Who are Iran's key allies in the Middle East and globally?
Iran has spent decades propping up militant groups and political regimes across the Middle East, forming its so-called "Axis of Resistance", while pursuing close relationships with other global powers.
Yet after Israel attacked multiple sites in Iran last weekend, sparking a fierce exchange of missiles, those allies were largely silent.
Israel's powerful ally the US has openly discussed attacking, yet only one Iran-backed militant group has stepped in to defend it.
Here's a closer look at the key alliances in the Iran-Israel conflict and how these allies are responding.
Iran's so-called 'Axis of Resistance'
Since the 1970s, Iran has projected its power across the Middle East using a network of close allies that share its aim of countering US and Israeli influence across the region.
This so-called "Axis of Resistance" threatened that any strikes against Iran or its affiliates would trigger a formidable response.
The network grew to include Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, some armed groups in Iraq and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza and the West Bank.
But over the past two years, the "axis" has been dealt some severe blows, with many of Iran's allies in the region either weakened or ousted from power.
Andreas Krieg, a security expert and associate professor at King's College London, says Iran's ties have unravelled.
"It is not really an 'axis' anymore as [much as] a loose network where everyone largely is occupied with its own survival," he says.
According to Ian Parmeter, a Middle East scholar at the Australian National University (ANU) and a former Australian ambassador to Lebanon, that leaves Iran in its "weakest state" in more than 40 years.
"None of its allies are able to support it in a way that they could previously," he says.
"That's why the Israel Defense Forces have been able to launch these attacks on Iran now."
Click on the cards below to read more about Iran's remaining allies.
Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem vowed retaliation for recent Israeli strikes in Lebanon would be carried out in central Tel Aviv. ( Reuters: Al Manar TV )
Hezbollah has long been considered Iran's first line of defence in case of a war with Israel, but the Lebanese militant group has stayed out of the latest conflict.
At one point, Hezbollah was believed to have around 150,000 rockets and missiles, and its former leader, Hassan Nasrallah, once claimed to have 100,000 fighters.
The group was drawn into a full-scale war with Israel last September after it tried to help its ally, Hamas, fight off Israel's offensive in Gaza, which was sparked by the Palestinian militants' October 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel.
Israel's daring attack, which involved remotely detonating pagers and walkie-talkies armed with explosives that had been distributed to Hezbollah members, killed key members of the armed group as well as some civilians.
While a US-brokered ceasefire halted the Israel-Hezbollah conflict last November, Israel continues to occupy parts of southern Lebanon and carries out near-daily air strikes.
Hezbollah's current leader, Naim Qassem, has condemned Israel's attacks on Iran and offered condolences for the senior Iranian officers who were killed.
But Qassem did not suggest Hezbollah would take part in any retaliation against Israel.
ANU's Mr Parmeter says it is because Hezbollah is still reeling from its losses, with Israel having killed most of its top leaders and destroying much of its arsenal.
"Hezbollah has been very badly degraded, and Iran hasn't been able to resupply it with rockets and missiles," Mr Parmeter says.
"So Hezbollah is not able to create a diversionary attack on Iran's behalf."
Still, Qassem Qassir, a Lebanese analyst close to Hezbollah, told the Associated Press a role for the militant group in the Israel-Iran conflict should not be ruled out.
"This depends on political and field developments," he said. "Anything is possible." Iran-backed: Iraqi militias show solidarity The US launched strikes against the Iranian-backed group Kataib Hezbollah. ( Reuters: Thaier al-Sudani )
Unlike Hezbollah, whose military wing has operated as a non-state actor in Lebanon, the main Iraqi militias are members of a coalition that is officially part of the state defence forces.
For their part in Iran's "axis", the Iraqi militias have occasionally struck bases housing US troops in Iraq and Syria.
One of these militias, Kataib Hezbollah, said it was "deeply regrettable" that Israel allegedly fired at Iran from Iraqi airspace in the last week.
The armed group called on the Iraqi government to "urgently expel hostile forces from the country," which is a reference to US troops in Iraq, but it made no threat of force.
Renad Mansour, a senior research fellow at the British think tank Chatham House, told the Associated Press that Iraq's militias did not want to pull their country into a major conflict.
"Things in Iraq are good for them right now, they're connected to the state — they're benefiting politically, economically," Dr Mansour said.
