Five attempts too many? Ex-IPS officer's ‘wasting youth' comment on UPSC topper Shakti Dubey sparks aspirants' debate
Shakti Dubey's ascent to UPSC 2024 topper after six years and five attempts sparked debate when ex-IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad criticized the exam's lengthy preparation, calling it a waste of youth and urging limits on attempts and age. Supporters argue inclusivity and perseverance matter, while critics warn reforms could harm underprivileged aspirants and fail to address deeper coaching-driven issues.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
From Celebration to Controversy in Seconds
Is the UPSC Marathon Robbing Youth of Their Prime?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Road to Rank One: Tribute to Tenacity
When Shakti Dubey clinched the coveted Rank 1 in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2024 , the country erupted in applause. Yet amid the jubilation came a seismic jolt: a former IPS officer's blunt critique of Dubey's six‑year journey—and five attempts—through the grueling preparation cycle. His comments have thrown the spotlight on whether India's premier exam is costing its brightest minds their youth.As news portals and social feeds buzzed with praise for Dubey—whose Political Science and International Relations optional brought her to the summit—Yashovardhan Jha Azad, once an IPS officer himself, seized the moment on social media. 'Congratulations to Shikha Dubey, ranking first in UPSC result,' he began on X (formerly Twitter), 'But five attempts means six years of toil—the best years of youth gone in coaching?'Azad's message did more than question Dubey's personal sacrifice. It painted a broader picture of a system in which half a million aspirants chase a handful of vacancies year after year, often investing vast sums in coaching institutes. 'This obsession with UPSC is costing the nation huge,' he wrote, 'Employing our youth wrongly for five to six years. Coaching institutes are laughing all the way to the bank.'At the heart of Azad's argument lies a provocative proposal: cap attempts at two and lower the age ceiling to 25. By his reckoning, this would force an earlier specialization—allowing unsuccessful candidates to pivot into other careers rather than lingering in endless exam cycles.Critics were quick to catch fire. One commentator warned that stricter limits would penalize those from humble backgrounds who rely on time and perseverance to level the playing field. Another pointed out that the true beneficiaries of repeated attempts are not the candidates but the coaching industry itself—while successful officers emerge underprepared in leadership and common sense.Regardless of the controversy, Dubey's success story is undeniably inspirational. Over six years of rigorous study and repeated mains, she shattered stereotypes and climbed to the very top of India's most competitive exam. Her achievement is mirrored by the Commission's broader efforts toward inclusivity: among the 1,009 recommended candidates, representation spans General, EWS, OBC, SC, and ST categories.Behind her victory lies the closing chapter of UPSC 2024: the interview round. Conducted for 2,845 candidates and wrapped in April, it distilled aspirations into 1,132 appointments across IAS, IPS, and other premier services. For Dubey and her peers, it was the final hurdle in a marathon that Azad—and many others—now argue might need drastic reform.As debate rages, one thing is certain: India's obsession with UPSC—the allure, the agony, the academy-driven coaching culture—has once again taken center stage. Will policymakers heed calls for age and attempt restrictions? Or will they find other ways to preserve both the integrity of the exam and the prime years of its aspirants?For now, Shakti Dubey's triumph and Yashovardhan Azad's stark question linger together, challenging the nation to balance excellence with empathy—and to decide whether the cost of greatness should be measured in lost youth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
CM's oppn to rise of Almatti dam height sparks row
Vijayapura: CM Devendra Fadnavis' opposition to the proposed increase in height of Almatti dam has reignited tensions between Maharashtra and Karnataka over the Krishna river water. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It comes even as Karnataka struggles to complete the long-pending Upper Krishna Project Phase-2. In a letter to Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah, Fadnavis objected to raising the dam's height from 519 m to 524 m, claiming it would flood upstream areas of Sangli and Kolhapur in Maharashtra. However, his objections have been contested after revelations that a high-level expert committee appointed by Maharashtra govt in 2020 had found no basis for such apprehensions. The seven-member panel, led by irrigation expert and ex-Maharashtra principal secretary Nandakumar Vadnere, had studied flood patterns and the river basin across both states before submitting its findings. The committee's report, submitted to then CM Uddhav Thackeray, concluded the recurring floods in Sangli and Kolhapur were not linked to water storage in Almatti and Hipparagi reservoirs. Instead, the report blamed "encroachment in the river basin and illegal, unscientific construction of buildings in Sangli and Kolhapur" as primary causes. Other members of the committee included Sanjay Ghanekar, R R Pawar, Pradeep Purandare, Atul Kapole, N S Khare and Dhairyasheel Pawar. During their study, the committee members visited locations including Almatti dam and Hipparagi reservoir, where Karnataka officials briefed them on water storage and flood-prevention measures. Maharashtra's stand marks the first formal objection since the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal delivered its final verdict in 2013, allocating 173 tmcft of Krishna water to Karnataka.
