Will a food dye ban make your favorite treats taste different? We put Froot Loops to the test.
According to a Yahoo News/YouGov poll of 1,597 U.S. adults conducted in April, 65% of Americans support such a ban. According to 26% of the respondents, losing artificial food dyes would 'affect the taste or quality' of certain food items that traditionally contain them — things like Mountain Dew, Doritos, M&Ms and Froot Loops — for the better, while 10% think it would 'make them worse.' (Another 34% thought there would be no change, and 31% were unsure.)
So ... which is it? We wanted to see if people could actually tell whether a food item contained artificial food dyes or not. Enter a blind taste test comparing traditional Kellogg's Froot Loops sold in the United States (which contain Red 40, Yellows 5 and 6 and Blue 1), Canadian Froot Loops (which come in a box boasting 'no artificial colors, same fruity taste' and get their color from turmeric, fruit and vegetable juice concentrate and other natural sources ) and a dye-free alternative from Aldi, the chain known for its use of plant-based colorings. Did our testers taste a difference? Here's how it played out.
We recruited four testers from our New York City offices: Yahoo News Reporter Katie Mather, Yahoo Finance Video Producer Jo Santangelo, Yahoo News Director of Social Media Marianna Brady and Yahoo Finance Senior Health Care and Business Reporter Anjalee Khemlani.
Each tester was blindfolded and given three bowls of cereal to sample — American Froot Loops, Canadian Froot Loops and Aldi's Millville Fruit Rounds. They tried them in different order and gave their honest reviews and best guesses about which was which. (You can watch the video here.)
The Aldi Fruit Rounds, which are free of artificial flavors and colors, preservatives and corn syrup, tasted a little different from our testers' childhood memories of Froot Loops. But they scored highly for tasting somehow 'more wholesome,' says Brady.
Mather and Khemlani were convinced that Canadian Froot Loops were the real American deal. To be fair, they're effectively identical to the U.S. version of the cereal, minus the dyes. 'This is really good,' Mather says. '[it] reminds me of being a kid and being so excited to have like seven bowls of this before going to school.' Khemlani picked up on the sweetness and said the Canadian cereal 'has to be the American one.'
The U.S version actually had Santangelo convinced that it was the 'alternative' (Aldi-sourced) brand, because it seemed less sugary. Mather and Khemlani also detected the fruity nostalgia of the flavors they knew from their youth.
In the end, only one person correctly guessed which cereal was the American one. And nobody could agree which version tasted best. Mather summed it up after her blindfold was removed and she saw the cereals she'd tried: 'The colors don't make any difference. [Each] tastes exactly like my spoonful of whatever colors I ate the last time.'
On their own, artificial food dyes are designed to have no negative flavors. Dyes may not be entirely flavorless, but they're usually added to foods in small enough quantities that there's no detectable change to the taste, Marion Nestle, a New York University professor emerita and a leading food activist, tells Yahoo Life.
But that doesn't mean those colors don't affect how we perceive the taste of food. 'We eat with our eyes,' says Nestle, who is also working on a book called Sugar Coated, which explores nutrition policy through an examination of her exhaustive collection of cereal boxes. It's not just smell and taste that 'make food attractive, but bright colors [too] — and people, particularly kids, really like them,' she adds. In fact, after General Mills tried producing a version of its cereals (including Trix) without artificial dyes in 2016, sales plummeted. The company reversed course the next year.
Is that reason enough to leave the bright colors alone? No, says Nestle. As noted by RFK Jr. and the FDA, studies — including a small but influential 1980 paper — have suggested a link between behavioral disruptions and problems, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in kids and artificial dyes. It's difficult to establish that dyes alone are a major cause of ADHD or behavioral problems, but there's enough evidence to result in bans in Canada, California public schools and, now, the United States generally. Plus, according to Nestle, 'There's no reason to keep them; they're just cosmetic and have no safety or taste function.'
