.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C640%2C360%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary insists ‘nobody gives a poop' about Epstein
When confronted with poll numbers that found a vast majority of Republicans want all the documents related to the Epstein case to be published, the pro-Trump businessman and self-described 'Mr. Wonderful' doubled down while continuing to shrug off the controversy.
'The average American, awake for 18 hours a day, how many minutes do you think they spend worrying about this stuff?' O'Leary wondered. 'Maybe they were raped, maybe they weren't.'
Since the Justice Department concluded in a July 6 memo that Epstein died by suicide and did not keep a 'client list' to blackmail prominent figures, despite Attorney General Pam Bondi claiming months earlier that she had the supposed list sitting on her desk, the administration has faced a MAGA uproar for walking back its promise to release the Epstein files.
After initially reacting to the blowback by lashing out at his 'PAST supporters' and calling them 'weaklings' for continuing to focus on the Epstein case, which he suddenly began calling a Democratic 'hoax,' Donald Trump was able to – at least for the time being – united the MAGA base by tapping into a shared grievance: disdain for the mainstream media.
Following the Wall Street Journal's bombshell detailing a lewd birthday card that Trump allegedly gave Epstein in 2003, highlighting the once-close relationship the president shared with the convicted sex predator, many of those on the right who had been critical of the administration's handling of the saga quickly rallied around Trump as he denied the letter and sued the WSJ and Murdoch.
Trump has since followed up by throwing a series of other distractions at the MAGA base in order to fully dissipate the anger over the Epstein case. Pointing his supporters at a list of common enemies, for instance, the administration has reignited the GOP's years-old complaints about the 'Russia witch hunt' by repackaging intelligence documents to accuse former President Barack Obama of a 'treasonous conspiracy.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's accusations, however, have been described as 'frivolous' and 'foolish' by conservative legal experts.
Amid Trump's continued efforts to deflect and dodge, which also include House Republicans preparing to leave on a six-week vacation without voting on a motion to release the Epstein files, O'Leary appeared on CNN Monday night to run cover for the administration.
During a panel discussion on CNN NewsNight, columnist Ahmed Baba noted that the 'fundamental deal Trump made with his base was that he was gonna root out this mysterious cabal of elites that were running things,' adding that the Epstein files were a 'key part' of this narrative.
'Essentially, what he is proving is that he actually is one of these corrupt elites himself, right?' Ahmed wondered.
O'Leary, however, eventually jumped in and exclaimed that 'nobody gives a d*** about Epstein because he's still dead,' asserting that the 'average person at the kitchen table is not worrying about Epstein.'
This eventually prompted CNN anchor Abby Phillip to interrupt and point out that a recent survey found that 83 percent of Republicans want the administration to release all the documents related to the Epstein investigation. O'Leary, though, remained unswayed.
'The average American, awake for 18 hours a day, how many minutes do you think they spend worrying about this stuff? Maybe they were raped, maybe they weren't. This is not what American families give a *** about,' he shot back.
'We do know there were victims, so that's not speculative,' Phillip reminded her guest.
The reality TV star would continue undeterred and continue to brush aside the administration's bungle with the Epstein files, reiterating that he believed this was an issue of very little public interest.
'Nobody gives a poop! Nobody gives a poop, poop, poop,' O'Leary groused. 'Worst case scenario, all this stuff's true. Does that in any way affect the American economy?'
After The Young Turks' Ana Kasparian responded that there's 'more to life than the American economy' and the public could be concerned that 'we might have pedophiles serving in our government right now,' O'Leary continued to mock the drama surrounding the case.
'Oh my goodness! That's horrible. I'm just saying, what people care about is how to feed their families and how the economy grows,' he sneered. 'This stuff is poop on a stick!'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said on Friday the United States and Pakistan were "very close" to a trade deal that could come within days, but comments from the U.S. after Dar met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned no timeline. "I think we are very close to finalizing a deal with U.S. Our teams have been here in Washington, discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine-tune now," Dar said in a discussion at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington. "It's not going to be months, not even weeks, I would say (just) days," he said. Under U.S. President Donald Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization. The U.S. State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said the two stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. A post by Rubio on X after the meeting and the State Department's statement mentioned no timeline for finalizing a trade deal. The Pakistan foreign ministry also said Dar "appreciated the pivotal role" by Trump and Rubio "in de-escalating tensions between Pakistan and India by facilitating a ceasefire." The State Department statement did not mention India. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10 after Washington held talks with both sides. India disputes Trump's claims that the ceasefire resulted from his intervention and trade threats. India's position is that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve problems directly with no outside involvement. An April 22 militant attack in India-administered Kashmir killed 26 men and sparked heavy fighting between the nuclear-armed Asian neighbors in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. India struck Pakistan on May 7 and the two nations exchanged hostilities, killing dozens across three days. The ceasefire was declared on May 10. New Delhi blamed the April attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility and called for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not blame Islamabad.


