Justice Naatasha Burian Sworn in as Judge of the Supreme Court of Seychelles
Justice Burian took the Oaths of Allegiance and the Judicial Oath in the presence of distinguished officials including Vice-President Ahmed Afif, Speaker of the National Assembly Hon. Roger Mancienne, President of the Court of Appeal Justice Anthony Fernando, Chief Justice Rony Govinden, and Attorney General Vinsent Perera. Members of the judiciary, the Constitutional Appointments Authority, esteemed guest and family members.
During the ceremony, on behalf of the country and on his personal behalf President Ramkalawam congratulated Justice Burian on her appointment, praising the successful appointment of a Seychelloise for the new role. He highlighted her experience as a valuable asset in the delivery of justice and upholding the rule of law of our nation.
Justice Burian brings impressive credentials to the Supreme Court. She earned her Bachelor's Degree in Law from the University of Reading (UK) and was admitted to the Bar in July 2011. Previously admitted as a Member of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple in May 2010, she began her legal career in Seychelles with a Pupillage in September 2011. She was formally admitted as an Attorney at Law in November 2013 and appointed as a Notary two years later.
Her judicial service began in May 2017 when she was sworn in as Magistrate, a position she held until November 2021, after which she served as Master of the Supreme Court. Justice Burian has also demonstrated leadership as Chairperson of several important bodies including the Rent Board, Employment Tribunal, and Mental Health Care Tribunal, as well as Vice-Chairperson of the Family Tribunal.
Recently, Justice Burian completed a Master's Degree in Law at the University of London, specializing in Criminology and International Criminal Justice, further enhancing her expertise. This appointment makes her the fourth woman to serve as a puisne Judge with the Supreme Court of Seychelles, representing an important advancement in gender diversity within the nation's judiciary.
Justice Burian will primarily serve in the commercial court. "I feel extremely privileged to have been given the opportunity to further advance in my professional career," she stated following the ceremony. "The setup of the commercial court is extremely important in Seychelles. We need to encourage the ease of doing business, not only for foreign investment but for domestic businesses as well. We need to ensure smooth operations and swift delivery of judgments in commercial matters."
This appointment underscores Seychelles ongoing commitment to strengthening its judicial system through the selection of highly qualified legal professionals.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of State House Seychelles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Perfect solution
Several prominent Bollywood figures, including Janhvi Kapoor, Varun Dhawan, Chinmayi Sripaada, Varun Grover, and Vir Das, have criticised the top Indian court's recent directive ordering all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to be relocated to shelters. The celebrities labelled the ruling as a 'death sentence for all dogs' on social media. I appreciate and thank the Supreme Court for this wonderful ruling. I have lived in Delhi from 1995 to 2007, and I know how painful it was to walk on the streets of Delhi in the night. It was a very challenging time for me. I have been chased by dogs many times during my stay in Delhi. I could never go to the library alone from my hostel due to an excess of stray dogs in the night. Every night I would come across cases of dog bites in my locality. This is a very old problem. Those who have lived in Delhi or living there know how painful it is to step out from their houses after sunset. Those who are against this ruling have never experienced an encounter with dogs. Just for the sake of 'likes', people start talking about the subject, which they have never ever experienced in their entire lives. I feel those who are against this ruling should stroll in any part of Delhi after the sunset and then they should tweet. Shahzad Ali, By email
Arabian Post
4 days ago
- Arabian Post
Netanyahu's Israel in the World's Eyes
Dr Divya Malhotra Across Europe, the United States, and even parts of Asia, Jewish communities and Israeli citizens are facing a wave of renewed hostility, not because of their religion, but because of Israeli government's devastating actions in Gaza. What began as a war of self-defense following the October 2023 Hamas attacks has transformed into a prolonged humanitarian catastrophe. With over 50,000 Palestinians killed, Gaza is not just a battlefield, it is a humanitarian graveyard. As an Indian scholar, I observe with deep unease how Israel's image, once rooted in resilience and survival, is now increasingly associated with moral decline. And at the heart of this shift is not just war, but the man directing it: Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel's military response was initially understood as retaliation against an unprecedented act of terror. But nearly two years later, it is difficult to decipher the objectives. Hamas cannot be bombed out of existence, and Palestinians, as a people, cannot be erased. If Hitler, with his genocidal machinery, failed to annihilate the Jews, how can Netanyahu expect to eliminate a people or an ideology with force alone? Wars have ethics. Occupation has limits. And leadership, above all, demands responsibility. ADVERTISEMENT What Netanyahu is doing now is not merely retaliatory—it's strategic self-preservation. It is a war prolonged, not solely against Hamas, but against political dissent, democratic institutions, and increasingly, against the very soul of Israel. Even among partner countries like India—long friendly to Tel Aviv—concerns about Gaza's devastation are making it harder to maintain stable, open ties. Realist foreign policy may prioritize interests, but no nation can long ignore the moral stain of collective punishment. Israel was beginning to emerge from a prolonged era of covert diplomacy, carving out a new regional foothold through the Abraham Accords and enjoying an unprecedented wave of Arab diplomatic engagement. But Netanyahu's persistence in prosecuting a war with diminishing returns has jeopardized that progress. Many of