Ditching them won't solve the bigger issue with cereals like Froot Loops, however, says Nestle. 'Kids shouldn't be eating them anyway, and [banning] the color additives isn't going to change that — they're still ultra-processed cereals,' she says. 'I'm all for getting the color additives out of the food supply, but it is not going to make America's kids healthier again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cigna (CI) Pullback a Buying Opportunity, Says TD Cowen with a Buy Rating
The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) is one of the best defensive stocks to invest in according to analysts. Cigna shares cracked over 10% on July 31 after the company reported its Q2 2025 quarterly results. Following the results, TD Cowen analyst Charles Rhyee reiterated a Buy rating on Cigna, maintaining a $387 price target. He believes the recent pullback in the shares was overdone and sees current levels as an attractive entry point. A health care professional consulting with patients in a state-of-the-art facility. While concerns around performance in the Health Insurance Exchange (HIX) segment weighed on sentiment, Rhyee expects the impact to be limited. He points to strength in other parts of the business, particularly Specialty and Care Services, as well as solid momentum in the company's Pharmacy Benefit Management (PBM) operations, which should help offset pressures. Rhyee also noted that management's Q3 guidance appears cautious, especially considering stepped-up investment in improving patient experience. Still, he remains confident in the company's earnings outlook, with robust EPS growth projections for 2025 and 2026 supporting his valuation. The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) is a health services company that provides medical, pharmacy, behavioural health, dental, and supplemental insurance products. While we acknowledge the potential of CI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Most Oversold S&P 500 Stocks So Far in 2025 and 10 Most Oversold Semiconductor Stocks So Far in 2025. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wells Fargo Sticks with Overweight on UnitedHealth (UNH), Trims Target to $267
UnitedHealth Group Inc. (NYSE:UNH) is one of the best defensive stocks to invest in according to analysts. At the time of writing this article, UnitedHealth ranks among the 10 biggest year-to-date decliners, which have lost over 50% among U.S.-listed stocks with a market capitalization exceeding $2 billion. The company, which was marred by government investigations, operational failures, and leadership changes, reported mixed Q2 2025 earnings results at the end of July. Those results have been unable to shore up the share price, as the long-term growth outlook is still murky. A close-up of a healthcare professional studying a computer screen with data while consulting with a patient. The company guided for 2025 adjusted EPS to be over $16, which was significantly below Bloomberg's consensus expectations of $20.4. Seeing the brighter side, Jeff Jonas, portfolio manager at Gabelli Funds, called the guidance highly conservative and believes that it will be easier for the company to beat such low expectations. However, the steep correction and valuation discount have attracted analysts' interest, with around two-thirds of them having a Buy or equivalent rating. One of the analysts who maintains an optimistic view is Wells Fargo's Stephen Baxter. On August 4, Baxter maintained an Overweight rating on UnitedHealth but lowered his price target to $267 from $306. The revision followed a recently held management meeting where he assessed the company's updated outlook. According to the analyst, UnitedHealth's management remains confident in the company's ability to meet its reset 2025 guidance. In his view, management is taking a cautious but disciplined approach in factoring in cost trends and margin recovery. Baxter views this conservatism positively, suggesting it reduces the risk of further downside revisions. UnitedHealth Group Inc. (NYSE:UNH) is a healthcare company that provides health insurance and healthcare solutions in the U.S. and globally under the UnitedHealthcare and Optum brands. While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Most Oversold S&P 500 Stocks So Far in 2025 and 10 Most Oversold Semiconductor Stocks So Far in 2025. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Giant Asterisk to MAHA's Food-Dye Crackdown
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Last month, America's top health officials gathered in downtown Washington for an ice-cream party. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—joined by Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins—hunched over a cooler and served himself a scoop. Off to the side, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary licked a cone. There was a reason to celebrate: The dairy industry, like many of America's largest food makers, had acquiesced to the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement's crackdown on synthetic food dyes. The International Dairy Foods Association, a lobbying group, announced that more than 40 major ice-cream companies would begin phasing out several dyes that RFK Jr. has blamed for a slew of chronic-health problems, especially in children. 