
India must engage with China, US on equal terms: GTRI
New Delhi, Apr 21 (PTI) India should engage with China and the US on equal terms and the engagement should be guided by its strategic autonomy, economic interest and global trade principles, not by external pressure, think tank GTRI said on Monday.
These remarks came in the backdrop of China's warning that it would take countermeasures in a "resolute and reciprocal" manner against nations that strike trade deals with America at the expense of Chinese interests.
Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said that China's warning of retaliation against countries aligning with the US efforts to isolate Beijing must be viewed through the lens of global supply chain realities.
Leading economies, including the US, EU, Japan, South Korea, and India, are deeply dependent on China for the supply of industrial and consumer goods, it said, adding that China is embedded at every level of the global production hierarchy - finished goods, intermediate products and parts and components.
Replacing China entirely requires building manufacturing capabilities from the raw material stage upward an effort that no country has yet achieved at scale.
The think tank said that India must chart an independent course, strengthening its domestic manufacturing base and reducing critical import dependencies through targeted investment in deep manufacturing.
At the same time, it said, India should remain firmly committed to WTO-led multilateral trade norms and avoid actions that risk violating global rules.
"India should not be drawn into binary geopolitical rivalries. Instead, it must engage with both China and the US on equal terms, guided by strategic autonomy, economic interest, and global trade principles not by external pressure," GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava said.
The US remained India's largest trading partner for the fourth consecutive year in 2024-25 with bilateral trade valued at USD 131.84 billion, while the country's trade deficit with China widened to USD 99.2 billion during the same period, government data showed.
In the last fiscal, India's exports to China contracted 14.5 per cent to USD 14.25 billion against USD 16.66 billion in 2023-24. The imports, however, rose by 11.52 per cent in 2024-25 to USD 113.45 billion against USD 101.73 billion in 2023-24.
China continues to be the second largest trading partner of India with USD 127.7 billion two-way commerce in 2024-25 compared to USD 118.4 billion in 2023-24.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MMRDA seeks stay, HC: Deposit Metro 1 1,169cr arbitral award
Mumbai: Bombay HC on Tuesday directed MMRDA to deposit by July 15 Rs 1,169 crore awarded by a three-member arbitral tribunal in 2023 to Mumbai Metro One Pvt Ltd (MMOPL), a special purpose vehicle operating the Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar Metro line 1 in which Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure holds majority stake. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It said the dispute would be fully examined at the final hearing but MMOPL's win in arbitration could not be rendered meaningless in the interim. Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan held that MMRDA failed to make a prima facie case for a stay without deposit. The tribunal had in Aug 2023 awarded Rs 992 crore to MMOPL as compensation for cost escalation and other contractual disputes. With interest accrued till May 31 this year, the sum rose to Rs 1,169 crore. MMRDA had sought an unconditional stay on the award, challenging it under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. It argued that the award was illegal and based on flawed assumptions about rent recovery, project delays and cost escalation. In response, MMOPL said MMRDA had approved key decisions and was now trying to backtrack from them. HC said the award, passed by a 2:1 majority, is in the nature of a money decree and that MMRDA, being a 26% equity holder in MMOPL, was actively involved in the project's financial decision-making. "The award cannot be termed perverse or arbitrary on the face of it," it said. The court made it clear that the amended arbitration law does not permit automatic stays and rejected MMRDA's request to avoid paying the deposit. The matter will be heard next on June 17. An official said MMRDA is yet to get a copy of the HC order. "MMRDA will thoroughly examine the order and take appropriate action."


