Ministers plan major changes to Send education in England
Labour is preparing major changes to special educational needs provision in English schools, as individual councils raise the alarm over debts running into hundreds of millions of pounds that have pushed many to the brink of bankruptcy.
A Guardian analysis has found the vast majority of English upper-tier councils have accumulated often eye-watering special educational needs spending deficits. At least 12 have forecast accumulated deficits over £100m, running as high as £312m, when the debts have to be settled in a year's time.
It is understood ministers are preparing a white paper due to be published in late spring setting out details of what one insider called a 'complete recalibration' of the special educational needs and disabilities (Send) system.
The government is believed to be considering changes to existing Send legislation that councils hope would ease the deficits, alongside a raft of reforms designed to prioritise state school provision and cut council spending in costly private specialist needs schools.
The move comes amid frantic calls by English local authorities for ministers to write off a collective £5bn forecast deficit on Send budgets. The deficit – effectively kept off council books through a temporary credit-facility arrangement called an 'override' since 2018 – is due to hit council balance sheets on 31 March 2026 , a financial shock that could push more than 60 councils into insolvency.
Council Send spending has accelerated in recent years, and the deficit – the gap between the money the government gives councils for Send and the amount they have been legally obliged to spend on provision – has become one of the biggest threats to the viability of many town halls, on a par with the social care crisis.
Local authorities are lobbying for law changes to give them more control over Send costs by limiting parental rights to appeal over Send assessments, and reducing the powers of Send tribunals to direct how a child's needs are provided for in the school system.
Kate Foale, a Labour councillor and Send spokesperson for the County Councils Network, said law changes must go hand in hand with reform and extra investment in special needs education. 'It [the Send system] is adversarial, and it doesn't work for children and their families. We are in a really bad place.'
Parents' groups warned ministers would have a 'massive fight on their hands' over any attempts to dilute children's legal rights to Send support. 'Reducing Send entitlement won't make needs go away – you just end up with lots of children with needs but no support,' said Tania Tirraoro of the campaign group Special Needs Jungle.
The biggest forecast deficits by next March include Hampshire county council (£312m by March 2026), West Sussex (£222m), Norfolk (£186m), Cheshire East (£154m), Warwickshire (£151m), Wiltshire (£117m), Oxfordshire (£111m), Gloucestershire (£108m), Somerset (£100m), and Staffordshire (£100m).
Guardian analysis of two-thirds of English upper-tier councils found at least 13 have forecast accumulated Send deficits of between £50m and £100m, including Sefton (£86m), Hertfordshire (£81m), Cornwall (£70m), Cambridgeshire (£70m), Leicestershire (£66m), Merton (£65m), Central Bedfordshire (£65m), and Wokingham £61m).
Bournemouth, Chichester and Poole council, whose deficit will reach £165m in a year's time, said without the deficit override it would be technically bankrupt from next month because its Send deficit exceeds its available financial reserves. It described its position as 'an impossible situation'.
Many councils have had to take out huge loans to manage cash flow crises caused by Send spending. The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy estimates the cost of these loans, including interest payments, amounts to around £600m a year, which could have been spent on frontline services.
The Send deficit is also eating into other parts of council budgets, with many town halls reporting unsustainable increases in the cost of home to school transport as more children with EHCPs are sent to out-of-borough special schools.
The deficits are driven by huge high-needs budgets overspends, especially on education, health and care plans (EHCPs), which set out a council's legal duty to meet a child's educational support requirements.
A rapid rise in pupils diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder, special emotional needs (including ADHD), and speech, language and communication needs has fuelled a 140% increase in EHCPs between 2015 and 2024, from 240,000 to 576,000.
Although the 2014 Act clarified entitlement to Send support, critics say the previous government failed to anticipate, plan for, and properly fund and manage the resulting explosion in need and demand. Guardian analysis indicates EHCP demand continues to increase rapidly, with a number of councils reporting 50% rises in the past 12 months.