'I'm very grateful for this industry for stepping up,' Kennedy told onlookers. By the end of 2027, Hershey's birthday-cake ice cream won't have Yellow 5 or Red 40, nor will its 'blue moon' flavor have Blue 1. But your ice cream might still come with one particular artificial food dye: titanium dioxide, a chemical that turns food white and isn't included in the International Dairy Foods Association's 'Ice Cream Commitment.' (Yes, the milk in ice cream already is white to begin with, but titanium dioxide helps keep some ice cream with added ingredients from looking like the muddied leftover milk in a bowl of cereal.) Titanium dioxide is added to many other foods, too, including salad dressings, low-fat milks, and soups. So far, the chemical seems to be largely surviving the food-dye purge. Many companies—including Kraft Heinz and General Mills—don't mention titanium dioxide in their promises to replace similar dyes. (Neither company responded to multiple requests for comment.) You might be eating more titanium dioxide than you think. Even food that isn't white might contain it. The chemical is commonly used as a base layer—kind of like primer on a wall—to make brightly colored products pop. It's not always named as an ingredient in foods that are made with the dye. Other synthetic dyes, such as Red 40 and Yellow 5, which are made from petroleum, must be disclosed on a product's nutrition label. (That's also true for several other dyes that end in a number.) The FDA, however, allows food companies to simply label titanium dioxide as an 'artificial color,' given that technically titanium is a mineral. Food makers argue that this distinction demonstrates that titanium dioxide is not like other dyes. The International Dairy Foods Association told me that it's 'focused on removing certified artificial colors' when I asked whether the group's pledge included titanium dioxide. A spokesperson for the Consumer Brands Association, a major lobbying group that recently announced a food-dye pledge of its own, similarly said that the numbered dyes 'are a unique subset.' Whether people really should fret about titanium dioxide while licking an ice-cream cone is a contentious question. In 2022, the European Union banned the dye over concerns that tiny particles in the product could build up in the body and damage DNA. But the decision wasn't based on clear evidence that links the chemical to specific ailments. Rather, European officials identified 'some data gaps and uncertainties' about the dye's health impacts, and acted out of an abundance of caution. The evidence against titanium dioxide isn't much different from that against other artificial dyes. Food makers have stopped using the numbered dyes based solely on preliminary science. Prior to Kennedy's confirmation, many of the same organizations that are now touting the food industry's efforts to remove synthetic dyes were arguing that requests to ban these ingredients were scientifically flawed. In 2023, the Consumer Brands Association, alongside two other trade groups, argued that the FDA should not ban Red 3, because the science around its health harms was unconvincing. Kennedy has indicated that he does want to phase out titanium dioxide along with other synthetic dyes, pointing to the European ban. Titanium dioxide is listed as a food additive of concern in a report on childhood chronic disease recently released by the Trump administration's MAHA Commission. ('HHS takes the safety of food ingredients seriously and will continue to review available evidence and expert guidance on this and other additives,' a Health and Human Services spokesperson told me in an email.) MAHA has had some victories when it comes to titanium dioxide. At the end of last year, the food giant Mars removed the chemical from Skittles. The ice-cream company Turkey Hill, which joined the dairy industry's dye pledge, is in the process of purging its products of titanium dioxide, a spokesperson said. (The company did not respond after I asked when that transition would be complete.) A representative for PepsiCo told me that the company is phasing out titanium dioxide in the one product it sells that includes the chemical: Muscle Milk. But many more companies that are replacing other artificial food dyes have been quiet about titanium dioxide. The food industry is reluctant to give the chemical up for a reason. It's remarkably efficient as a food dye—nothing else comes close to its ability to turn food white. (No wonder versions of the chemical are also used in house paint.) The main replacement is calcium carbonate, also known as chalk, which is much less opaque, and so food companies would need to use much more of it to get the same whitening effect. This could not only make products more expensive, it could impact the texture and taste of the underlying food. Some companies have successfully been able to reformulate their products: Skittles look the same as they always have. 'These reformulations are not easy and can sometimes take months to years to accomplish adequately,' Dave Schoneker, a food-dye consultant, told me. 'This ends up being a big investment.' Not every company will have a bench of food scientists able to spend years reformulating its products. Without titanium dioxide, consumers may just have to get used to uglier food. At one point while working on this story, I went to the grocery store and picked up two blue-cheese dressings—one with titanium dioxide and one without. The version with the additive looked like what I expected blue-cheese dressing to look like: pearly white. The other one looked a bit like grayish-green mucus. That's not a proposition that excites the food industry, nor is it something that companies seem to believe Americans can handle. As California prepared to become the first state to ban several food additives in 2023, titanium dioxide was removed from the legislation at the eleventh hour amid vocal opposition from food companies. Before caving to pressure, Mars had resisted calls for the company to stop using artificial dyes in sweets; instead, the company settled on doing so just in Europe, citing that it's where 'consumers have expressed this preference.' Indeed, European consumers are 'okay with muted tones,' Chari Rai, the head of innovation for North America at Oterra, a natural-color manufacturer, told me. "I think the difference in the U.S. market is they're just so used to seeing vibrant colors.' If the industry is correct and Kennedy cannot persuade Americans to embrace an ugly scoop of ice cream, that would signal he's going to have an even harder time pushing Americans away from foods containing the many other ingredients that he claims, with varying degrees of evidence, are making people sick. Food dyes are just cosmetic. (Ice cream still generally tastes the same with or without titanium dioxide.) Other food additives, such as emulsifiers and low-calorie sweeteners, serve a bigger role; ultra-processed foods, which Kennedy opposes, make up a sizable portion of the American diet. MAHA still has much bigger battles to fight. Article originally published at The Atlantic Solve the daily Crossword