Israel's allies are starting to speak up against Bibi, and are getting increasingly uncomfortable in being publicly associated with his government. Power as an End, not a Means: Netanyahu could have left behind a legacy of economic prowess and geopolitical pragmatism. Instead, it is now marked by democratic backsliding and institutional sabotage. His judicial overhaul effort aimed at neutering Israel's Supreme Court ignited one of the largest civil resistance movements in the country's history. Reservists refused duty, former Mossad and Shin Bet chiefs condemned the plan, and economists warned of irreversible investor flight. Netanyahu dismissed them all, invoking 'the will of the people' while undermining the very frameworks that make democracy resilient. Like Viktor Orbán in Hungary or Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey, Netanyahu has mastered the art of cloaking authoritarian instincts in the rhetoric of patriotism. But history tells us that strongmen rarely exit gracefully. Mussolini, too, believed Italy's future rested solely in his hands; he left behind a legacy of ruin. Bibi's trajectory is alarmingly familiar. When Leaders Become Liabilities: For a man who built his brand on security, the October 2023 attacks exposed staggering failure. Years of undermining the Palestinian Authority, fixating on Iran, and ignoring brewing tensions in Gaza created a blind spot that Hamas exploited with precision. In most democracies, such a collapse would lead to resignation or serious political reckoning. Netanyahu chose deflection and denial. ADVERTISEMENT What followed was not just war, but the tightening of his political grip—vilifying opponents, rallying far-right allies, and portraying himself as indispensable. He brought fringe figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich into mainstream power, sacrificing societal cohesion for coalition arithmetic. Israeli democracy, long admired for its vitality even amid war, now teeters as Netanyahu aligns with messianic ultranationalists who reject pluralism and inflame racial tensions. And while Israel burns internally, the consequences are global. Jews around the world are being judged for the decisions of a government many did not elect and even more do not endorse. The reputational damage Netanyahu has inflicted on Jewish communities globally is immeasurable. Political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt warned in How Democracies Die that it is often elected leaders, not generals, who destroy democracies by gradually dismantling institutions and norms to advance their own political agendas. Netanyahu has followed this script faithfully: inciting against judges, delegitimizing Israel's Arab citizens, tolerating/promoting violence from settlers, and branding dissenters as traitors. Israel once prided itself on institutional strength amid constant external threat. But Netanyahu's reign has hollowed out that pride. His obsession with avoiding prosecution has taken precedence over national interests, and his consolidation of power resembles more an autocrat than a statesman. A Nation Larger Than One Man: To his credit, Netanyahu does have tangible accomplishments. He globalized Israel's economy, opened diplomatic doors, and projected strength on the world stage. But a true leader knows when to step aside. Instead, Netanyahu clings to office like a man trapped by his own contradictions—too powerful to be challenged, too compromised to walk away. Israel is more than Netanyahu. Its people, its institutions, and its moral legacy deserve better. Increasingly, even its allies are making the distinction between the Israeli state and the man leading it. The hope for a post-Netanyahu Israel is not just political, it is moral. For the sake of both Israelis and Palestinians, and for the credibility of Jews around the world, that hope must be realised soon. Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
Filipino Times
6 days ago
- Filipino Times
Sotto files bill mandating full public disclosure of key government records
Senate Minority Leader Vicente 'Tito' Sotto III has filed a bill seeking to establish a policy for full public disclosure of government records and transactions involving matters of public interest. Under the proposed 'People's Freedom of Information Act of 2025,' the public will have the right to access information on issues of public concern, in line with promoting transparency, accountability, and citizen participation. 'Transparency is the cornerstone of good governance. To foster accountability, trust, and citizen participation, our Government shall provide ready and complete access to key information to the discerning public,' Sotto said in a statement. The bill requires the release of specific information, including the annual Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) of the following officials: • President • Vice President • Cabinet members • Members of Congress • Supreme Court justices • Members of constitutional commissions and other constitutional offices • Armed Forces officers with general or flag ranks Government agencies will also be required to upload certain records on their official websites, with monthly updates. These include registers of transactions, annual budgets, monthly collections and disbursements, summaries of income and expenditures, procurement plans, bid invitations, and procurement contracts. However, sensitive personal details such as race, ethnicity, origin, health records, religion, political affiliation, education, and tax returns will remain classified. Requests may also be denied if releasing the information would endanger national security or harm foreign relations. Agencies will have six months from the law's effectivity to craft their Freedom of Information Manual. Officials who conceal, destroy, alter, or tamper with requested information face penalties of one to six months in prison and fines of ₱10,000 to ₱100,000. 'In this modern world where data is readily available online, information about government transactions, processes and actions shall likewise be accessible to our countrymen as a matter of right,' Sotto said. Members of the Liberal Party in the House of Representatives have also refiled their version of the FOI bill, which similarly mandates the disclosure of SALNs of the president, vice president, and other high-ranking officials.
