logo
Trump's U.K. Trade Deal Sparks Outrage from Detroit Automakers

Trump's U.K. Trade Deal Sparks Outrage from Detroit Automakers

ArabGT11-05-2025

Remember when we warned that British carmakers could become the biggest losers under Trump's aggressive tariff agenda? It turns out the U.K. government shared the same concern—and acted fast. In a political and economic maneuver that stunned the auto world, Britain secured a deal with Washington that significantly softens U.S. tariffs on U.K.-made vehicles. And the biggest losers? Detroit's Big Three.
The agreement, still in a preliminary phase, reduces U.S. import tariffs on British cars—many of which have no American components—from 25% down to just 10%. That figure matches the U.K.'s own duty on imported vehicles and applies to the first 100,000 cars shipped to the U.S. annually, conveniently covering Britain's current export volume.
This has triggered a fierce backlash from American manufacturers, especially General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis. Their frustration stems from the fact that vehicles built in Mexico or Canada—even those containing a high percentage of U.S. parts under the USMCA trade deal—remain subject to the full 25% tariff. In effect, a British car with almost no American content now costs less to import than a partially U.S.-made one.
'This hurts American automakers, suppliers and auto workers,' said Matt Blunt, President of the American Automotive Policy Council. 'We hope this preferential access for U.K. vehicles over North American ones does not set a precedent for future negotiations with Asian and European competitors.'
The group criticized Trump for favoring the U.K.—a nation far removed from America's immediate trade sphere—over its closest partners. 'Under this deal, it will now be cheaper to import a U.K. vehicle with very little U.S. content than a USMCA-compliant vehicle from Mexico or Canada that is half American parts,' Blunt emphasized.
The White House quickly fired back. 'No president has taken a greater personal interest in reviving the American auto industry than President Trump,' said spokesperson Kush Desai. He insisted that the administration is working closely with automakers to reshore manufacturing and deliver targeted relief through deregulation and tariffs.
Still, the political calculus behind the agreement is hard to ignore. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has faced mounting pressure after a bruising local election loss, while Trump's approval ratings have been shaken amid fears of a looming trade-induced recession. The trade pact offers both leaders a chance to score a political win—and Trump wasted no time declaring a 'MAJOR TRADE DEAL' with a 'BIG, AND HIGHLY RESPECTED COUNTRY' on Truth Social, even before it was finalized.
Back in the U.K., the reception was far more positive. Mike Hawes, CEO of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, hailed the deal as 'great news' for British carmakers. 'The application of these tariffs was a severe and immediate threat to U.K. automotive exporters, so this deal will provide much-needed relief,' he said.
Adding fuel to the fire, Trump admitted his own personal fondness for Britain's high-end car brands may have influenced his decision. Speaking to reporters, he said he favored lowering tariffs for companies like McLaren, Bentley, and Rolls-Royce—luxury manufacturers unlikely to ever build vehicles on American soil.
'That's really handmade stuff. They've been doing it for a long time in the same location,' Trump remarked. 'So I said, 'yeah, that would be good. Let's help them out with that one'.'
Even though the 100,000-car limit caps potential future growth for the U.K. auto industry in the U.S., the financial markets responded swiftly. Shares in Aston Martin Lagonda—the only British automaker listed on the London Stock Exchange—jumped 14% following news of the deal.
For Detroit's Big Three, however, the message was loud and clear: when it comes to Trump's trade priorities, it may be handcrafted luxury over homegrown industry.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's ugly divorce
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's ugly divorce