"They've seen what's happened to Iran, to Hezbollah, and they're concerned that Israel will turn on them as well." Iran-backed: Houthis still attacking The strike was the third US attack on Houthi targets in Yemen in recent days. ( AP Photo )
The Houthis remain the only Iran-backed group still firing missiles at Israel as part of a campaign that began with the Gaza war in solidarity with Palestinians.
"Triumphing for the oppressed Palestinian and Iranian peoples … This operation was coordinated with the operations carried out by the Iranian army," a military spokesperson said after targeting central Israel's Jaffa.
The Houthis are mountain fighters who have been battling Saudi-led forces for control of Yemen, in what is widely seen as a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
They have been the de facto government in north Yemen since a 2022 ceasefire.
The group has a large arsenal of armed drones and ballistic missiles largely supplied by Iran, which it has previously used to fire at ships in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route.
But the ANU's Mr Parmeter says the Houthis are too geographically removed to strategically harm Israel beyond the rebels' sporadic missile attacks.
"Yemen is certainly supported by Iran, but it's too far away to be able to do much damage to Israel," he says.
The US has thwarted most of the previous attacks and carried out retaliatory strikes with Israel on Houthi bases.
Could Iran's global allies step in?
Iran is also part of an informal network of "CRINK" countries, which is an acronym for China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.
So far, China has condemned Israel's attacks on Iran but it has limited its response to supporting a diplomatic solution.
North Korea has also condemned the attacks as a "crime against humanity" without offering Iran further support.
It's Russia, however, that has stepped in by offering to mediate the conflict.
Vladimir Putin has close ties with both Iran and Israel's leader. ( Reuters: Evgenia Novozhenina/Pool )
President Vladimir Putin has denounced the attacks on Iran and has reportedly warned that any US intervention would be a "terrible spiral of escalation".
"Russia is certainly very close to Iran at the moment and it's playing a very important role in supplying drones to Russia for the war in Ukraine," Mr Parmeter says.
"So Russia owes Iran for its drones, but, at the same time, Putin and Netanyahu get on very well personally."
According to Mr Parmeter, Russia's offer to mediate is unlikely to "go anywhere" and "it's just a good way for Putin to present as an international statesman".
Mr Parmeter says it is also unlikely that other Arab countries such as Egypt, Jordan or the United Arab Emirates would support Iran because they are not close and would not want further escalation.
Israel and US 'extraordinarily close'
Donald Trump shares a close relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu. ( Reuters )
As for Israel, it has the militarily and politically powerful United States as a close ally.
"Netanyahu won't do anything without first clearing it with Trump, he has an extraordinarily close relationship with him," Mr Parmeter says.
US President Donald Trump has called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" and raised the idea that its supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, would be an "easy target" if he were to be assassinated.
But the US says it is maintaining a "defensive" position in the Iran–Israel conflict for now, meaning it is only focused on deterring or intercepting attacks on Israel.
Still, Mr Trump has teased that the US "may or may not" strike Iran and would make a decision "within two weeks".
The US currently holds a significant military presence in more than a dozen Middle Eastern countries and on ships throughout the region's waters, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Mr Parmeter says Israel would want the US to get involved because it needs the American "bunker-buster" bombs to finish destroying Iran's nuclear sites.
These bombs are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding, making them ideal for attacking hardened bunkers and tunnels.
In this case, Mr Parmeter says Israel needs them to significantly damage Iran's Fordow nuclear fuel enrichment plant, built deeply into a mountain.
"The big risk is the United States will get involved in some way, but I don't see it getting involved with boots on the ground or much more than using their bunker-buster bombs," he says.
That's because Mr Trump is facing domestic pressure from within his own Republican base, which is "divided" on whether to get involved in another war, Mr Parmeter says.