Bradford, already on the edge of effective bankruptcy because of social care pressures, is one of tiny handful of councils currently in surplus on its Send budget. However, it says an expected surge in EHCPs will rapidly turn this into a £14m deficit by March 2026, rising to £54m in 2027.
Experts say an extension may delay a local financial meltdown across local government but is unlikely to give councils enough time to tackle the underlying causes of the deficit, which if not mitigated could rise to as much as £8bn by 2029.A Guardian analysis of internal documents and budget reports in over two-thirds of upper-tier English councils, also found:
Some councils have raised concerns over profiteering amid frustration over huge fees charged by private specialist schools, which can charge between £50,000 and £100,000 per place, typically two to three times the cost of state provision.
Tensions between headteachers and councils over attempts by the latter to shift millions of pounds from local school budgets to ease high needs deficits. Some schools have warned such moves would force them to sack Send support staff.
Attempts to rein in local Send demand and spending via 'safety valve' initiatives at 42 councils have largely failed, with most failing to hit savings targets on time, despite receiving government grants running into tens of millions of pounds.
A Department for Education spokesperson said the Send system had long been failing to meet the needs of children and families. 'Through our Plan for Change, we are determined to improve inclusivity and expertise in mainstream schools, making sure special schools cater to children with the most complex needs and restoring parents' trust that their child will get the right support.
'We are already making progress by investing £1bn into Send, alongside £740m for councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools, paving the way for significant, long-term reform.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
37 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land
A 10-year battle has raged over what this idyllic spot on one of the world's most storied waterways should come to look like in the future. An English leisure company called Flamingo Land specialising in leisure resorts has fought hard to build a hotel and log cabins and, ahem … a monorail here. The very notion of a leisure complex annexing one of the few remaining accessible spots on what the legendary Scottish naturalist, Tom Weir had called 'a lung for Glasgow' immediately seemed an anathema to the Scottish public and to those across the world who had experienced Loch Lomond's wild beauty. More than 155,000 signatures were collected expressing opposition to what they regarded as an environmental sacrilege. No other grassroots campaign had ever come anywhere near gathering so many responses. Read More Fake liberals wage war on Scotland's poorest and most vulnerable folk How new Pope and Catholic Church have mesmerised our Godless societies Pope Leo is the first American pontiff, but Trump should not celebrate It forced the developers and their partners, Scottish Enterprise and the Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park authority to retreat and re-consider an arrangement they'd all thought could be steered through with a minimum of public engagement and scrutiny. Along the way, a pattern of civic and private relationships has been exposed in which an exclusivity agreement with the developers was uncovered as well as a nexus of interlocking relationships in which undeclared interests and quiet land transfers have occurred. Featuring heavily throughout the saga has been the SNP's favoured weapon of mass obstruction: the redacted official document. The latest twists in a decade-long series of convulsions have occurred in the last few weeks. In May, the Scottish Government's Planning and Environmental Appeals Division intimated that the Reporter assigned to the case was minded to allow the appeal for the Flamingo Land development after it had been unanimously rejected by the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs Planning Authority last September Seasoned campaigners though, who had observed the behaviour of Scottish Enterprise and the tactics of the developers up close were wary of breaking open the champagne just yet. Scotland's planning laws allow developers unlimited scope for appeal while denying the same to community groups. It was inevitable that Flamingo Land bosses would return. Yet, there would be one more turn of the cards. It came when Jackie Baillie, the formidable Labour MSP for the area, succeeded in having the issue debated last Wednesday. The Scottish Government, fearing a vote it would lose, moved suddenly to re-call the plans. One local campaigner told me: 'When Jackie gets going on an issue she becomes a force of nature. It's clear she'd stacked enough votes among all opposition parties to cause the Government problems.' Loch Lomond plans (Image: Loch Lomond planning portal) In the Balloch House Inn, local people were keen to dismantle some of the mythology of this struggle for what they regard as the soul of their community. 