Giannis Antetokounmpo declines to address Bucks future after another first-round playoff exit: 'I wish I was still playing'
The Milwaukee Bucks' season is over, but the questions are just beginning. With rumors swirling about Giannis Antetokounmpo's future in Milwaukee, the Bucks superstar declined to address the situation following the team's loss to the Indiana Pacers on Tuesday.
Antetokounmpo, who stated multiple times he wants to play for a perennial championship contender, was asked whether that's possible with the Bucks. He didn't want to engage with the question.
Giannis on whether he can still win chips in Milwaukee:"I'm not gonna do this. Whatever I say I know it's going to translate. I don't know man. I wish I was still playing" pic.twitter.com/a4gGhXSoim
— Oh No He Didn't (@ohnohedidnt24) April 30, 2025
Antetokounmpo initially said he didn't want to get into it, knowing whatever he said would make headlines Wednesday. He then said, "I don't know, man. I wish I was still playing."
Tuesday's 119-118 loss eliminated the Bucks from the postseason, giving the team its third straight first-round exit in the playoffs. While the Bucks were the lower seed this time around, the team lost in the first round despite earning the No. 1 seed and No. 3 seed the last two seasons.
The future in Milwaukee looks bleak. The Bucks don't own a first-round pick in this year's draft, are not a particularly young team and may not have Damian Lillard back next season as he recovers from an Achilles injury.
That sets up a difficult situation for Bucks general manager Jon Horst, who the team signed to a multi-year extension in April. Antetokounmpo has consistently said he wants to play for a team with championship aspirations. If he no longer believes that's possible with the Bucks, Antetokounmpo could force Horst's hand by demanding a trade.
Antetokounmpo is signed through the next two seasons and carries a player option in 2027-28.
But even if Antetokounmpo is fine sticking it out, it might be in Horst's best interest to trade away the team's superstar. Antetokounmpo, 30, would undoubtedly bring back a lot of resources the Bucks could use to turn around their roster quickly. It would be a massive blow to the fan base to see Antetokounmpo leave, but it might be the best thing for the franchise.
While Antetokounmpo's status will be arguably the biggest story of the NBA offseason, his answer Tuesday was lost in the shuffle after some on-court fireworks.
Following the team's loss, Antetokounmpo got into a heated exchange with Tyrese Haliburton's father, who taunted Antetokounmpo after the game. Antetokounmpo also got into a verbal altercation with Pacers forward Bennedict Mathurin in a separate post-game incident.
Antetokounmpo addressed the altercations after the game, saying he believes in "being humble in victory." Haliburton said his father was in the wrong. The Pacers star added he would talk to his father about the incident.
For Antetokounmpo, those moments could be the last he spends in a Bucks uniform. Despite everything he's accomplished with the franchise — including leading the team to a championship in 2021 — Tuesday's on-court incidents would mark a disappointing end to an otherwise excellent run in Milwaukee.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ranking Nickeil Alexander-Walker free-agency destinations if he leaves Timberwolves
The post Ranking Nickeil Alexander-Walker free-agency destinations if he leaves Timberwolves appeared first on ClutchPoints. The Minnesota Timberwolves were just eliminated from the Western Conference Finals by the Oklahoma City Thunder. Unfortunately for Timberwolves fans, this may have been the team's best shot at winning the championship. Advertisement Minnesota had arguably the best eight-man rotation in the NBA. Their starting five consisted of Anthony Edwards, Mike Conley, Rudy Gobert, Julius Randle, and Jaden McDaniels, and their bench players were all starting-caliber hoopers. That bench consisted of Naz Reid, Donte DiVincenzo, and Nickeil Alexander-Walker. The team is likely to get a whole lot thinner this offseason as both Reid and Alexander-Walker can and likely will become unrestricted free agents. It will be hard to re-sign either of them, let alone both. Alexander-Walker has had some big moments in these playoffs, so where are his best free-agent fits if he leaves Minnesota? 