Should the Sycamore Gap duo be given a planting punishment? Readers discuss
It seems obvious to me but wouldn't it have been fitting if Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers – the pair who felled the Sycamore Gap tree (Metro, Wed) – were given the additional punishment of each planting 1,000 new trees, on top of each being jailed for four years and three months?
Up first thing in the morning and work them all day until their backs ache and they are sick of the sight of trees, grass and soil.
I read that Glastonbury organisers intend to plant new trees next year, with the festival being rested. So where better a place to send them? Dec, Essex
Sculptor Charlie Whinney, who has created an installation from a 6ft section of the Sycamore Gap tree, suggests people hug it as an act of remembrance (Metro, Fri). Rather than that, could we not have an annual wringing of the necks of the perpetrators? Howard, Devizes
The Sycamore Gap tree chaps got hefty custodial sentences. What if they'd sawn an animal in pieces? They'd have got a slap on the wrists.
The mild sentences animal abusers are given shows the contempt judges have for animals. Why is a tree more precious than an animal? Alan Meadowcroft, Oldham
Constance Marten – found guilty with partner Mark Gordon of killing their new-born baby while on the run – has a trust fund of £2.4million but gets £600,000 of legal aid (Metro, Tue).
Can someone please explain how this is possible. Mr A Bowman, Derby
I agree with Alfie Mullin (MetroTalk, Tue) when he says e-bikes are a menace in London parks. He suggests that riders should have a licence to ride them.
The thing is, any amount of legislation is worthless if it is not policed.
Maybe the Met Police could concentrate on actual physical, harmful crime, rather than tweets and perceived 'emoti-crimes' for the hurt feelings of the feeble. Tony Cooper, Bognor Regis
Migel (MetroTalk, Wed) suggests a plutocracy of 'philanthropist-capitalists' would be better running the planet than a democracy on the basis that majority decisions do not always prove correct.
But what if I don't agree with what the plutocrats propose?
Why should the plan of a small group of people be automatically deemed the best for the whole population? What if they decide to use their power to enslave everybody? Or to get rid of the elderly?
Democracy isn't without its drawbacks but at the moment it is the best we have.
As well as Brexit, Migel points to the fact the audience often got it wrong when asked on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? Managing a society is much more nuanced than picking the right answer out of four options. Michal Piwowarek, Dewsbury
Regarding Donald Trump's threat of 100 per cent tariffs on countries buying Russian exports, including oil and gas.
Japan has been buying gas from Russia's Sakhalin-2 field since 2009.
The Sakhalin-2 field is two oil and gas platforms operating off Sakhalin Island, offshored 50m deep in the Sea of Okhtosk.
So, will Trump place 100 per cent tariffs on Japanese goods entering the US? Malco, Chislehurst
How can £650million of government money for grants of up to £3,750 to assist buying electric cars worth up to £37,000 be fair to the average taxpayer? More Trending
It's going to cause further division between the haves and the have-nots. Molly Neville, Sheffield
Thames Water blames poor finances on an increase in sewage spills caused by higher-than-usual rainfall, yet has just announced a hosepipe ban due to lower-than-average rainfall (Metro, Wed).
The company should be used as a sample case to teach students at business universities how not to run a business. Pedro, Hammersmith
Did you hear about the farmer who won a Nobel prize? He was outstanding in his field. Colin Monks, Romford
MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables
MORE: Which four Labour MPs have been suspended and why?
MORE: 'We tried No7's new Pro Artist Weightless Silk Foundation and it really is silky soft'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
14 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Nato jets scrambled as Putin launches 10-hour blitz on Ukraine… while Kyiv's drones hit Moscow for FIFTH night in a row
OVERNIGHT ONSLAUGHT Nato jets scrambled as Putin launches 10-hour blitz on Ukraine… while Kyiv's drones hit Moscow for FIFTH night in a row Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NATO fighter jets were scrambled overnight after Russia launched a fresh wave of drone and missile strikes on Ukraine in a 10-hour blitz. Kyiv unleashed chaos in Russia after launching its own drone attack on Moscow for the fifth night in a row. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike Credit: Reuters 3 An explosion of a drone is seen over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike Credit: Reuters 3 A firefighter stands near a damaged residential building following a Russian attack Credit: AFP Explosions lit up the night sky in Kyiv as the missiles and drones were seen above high-rise buildings. In another tense and sleepless night for Kyiv residents, many were forced to rush to take shelter in underground stations. Explosions were heard across the city as air defence units engaged in repelling the attack. Ukraine's air force said that Russia launched 426 drones and 24 missiles overnight across the country. But only 23 drones hit their targets, officials added. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said rescuers and medics were working on sites across four districts of the capital. A subway station in central Kyiv, commercial property, shops, houses and a kindergarten were damaged, city officials said. Meanwhile, Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia sowed chaos at major airports serving Moscow on early Monday. Thousands of passengers were forced to wait in long queues or sleep on the floor after flights were cancelled or delayed, Russian media reported. Russia's defence ministry said it had downed 117 drones overnight, including 30 over the Moscow region. On Sunday, officials claimed to have downed 172 drones, including 30 over the Moscow region. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Who's the Vylan of the piece?