'It now looks like the plans won't be going forward any time soon,' said Peter Broughan, long-time resident of this neighbourhood. 'And let's be honest: it would be insanity to do this before the 2026 election. It's not a vote winner. The problem of course is parity of planning. The developers can come back any time they want. Objectors can't.' Last week, Scotland's MSPs all received a clumsy letter from a lobbying firm acting on behalf of the developers. It attempted to dispel what it described as myths in the objectors' narrative. Within hours the decision to recall the plans was made: surely one of the fastest times on record a lobbyist's claims were dumped. The firm described as 'myth' that more than 155,000 people had objected to the Lomond Banks development. Here's what they claimed was the truth: 'While an online petition claimed to gather more than 155,000 signatures, these figures are not independently verifiable. In contrast, the official planning process received just 760 formal objections, a small number given the scale and reach of the project.' Local campaigner, Alannah Maurer is familiar with this type of claim and dismantles it. 'This is desperate stuff,' she said. 'It's a verifiable fact that 155,000 objected, whether by email or through an online portal platformed by the Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer. It shows the strength of feeling – and to an unprecedented extent – that the Scottish are opposed to the planning application. If the developer claims these figures are not independently verifiable, is he suggesting that our MSPs are misrepresenting figures in statements they have made in Parliament? 'Are they suggesting that 155,000 objections, including campaign groups representing 6,000 members are not to be considered? How arrogant and insidious.' Willie Hutchison, an engineer who has worked all over the world, said: 'Loch Lomond is an area of outstanding natural beauty and it is recognised both at home and internationally as such. Commercial real estate developments like the Flamingo Land proposal are utterly at odds with the objects of retaining an area of natural beauty. Their proposal comprising two hotels, restaurants, bars, shops, a brewery, over a hundred chalets, and a monorail tells you that. 'Las Vegas on the Loch may be a quip but in truth it reflects how such commercial developments are the antithesis of the natural environment. In my opinion, this is a Trojan Horse with more development to come. 'And why has this deal proceeded with such secrecy? What justifies a near ten-year 'exclusivity agreement'? Why can't people know what public land is being sold for? And how much is the running bill, including working hours spent by highly-paid public officials? Are we expected to believe that 10 years and huge public and private expense is all merely for this development?' Local resident, Elaine Telfer said: 'You wonder why Flamingo Land is so determined to keep fighting, and at what cost? Could it be a Land Grab, of a world famous prime location: the gateway to Loch Lomond? Looking at their financial position, from Companies House, they are asset-rich only, so who are their backers? From the first sod being cut to the opening of the resort will take something like seven years. The disruption caused is beyond comprehension.' Enter Peter Haining, the world-renowned Scottish rower who won three world Sculling titles. He is founding Director of the Scottish Institute of Sport and remains a globally-respected rowing coach. He was born in nearby Dumbarton and first honed his skills on this stretch of water as a member of the Loch Lomond Rowing Club. Mr Haining has been in quiet discussions with some local campaigners and politicians about a much more ambitious and sustainable project which would unlock the full cultural and economic potential of this historic region. 'The scope of what can be achieved here, without disturbing the natural beauty and the natural order of this place is vast,' he said. 'I'd propose a Loch Lomond watersports centre. And from that you could develop ideas around on what this area really needs. I'd like to expand it to the University of Loch Lomond which would provide a natural link in an educational chain which has Stirling at one end and Glasgow at the other. 'This place is a natural environment for providing degrees in a broad spectrum of environment specialisms, including energy conservation and the study of algae and solar energy. Loch Lomond and the surrounding lands are intrinsic to a true appreciation of both ancient and modern Scotland, stretching back to the Neolithic age. The heartbeat of Scotland can be felt here. 