Cuba activists say detained on anniversary of 1994 anti-Castro protest
On August 5, 1994, hundreds of people took to the streets of Havana's Malecon waterfront to protest, an event that triggered the rafter crisis during which many Cubans fled by sea to the U.S.
The government attributed the protests to incitement by Radio Marti, a Washington-funded station that broadcasts news into Cuba.
Nearly five years after Castro's death, historic protests shook the island on July 11, 2021, when thousands took to the streets, resulting in one death, dozens injured and hundreds arrested. Many protesters remain behind bars.
The government claims those marches were also orchestrated by Washington.
President Miguel Diaz-Canel said the "Maleconazo" anniversary was a reminder that "there will always be dark forces lurking against a genuine Revolution in difficult moments," posting a photograph on X of Castro confronting protesters in 1994.
Tuesday (August 5, 2025) saw "surveillance, house arrests, arbitrary detention, and selective internet shutdowns," according to Cubalex, a Miami-based NGO.
Manuel Cuesta Morua, a dissident who promotes democratic transition in Cuba, said via WhatsApp that since early morning he had been "besieged by the police" in a "type of house arrest, without a court order."
The government "activated its repressive apparatus" following the "police pattern" applied on sensitive dates, said Yoani Sanchez, director of independent newspaper 14ymedio.
She said her husband, Reinaldo Escobar, also a journalist for the outlet, "was detained for a couple of hours in Havana."
Independent journalist Camila Acosta told AFP that a state security officer had been stationed at the entrance of her house early in the morning.
Among others in similar situations reported by Cubalex were representatives of the Ladies in White rights group and the father of a young man imprisoned for participating in the July 2021 protests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Can Abu Salem walk free soon? Here's what the Maharashtra government and the courts have said
Gangster Abu Salem, who was extradited to India from Portugal in 2005, has been trying to make the case for premature release from prison. But the state government told the Bombay High Court this week that he has to serve out a term of 25 years as per the conditions of his extradition from Portugal – which means that he cannot be released before 2030. India had assured Portugal that Salem would not be given the death penalty or jail term exceeding 25 years if he was found guilty in cases that were pending against him. In 2015 and 2017, Salem was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of builder Pradeep Jain and the 1993 Bombay blasts, respectively. On what basis is Salem seeking release? Abu Salem, or Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari, was named as an absconding accused in the first chargesheet filed by Mumbai Police in the Bombay blasts case on November 4, 1993. The police claimed that Salem had been given the task of transporting and concealing weapons, and was linked to the conspiracy to execute the blasts. On March 12 that year, a dozen bombs went off across Mumbai in a terrorist attack coordinated by Dawood Ibrahim and his gang, killing 257 people. Salem remained a wanted accused in the blasts case as well as the 1995 murder of Jain, a Mumbai-based builder. He was said to have fled the country, and remained absconding as the trial against the other accused began and ended. It was only in 2002 that investigators had a breakthrough, and Salem was detained in Lisbon, the capital of Portugal. He was said to have undergone plastic surgery to change his appearance, but his identity was established on the basis of his fingerprints that were available in police records. A year later, the Portuguese government consented to India's request for Salem's extradition on the basis of documents and evidence that were made available on his alleged role in crimes in India, including the 1993 terrorist attack. Salem appealed against the government's order in courts in Portugal, and L K Advani, then deputy Prime Minister, gave an assurance that he would not be given the death penalty or a prison term of more than 25 years. On November 11, 2005, Salem was extradited to India. He was put on trial for the murder of the builder, and the 1993 blasts case. He was found guilty of murder and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and sections of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), and was sentenced to life imprisonment. For the past few years, Salem, who is lodged in a jail in Maharashtra, has been knocking on the doors of various authorities, including the trial court, Bombay High Court, and the Supreme Court, asking for the date on which he would be released. He has been claiming that he is entitled to benefits that a prisoner gets, including remission. Remission is a reduction in the jail term based on grounds including the nature of the offence and good conduct, and as part of special schemes, etc. Salem has claimed that based on the time he has spent in jail, he is entitled to 3 years and 16 days of remission. Also, given that he had been detained in Portugal from September 2002 onward, he has spent more than 25 years in jail, and should have been released on March 31, 2025. Based on these calculations, Salem has written to Portuguese authorities on various occasions, claiming that the conditions of his extradition have been violated. He has also written to the Maharashtra Prison Department, the state government, and the courts. Back in 2017, Salem had sought remission under a special scheme introduced by the state to mark the 125th birth anniversary of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar. He had said that his case was 'entirely different' from that of other convicts, as the agreement between Portugal and India guaranteed 'pardon, reprieve, respite or remission'. And what have the courts ruled in this matter? * Salem had approached the Supreme Court in 2018 with his plea on early release. In 2022, the court said that considering the gravity of his offences, no special privileges could be extended to him. The court also said that his contention that the period of his detention should be considered to have started in 2002 when he was first detained could not be accepted, as he was convicted of entering Portugal on a fake passport and had been punished in that country. The court said that in keeping with the assurance given to Portugal, once Salem completed 25 years in jail, which would be in 2030, the Union of India would consider the matter. * Last year, Salem approached the trial court in Mumbai, asking for the tentative date of his release, and a calculation of his remission as per prison rules. The court rejected his plea in December 2024 after the CBI submitted that as per the order of the Supreme Court, he could be released only in 2030. * Salem then approached the Bombay High Court, where the Prison Department and Home Department of the state submitted in May that he had actually been in prison for 19 years. The Home Department also submitted that since Salem is a convict in two cases, under the anti-terror law, TADA, his life imprisonment would not be calculated as a 14-year prison term. