Brazil's Bolsonaro takes stand, rejects coup charges
The 70-year-old is answering questions from lawyers and judges on his alleged role in a "criminal organization" that plotted to wrest power from leftist Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who narrowly beat Bolsonaro at the ballot box in 2022.
The plot only failed, the charge sheet says, for a lack of military backing.
Bolsonaro, a former army captain who governed Brazil from 2019 to 2022, was the sixth of eight accused to take the stand for in-person questioning that started on Monday.
"That's not the case, Your Honor," he replied when asked by Judge Alexandre de Moraes -- an arch political foe -- about "the truthfulness" of the accusations against him.
Bolsonaro and his co-accused risk prison sentences of up to 40 years.
On Monday, his former right-hand man Mauro Cid -- a co-defendant who has turned state's witness -- told the court Bolsonaro had "received and read" a draft decree for the declaration of a state of emergency.
He then "edited" the document, which would have paved the way for measures to "redo the election" and also envisaged the imprisonment of top personalities including Moraes, said Cid.
Cid also testified he had received cash in a wine crate from Bolsonaro's former running mate and defense minister Walter Braga Netto.
The money, say investigators, was to be used to finance an operation by special troops to kill Lula, his vice president Geraldo Alckmin and Moraes.
Apart from Cid, the other co-defendants are four ex-ministers and the former heads of Brazil's navy and intelligence agency.
Most who have taken the stand so far have rejected the bulk of the accusations in the charge sheet.
Two former army commanders have claimed Bolsonaro hosted a meeting where the declaration of a state of emergency was discussed as a means of overturning Lula's election victory.
'My conscience is clear'
Bolsonaro, who is still hoping to make a comeback in 2026 presidential elections despite being barred from running in a separate court ruling, denies all charges.
"They have nothing to convict me, my conscience is clear," the former leader told reporters Monday.
Almir Garnier, who was Navy commander under Bolsonaro, denied the former president had discussed the declaration of a state of emergency with military officials.
"I did not see any document; no document was presented," Garnier testified.
He also denied offering Bolsonaro Navy troops.
Although he has the right to remain silent, the former president previously told reporters he plans to respond "without any problem" to questions from the court.
"It's an excellent idea to speak openly about the coup. I will be very happy to have the opportunity to clarify what happened," he said last week. "It's the moment of truth."
The Supreme Court headquarters in Brasilia was one of the targets of rioting supporters known as "Bolsonaristas" -- who raided government buildings in January 2023 as they urged the military to oust Lula.
Bolsonaro was abroad at the time of this last-gasp effort to keep him in power after the alleged coup planning fizzled.
The trial is the first for an attempted coup under a democratic regime in Brazil.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
13 hours ago
- France 24
Majority on Brazil court in favor of tougher social media rules
The South American country's highest court is seeking to determine to what extent companies such as X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are responsible for removing illegal content, and how they can be sanctioned if they do not. The judges' final ruling will create a precedent that will affect tens of millions of social media users in Brazil. At issue is a clause in the country's so-called Civil Framework for the Internet, a law in effect since 2014, that says platforms are only responsible for harm caused by a post if they ignore a judge's order to remove it. By Wednesday, six of the court's 11 judges had ruled in favor of higher accountability, meaning sites should monitor content and remove problematic posts on their own initiative, without court intervention. One judge has voted against tougher regulation, and three have yet to express an opinion. Alexandre de Moraes, one of 11 judges of the court, has repeatedly clashed with X owner Elon Musk and various right-wing personalities over social media posts. The review is taking place in parallel with the Supreme Court trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is alleged to have collaborated on a coup plot to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat. Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's followers used social media to lie about the reliability of the electoral system and plot the downfall of successor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Last year, Moraes blocked X for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation. He had previously ordered X to suspend the accounts of several Bolsonaro supporters. Musk and other critics say Moraes is stifling free speech, and US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing sanctions against the judge, whom Bolsonaro accuses of judicial "persecution." Lula, who emerged the victor in a tightly-fought election against Bolsonaro in 2022, is advocating for "accelerating regulation" of online platforms. © 2025 AFP
LeMonde
15 hours ago
- LeMonde
Aragon and Catalonia battle over the 'Sistine Chapel of Romanesque art'
Letter from Madrid After 11 years of complaints, appeals and back-and-forth between various courts, on May 28, Spain's Supreme Court finally ruled in the case of the mural paintings from the Romanesque Monastery of Santa María de Sijena. The dispute has pitted the regions of Aragon and Catalonia against each other since 2015. Unsurprisingly, but not without controversy, the court upheld, as a final ruling, the sentence imposed on the Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya (MNAC) in Barcelona: It must return the monastery's frescoes, located in the town of Villanueva de Sijena in the province of Huesca, within 20 days. Dating from 1196 to 1208, the works were removed in 1936 to protect them from the Spanish Civil War, before being purchased by the MNAC from nuns who were not the rightful owners. For the Catalan museum officials who have displayed the works since 1961, and who in recent years have called on numerous experts to bolster their case against the transfer, the decision puts extremely fragile works at risk. For the Aragonese government, which invested nearly €1.2 million in restoration work at the monastery, including the installation of a sophisticated climate control system to accommodate the paintings, it is time for the "Sistine Chapel of Romanesque art" to return to its original home. "The monastery is now able to store these works in perfect safety and, very soon, to exhibit them," said Jorge Azcon, president of the government of Aragon and of the right-wing People's Party of Aragon.
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
On trial for 2023 coup attempt, Brazil's Bolsonaro admits he tried to hold on to power
Name, civil status and occupation. Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro (2018 - 2022) introduced himself as any ordinary defendant on Tuesday, June 10, alongside seven others, before Justice Alexandre de Moraes of the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Under the white neon lights of Annex II-B of the Brasília court – transformed into a criminal jury for the first trial of a former president for attempted coup d'état – the judges heard the "core group" from the plot that aimed to prevent Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's return to office and keep Bolsonaro in power, after his loss at the polls in October 2022. Bolsonaro, whom the federal police accused of having a "direct and active" role in the coup attempt, was at the center of attention throughout these two days of hearings. At stake: a sentence of up to 43 years in prison. Well aware of the charges he faces, the reserve captain and former president adopted a courteous tone. Yet over the past four years, Bolsonaro has not shied away from attacking Justice Moraes, who has become his nemesis. On Tuesday, the far-right leader even went so far as to apologize for remarks made at a meeting with associates in July 2022, during which he accused Moraes and two other STF justices of having received between $30 million and $50 million in bribes to manipulate the election. "It slipped out (...) I did not intend to accuse you of any misconduct," the defendant pleaded, sounding sheepish.
