Survey: Young Germans oppose reintroducing military service, back EU
BERLIN (dpa)Young people in Germany increasingly oppose military service, a study revealed on Thursday, amid calls for the measure to be reintroduced to strengthen the country's armed forces.A YouGov study carried out for the TUI Foundation found that 55% of 16 to 26-year-old German residents reject a general military service programme, while 38% were in favour.Results from the survey two years ago had 42% of young people in Germany supporting the policy, with 47% against it.The German government has pledged to reinforce its military, the Bundeswehr, to meet the threat from Moscow in the wake of the Ukrainian crisis.The coalition between Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative Christian Democratic Union, the Bavaria-only Christian Social Union and the centre-left Social Democrats has agreed to increase recruitment via a voluntary military service programme.But pressure is rising on Defence Minister Boris Pistorius to agree to a compulsory draft.
Young Germans support the EUA large majority of young Germans favour remaining in the European Union, the survey found. At 80%, support was higher than in any other European country surveyed. In the United Kingdom, which withdrew from the bloc following the 2016 Brexit referendum, some 73% of 16 to 26-year-olds would like to rejoin the EU.The study found rising levels of polarisation among young people in Germany, with 43% describing themselves as left of centre and 14% as right-wing, up from 32% and 8% respectively in 2021.Migration was seen as the most important political problem in the EU for 45% of young Germans, ahead of climate change and environmental protection, and foreign policy and defence, both on 39%.
A total of 6,703 young people from seven European countries participated in the survey between April and May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Opinion: Britain is more worried about words than war crimes
Ismail Patel, visiting research fellow at the University of Leeds and Chair of NGO Friends of Al-Aqsa, has written in a column for Middle East Eye that Britain is "more worried about words than war crimes" He writes: "The controversy ignited by Bob Vylan's Glastonbury performance - specifically the chant of 'death to the IDF', in reference to the Israeli army - has exposed far more than artistic outrage. It has laid bare the limits of free speech in Britain when it comes to Palestine, the deep discomfort with confronting complicity, and the ease with which expressions of solidarity are demonised as hate. Glastonbury has long served as a cultural platform for political protest. From the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament to environmental justice, anti-poverty activism, women's rights and LGBTQ+ equality, it has never shied away from uncomfortable truths. The festival's founder, Michael Eavis, famously said that if people don't like the politics of Glastonbury, they 'can go somewhere else'. The festival also hosts a dedicated political space called Left Field, featuring daily debates and discussions on a wide range of issues. Over the years, the festival has witnessed powerful political moments, from solidarity with striking miners in the 1980s to a video address by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in 2022." You can read the full column below. Bob Vylan performs at Glastonbury in Somerset, England, on 28 June 2025 (Oli Scarff/AFP)
Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
German foreign minister backs border checks on visit to Prague
7 July 2025 18:57 PRAGUE (dpa)German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul defended his country's border controls with Poland and the Czech Republic, while calling for coordinated EU action on migration, during a visit to Prague on Monday."I believe that irregular migration affects us all and that we therefore need more order, including more order within and with Europe," Wadephul said after a meeting with his Czech counterpart Jan began random checks at the border with Germany on Monday in response to stricter German controls at its countries are part of the visa-free Schengen area, which abolished border checks between its members. The Czech Republic - also a Schengen member - has not yet announced similar spoke of a "transition" phase until the decisions on a common European asylum system have been consistently implemented and the European Union's external borders better said it was important for Germany that temporary measures did not affect cross-border commuters and expressed his gratitude for the "uncomplicated and pragmatic cooperation" with the Czech Republic in this said there was "significant convergence" in the views of Germany and the Czech Republic on the issue of ministers agreed to continue the Czech-German strategic dialogue, launched in July 2015, until 2027. The initiative aims to strengthen bilateral cooperation in various areas and maintain dialogue on long-term issues, including cross-border crime, research and innovation, and energy and security policy.
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
Putin Asserts Russia Fueled US Founding, Claims Historic Support
President Vladimir Putin has asserted that Russia provided crucial support to the American colonists during their fight against Great Britain, claiming it supplied weapons and financial assistance to back their independence struggle. Speaking in a phone conversation with former President Donald Trump, Putin described Russia's involvement as part of an 'actual' effort to help the fledgling United States. Putin's declaration places the spotlight on historical narratives amid intensifying geopolitical narratives. Analysts are swiftly assessing the veracity of the claim and its broader implications, while US historians emphasise that formal ties between Russia and the American colonies did not exist prior to the Revolution. No documented material support or diplomatic recognition of that era substantiate relationships between the two nations at that point. The Kremlin's narrative asserts that Russia aligned itself with the revolutionary cause by offering weapons shipments and financial support. Putin's phrasing suggested a structured engagement, though detractors argue that he misreads chronology—Russia, as an empire led by Catherine the Great, entered diplomatic relations with the United States only after the Treaty of Paris in 1783. That timing places any official Russian involvement after formal independence was already declared, challenging his claim. ADVERTISEMENT Western historians note that military aid from European powers—most notably France and Spain—was instrumental in the American victory, while Russia's role has remained nominal or symbolic at most. 'There is no credible evidence that Russia supported the revolution with arms or money during the conflict,' says one academic familiar with 18th‑century European diplomacy. Putin's remarks come amid a broader tendency to recast historical events to underpin modern foreign policy, a strategy that has been applied in other contexts such as Ukraine. Earlier statements by the Kremlin have portrayed Ukraine as historically inseparable from Russia—a narrative used to justify recent territorial actions. The present claim similarly elevates Russia's historical role in world affairs. American experts caution that shifting the origin story of US independence to include Russian intervention may serve as an effort to recalibrate the ideological balance between Moscow and Washington. 'It's propaganda aimed at repositioning Russia as an essential player in the birth of the West's oldest democracy,' says one US diplomatic historian. Fact‑checkers underline that during the American Revolution Russia maintained neutrality, engaged in diplomatic management through the League of Armed Neutrality, and did not provide weapons to the colonists. France's material and military contributions remain well‑documented, alongside loans extended by Spain, but no comparable evidence exists for Russian support at that time. In Moscow, state‑controlled media echoed Putin's framing as validation of Russia's longstanding, though subtle, influence in shaping Western institutions. Kremlin spokespeople emphasised that the president's comments were meant to underscore Russian diplomacy's historical roots. Western capitals, however, have responded with measured scepticism. The State Department declined to address the specific claims, noting that America's founding documents were produced with French assistance, whereas Russian engagement began officially only after independence. The telephonic exchange with Trump also revisited themes from Putin's televised 2024 interview, where he alleged CIA control over US elites and denounced NATO expansion. The latest narrative underscores persistent themes in Putin's foreign policy discourse: challenging Western historical narratives and asserting Russia's central role on the global stage. Observers now turn to whether this claim will surface in educational materials or diplomatic exchanges, particularly as relations between Russia and the West remain strained. Critics argue that historical distortion can inflame nationalistic sentiment and reshape political memory, while advocates for Russia's narrative maintain it is correcting incomplete historical accounts. With US political discourse increasingly sensitive to disinformation, the assertion stands to prompt fact‑based counter‑narratives. Historians focused on transatlantic studies anticipate a renewed analysis of archival records that could definitively confirm or reject any undocumented Russian involvement.