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs too filed an affidavit in May, saying that as a TADA convict, Salem's life imprisonment was for 60 years – however, to honour the assurance given to Portugal, the question of his release would arise on November 10, 2030, after he had served 25 years. The Union of India would abide by the assurance at the appropriate time, subject to remedies which may be available, the affidavit said. In July, the High Court admitted Salem's plea seeking remission and early release, but said that he was yet to complete the 25-year term, and that his plea would be heard in due course. This week, the state informed the court in an affidavit that Salem does not have a 'palatable history', citing the criminal offences he had been convicted of. It said that given his criminal record, Salem was a 'Category 8' prisoner who would have to spend 60 years in jail before being considered for release. However, as per the agreement with the Portuguese, Salem would not be put in jail for more than 25 years, the state said. But these 25 years would be 'actual imprisonment', and would not include remission. Therefore, he cannot be released before 2030.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why Trump Towers can give US prez a realty check on ‘dead economy'
Why Trump Towers can give US prez a realty check on 'dead economy' Rao Jaswant Singh TNN Aug 7, 2025, 18:46 IST IST Gurgaon alone has thrown up massive revenues and is the only city besides New York to have two Trump-branded residential projects Forget politics and diplomacy, US President Donald Trump 's 'dead economy' jibe at India while warning of higher tariffs wouldn't stand up to scrutiny in his family-run company. The Indian market has proved a real estate goldmine for The Trump Organization, which has entered into partnerships with Indian developers for premium ventures. One of those is its flagship project in the north — Trump Towers Delhi NCR in Sector 65, for which it is in a joint venture with Mumbai-based Tribeca, the exclusive Indian partner for Trump-branded projects, and Gurgaon-based M3M.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's double-standards on Russian oil in hard numbers
EU contributed €212 bn to Russia's fossil fuel revenue since Ukraine war, 23% of total, nearly double India's €121 bn or 13% share, according to Finland-based think tank Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) read more India became a major buyer of Russian oil, providing a much-needed export market for Moscow after it was cut off from traditional buyers in Europe because of the Ukraine war. Reuters File As US President Donald Trump continues to criticise India's energy ties with Moscow, fresh data from the Finland-based think tank Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) has brought renewed attention to the West's uneven stance on Russian oil. According to a Times of India report, citing CREA, European Union countries have accounted for 23% of Russia's fossil fuel export revenues since the onset of the Ukraine conflict, nearly double India's share of 13%. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Additionally, tankers owned or insured by G7+ countries are transporting over half of all Russian oil exports, underlining the continued role of Western economies in sustaining Russia's energy revenues, added the report. Reacting to the data, Indian government sources pointed to what they called 'Western hypocrisy' in targeting India for safeguarding its energy security, while largely overlooking similar actions by European nations and their allies. The EU, the sources said, has not only continued importing Russian energy but also maintained trade in other sectors, including fertilizers, chemicals, iron, steel, and transport equipment — despite publicly backing sanctions against Moscow. 'These figures only vindicate India's emphasis on ensuring for its citizens regular and affordable energy supplies,' Times of India quoted a source as saying on condition of anonymity. As the US doubled tariffs on Indian goods to 50% on Wednesday for allegedly 'fuelling the Russian war machine,' and the EU last month sanctioned Indian refiner Nayara Energy, a new report by CREA has reignited the debate over Western double standards. Russia has earned €923 billion from fossil fuel exports since the Ukraine war began. Of this, €212 billion came from EU nations, nearly double India's €121 billion contribution. China topped the list with over €200 billion in purchases, according to CERA. Significantly, CERA noted that G7-owned tankers are increasingly transporting Russian oil, especially after the EU's latest sanctions in June, highlighting what Indian officials call a clear gap between Western rhetoric and action. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Since Jan, the G7+ share in Russian oil transport has increased from 36% to 56%,' it says. More than half of Russian seaborne oil exports were transported in G7+ tankers in June, reflecting a six percentage point increase over May. The use of Western tanker fleets indicates that these shipments adhered to the price cap and other sanction terms. India maintains that its imports of Russian oil, around 9% of global daily supply, have helped stabilise prices and prevent market shocks. This aligns with the rationale behind the US and EU's price cap strategy, which aimed to limit Moscow's revenue without disrupting global oil flows. Despite an 8% rise in export volumes in Q2 2025 compared to the previous quarter, the CERA notes that 'Russian fossil fuel revenues in second quarter of 2025 dropped by 18% year-on-year — lowest in a quarter since the invasion of Ukraine.' Trump slaps 50% tariff, sparks trade tensions On Wednesday, President Trump issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods from India, as penalty for importing Russian oil. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Wednesday's hike comes in addition to the 25 percent tariff India already faces, making it subject to one of the US's highest import tax brackets under Trump, at a total of 50%. Trump's order stated that 'the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.' India's Ministry of External Affairs responded sharply, calling the decision 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' The government questioned why India was being penalised while other major importers of Russian oil were spared. 'We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India,' the statement said. 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest,' it added. The move comes despite five rounds of bilateral trade talks and a high-level visit by US Vice President JD Vance in April. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With no trade deal reached, experts say US-India ties are now under the greatest strain in years. Brazil remains the only other country facing a 50% tariff under the same order. With inputs from agencies