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Are Australians about to see US beef on supermarket shelves? And why is Donald Trump celebrating?
Donald Trump has claimed victory over Australia's decision to lift restrictions on the import of US beef, but don't expect to see the product on supermarket shelves anytime soon, says industry. Much has been made of the timing of the decision, which followed a decade-long process by the agriculture department, and coincides with a push from the Trump administration to open up Australia's market to US exporters. The government has said there will be no weakening or compromise of Australia's biosecurity in opening the gates to more US beef, and most in the cattle and farming industry doubt we'll see much increase of US exports. Here's what you need to know about what impact it could have in Australia. Sign up: AU Breaking News email More than 99% of beef available in Australian pubs, supermarkets and restaurants is Australian beef, says Meat and Livestock Australia. The industry body, as well as Cattle Farmers Australia and the National Farmers' Federation, believe it's unlikely the restriction change will have any significant material impact. Dr Kate Sievert at Deakin University said US beef can't compete with the strong domestic cattle industry. She said it's unlikely Australians could see more US beef on the supermarket shelf, but it could be used more in fast-food or prepackaged meals. 'It's more likely to be used in specific segments of the food system, so areas like food service, particularly in fast-food service or ultra-processed products like ready meals,' Sievert said. 'The US relies a lot more on confined animal feeding operations where it's cheaper to produce.' That doesn't necessarily make it cheaper overall than Australian beef. The cattle industry has also pointed out that of the more niche or exclusive cuts of beef that the US produces, almost all are available already in Australia. Sievert said the rule change would put Australia more in line with countries such as Japan and South Korea that have been importing more beef from the US. But the US has also been facing a steady decline in its cattle herds, and production fell about 1% in 2024. 'Cattle herd sizes are the lowest they've been in decades,' Sievert said. Asked whether the decision on beef will change the dynamic with the US administration, the trade minister, Don Farrell, told the Lowy Institute thinktank on Friday: 'I'm not too sure. 'We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement,' he said. 'President Trump thinks it's a good decision, [he's] taking credit for it. We have to pursue our national interest, and our national interest is the removal of all of those tariffs.' The government has been at pains to say the decision is not linked to the trade relationship, or the demands for open access from the US. Farrell said the government shouldn't 'give up' on the ambition to have the tariffs removed. He also said Australia's exports have been increasing to the US, ever since the tariffs were announced. 'We do $4bn worth of beef exports to the United States, and it's increasing by the way, we export huge amounts of beef to China, again, that's increasing.' On Thursday, Donald Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, 'The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE.' The Nationals said those comments from Trump sit at odds with the government's assertion that the decision was separate to the tariffs. The deputy leader of the Nationals, Kevin Hogan, said in a statement that Australia cannot use 'our science-based biosecurity standards as a bargaining chip'. 'We have the US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer directly connecting this decision to the US-Australia trade relationship, but the Albanese Government is saying the complete opposite,' he said. Australia introduced a ban on US beef imports in 2003, in response to an outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease. Any country seeking market access to import fresh beef products must undergo a BSE risk assessment. In 2015, Australia granted the US a category 1 status, following a risk assessment, meaning the US had 'comprehensive and well-established controls' to prevent BSE outbreaks in cattle. Category 1 countries are able to import fresh and processed beef into Australia so long as they comply with other conditions. In 2017, Australia released the beef review, which assessed applications for market access from countries that had passed the BSE risk assessment, including the US. That review should have been the final step in allowing access to the Australian market – except it specified that the animal from which the beef was derived must have been 'continuously resident' in the approved country since birth. In 2019, the government began allowing beef imports from cattle traceably born and raised in the US. Imports were also subject to an ongoing biosecurity review that, in practice, has still meant no imports of fresh beef. The restriction changes now allow beef exports that are sourced from cattle born in Canada or Mexico, which the US has been importing to bolster its national herd. That cattle must be traceable, and legally imported and slaughtered in the US. The US imported an average of 700,000 cattle, buffalo or bison from Canada each year between 2019 and 2023 and 1.2 million per year from Mexico over the same period. However, live cattle imports from Mexico have been banned in the US since May, due to the spread of a flesh-eating pest.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
House Ethics Committee orders AOC to pay nearly $3,000 for Met Gala dress
The House Ethics Committee has directed US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to make additional payments concerning her 2021 Met Gala appearance. The committee's investigation revealed she did not fully adhere to Gift Rule regulations, having accepted free admission for her partner and underpaid for certain outfit items. Although Ocasio-Cortez had paid nearly $1,000 for her ′Tax the Rich′ gown and accessories, the panel assessed their fair market value at over $3,700. She has been advised to pay an extra $2,733.28 and contribute $250 to the Met's Costume Institute for her partner's meal. The committee found no evidence of intentional underpayment by Ocasio-Cortez, and her chief of staff confirmed she accepts the ruling and will settle the remaining amounts.