Minister contradicts terms of Labour's migrant returns deal
Asked whether human rights challenges amounted to a loophole in the plan, Culture Secretary Ms Nandy said: 'That's not the case at all. 'The deal that we've struck will allow… us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. 'Those claims will be heard in France.'
She told Sky News: 'I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.' However, the treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full.
It was a narrower interpretation of the circumstances than those set out by Ms Nandy, and legal proceedings could take months or even years to wrap up. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed.
The Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, has published an analysis of the new measures which says: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.'
Meanwhile, the French interior ministry led by Bruno Retailleau - who signed the treaty alongside Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - declined to answer questions about the deal. Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But earlier today – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel.
He said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'. 'On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick in, I watched French ships escort illegal migrants straight into British waters,' Mr Philp said. 'Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.'
It is unclear whether the Home Office had detained any of the new arrivals for possible removal to France. Officials had previously described how migrants would be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate in Kent, for initial screening. Those selected would be sent to short-term detention facilities for further screening, and then on to an immigration removal centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Val, it's not misogyny that got Sturgeon – it's her wokester ideology
Spare a thought for Nicola Sturgeon. One minute she was in charge of a small country, trying to make it seem bigger by cutting it off from England; the next she's wandering around literary festivals talking about a tattoo. That's not the Royal Military Tattoo, the annual extravaganza at Edinburgh Castle, she's on about, but an actual tattoo she's had inked on her wrist. According to what she told her mother, which every parent knows may not be the whole truth, it's an 'infinity symbol' capped with an arrow, which she describes as a 'symbol of strength'. Who would deny her this wee act of rebellion? After a spectacular fall from political grace and a very public marriage break up, Sturgeon has certainly been through the wringer. Yet strength is what the rest of us required throughout her reign as First Minister, especially during the pandemic, when Boris Johnson kept having to ban things to stop her sounding tougher. The female population in Scotland needed particular fortitude to withstand her assault on their identity. Promoting her disastrous 'gender recognition' reforms, she kept insisting that 'trans women are women' when quite obviously they are biological men. It was all terribly disturbing, especially when a bloke named Isla Bryson, who used 'her' penis to carry out two rapes, was placed in a women's prison. Sturgeon's refusal to define this individual as male pretty much did for her political career. Her biggest ambition was Scottish independence, a cause she managed to set back for generations by demonstrating just how badly her party would run everything. Amid ill concealed contempt for the Monarchy, she railed against Westminster and obsessed about 'hate crimes' while Scottish NHS waiting lists exploded. Year after year, Scotland recorded the worst drug-related death rate in Europe. 'If I could turn the clock back… I would have done things differently,' she claimed, in what was not exactly a heartfelt apology for so many lives ruined and wasted. These days, she seems to be spending a lot of time with her old pal Val McDermid. In an interview with The Telegraph, the author claims Sturgeon has been 'treated appallingly' and is the victim of misogyny. 'I've seen some of the stuff she gets poured on her head and it's horrible,' McDermid said. Apparently, she is taking comfort from the new tattoo. Aye, well – it will take much more than a bit of ink for her country to recover. We can only hope that the 'infinity' symbol does not make her legacy indelible.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Home Office drops plans to house asylum seekers in town centre flats
The Home Office has abandoned plans to house asylum seekers in a town centre flat after protests led by Suella Braverman. Officials have told the former home secretary that the Home Office contractor Clearsprings will no longer be seeking to 'procure' a converted high-street clothes shop, which would have housed 35 asylum seekers. It is the first U-turn by the Government since the protests began over the summer at hotels and other sites either where asylum seekers are being housed or have been proposed for their accommodation. The flats in Waterlooville, part of Mrs Braverman's constituency in Hampshire, saw more than 2,000 people turn out at a high-street protest at the plans last month. More than 10,000 residents have also signed a petition organised by the MP opposing the scheme. She branded the plans as 'outrageous', 'reckless' and 'insulting to local people', and warned they would add to pressures on services that were already under strain in the area. It comes as 3,000 riot officers are being deployed and placed on standby this weekend amid concerns a string of anti-asylum seeker protests and counter-protests could lead to violence and disorder. It is the first time since last summer's riots that specialist public order officers have been deployed on a national scale. Speaking after the Home Office's decision to scrap the proposals, Mrs Braverman echoed comments she made three years ago when she had been appointed by Rishi Sunak to steer the Tories' asylum and Rwanda deportation plans through the Commons. 'We must not give up. This invasion must end. Any person who arrives illegally in our country must be detained in a secure facility and deported,' she said. 'I am very pleased that the Home Office has been forced to U-turn on their plans to house illegal migrants in Waterlooville. Thank you to the 10,000+ local people who signed my petition and peacefully protested to stop these plans 'Those of us who have stood up against this have been called racist, 'inflammatory' and 'divisive'. We are none of these things. Well done to the patriotic people of Waterlooville who took a stand for our community and for our country.' The Home Office said in a letter to Mrs Braverman that it would still be seeking to house asylum seekers in her area 'to ensure that we can meet our statutory responsibilities'. The Home Office has adopted a 'fair share' approach in which it is attempting to ensure all councils play a part in housing asylum seekers rather than concentrating their accommodation in particular local authorities. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is seeking to reduce the use of hotels that are currently housing more than 30,000 asylum seekers. Alternative arrangements include moving them into private rental accommodation or medium-sized sites such as old tower blocks, former student accommodation and ex-teacher training colleges. The accommodation crisis is, however, not being eased by the record number of migrants continuing to cross the Channel, with some 25,839 having reached the UK so far this year. This is the highest number at this point in the year since the first arrivals in 2018 and 50 per cent up on last year's figure. Last week Labour detained the first Channel migrants who are to be returned to France within weeks under its 'one-in, one-out' deal with France, which it hopes will act as a deterrent to further crossings. The social divisions over migration have been highlighted by the row in Waterlooville where Phil Munday, the leader of Havant council, criticised Mrs Braverman's language for 'flaming fears'. 'Repeated reference to illegal immigrants and unwanted men flames fears when we know as a matter of fact all users of the proposed accommodation are supported asylum seekers,' he said. 'Furthermore, the proposed use – as I discussed in depth with the Home Office personally – is that the accommodation would be used by a mix of families and individuals. 'This is a marked difference to the quite frankly offensive remarks that the proposed use of the site is to solely house dangerous single men of detriment to the borough.'
