KY professors say bill could erode academic tenure. Sponsor says it's ‘not about tenure.'
FRANKFORT — A Kentucky House committee forwarded a bill that academics warn could erode faculty tenure at the state's public universities and colleges. Meanwhile, the Republican sponsor repeatedly said the bill 'is not about tenure.'
If it passes the General Assembly this year, House Bill 424 would give universities and colleges the ability to remove faculty members and presidents for not meeting 'performance and productivity requirements' set by the institutions' boards. The bill would require faculty and presidents to be evaluated at least once every four years.
The House Committee on Postsecondary Education adopted a committee substitute version of the bill during its Tuesday meeting. The bill now reads that 'no person shall receive an employment contract' for more than four years at an institution of higher education. It previously said no employment contracts could be offered for more than four years 'except full-time faculty members may, in lieu of receiving tenure if offered by the public postsecondary institution, receive an employment contract for up to six years.'
The sponsor of the legislation, committee Chair James Tipton, R-Taylorsville, introduced a similar bill last year though he did not seek a committee vote on it. During Tuesday's meeting, he testified that he had gotten a suggestion to include a definition of tenure in the bill, but 'I really could not come up with a good definition for tenure that I felt comfortable putting in statute.'
'I felt like it was best to leave that definition up to each individual public postsecondary institution to define tenure on their own campus, because this bill is not about tenure,' Tipton said. 'This is about employment contracts.'
However, multiple professors — both who testified Tuesday with United Campus Workers of Kentucky and spoke to the Kentucky Lantern ahead of the meeting — warned that Tipton's proposal could erode tenure at Kentucky universities. Down the road, the bill could make it harder to recruit and retain faculty who are seeking benefits that tenured positions offer, they say.
According to the American Association of University Professors, a tenured position 'is an indefinite appointment that can be terminated only for cause or under extraordinary circumstances such as financial exigency and program discontinuation.'
Julie Cyzewski, an associate professor at Murray State University, told the committee that the tenure process is a 'rigorous one' that requires feedback from colleagues and administrators — and she had just completed that process herself. She said Tipton's bill 'would deeply complicate and confuse the process of teaching and running the university' and the process laid out in the bill was 'very arbitrary,' which could jeopardize student learning.
'Removing tenure protections removes protections for faculty to conduct research and teach free from outside influence. This risks undermining the reputation of Kentucky's public higher ed system and puts student success at risk,' Cyzewski said. 'Murray State in particular, as all of our institutions, need to recruit and retain high quality faculty in order to continue to offer our students an excellent education that prepares them for their future.'
Bills to pave the way for new graduate programs at Murray State, as well as Western Kentucky University and Eastern Kentucky University, have been filed in both the House and Senate. A study by Deloitte Consulting reviewed by lawmakers in November highlighted that the universities would have to make some hires or rely on existing faculty for the new programs, depending on the degrees planned.
Bernadette Barton, a professor at Morehead State University, told the committee that the bill could establish 'a process of eroding tenure' and give university boards and presidents the power to 'terminate faculty for possibly ideological reasons.' She said tenured faculty, including herself, at Morehead State go through annual reviews.
Ahead of the meeting, Karen Petrone, a professor and president of the American Association of University Professors chapter at the University of Kentucky, told the Lantern said that the chapter shares a goal of Tipton's — making education in Kentucky the best that it can be. However, the chapter is opposed to centralizing the faculty review process.
Petrone said that the bill does not outright eliminate tenure, but 'there's a danger of erosion of tenure.'
'To know what is actually the proper way to evaluate somebody, you need to be close to them to understand what the norms are in their particular fields,' Petrone said. 'And I think that the danger of a bill like this is to go at the flyover level, where the board of trustees or the president doesn't even necessarily know how to evaluate the faculty, whereas the faculty who are alongside those faculty in that same field do understand how to evaluate them.'
UK's administration and faculty members are already at odds over a change in shared governance at the university that took effect over the summer. The Board of Trustees voted to replace the University Senate with a faculty senate that professors argued stripped them of power over academic decisions.
Petrone said a bill like Tipton's could raise anxiety on campus about faculty evaluations if it passes because an 'adequate faculty voice' may not be able to articulate how the new evaluations should be carried out and the guard rails for due process have recently changed.
Katy Varner, the executive director of American Federation of Teachers Local 1360, which represents Kentucky Community and Technical College System employees, wrote in an email before the meeting that the bill is 'dangerous legislation' as it could pave the way for faculty members to be fired for not meeting productivity standards that would be hard to define because their mission is not mass production but educating students.
'The idea that a tenure track professor has a job for life is a myth,' Varner said. 'Higher ed professors can and do lose their positions for various reasons; the failure to execute the terms of their contract, non-compliance with federal or state laws and conviction of a crime are some examples. Tenure protects a professor's right to free speech and to question the status quo if necessary. Tenure should protect a professor against racial, ethnic, gender, and age discrimination. Tenure helps ensure the right to due process. Tenure helps students learn about and think about ideas that may not be currently politically popular.'
Nevertheless, the bill does have some supporters. Michael Frazier, the executive director of the Kentucky Student Rights Coalition, told the committee on Tuesday that the coalition supports the bill because it 'does closely protect academic freedom' while ensuring that the 'status quo of higher education does not remain' in the state. He argued that low income and minority students had been 'disproportionately impacted by the stagnation of higher education.'
Eleven Republicans on the committee, including Tipton, voted Tuesday in favor of the bill. Two Democrats, Reps. George Brown Jr., of Lexington, and Sarah Stalker, of Louisville, voted against it. Rep. Rachel Roarx, D-Louisville, passed.