Al Arabiya

time30 minutes ago

  • Al Arabiya

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's ugly divorce

In one of his emotional outbursts, Elon Musk wrote months ago on his platform 'X': 'I love [Donald Trump] as much as a straight man can love another man.' Since then, we've seen him – with his son – accompanying Trump more often than we see the president with his own wife and son, Barron. Yet this affection and personal attraction were, in reality, built on fragile foundations of mutual interest and benefit. It was expected that this tangled relationship would end quickly – but not in the bitter and ugly way it did, when Musk accused his former boss of ties to the infamous Jeffrey Epstein case and called for his ouster. Trump, known for firing his staff in humiliating ways – sometimes without them even knowing – and calling them 'idiots,' couldn't treat the richest man in the world the same way. Elon Musk is no ordinary man, and he played a critical role in Trump's re-election. That's why Trump tried to ease him out gracefully and with minimal damage. In a bland farewell ceremony before reporters in the Oval Office, he handed Musk – who was in a state of turmoil – a golden key in honor of his service. In his parting words, Musk said he would remain a supporter and friend to Trump, who, despite Musk's remarks, tried to absorb the blow and calm the tension. But just a few days later, Musk launched a furious, unhinged attack on his former boss, declaring that he hadn't meant what he said in front of millions. Musk is an emotional and volatile figure, difficult to contain. This is one of the key reasons behind the rift between him and Trump that led to this ugly split. While Trump seeks to weaken established institutions and challenge the so-called deep state, Musk operates entirely outside traditional government structures, disregarding its norms and conventions altogether. Trump, despite rebelling against Washington and its elite, still adhered to some rules and never became an absolute destructive force – after all, he is the president of the United States. Musk, on the other hand, has never worked in government, but wants to change it as he does his corporate leadership teams – without oversight or accountability. His clash with members of Trump's administration over the government efficiency board known as 'DOGE' sparked much controversy. He used a harsh management style, and although Trump publicly supported him at first, Musk's employee purge campaign ultimately damaged Trump's political image and failed to deliver the promised financial savings. It was a chaotic project doomed to fail from the very beginning. Another rift between Musk and Trump lies in their worldviews. After Trump's victory, Musk entered into a state of hysterical celebration, declaring that the win would serve human civilization and the interests of mankind. Musk's motivations are cosmic and idealistic, whereas Trump speaks in terms of individual interests, 'America First,' egg prices, and tariffs. While Musk saw Trump's win as a turning point in human history, Trump was busy attacking Biden and blaming him. Their conflict was a collision of extremes – excessive idealism versus self-serving realism, visionary romanticism versus cold materialism. For all these reasons, the split wasn't surprising – it was a logical conclusion to a fragile relationship between two personalities who were never meant to meet in the first place.

Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a ‘mobile security crisis'
Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a ‘mobile security crisis'

Arab News

time4 hours ago

  • Arab News

Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a ‘mobile security crisis'