1. Hawks add more defense Alexander-Walker is one of the best point-of-attack defenders in the NBA. Surrounding Trae Young with elite defenders should still be the priority for the Atlanta Hawks, which is why the team should sign the wing in free agency. Young is an elite offensive player who has led the league in both points and assists. Advertisement He is a liability on defense due to his short stature and skinny frame, though. Dyson Daniels was in the Defensive Player of the Year conversation this year while sharing a backcourt with Young. Daniels had one of the best seasons stealing the ball ever, but even more defense would help because the Hawks still finished 20th in team defensive efficiency. Alexander-Walker is much more than just a defensive ace, too. The shooting guard/small forward shoots close to 40% from deep every season. He particularly thrives as a catch-and-shoot threat from the corner. Having another marksman for Young to kick out to would make the Hawks' offense even more dangerous. 2. Nickeil Alexander-Walker to the Pacers Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports The Indiana Pacers are so effective because everybody on their roster can shoot the basketball. Alexander-Walker would fit right in, in that regard. The Pacers are currently up 3-1 over the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference Finals. The NBA Finals are right around the corner for the team, but despite that, they are still being overlooked by a lot of fans and media. Advertisement Some believe they are still a piece away from true contention. Regardless, by signing Alexander-Walker this offseason, the Pacers would certainly better their chances of winning. Indiana already has incredible depth, so why not add even more? Additionally, the Pacers are a pretty average defensive team, and Alexander-Walker help could get them over the hump in that regard. 3. Thunder pair cousins together The Thunder already have 15 players under contract for next season, and big paydays are coming for players such as Chet Holmgren and Jalen Williams. That makes it highly unlikely that the team would give a big contract to a free agent this offseason. They already did that last offseason when they gave Isaiah Hartenstein a three-year $87 million deal. Not to mention, the Thunder still have a surplus of draft picks coming in over the coming years. Advertisement Even so, there is no denying that MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and his cousin, Alexander-Walker, share a special bond. If the cousins really wanted to play together, the Thunder could try and make it happen. The two battled in the Western Conference Finals against each other while singing each other's praises the entire time. Family ties are strong in professional sports, and while Alexander-Walker would fit exactly what the Thunder like to do, him signing to the Thunder is just too unrealistic. Oklahoma City is the favorite to win the NBA Finals this year, and Alexander-Walker signing with the team would be an example of the rich getting richer.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Report: If Steven Adams leaves in free agency, Rockets eyeing Brook Lopez as backup plan
When the Houston Rockets signed Fred VanVleet and Dillon Brooks in 2023 free agency, they also pursued Bucks center Brook Lopez. But in the final hours, Lopez spurned Houston to stay in Milwaukee. Two years later, however, the interest from a basketball standpoint is still there. If backup center Steven Adams leaves the Rockets this offseason, The Athletic's Kelly Iko reports that Houston could again pursue Lopez in free agency: If Adams leaves, team sources said the Rockets could reignite their interest in Brook Lopez. The 37-year-old, who averaged 13.0 points, 5.0 rebounds, and 1.9 blocks per game (while) shooting 37% from 3 in Milwaukee last season, was previously a target for Houston. He would theoretically be a fit, given his two-way production and health (played 237 games over the last three seasons). Advertisement Lopez will be an unrestricted free agent this offseason, with negotiations open to all teams on June 30. To be clear, Houston's priority will be Adams, who is several years younger (at 31) and is coming off an extremely strong run in the 2025 NBA playoffs. But as an unrestricted free agent, he will have other options — and the Rockets can't offer a starting role, given the presence of All-Star incumbent Alperen Sengun. Interestingly enough, one of the reasons Lopez stayed with the Bucks two years ago was presumably the fact that Milwaukee appeared much closer to title contention. But the aging Bucks are reeling and dealing with a potential trade request from franchise cornerstone Giannis Antetokounmpo, while the young and improving Rockets are coming off a 52-30 season with the NBA's fourth-best record. Advertisement The landscape has changed, and that might make the Rockets more of a draw to Lopez, this time around. However, Adams remains Houston's preference. Both Adams and Lopez could potentially play alongside Sengun in double big lineups, which the Rockets increasingly used as the 2024-25 season progressed. The ability of Lopez to also hit 3-pointers could mitigate some of the floor spacing concerns with those units, though Adams is clearly the superior rebounder. More: As free agency looms, Rockets hopeful of reunion with Steven Adams This article originally appeared on Rockets Wire: Report: If Steven Adams leaves, Rockets eye Brook Lopez as backup plan