Meanwhile, the G7 countries have also expressed their support for the security of Israel, but have urged for "a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
'Unmitigated disaster': What Donald Trump could be weighing up on Iran
US President Donald Trump says he's considering whether or not to involve the US in the Israel-Iran conflict. Source: AAP, Press Association / Suzanne Plunkett As hostilities between Israel and Iran continue, United States President Donald Trump is keeping the world guessing as to what he might do next. Israel launched a sweeping aerial campaign against Iran a week ago, calling it a "pre-emptive" strike to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran has denied plans to develop such weapons and retaliated by launching counterstrikes on Israel. Trump has repeatedly criticised Iran, called for an "unconditional surrender", and floated the possibility of US action in Iran. On Thursday, Trump said he has yet to decide how the US would proceed, but will do so in the next two weeks. He has indicated there is still a chance of negotiating with Iran. "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, quoting a message from Trump. Leavitt told a regular briefing at the White House that Trump was interested in pursuing a diplomatic solution with Iran, but his top priority was ensuring that Iran could not obtain a nuclear weapon. Professor Wesley Widmaier, from the Australian National University's Department of International Relations, said domestic policies could play a major role in Trump's decision. Widmaier said a portion of Trump's voter base may not support involvement in the conflict. "I think right now he is poised on the horns of a dilemma between the isolationist MAGA [Make America Great Again] coalition base and anti-Iran pro-Israel kind of foreign policy imperative," he said. "And politicians like to keep things ambiguous for as long as possible; it gives them maximum mobility." Widmaier said the two-week time frame will provide Trump with an extension to weigh up tensions in his supporter base, political strategy and pressure, and the US relationship with Israel. Michael Green, professor and CEO of the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, said Trump is likely deciding whether or not to use a 13,000kg Massive Ordnance Penetrator 'bunker buster' bomb on an Iranian underground nuclear facility. Only the US military has the bunker buster bomb. "I believe that the decision he has to make is whether or not the US drops that bunker-busting bomb on Fordo, the remaining intact part of Iran's nuclear weapons programs," he said. "The reason he might do it is because the Israelis believe that the Iranians are weeks away from creating nuclear weapons capability. The reason to not do it is because there's no guarantee of success." Trump has not outlined exactly what US involvement in Iran could look like, but he has floated several possible scenarios. Comments and social media posts about his plans have veered from proposing a swift diplomatic solution to suggesting the US might join the fighting on Israel's side. On Wednesday, he said nobody knew what he would do. A day earlier, he mused on social media about killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, then demanded Iran's unconditional surrender. Iran has warned of "all-out war" if the US joins the military action. Green said while the Iranian regime is vulnerable, it could still "lash out" and cause threats to US forces and allied interests. He said Trump may be hoping the threat of the bunker buster bomb could influence Iranians to agree to peacefully give up their nuclear capability. "I am sceptical that Iran will, even under this huge amount of pressure, give up their nuclear program, [but] they might agree to meet, they might agree to talk about it, to dissipate the pressure," he said. "The most likely scenario is they put something out there to save themselves and it will be debated whether it's enough, and Donald Trump may or may not take it." Widmaier said he believes the US bombing Iran would be a "disaster". "My sense is this would all be leading to a disaster. It would just be a disaster for the region, it would be a disaster for American foreign policy," he said. If the Trump administration decides to pursue US action in Iran, Widmaier said it would need to have clear aims and a clear exit strategy. He said the US government would also want to be sure of public support if it were to take action. "These are lessons of the Vietnam war, these are lessons of the Iraq war, and I see no sense that they really know what they want," Widmaier said. Wars are easy to start, but hard to end. Wesley Windmaier "I say with a high level of confidence that it would be an unmitigated disaster, and it's something absolutely to be avoided. "I don't think you need a PhD to see that, given the disastrous military interventions that are a history of US foreign policy." While Trump has publicly criticised Iran and sided with Israel, US action against Iran is not guaranteed. In the next two weeks, Trump will weigh up different factors and scenarios, including opposition from some of his Republican colleagues, some of whom have said the US should avoid war. Kentucky senator Rand Paul said he hoped Trump would not give in to pressure to get involved. "It's not the US' job to be involved in this war," Paul said on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. Republican representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky said on X: "This is not our war. We should not engage our military here." Widmaier said it's possible the president could opt out of the US becoming directly involved in another Middle East conflict. He pointed out Trump does have a record of holding off in the context of Iran. "In his first term, he came right up to the brink of ordering some strikes against Iranian sites, and he backed off at the last possible minute," Widmaier said. "So he does seem to have some inhibitions against, it may be that at the last minute he pulls back ... he does have a pragmatic streak too." — Additional reporting by Reuters and the Australian Associated Press


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Australian embassy officials in Iran evacuate as conflict grows in Middle East
Australian embassy officials in Iran evacuate as conflict grows in Middle East Published 20 June 2025, 8:37 am Australian officials and their families have been evacuated from Tehran. Threats of a major regional war have prompted Australia to close its embassy. The Federal government is urgently warning Australians in Iran to leave if safe to do so.