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
RCB to be sold after historic IPL 2025 win? Owner Diageo breaks silence
Image credit: BCCI/IPL Diageo India, the Indian branch of UK-based Diageo Plc and owner of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) IPL franchise, has firmly rejected rumors of selling the team. In a letter addressed to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and its Surveillance Department on Tuesday, June 10, a Diageo India representative stated that the media reports suggesting a potential sale are purely speculative. "The company would like to clarify that the aforesaid media reports are speculative in nature and it is not pursuing any such discussion," Mital Sanghvi, the company secretary, informed the regulating body of the Indian Stock Market. "This is for your information and records." Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! According to a Cricbuzz report, Diageo's statement was in response to a query from the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), where the company is publicly listed. Since speculation about a possible sale of the RCB franchise began circulating, shares of United Spirits — the Diageo-owned company that holds RCB — have seen a notable uptick. On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that Diageo is considering selling the RCB franchise. The report surfaced shortly after RCB's maiden IPL title win on June 3 — a milestone achieved after 17 years — followed tragically by an incident in Bengaluru on June 4, where celebrations turned fatal, leaving 11 dead and many injured. Virat Kohli's love for 'dhaba' food, priority for family & more | RCB bus driver shares stories Though Diageo officially dismissed the sale reports as "speculative," the ambiguity of their statement has sparked deeper speculation. A seasoned voice in India's sports business ecosystem suggested that 'being a public company, there will be a lot of pressure on reputational damage,' hinting that Diageo could be weighing its options more seriously than publicly admitted. There are also murmurs about Diageo valuing the RCB franchise at around USD 2 billion. While some industry insiders view that figure as inflated — especially when compared to Torrent's acquisition of Gujarat Titans at approximately INR 7500 crore (around USD 1 billion) — others disagree. Lalit Modi , the architect of the IPL, told Cricbuzz that a USD 2 billion valuation for RCB is quite realistic. 'A particularly special feeling': Andy Flower hails Virat Kohli, RCB after historic title win "I will not be surprised if it is sold for a higher price," he remarked, adding that comparing the RCB valuation to that of the newer Gujarat franchise isn't an apples-to-apples comparison. "I will not be surprised if it is sold for a higher price," he said , stating that the valuation of GT cannot be compared here since it was a one-year-old deal. The sale report remains speculative, as clarified by the Diageo official in the response to the BSE. "No decision is final and they may decide against selling the team, the people said, asking not to be named as the details are private," the Bloomberg report says.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Chinese beauty brands explore foreign M&A to spur growth
HighlightsProya Cosmetics aims to join the ranks of the top ten global beauty brands within the next decade, targeting annual revenue of at least 50 billion yuan ($7 billion) through acquisitions of established European brands. Chinese beauty companies such as S'Young and Ushopal are actively pursuing international acquisitions, having already expanded their portfolios with well-known foreign skincare and fragrance brands. Experts warn that while global acquisitions can diversify revenue streams for Chinese beauty firms, challenges remain in successfully managing and localizing foreign brands after acquisition. Some of China's top beauty brands such as Proya and S'Young are exploring acquisitions of smaller foreign rivals to expand their portfolios and replicate the success of global leaders like L'Oreal or Estee Lauder amid slowing growth at home. While still relatively unknown internationally, these Chinese brands have found significant domestic success, even capturing market share from global players. But a prolonged property crisis and concerns about wage growth and employment security have dampened consumer spending in China - posing new challenges to their continued growth. Proya Cosmetics ' founder, Hou Juncheng, said last month that the company's 10-year plan aims to position the firm among the top ten globally, a goal that would require an annual revenue of at least 50 billion yuan ($7 billion). To do so, the Hangzhou-based Proya plans "to acquire some European brands with history and technology", local media reports cited Hou as telling shareholders at a meeting. Proya, which specialises in science-backed skincare at mass market price points, became the first Chinese beauty player to surpass 10 billion yuan in annual revenue in 2024. In comparison, Japan's Shiseido, currently ranked tenth globally, raked in $6.9 billion and market leader L'Oreal generated over $45 billion in revenue last year. S'Young and Ushopal , two prominent Chinese beauty groups, have already made strides in international acquisitions. S'Young owns French skincare brand Evidens de Beaute and U.S.-brand ReVive, while Ushopal added French brand Payot to a portfolio that includes British skincare label ARgENTUM and French fragrance Juliette has a gun. William Lau, a partner at Ushopal, said the company plans to acquire one to two new brands annually. Analysts say buying foreign brands can help Chinese beauty firms diversify revenue streams and reduce reliance on the domestic market, but they also note that some similar efforts by Chinese fashion groups had missed expectations in the past. The beauty and personal care market is projected to generate a revenue of $677.19 billion globally in 2025, versus $41.78 billion in China, German data provider Statista estimates. Chinese brands are likely to target premium-positioned European skincare, fragrance or haircare brands with valuations under $500 million, said Gregoire Grandchamp, co-founder of Next Beauty China, who has advised Chinese groups on global deals. "In coming years, there will be a big Chinese company that will be the Chinese L'Oreal, Estee Lauder, Shiseido, or Amorepacific," Grandchamp predicted. GLOBAL M&A 'VERY DIFFICULT' Acquisitions have long been a growth strategy for beauty giants. L'Oreal's $2.5 billion purchase of Australian brand Aesop in 2023 added a premium, natural cosmetics brand to its portfolio, while Estee Lauder's $2.8 billion acquisition of Tom Ford in 2022 helped boost its array of high-end perfumes. Chinese beauty brands aim to borrow from this M&A playbook, but there are concerns about their ability to operate brands outside their home turf. In the fashion space, state-owned textile giant Ruyi once made headlines for snapping up foreign brands and touting its ambition to become "China's LVMH" only to see those international deals unwound by creditors in a few short years. But Ushopal's Lau says these challenges are not unique to Chinese groups, citing examples like Shiseido's buyout of Drunk Elephant to L'Oreal's purchase of some Chinese brands that struggled to meet expectations. "Global acquisitions are very difficult" in general and part of the problem is that companies often try to localise brands too quickly after a deal, he said. "One of the reasons you buy a brand is because it's an amazing brand, so if you then redo the entire DNA of the brand, what's the point of buying it?" he added. Mark Tanner, founder and managing director of Shanghai-based marketing and research agency China Skinny, said: "Opening doors to the Chinese market and capital injections, rather than a wholesale management takeover" are more likely to succeed.