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 NBA Finals: Thunder and Pacers are the modern blueprint of what winning looks like
The deeper we go into the NBA Playoffs, the more one truth gets hammered home: If you've got a guy on the floor who can't shoot or defend, he's getting exposed and you're probably getting sent home. But the 3-and-D archetype with the guy who just stands in the corner isn't quite enough anymore. All players on the floor must ideally be able to dribble and make quick decisions. That's why the Boston Celtics won the title last year. Sure, they had stars in Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. But they also surrounded them with well-rounded pieces. When Tatum and Brown were sharing the floor with Derrick White, Jrue Holiday, and Al Horford, everyone could shoot and make a read, and nobody was a defensive liability. Even with bench units, there was no obvious weak link. Advertisement The same blueprint is playing out this season with the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers facing off in the NBA Finals. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, and at least one of Lu Dort, Alex Caruso, or Cason Wallace have shared the floor for 88% of Oklahoma City's playoff minutes. In 176 of those minutes, at least four of them have played together and, during that time, the Thunder have outscored opponents by a staggering 18.1 points per 100 possessions. Every single one of those guys can defend, process the game fast, and create offense either for themselves or someone else. SGA is the hub, but OKC's success hinges on the fact that nobody else gums up the system. Dort cuts. Wallace connects. Caruso makes instant reads. There's no ball-stopper, no spacer who can't dribble, no defender the Thunder can't trust to ferociously execute a game plan. Even OKC's bigs fit the mold: Chet Holmgren can shoot, pass, and handle. And while Isaiah Hartenstein doesn't shoot 3s, he plays with elite feel as a finisher and facilitator. (Henry Russell/Yahoo Sports Illustration) Indiana functions similarly. Tyrese Haliburton is their engine, but the pieces around him — Andrew Nembhard, Aaron Nesmith, Pascal Siakam, and Myles Turner — are all skilled enough to play with tempo, precision, and relentless energy. And they all shoot the hell out of the ball: Nembhard, Nesmith, Siakam, and Turner are all shooting over 40% from 3 on over three attempts per game in the playoffs. Everyone can eat in this system. Nesmith of course had his all-time hot streak to fuel a historic Pacers comeback in Game 1. Siakam went off for 39 in Game 2 and 31 in Game 6 against the Knicks, winning himself East Finals MVP. Nembhard has had separate games with over 20 points and over 10 assists while playing lockdown defense. Even with bench units featuring T.J. McConnell and Thomas Bryant, the Pacers can go on a scoring flurry like they did to close out New York. Advertisement Their historic comebacks break the mold too. The Pacers don't turn to clear-out, hero-ball isolations. They stick with their flow: pace, movement, and speed. In the moments that most teams tighten up, Indiana just keeps running its offense. The throughline with both teams is clear: there are no dead zones, everyone is a threat. It's a roster with continuity and a system built on interchangeable skill sets, rapid processing, and nonstop effort. And two excellent coaching staffs led by Mark Daigneault and Rick Carlisle who constructed these systems and devised game plans to unleash their players' strengths. We've seen prototypes before, like the Beautiful Game Spurs, and the Warriors dynasty. But today's shift is a product of how the game has evolved. Pace is at an all-time high. So is spacing. A record-high 42.1% of shots were taken from 3 this season, and they were launched from farther than ever before: 26.2 feet on average above the break. Advertisement Screens are also being set farther from the hoop: the average on-ball screen came 25.7 feet from the rim, another all-time high. Defenses are switching more than ever: 24.6% of the time this year, up from just 7.7% a decade ago and 15.8% a half-decade ago. All of that means defenders have to cover more ground and do it faster than ever. Every offensive possession stretches the floor horizontally and vertically. On top of that, playoff officiating has made the