If the bill receives a favorable vote on the House floor, it could go to the Senate for further consideration.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed off Thursday evening on a redistricting plan aimed at countering Texas Republicans' planned implementation of new congressional maps for the Lone Star State. Newsom enacted the so-called 'Election Rigging Response Act,' setting a Nov. 4 special election asking whether Golden State voters approve of new House districts designed by legislators. The Democrat-controlled state Senate passed the special election measure in a 30-8 vote, shortly after the Dem-held state Assembly approved it in a 57-20 vote. Advertisement If the new map is approved by voters — and if it survives near-certain legal challenges — Democrats could win up to five additional House seats in next year's midterm elections, canceling out the five seats Republicans in Texas are expected to gain as a result of their redistricting push. Newsom announced that California would forge ahead with redistricting at a rally-like press conference in Los Angeles last week. AFP via Getty Images 'The president and the Texas Republicans are rigging the election … it is our duty to fight fire with fire,' state Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-East Bay) said during debate on the measure. Advertisement McNerney argued that 'California voters should have the right to decide if the state should respond to the president's effort to rig the election.' Since the measure seeks to override the Golden State's voter-approved, nonpartisan redistricting commission, a special election is necessary to redraw the existing congressional map. State Democrats maintain that the mid-decade redistricting measure is a one-off, needed to directly respond to Texas Republicans, but some in the legislature expressed fear that California would never return to its original system. President Trump strongly backed Texas' effort to redraw congressional maps in the Lone Star State. REUTERS Advertisement 'With the reported involvement of the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] in this action – that has been developed behind the scenes – one has to be awfully suspicious of significant changes to this process,' argued Republican state Sen. Roger Niello (R-Sacramento County). 'Indeed, the intent or the power to continue on our previous track after 2030 is of great concern to me and I think should be of great concern to everybody who votes in favor of this,' he added. Former President Barack Obama weighed in on California's redistricting earlier this week at a DCCC fundraiser, arguing that Newsom's plan 'was a smart, measured approach' to counter Texas' move.


The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal
Republican strategist Karl Rove on Thursday underscored the stakes of the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, saying failure to come to a resolution could be the downfall of President Trump's presidency. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rove outlined the three possible outcomes from Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine: a successful peace deal; a failure to reach a deal, resulting in continued conflict; and a Russian victory over Ukraine. Rove compared the third possibility — which Rove said would result from either no agreement or from an agreement that Russia breaks — to the Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, when President Biden's poll numbers tanked and never recovered. 'In addition to being the worst possible outcome morally and geopolitically, this third possibility is the worst scenario for the president and the GOP,' Rove wrote in the op-ed. 'The disastrous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and subsequent Taliban takeover broke President Biden's reputation with voters. He never recovered. Mr. Biden was at 50% approval in Gallup in July 2021; he dropped precipitously after Kabul fell the following month. He bottomed out at 36% in July 2024 before he withdrew from the presidential race,' Rove continued. 'The defeat of Ukraine by Russia would be similarly disastrous for Mr. Trump,' he added. Rove noted that Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. Since then, Rove said, Trump has 'put himself at center stage' with his approach to dealmaking and his engagements with foreign leaders. 'The president can't abandon his starring role even if he wants to,' Rove said. 'Public opinion in America and the rest of the civilized world would rightly blame Mr. Putin for the invasion itself—but Mr. Trump for allowing it to succeed.' Rove said that the first outcome—a successful deal—is within reach for the U.S. president, and he touted Trump's steps so far in defense of Ukraine. He also said Trump's pressure on NATO countries to spend more on defense 'is paying off.' Rove urged Trump to become 'as tough on Mr. Putin as he has been on' Zelensky, saying that approach could get the warring countries 'to arrive at a deal that results in a durable peace.' 'Mr. Trump can bring about a reasonably successful conclusion to this catastrophic war by doing what Mr. Putin fears most: rejecting the Russian dictator's flattery and demands and insisting he make a fair, enforceable deal with Mr. Zelensky. Or else,' Rove said. 'Anything less would be a stain on Mr. Trump and on his party, for which they'd rightly pay a high political price,' he continued.


Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands
Longtime Austin Democratic congressman Lloyd Doggett said Thursday that he won't seek reelection if new congressional maps are not overturned by courts. Why it matters: Doggett's move prevents a potentially nasty Democratic primary in the wake of a Republican redistricting effort, allowing U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Austin, a rising progressive, to remain in power. State of play: Casar and Doggett would have battled for a single Austin-based district under the new congressional map that the Texas House approved on Wednesday and which the Senate is expected to pass soon. Gov. Greg Abbott has said he'll sign the legislation. Doggett, who has been repeatedly targeted by Republicans in redistricting during his over 30 years in Congress, currently represents much of Austin and its suburbs. Casar, a former Austin city council member first elected to Congress in 2022, represents parts of southern and eastern Austin in a district that snakes down to San Antonio. Flashback: In a campaign email nearly two weeks ago, Doggett wrote that "seniority is an asset, not a liability." He urged Casar to "not abandon" his reconfigured district, arguing that Casar could "use his organizing skills and populist message to win over the disaffected, particularly disaffected Hispanic voters." What they're saying: Unless the new maps are overturned by courts, "I will not seek reelection," Doggett said in a statement Thursday. "I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump." "While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats." On X, Casar wrote: "Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution. I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues." The big picture: The new map could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress. Democrats say the map disenfranchises Black and Latino voters.