In the wake of the Bob Vylan controversy, Douglas McConnell takes a look at Glastonbury, free speech and Scots law Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The 2025 Glastonbury Festival made headlines far beyond the music world when punk-rap duo Bob Vylan led the crowd in chants of 'Death to the IDF'. Broadcast live before being removed by the BBC, the incident prompted condemnation from political leaders and ignited a criminal investigation in England. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The controversy reopened complex questions about hate speech, protest and legal thresholds, especially in light of Scotland's newly enforced hate crime legislation. My colleague, David Duncan, wrote earlier this year about how Scotland's new hate crime laws apply to individuals. But this is something different – a public performance, broadcast to thousands, where the audience isn't just incidental, it's central. Bobby Vylan of the Bob Vylan duo at this year's Glastonbury festival (Picture:) Although the chant occurred in England, it provides a useful lens through which to examine how Scotland's Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021, in force since April 2024, might address such speech. The Scottish legislation consolidates and updates previous hate crime statutes. It criminalises conduct that is: Threatening or abusive; and Intended to stir up hatred against groups defined by protected characteristics, including race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, transgender identity, age, and variations in sex characteristics. It also introduces specific 'stirring up hatred' offences, which require not only abusive or threatening language but clear intent to incite hatred. Notably, the Act includes built-in protections for freedom of expression, aiming to safeguard genuine political discourse and critical commentary that doesn't cross into incitement. Bob Vylan's chant against the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) presents a legal grey area. The IDF is a state military body, not itself a protected group. But if a court interpreted the chant as a stand-in for hostility toward Jewish people, it could potentially fall within the law's scope under religious or racial hatred provisions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In Scotland, the key prosecutorial questions would be: Did the performer intend to stir up hatred, not just express opposition to Israeli military policy? Was the chant directed at a protected group, or clearly framed as political dissent? How would a reasonable observer interpret its tone, content and impact? The Bob Vylan controversy reopened complex questions about hate speech, says Douglas McConnell The performers could argue the chant was rooted in protest against state violence, not hostility toward any religion or ethnicity. This would engage the Act's freedom of expression defence, which allows controversial views so long as they don't provoke hatred. While English law criminalises stirring up racial or religious hatred under the Public Order Act 1986, its focus is whether the speech is likely to stir up hatred, not whether it was intended. Scotland's Act, though broader in scope, has a higher evidentiary threshold – proof of intent. Nonetheless, the Scottish law's clarity and breadth could arguably make prosecution more viable, depending how courts interpret the chant's intent and implied meaning. Scotland's newer framework was designed to tackle modern hate expressions, including online speech and performance. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This controversy also taps into Scotland's wider cultural debates, and boundaries between 'cancel culture,' accountability, and censorship. Some view legal mechanisms as protections for vulnerable groups, while others fear the potential chilling effects on protest and dissent. Had the Glastonbury performance taken place in Scotland, prosecution under the 2021 Hate Crime Act would be possible, but far from guaranteed. Intent, interpretation and context would all be crucial. The law is designed to protect against dangerous hate speech while safeguarding freedom of expression, but navigating that line requires careful legal and cultural judgment. In the court of public opinion, the chant has already been met with disapproval. In a Scottish court, the outcome would be far more nuanced.
Metro
13 hours ago
- Metro
Manhunt over Epping migrant hotel disorder as protesters gather again
Police are hunting three men in connection with violent disorder outside a migrant hotel that injured eight officers in Epping. Officers released images of the suspects as more than 100 protesters gathered outside the Bell Hotel in Essex believed to be housing asylum seekers on Sunday night. There is a line of police vans and officers blocking off the entrance to the hotel, with protesters facing them on the other side of the pavement. Some are holding signs which say 'deport foreign criminals', 'we go home when they go back' and 'defend our girls'. A small number of protesters are wearing balaclavas and face coverings against police orders. An Essex Police spokesman, imposing a Section 60 order lasting until Monday morning, said: 'Anyone who refuses to remove a face covering when required to do so is likely to be arrested and if convicted could face imprisonment.' The investigation to identify those who caused disorder in the town on Thursday continued. Essex Police said that a group intent on causing trouble and violence, arrived on the high street. One man was seen jumping on a riot van and kicking in the windscreen. The group damaged a number of police vehicles, threw projectiles and injured eight police officers, according to the force. One Metropolitan police van sped through an improvised blockade on Epping High Street 'making contact' with a protester who appeared to fail to move out of the way. Staff at the hotel told Metro on Thursday that the car park was a no-go zone after the riot as they feared the protesters would return in force. One, who looked visibly shaken, said: 'Everyone is ok but no one is allowed in the car park. The police say so.' A nearby resident, 48, who did not want to be named, said: 'I was sickened by what I saw. This is not acceptable. We have families and having these thugs shouting and chucking stuff is disgusting.' Another said: 'It's not ideal living right near a migrant hotel but what is worse is these rioters causing mayhem. There is rubbish everywhere from stuff they have chucked and they sort of lay siege to the hotel which must be terrifying for those inside.' Detectives are now seeking to trace the three men in connection with violent disorder and assaulting an emergency worker. Chief Supt Simon Anslow said: 'We continue to have a dedicated team of detectives working around the clock to find all of those who came to Epping last week intent on causing violence and disorder. 'There is no place for that on the streets of our county and there is a difference between peaceful, legitimate protest and those who are only interested in mindless thuggery. 'I continue to urge residents to support us by sending us your footage or imagery of those who came to Epping to do nothing but cause trouble. 'And a big thank you to those who have helped us by sending footage and images into us, we are grateful.' MORE: Manhunt after woman sexually assaulted in street near Tube station MORE: Moment boy, 15, shot dead in front of children at family fun day in 'Teletubbies Park' MORE: What I Own: I bought my £212,500 Chelmsford one-bed after divorce — and found myself again
