should 'ever be remembered', but over time, the North Sands Massacre has been virtually forgotten. The denial of truth and justice at Orgreave is unfortunately just one of several incidents where those policing industrial action have used unnecessary violence and then placed the blame on their victims. All victims of historical injustice should be remembered and their communities allowed to David Gordon ScottThe Open University Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store