'Spain has benefitted greatly from the tens of thousands who visit to walk the ancient pilgrimage routes that lead to the tomb of St James in Santiago de Compostela. We have our own sacred highways around here which tell the story of how the first Christian monks came here and where St Columba walked and which helped give birth to western Christianity. The geographical and historical timelines around this part of Scotland are vast end endless. 'You could have a Gaelic-speaking centre and foster trades and skills in kilt-making, acrylics, fabric-dying. In commercial terms, you could attract investment from global partners owing to the opportunities in world-class fishing, fine dining and whisky. It would be a four-phase plan, fully costed and researched, starting with a watersports centre, the university and training camps for international rowers. 'America's Ivy League universities have vast alumni wealth under management and these places absolutely adore the Scottish Highlands and the west coast.' Peter Haining's vision is significantly more valid and purposeful than anything that the government agencies and their favoured business partners have produced in a decade of wasted endeavour.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Labour is heading for war over welfare cuts
Photo by Jordan Pettitt - WPA Pool / Getty Images After the celebration, the hangover. Rachel Reeves' £300bn Spending Review gave Labour MPs plenty to cheer but reality soon intruded. GDP was revealed to have shrunk by 0.3 per cent in April (as Donald Trump's tariffs and higher taxes depressed growth). Israel and Iran's escalating conflict has only further darkened the global outlook. How, in this climate, will Reeves' largesse be paid for? Higher taxes are one answer (the Treasury is already compiling potential revenue raisers ahead of this autumn's Budget); the other is more cuts. When Keir Starmer last month U-turned on winter fuel payments and indicated his intent to abolish the two-child benefit limit, some inside Labour questioned whether the government's welfare bill would ever emerge. But the answer will become clear this week with legislation due to be published on Wednesday ahead of a vote next month. No 10 maintains that there is not just a fiscal case but a moral case for the bill. 'Winter fuel was a policy that was forced on us in a difficult situation at the start,' an aide told me. 'Welfare reform is an argument that we want to make about how to protect the most vulnerable and how to help people into work.' Starmer himself is moved to passion on this question, telling the cabinet earlier this year that there is 'nothing progressive' about a system in which one in eight young people are not in employment, education or training, and one in ten working-age people are claiming at least one type of health or disability benefit (with spending projected to rise from £48.5bn in 2023-24 to £75.7bn in 2029-30). But he faces the biggest revolt of his premiership to date. Forty-two Labour MPs have signed a public letter describing the £5bn cuts – which would see 370,000 current Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants and 430,000 future ones lose an average of £4,500 – as 'impossible to support'. More than 100 have signed a private letter to the Chief Whip ('none of us are consistent rebels,' they emphasise), warning that they too are unable to endorse the proposals. Here is why a government with a Commons majority of 165 seats has been forced to contemplate the possibility of defeat (with Downing Street also primed for ministerial resignations). The Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall – who faces the defining test of her political career – has sought to contain the rebellion by offering an 'olive branch' to critics. Those who no longer qualify for PIP would continue to receive payments for 13 weeks (rather than the standard four) and those with lifelong conditions or fewer than 12 months to live would automatically receive a higher rate of Universal Credit and be exempt from reassessments. By the end of the parliament, No 10 points out, there will still be an extra 750,000 people receiving PIP. Yet most MPs remain unmoved. 'The hang-tough position dressed up as concessions won't wash,' one soft-left figure told me. 'MPs know how this stuff works and can't be fobbed off.' Many privately warn that only a change in the assessment criteria would persuade them to support the bill. At present individuals who need help dressing, washing and feeding themselves would no longer receive PIP. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe What lies ahead is nothing less than a battle over Labour's founding purpose. For some – as cabinet ministers often like to put it, 'the clue is in the name' – this is the party of work, not welfare. Others riposte that Labour's duty is precisely to support those unable to support themselves. Kendall's task is to convince rebels that her bill does. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Impunity is fuelling Israel's spiralling aggression] Related
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Spending Review: Are wealth taxes on the horizon?