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
The AI revolution is not hanging around – we need to make hard choices
Although tourism doesn't dominate in cash terms – financial services is by far the biggest at over £7bn – it certainly does in employment, supporting over 30,000 jobs, with accommodation and food the city's third biggest employment sector behind health services (56,000) and finance and insurance (42,000). Education is fourth with 36,000. Unless someone blows up the Castle and closes the hotels, tourism will always be here, so no wonder councillors are already salivating at the prospect of raising £40m annually after the Tourist Tax – sorry, Visitor Levy – is introduced next year. Publicly funded health services aren't going anywhere, in both senses, but alarm bells should be ringing off the walls in other sectors about the challenges – not quite threats as yet – of technological advances now unfolding at breakneck speed, so vital for the future of both financial services and higher education. The issue is the need for data to drive artificial intelligence and the vast amounts of energy required, and a growing number of applications for battery storage and data centres are coming forward in South Scotland to tap into the new demand. Read more 'A staggering failure of even the most basic standards' Scotland needs a new kind of festival to take on the liberal elite Visitor levy group will have good intentions but may collide with reality One such project is a data centre at Hermiston unveiled last week by York-based energy company Apatura which specialises in large-scale data centres and battery infrastructure. It's involved with seven Central Belt sites, including an expression of interest to have part of the old Ravenscraig steelwork site included in a UK Government AI Growth Zone (AIGZ) programme. The AIGZ scheme, to which the UK Government has committed £2.5bn, is designed to speed up the regulatory and planning processes such significant projects normally face, but the criteria for inclusion are strict. There must be access to adequate power, a plentiful water supply for cooling, and at least 100 acres of developable land which will face few obstacles in obtaining planning permission by 2028, barely two years away. Apatura won't have considered the Hermiston project for AIGZ status because it's on Green Belt land and while Hermiston might suggest big roundabouts and a car-clogged retail park, this site is pleasant farmland off the A71 across from the Dalmahoy hotel and country club. It is, however, a short cable's length from Heriot Watt University's Riccarton campus, a national centre of computing and engineering excellence. As latency – the delay between data generation and its use – is of critical importance, the closer the data centre is to its customers the better, so across the road from Heriot-Watt would therefore be ideal. It should therefore be worthy of serious consideration if it comes to a formal planning application and the scheme has been submitted to Edinburgh Council for the pre-application process to flag up key issues, and there will now be two public consultation events at, guess where, Heriot-Watt's National Robotarium. Apatura's public communication seems minimal for such a significant proposal on what in planning terms is a difficult site, which might indicate the company either knows it's a long shot or has an inkling the path might be smoothed. Battery storage (Image: Newsquest) But the fact it's Green Belt is inescapable and perfectly reasonable proposals to build single houses on the site of old barns have been rejected for that reason. I recall an application for facilities for disabled people on the site of disused farm buildings in nearby Bonaly being rejected because the Green Belt was sacrosanct. Even if Edinburgh planners are prepared to make an exception to a local development blueprint only approved two years ago, the chances of years of opposition and court challenges must be high, and it could take over four years to turn schemes on contentious sites into reality. Data centres and battery storage facilities (there is a live application for a battery scheme just up the road for a field in Curriehill) are not usually constructions of great architectural beauty, essentially boxes of one size or another, but the necessity of having huge volumes of data in the AI age, particularly for research institutions, is beyond question. And if Edinburgh and the surrounding authorities reject such projects the applicants will simply go elsewhere and give the universities a serious headache. Much has been written about the collapse of the lucrative overseas post-graduate market, but inadequate access to data processing will be as damaging, if not more so, in the ultra-competitive battle for research investment. For Edinburgh and Heriot-Watt to be hit by both would be catastrophic, potentially turning them into glorified polytechnics. When Edinburgh's City Plan 2030 framework was being drawn up, few had heard of data centres, and they certainly didn't feature in the discussions. And the Scottish Government's Energy Consents Unit moves at a glacial pace which, like the planning system, is simply unfit for the challenges of the new era. The AIGZ initiative is designed to address such problems, but it's limited to sites where the planning process is relatively straightforward. And in Scotland don't even think about the obvious solution of small nuclear to provide reliable power instead of acres of batteries, solar panels and wind turbines. Hard choices need to be faced about a planning blueprint inadequate for housing demand, never mind new technology. The AI revolution is not hanging around for planning officers to reach conclusions, so let's hope the tourists keep coming.