game more physical than it's been in decades. Players have to be tough enough to absorb contact and relentless enough to fight through every screen, closeout, and rotation. That's part of why the Thunder and Pacers have made it this far. Both teams are deep with guys who meet those demands. Teams with shorter benches run out of answers fast. They either put a target on the floor or ask key players to dial it back to avoid fouling out. As always, when a blueprint starts working, everyone else tries to replicate it. But copying the trend and executing it are two very different things. And this year's playoff exits made that brutally clear. OKC is the model franchise. (AP Photo/Nate Billings) (ASSOCIATED PRESS) The Knicks and Timberwolves both made the conference finals, but neither felt like they belonged by the end of it. New York has a ton of guys who can generate shots and offer lengthy defense. But it's hard to win when your two best players are the weakest links on defense. Karl-Anthony Towns is an aloof liability at every spot on the floor. And Jalen Brunson is both tiny and unaware with poor technique fighting through screens. Until one of them is replaced, it's hard to take the Knicks seriously as a team that'll still be playing in June. Advertisement Minnesota looked like a team from another era against OKC. Julius Randle is a ball-stopper and Anthony Edwards dazzled on-ball but disappeared off it. At just 6-foot-3, Edwards has to evolve through movement: cuts, catch-and-shoot 3s, relocations, connective passing. And Minnesota's offense must change to best promote the development of its 23-year-old star. Coaches can only do with what they have though. The Pacers and Thunder were built from the top down by their front offices to play this way with rosters that can go deep into the bench. But the lead tacticians do have a choice in the matter. Daigneault spent all season experimenting with lineup combinations, playing everyone on his roster, creating a culture where everyone contributes to the greater good. The system Carlisle installed naturally promotes these habits on top of continuing to go deeper into his rotation as the playoffs advanced. One of the challenges for teams looking to take the next step will be navigating the new collective bargaining agreement with rules that make it nearly impossible to have three stars on max contracts and survive with one-dimensional role players on minimum deals. The Heatles approach is no longer a realistic option. We've exited the superteam era. And given the way the best teams are playing and the way they're constructed, and given the restrictions of the new CBA, this likely isn't a temporary trend. It's more of a structural shift where the teams that last are built around four pillars: shooting ability, quick decision-making, offensive adaptability, and defensive versatility. That foundation is necessary to support at least one superstar, who also must embrace those qualities. Some teams like the Cavaliers need to add more toughness. Others need shooting, like the Magic and Pistons. And some teams like the Rockets also need a star. Advertisement Even veteran teams will start to feel the pressure. If OKC levels up again next year, Denver will have to ask hard questions. Nikola Jokić checks every box the Nuggets could possibly want in a star. But do they have enough shooting around him? And can Michael Porter Jr. thrive in this era with his limited creation and defensive shortcomings? Golden State went out and got Jimmy Butler to support Steph Curry, but that isn't enough when the roster is littered with players who can't shoot or playmake. Has the contention window already shut on the Warriors and they just don't know it? And in Los Angeles, Luka Dončić's slow-it-down style may not get him quite as far as it did in Dallas given the way the NBA is evolving. The Lakers may need to rethink what it looks like to build around Luka. And Luka needs to rethink how much of the ball he really needs to dominate. Maybe being a top-five player isn't enough in this era. Maybe you can't be the system, but you have to thrive within one. So here we are: Thunder vs. Pacers for all the marbles. Two small-market franchises, built from the ground up, now defining what winning looks like in the modern NBA. They didn't do it with an aging max-contract trio. They did it with deep and versatile rosters that can throw out lineup after lineup of five guys who can all shoot, dribble, guard, and make decisions in half a second. Advertisement And none of this works without stars who buy in. SGA did. Haliburton did. When your best players excel within the system, the ceiling gets higher. The Thunder and Pacers are not just the Finals teams; they're the blueprint.