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Thousands from Tehran have fled their home. Those who've stayed say they feel 'constant anxiety'
As Iran and Israel continue to trade strikes, human rights organisations have warned of the humanitarian toll of the conflict on both sides. Credit: Middle East Images / ABACA / PA/ Alamy / SBS Persian Columns of "black smoke" rising from different corners of the city, "loud explosive sounds", the constant noise of "gunfire", and empty streets — this is how some in Iran's capital of Tehran are describing their city, a week into the country's conflict with Israel. "I'm in constant anxiety," one citizen told SBS News, hours before the latest internet blackout in Iran. "When I want to sleep in the evening, I think to myself, should I tell my wife, 'I love you'? Should I tell her 'I had a good life with you'? What if this is the last moment?" Another person from Tehran said: "If I say I'm not scared, I'd be lying. We were all scared, we're all anxious. The future is uncertain for all of us." The conflict between Israel and Iran erupted on Friday, 13 June, after Israel launched an aerial assault that it said was aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Nuclear facilities, military sites and residential buildings were hit, while Iranian media said military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians were killed. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel, and the two countries have continued to trade deadly attacks since. As of Friday, at least 25 people have been killed in Iranian strikes, according to Israel. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, but authorities have not issued an updated toll since. The Human Rights Activists News Agency, a Washington-based Iranian human rights group, has said at least 639 people have been killed in Israeli strikes on Iran. Human rights groups are urging Israeli and Iranian authorities to protect civilians. "What we are seeing in both of these countries is a pattern of indiscriminate and unlawful attacks," Kyinzom Dhongdue, advocacy manager at Amnesty International Australia, told SBS News. "These are not just morally unconscionable, these are a direct breach of human rights law." Iran's capital has been one of the main targets of Israel's attacks in the past seven days. Eyewitnesses from Tehran told SBS News that many had left their homes in recent days. "Many people have left the city to save their lives. The city is almost empty. Most shops are closed. Right now, life in Tehran is not in a good state," one person said. Another person from Tehran said "the usual sound of the city has disappeared". Living in a state of uncertainty, Tehranis say they are concerned for their city, which is completely different from just a week ago. "I'm seeing my city just from the window," a person from Tehran said. "On one hand, I want to go and see up close what's happening," they said. "I want to see it with my own eyes. "But I can't, because I'm scared." Evacuating Tehran has come at a cost for some of its people. Iranian Australian Ramak Bamzar worries for her father in Iran. The Tehran resident was diagnosed with colon cancer a few weeks ago and was receiving urgent treatment at a hospital in the capital. Bamzar said her father was forced to evacuate Tehran amid strikes, as an area near the hospital was bombed. This has meant he has had to stop chemotherapy. "They shot the spot near the hospital, not exactly the hospital, but the shock was really massive," she told SBS News. "He was on the bed in the hospital to start the chemo[therapy] and the nurses, they fainted." Bamzar said her father is now living in limbo. 'We don't know when he can start doing treatment, and it could be very dangerous for him if he doesn't do it as soon as possible. "It's really serious — having cancer and war, it's just like which one is more important?" Amir Ali Savadkoohi, an ICU doctor in Tehran, told SBS News there is dwindling medical support in the city. "Many people have left Tehran, and we're facing a shortage of nurses and doctors," he said. "We've mostly tried to merge departments to make the most of the limited medical staff we have." While Bamzar has not been able to contact her father in the last two days, as many Iranians have lost access to the internet, the distance between father and daughter is being felt more than ever before. "If I was there, maybe I could do something. Here, you are just desperate. You feel like you have no power to do anything to help," she said. While some have decided to flee Tehran, others have decided to stay. Iranian Australian Fariman Kashani's 72-year-old mother is one of them. "She's very strong. She decided to stay at home. She said, 'If they're gonna bomb me, I choose to stay and die in my house,'" he said. Separated by thousands of kilometres, Kashani says he feels "helpless". "I can feel how damaging war can be," he said. "I can feel it with my whole body and my heart."