WASHINGTON: Cybersecurity investigators noticed a highly unusual software crash — it was affecting a small number of smartphones belonging to people who worked in government, politics, tech and journalism. The crashes, which began late last year and carried into 2025, were the tipoff to a sophisticated cyberattack that may have allowed hackers to infiltrate a phone without a single click from the user. The attackers left no clues about their identities, but investigators at the cybersecurity firm iVerify noticed that the victims all had something in common: They worked in fields of interest to China's government and had been targeted by Chinese hackers in the past. Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in US cyberdefenses. Groups linked to China's military and intelligence service have targeted the smartphones of prominent Americans and burrowed deep into telecommunication networks, according to national security and tech experts. It shows how vulnerable mobile devices and apps are and the risk that security failures could expose sensitive information or leave American interests open to cyberattack, those experts say. 'The world is in a mobile security crisis right now,' said Rocky Cole, a former cybersecurity expert at the National Security Agency and Google and now chief operations officer at iVerify. 'No one is watching the phones.' US zeroes in on China as a threat, and Beijing levels its own accusations US authorities warned in December of a sprawling Chinese hacking campaign designed to gain access to the texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. 'They were able to listen in on phone calls in real time and able to read text messages,' said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois. He is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the senior Democrat on the Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, created to study the geopolitical threat from China. Chinese hackers also sought access to phones used by Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance during the 2024 campaign. The Chinese government has denied allegations of cyberespionage, and accused the US of mounting its own cyberoperations. It says America cites national security as an excuse to issue sanctions against Chinese organizations and keep Chinese technology companies from the global market. 'The US has long been using all kinds of despicable methods to steal other countries' secrets,' Lin Jian, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a recent press conference in response to questions about a CIA push to recruit Chinese informants. US intelligence officials have said China poses a significant, persistent threat to US economic and political interests, and it has harnessed the tools of digital conflict: online propaganda and disinformation, artificial intelligence and cyber surveillance and espionage designed to deliver a significant advantage in any military conflict. Mobile networks are a top concern. The US and many of its closest allies have banned Chinese telecom companies from their networks. Other countries, including Germany, are phasing out Chinese involvement because of security concerns. But Chinese tech firms remain a big part of the systems in many nations, giving state-controlled companies a global footprint they could exploit for cyberattacks, experts say. Chinese telecom firms still maintain some routing and cloud storage systems in the US — a growing concern to lawmakers. 'The American people deserve to know if Beijing is quietly using state-owned firms to infiltrate our critical infrastructure,' US Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan and chairman of the China committee, which in April issued subpoenas to Chinese telecom companies seeking information about their US operations. Mobile devices have become an intel treasure trove Mobile devices can buy stocks, launch drones and run power plants. Their proliferation has often outpaced their security. The phones of top government officials are especially valuable, containing sensitive government information, passwords and an insider's glimpse into policy discussions and decision-making. The White House said last week that someone impersonating Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, reached out to governors, senators and business leaders with texts and phone calls. It's unclear how the person obtained Wiles' connections, but they apparently gained access to the contacts in her personal cellphone, The Wall Street Journal reported. The messages and calls were not coming from Wiles' number, the newspaper reported. While most smartphones and tablets come with robust security, apps and connected devices often lack these protections or the regular software updates needed to stay ahead of new threats. That makes every fitness tracker, baby monitor or smart appliance another potential foothold for hackers looking to penetrate networks, retrieve information or infect systems with malware. Federal officials launched a program this year creating a 'cyber trust mark' for connected devices that meet federal security standards. But consumers and officials shouldn't lower their guard, said Snehal Antani, former chief technology officer for the Pentagon's Joint Special Operations Command. 'They're finding backdoors in Barbie dolls,' said Antani, now CEO of a cybersecurity firm, referring to concerns from researchers who successfully hacked the microphone of a digitally connected version of the toy. Risks emerge when smartphone users don't take precautions It doesn't matter how secure a mobile device is if the user doesn't follow basic security precautions, especially if their device contains classified or sensitive information, experts say. Mike Waltz, who departed as Trump's national security adviser, inadvertently added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal chat used to discuss military plans with other top officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had an Internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols set up in his office so he could use the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, the AP has reported. Hegseth has rejected assertions that he shared classified information on Signal, a popular encrypted messaging app not approved for the use of communicating classified information. China and other nations will try to take advantage of such lapses, and national security officials must take steps to prevent them from recurring, said Michael Williams, a national security expert at Syracuse University. 'They all have access to a variety of secure communications platforms,' Williams said. 'We just can't share things willy-nilly.'

US troops make first detentions in Trump border military zones
US troops make first detentions in Trump border military zones

Arab News

time5 hours ago

  • Arab News

US troops make first detentions in Trump border military zones

US troops have made their first detentions inside military areas set up on the US-Mexico border as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration, the US Army said. The unprecedented military areas along 260 miles (418 km) of border in New Mexico and Texas were declared extensions of US Army bases by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, allowing troops to temporarily detain migrants and other civilian trespassers. Three 'illegal aliens' were detained by troops in the New Mexico area near Santa Teresa on June 3, before being handed to US Border Patrol, Army spokesperson Major Geoffrey Carmichael said in an email. 'This marks the first time Department of Defense personnel have recorded a temporary detainment within either National Defense Area,' Carmichael said. US presidents have long used active-duty and reservist troops on the international boundary in support roles to US Border Patrol such as surveillance and construction. President Donald Trump took military use a step further by giving troops the right to hold trespassers they catch in the zones until civilian law enforcement assumes custody. Federal troops can also search people and conduct crowd control measures within the areas, according to the Army. Designation of the zones as military bases allowed troops to detain migrants without the need for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. The 1807 law lets a US president deploy federal troops domestically to suppress events like civil disorder. Prosecution of dozens of migrants caught in the zones has faced setbacks in court after judges in New Mexico and Texas dismissed trespassing charges, and acquitted a Peruvian woman, ruling they did not know they were entering restricted areas. The primary role of troops in the zones is to detect and track illegal border crossers, with around 390 such detections so far, the Army said. News of the detentions inside military areas came as Trump deployed state-based National Guard troops to Los Angeles during protests over immigration raids.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store