India.com
13 hours ago
- India.com
Gandhi Family Fed Snake Pakistan With Blood And Water For 77 Years: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey
Stepping up the attack against the Gandhi family, BJP Lok Sabha MP Nishikant Dubey has accused them of not only giving away 80 per cent of India's water to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty but also giving Islamabad around Rs 14,000 crore for building dams and canals. In a post on X, Dubey accused the Gandhi family of feeding the snake called Pakistan with both water and blood for 77 years. "The Gandhi family fed the snake called Pakistan with both water and blood for 77 years. But read this document carefully— in return for attacks on Indian lives, the Congress icon, Prime Minister Nehru, not only gave away 80 per cent of India's water under the Indus Waters Treaty but also gave Pakistan what is today worth around Rs 14,000 crore for building dams and canals. Sell the country, fatten Pakistan by feeding it water, and die taking bullets and abuse—this is the India the Gandhi family created," Dubey said on X. गॉंधी परिवार ने सॉंप पाकिस्तान को पानी और खून एकसाथ 77 साल तक पिलाया, लेकिन इस काग़ज़ को गौर से पढ़िए भारत के लोगों को मारने के बदले कांग्रेस के सिरमौर प्रधानमंत्री नेहरु जी ने सिंधू जल समझौता में 80 प्रतिशत भारतीय पानी तो दिया ही,आज के हिसाब से लगभग 14 हज़ार करोड़ रुपए पाकिस्तान… — Dr Nishikant Dubey (@nishikant_dubey) June 6, 2025 In support of his claim, Dubey attached Article V (financial provisions) of the Indus Water Treaty in his post, which confirms that India agreed to pay 62.06 million pounds as financial assistance to Pakistan to build replacement infrastructure. This payment was to be made in 10 equal annual instalments and was non-refundable despite any provocation or hostility. India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty in April, following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, in which 26 innocent civilians were gunned down by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists. Prime Minister Narendra Modi attacked Pakistan over its support to cross-border terrorism and said terror and talks cannot go together and water and blood cannot flow together. In retaliation for the dastardly terror attack Indian government took a slew of action, including the launch of Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7, hitting nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK), in which more than 100 dreaded terrorists were killed.
The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
Suspension of police commissioner rankles police establishment
'Karnataka's ruling politicians and cricket administrators are jointly responsible for Wednesday's tragedy. Their greedy lust for reflected glory led to it. To make an outstanding officer a scapegoat is reprehensible.' -- Ramachandra Guha, Historian The unprecedented suspension of the Bengaluru City Police Commissioner over the stampede at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium, that claimed 11 lives, has left the police rank and file across the State deeply disgruntled. While those in service are unable to give vent to it their anger, at least three former Bengaluru City Police Commissioners -- Jyoti Prakash Mirji, Bhaskar Rao and N.S. Megharik -- have openly condemned the government's action and said the police were being made 'scapegoats.' Where is preliminary probe? Mr. Mirji termed the government action 'irresponsible' and done to 'save their own skin.' 'There was not even a preliminary inquiry conducted which found a prima facie lapse. How could a commissioner be suspended like this?' he questioned. Mr. Rao, now associated with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), took to social media and said this was the 'darkest day in the history of Karnataka police' and said this was 'the prize for telling the truth and slogging the whole night to keep Bengaluru safe.' Mr. Megharik said that the police were only a small part of the event and there were bigger stakeholders. 'Mistakes may happen but this is not the way to deal with them. As IPS and former Commissioners fraternity, we are upset,' he said on Friday. IPS officers' Association, Karnataka, was scheduled to meet on Friday evening to chart their next course of action, but the meeting was postponed at the last minute. Plans are on to meet the Chief Minister and register their protest at the decision, multiple sources said. One of the IPS officers suspended is expected to challenge his suspension in the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). Sources said the police fraternity is trying to build a strong case to counter the political leadership's allegation that they were not kept in loop about the event at the stadium and also to show how the police advice was overruled. Anger against political class A senior officer from the city rued that the political leadership first put pressure on them to hold a big celebration at short notice, overruling their advice, and later 'betrayed' them as a face-saving ploy. 'There is anger in the force even among juniors. How do we pacify or control them when our leadership has disregarded and unfairly made us scapegoats?' asked a senior officer. Another officer said that when things had gone wrong, they were being asked whether they had rejected the proposal for the event in writing. 'If the default mode of thinking of officers becomes how to save themselves from the axe, it will be a blow to policing,' he said. Public support Meanwhile, the city police have been getting public support from citizens online. The campaign #IstandwithBangalorePolice was trending on social media on Friday. City-based historian, who has written extensively on cricket, Ramachandra Guha, took to social media and wrote: 'Karnataka's ruling politicians and cricket administrators are jointly responsible for Wednesday's tragedy. Their greedy lust for reflected glory led to it. To make an outstanding officer a scapegoat is reprehensible'. Suspension has to be ratified by Centre The suspension of Indian Police Service (IPS) officers has to be ratified by the Union Government within 30 days and if they reject it, the suspension gets revoked, sources said. With the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Janata Dal (Secular) coming to the support of the police, claiming the Congress government has made them 'scapegoats', this procedural requirement may take a political turn, sources said. 'Procedurally, the government should have conducted a preliminary inquiry and suspended officials based on the report. No such inquiry was completed before suspension. This may become a bone of contention,' a senior IPS officer said.