Summary: Major pledges included £113 billion in capital funding for infrastructure projects. Defence and health saw healthy boosts to their budgets. Overall, the government has committed to £300 billion in future spending. But could the cost of meeting those pledges have ongoing implications for wealth taxes? Spending reviews were introduced by Labour in 1998 and typically cover a three-year period. These set out the funding that different government departments will receive over that time. The big winners in the 2025 Spending Review included the Department of Health. It received a £29 billion boost. This will lay the groundwork for the NHS 10-year plan – details of which should be published shortly. Energy infrastructure will benefit from substantial capital investment, including in nuclear. Defence spending will increase by £11 billion. Meanwhile Chancellor Rachel Reeves' reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Allowance has unsurprisingly garnered headlines. Labour's first Spending Review in 18 years was long awaited but had few surprises. But more relevant for many is what this review is likely to mean for the Autumn Budget. The economic backdrop The UK economic outlook is far from bright. UK inflation remains sticky. In other words, it remains higher than expected. There are risks to growth, not least from the potential impact of US tariffs. Gilt yields have risen, pushing up the cost of government borrowing. Justin Onuekwusi, SJP's Chief Investment Officer, says: 'Despite a strong start to the year, we expect the UK economy will likely slow down through the rest of the year due to weakening business sentiment and the impact of tax increases in increased employer contribution implemented in April. Read more: 'We remain concerned about inflation and believe it is likely to remain inflated. Services inflation is still running at over 5% and despite some softening in the labour market, pay growth remains stubbornly high. 'Though the review mainly allocates existing funds, ongoing public spending pressures suggest future borrowing and possible tax rises.' Looking ahead to the Autumn Budget The Office for Budget Responsibility forecast in the autumn will need to consider these issues. It will also have to factor in other governmental policy initiatives, such as changes to immigration. There is also little doubt the Chancellor will face pressure from her party to spend more in the Autumn Budget. In its election manifesto, Labour ruled out increases to income tax, employee national insurance contributions and VAT. But there are other levers it can pull. It is estimated the government could levy tax rises of around £15 billion without crossing these red lines. But this leaves little room for substantial spending commitments. This is fuelling expectations that tax rises could be on the horizon. The likely candidates There are a number of tax-rising measures that have been speculated on. These include extending the freeze in personal tax thresholds beyond April 2028, which could raise around £7 billion per annum. Further measures to limit tax avoidance could be introduced, while changes to property taxation are possible. This could take the form of scope for an additional band on council tax or an increase to existing higher bands to raise up to £2 billion. There has also been speculation about reintroducing the lifetime allowance on pensions and looking at salary sacrifice arrangements. However, both would be difficult to implement and cause sector-specific issues, especially for the NHS. Advice Divisional Director Claire Trott says: 'Salary sacrifice arrangements offer valuable National Insurance (NI) savings for both employers and employees, so any changes would be unwelcome, especially in light of the increase to employers' NI earlier this year. 'Introducing further changes to pension taxation also risks undermining pensions as a long-term savings vehicle. With other changes to the pension system on the horizon, there is a danger that these alterations could cause even more confusion and savers could become more disengaged with pensions – which is especially worrying as individuals have increasing responsibility to plan and save for their retirement.' An update on ISAs is likely to form part of the Autumn Budget too. The Treasury has been keen to encourage greater investment in UK markets. One suggestion which regularly crops up is of a cap on cash ISAs – the thinking being that people would instead invest more in equities in an ISA. James Heal, SJP's Director of Public Policy adds: 'We've been engaged in government and industry discussions around potential changes, including a cap on cash ISAs to encourage greater investment, but there are other measures such as simplifying ISAs (i.e. a single wrapper to make it easier to hold cash and or investments within that) which might be a more fruitful means to achieving this. 'We remain strong advocates for the value of investing, particularly once a sufficient emergency cash buffer has been established.' Ben Stark is a chartered financial planner with over a decade of experience advising businesses and families. He is partnered with St. James's Place Wealth Management.
