Auckland not performing for a city it's size, Deloitte NZ survey shows
Photo:
RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly
Many Aucklanders say the supercity model has failed to deliver the city's potential and it's falling behind.
Research from Auckland University examines the city's progress since the creation of the supercity 15 years ago, as
Auckland leaders gather
for an event marking the milestone.
Among them are the Minister for Auckland Simeon Brown, current Mayor Wayne Brown and former Prime Ministers John Key and Helen Clark.
The survey showed Aucklanders overwhelmingly supported a long-term infrastructure plan, and most (76 percent) believe the city lacked a cohesive public transport plan.
The consulting firm Deloitte has produced two of three annual State of the City reports which compare Auckland with similar cities globally.
Deloitte NZ chief executive Mike Horne told
Nine to Noon
the building blocks were there but the country's biggest city was falling behind, compared to overseas cities.
Deloitte NZ chief executive Mike Horne.
Photo:
Supplied / Focal Point Photos
"It's set some of those key building blocks but it's not seeing Auckland deliver its potential and it's not seeing Auckland compete on the global stage to the degree that it really needs to."
The survey showed 77 of respondents believed Auckland needed to position itself as a global innovation city to attract talent and strengthen its economy, but expressed concern that the city didn't maximise this advantage compared to overseas cities.
Horne said the supercity model allowed the city to be unified in order to make decisions around key infrastructure challenges.
He said the City Rail Link and Waterview tunnel may not have been delivered at all under the previous structure.
"We're at that early stage where we need a lot more of that infrastructure investment to deliver in the future."
Horne said there was support for greater intensification to be built around transport corridors, while retaining green space.
"There is a divide as to exactly how does that play through on private transport as well where there is a sig no that see private car transport as a big part of the future."
The survey showed 61 percent of Aucklanders thought reducing congestion should be the city's top transport priority, even if it meannt
introducing charges
on some roads at times when they were most congested.
Just over half think cycling and pedestrian access needed more investment.
Committee for Auckland Director Mark Thomas said if Auckland didn't reset its direction with a new agenda that focused on bolder action, smarter investment and much stronger global competitiveness, it would continue to fall behind.
"We must learn more effectively from the best globally and have the courage to back bold, transformative ideas locally or risk continuing to lose the economic opportunity, talent and quality of life we need to thrive," Thomas said.
"The annual State of the City report shows Auckland is already being overtaken by faster-moving global competitor cities.
"Without much clearer commitment from central and local government and their partners, Auckland's standard of living and growth prospects will continue to suffer."
Auckland University of Technology Vice-Chancellor Damon Salesa.
Photo:
The University of Auckland
Auckland University of Technology Vice-Chancellor Damon Salesa said the organisation was acutely aware of the need for Auckland to succeed in the next 15 years and beyond.
"Our city will be home to the greatest number of international students, Māori and Pacific young people and indeed of all youth. They have enormous potential and deserve a city that provides education, infrastructure and employment opportunities," Salesa said.
"AUT is focused on partnerships to amplify the impact our university, students and academics can provide for Auckland and beyond so our city's people can thrive. This means focusing on our city's unique combination of talented people with diverse and cosmopolitan experiences and viewpoints."
Former Prime Minister Helen Clark, patron of the Helen Clark Foundation, said there had been concern that Auckland's potential could not be maximised with its governance dispersed across a number of territorial councils.
"The Royal Commission was established to look at better options, and I have no doubt that the single city has been the right outcome."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Your money might be invested in Gaza weapons, investment platform says
Smoke billows from Israeli strikes in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip in May, 2024. Photo: AFP The amount of KiwiSaver money invested in weapons companies has increased 40.9 percent this year, a responsible investment platform says. Mindful Money founder Barry Coates said many New Zealanders might be unpleasantly surprised that their money was being invested in companies producing weapons that could be used in conflicts such as that in Gaza or the Ukraine. Mindful Money calculated that KiwiSaver investments in weapons companies are now worth $392.4 million. It said New Zealand investment in the production of weapons used in Gaza, through KiwiSaver and retail investment funds, totalled $71.9 m. Coates said the increase reflected a broader increase in activity in the defence industry around the world. "I think most of the increase is the chase for short-term profits - wars are good for business if you're a weapons company. "There's been an increase in investment in many of these companies that stand to benefit from sales to Gaza or via the US or into the Ukraine conflict." Koura founder Rupert Carlyon said the increase was probably because of weapons' companies strong performance. "They are strong performers with global conflicts and increased defence spending in Europe." He said while the dollar value of the investments was now much larger, funds' allocations might not have moved. "The increased size is a function of larger market capitalisations and larger KiwiSaver balances." The S&P Aerospace and Defense Select Industry index had increased 16.5 percent in the past year and 307 percent in the past decade. Coates said research had shown 80 percent of New Zealanders wanted to avoid investing in weapons companies but it continued. He said there had been a fall in investments in companies linked to social harm such as gambling or alcohol and tobacco. "But not enough and not so much in weapons particularly … it does look to us as though we're seeing the same thing happening in fossil fuels - that something happens in the world and investment funds see greater opportunity and they're increasing their investments … even though many of their clients may may be deeply worried about that." He said KiwiSaver investment in companies producing and selling firearms had also more than doubled. "There's a big increase in hand guns investments … maybe something to do with the Trump administration." The most dramatic individual company increase involved Walmart, where New Zealand KiwiSaver investment reached $115.8 million - representing a 144 percent increase over the year and 40 percent growth in just six months. Although it is best known as a general retailer, Mindful Money called it out because Walmart sells shotguns, rifles, ammunition, and firearm components. Coates said there were 36 weapons-free funds at 13 different providers. He said many people would get a "huge surprise" if they found their KiwiSaver investment was exposed to the Gaza conflict. "I think it's kind of one of the things that people can abstract a bit about weapons and so on but when they've seen the effects on people in Gaza and the complete levelling of the country, then you know, suddenly I think it comes home to them, that they don't want their funds to be invested in that." Earlier in the year, activists put pressure on ASB to divest its KiwiSaver investments from Motorola, which they said was supplying the Israeli military with smart phones and radios. But Carlyon said there should be a conversation about whether it was appropriate for weapons to remain in exclusion categories, "given the volatile world we are living in and the need for most countries to be increasing defence spending". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Beef and Lamb NZ on proposed Emissions Trading Scheme changes
environment 43 minutes ago Proposed changes to the Emissions Trading Scheme were reported back to the House last night. Beef and Lamb New Zealand chairperson Kate Acland spoke to Corin Dann.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Wilson Parking locked in multi-million legal fight with ex-employee
Wilson Parking signage, Queen Street Photo: RNZ / Calvin Samuel Wilson Parking is locked in a $6 million legal fight with a former employee who now owns a company that is in competition with it. Wilson Parking told the Employment Relations Authority former employee Peter Turner breached his employment agreement, duty of good faith and various fiduciary duties, and ATE Property aided and abetted the breaches. It is seeking damages, an account of profits, and a declaration that receivables gained by Turner and ATE, during the operation of the ATE business, are held on trust for Wilson Parking and will be handed over. Turner and ATE denied liability. ATE was incorporated in 2024 with Turner as the sole shareholder and director. Wilson Parking also filed a claim in the High Court, with causes of action based on knowing receipt, knowing assistance and breach of the duty of confidence. ATE responded to the High Court claim by questioning the High Court's jurisdiction, raising an objection. It argued Wilson Parking's claims were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment Relations Authority, based on an earlier Supreme Court decision. Wilson Parking said the authority could not grant equitable remedies, so the claim was appropriately filed. In a decision on 1 August, Associate Judge Paulsen found that the authority had exclusive jurisdiction over Wilson Parking's equitable claims against ATE and he dismissed the High Court claim. Wilson Parking then applied to remove the employment relationship problem to the Employment Court. It said there was uncertainty about the authority's power to award some of the remedies it was seeking. It said that removal to the employment court would also mean all the claims would be heard in one place at the same time. Complex expert evidence would need to be analysed, Wilson Parking said, and there was a significant amount at stake, of more than $6 million. Authority member Peter van Keulen was unconvinced by some of Wilson Parking's arguments to move the case to the Employment Court - he said the authority had the necessary experience and skill to deal with complex disputes involving significant sums. But he said the employment relationship problem had serious questions of law regarding the authority's jurisdiction, and a move was appropriate. Alison Maelzer, a partner at Hesketh Henry, said it was not unheard of for an employer to bring claims against an employee or former employee, and also to add in the former employee's new employer, where it was alleged that the new employer had helped to breach the former employee's obligations. "This is usually in matters involving a breach of confidentiality or breaches of restraints of trade or non-solicitation obligations - where the former employee is alleged to have taken confidential information, given it to the new employer, and the new employer has known about this or encouraged it. " She said Wilson Parking's case was unusual because of the claims filed in both the High Court and the Employment Relations Authority. "The High Court essentially struck out the general civil claims on the basis that the Employment Relations Authority had exclusive jurisdiction over those claims. "This was relying on a decision of the Supreme Court in FMV v TZB which found that if a dispute arose out of an employment relationship, it belonged in the Employment Relations Authority. "This was the case even if the dispute had been framed or could have been framed as a tort and put before the general courts. In other words, if it could be framed as an employment claim, the Employment Relations Authority would have exclusive jurisdiction. This was a matter to be determined on the facts - i.e. figuring out whether the dispute arose out of the employment relationship, or whether the employment relationship was incidental to the dispute." She said the former employer was seeking equitable remedies and was likely to add in the claims/remedies in relation to the matters that had been kicked out of the High Court. "While the Supreme Court in FMZ v TZB found that the Employment Relations Authority had jurisdiction to award the necessary remedies to address employment relationship problems, it was not clear whether this included equitable remedies. The Employment Relations Authority therefore decided to remove the matter to the Employment Court to determine the whether the Authority had this jurisdiction, and if so, what remedies could be awarded. " She said because Wilson Parking was seeking about $6m in remedies, the claims would require extensive and complex expert evidence. "This is unusual for an employment matter." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
