logo
Political tides in Africa are shifting: Britain must be clear who its friends are

Political tides in Africa are shifting: Britain must be clear who its friends are

Telegraph2 days ago

While the world's attention has understandably been focussed on events in Ukraine and Gaza, the Foreign Secretary 's recent visit to Morocco saw Britain seize the initiative on a diplomatic issue that has been neglected by the international community for nearly half a century; that of the status of Western Sahara, under administration by Morocco since 1975, but whose sovereignty over the region has been disputed by the Algerian-backed Polisario Front, sometimes violently, for decades. This example of British diplomatic engagement is particularly significant in the context of the new Strategic Defence Review, and the British Government's stated aim of enhancing national security through economic growth.
This vast territory of more than 100,000 square miles is home to 565,000 people – a population roughly the size of Leeds, spread across an area bigger than the United Kingdom, although largely concentrated in the town of Laayoune, the regional capital, and Dakhla, the largest and fastest growing container port on the east Atlantic coast. Morocco has invested heavily and imaginatively in the Western Sahara, providing tens of thousands of new jobs, and the prospect of many more to come, yet its full economic development has been held back by a frozen territorial dispute, which has contributed to a deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Tindouf refugee camps in Algeria.
Under an encouragingly wide-ranging partnership agreement signed this week between London and Rabat, the UK has, for the first time, acknowledged the autonomy plan proposed by Morocco as the most credible, viable and pragmatic basis for a lasting peace in the Western Sahara. The autonomy plan, first presented to the United Nations in 2007, represents the only credible, lasting solution for peace in the Western Sahara. Under its provisions, an autonomous region would be established within the Moroccan State, with Morocco taking responsibility for defence and foreign affairs, but with local control over law enforcement, taxation, infrastructure, economic development, cultural affairs and the environment.
By accepting the broad principles of the autonomy plan, UK diplomacy at last moves into line with other key western allies including France, Spain and the United States, shifts the dial at the UN Security Council and within the General Assembly and lays the ground for a definitive, permanent resolution of the dispute. Such a resolution is in the best interests of the people of the Western Sahara, and it is by far the best hope of bringing prosperity, and economic and human development to that region, and wider.
UK support for the Moroccan autonomy plan, in conjunction with a comprehensive range of other cultural and economic initiatives of great mutual benefit, seems to be firmly in line with the Foreign Secretary's declared diplomatic approach of 'progressive realism'. It demonstrates a recognition by the FCDO that the political tides in Africa are shifting once again, and that the UK needs to be clear-sighted about who its friends are, which countries can be trusted and reliable partners, and which countries are offering opportunities for the continent's potential and solutions to its challenges.
In this respect, Morocco has proved to be a bulwark against terrorism, extremism, serious crime, illegal migration and the destabilising activities of Russia's and Iran's proxies in sub-Saharan Africa – and the autonomy plan offers further, exciting economic opportunity and potential. It is security, stability and prosperity that will help address the humanitarian issues of the refugee camps, undermine the poisonous appeal of extremism and slow migration, and offer hope. Those that oppose this move, with an insistence on perpetuating a deadlock, have their own vested interests that offer nothing to the people of the region.
Supporting stability in the Sahara is politically and diplomatically the right thing to do, but our support for Morocco and its ambitions in the region also will unlock huge economic opportunities for British companies, and this UK-Moroccan partnership includes a £5 billion facility from UK Export Finance, which in turn will drive faster economic growth across the region.
Trade with Morocco is already a quiet success story for Britain, and trade between our two countries has already almost doubled since 2018, to over £4.2 billion in 2024. Morocco plays an important role in ensuring supermarkets are stocked year-round, without competing with our own farmers and fishermen, and tomatoes, sardines and soft fruit are among our biggest imports.
Britain's ambition of becoming a clean energy superpower can be boosted by access to landmark projects in solar, wind and green hydrogen through this new partnership. UK companies can also play a significant role in equipping Morocco's healthcare system with digital tools, medical equipment and pharmaceuticals, while there are new safeguards against the counterfeiting of British brands.
I would hope that further defence engagement opportunities were also discussed in these meetings – not simply defence sales and training, but the possibility of greater cooperation in the eastern Atlantic to address new maritime challenges.
Britain and Morocco have been engaged with each other for over 800 years. The first Moroccan ambassador came to London in 1600 during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, and our first trade treaty was signed over 300 years ago. We are now moving into a new era, looking to address challenges and seize opportunities together.
Last year, the Foreign Secretary spoke of a reset in relations between Britain and Africa, and a strategic engagement with the continent grounded in 'progressive realism'. The UK's re-energised partnership with Morocco, putting security, stability and prosperity at the forefront of this engagement, proves that those sentiments were not just words.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New pension changes to help people keep retirement savings worth £1,000 or less in one pot
New pension changes to help people keep retirement savings worth £1,000 or less in one pot

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

New pension changes to help people keep retirement savings worth £1,000 or less in one pot

The DWP said the new pensions Bill is about securing better value for savers. Reforms 'tidying up' pensions by building 'megafunds' and sweeping away 'micro' retirement pots have been outlined in a new parliamentary Bill. The UK Government said the Pension Schemes Bill will create 'bigger and better pension funds' and combine smaller pension pots. Many people build up several small pensions during their working life which can be hard to keep track of as they switch jobs. The Bill will bring together micro pension pots worth £1,000 or less into one pension scheme. For people approaching retirement, the Bill will require schemes to offer clear default options for turning savings into a retirement income. There will also be new rules creating multi-employer defined contribution (DC) scheme megafunds of at least £25 billion, using economies of scale to invest in a wider range of assets. The UK Government said defined benefit (DB) pension schemes will also have increased flexibility to 'safely' release a surplus worth collectively £160 billion, to support employers' investment plans and benefit scheme members. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'The Bill is about securing better value for savers' pensions and driving long-term investment in British businesses to boost economic growth in our country.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves described the legislation as 'a game changer'. Pensions minister Torsten Bell said: 'Pension saving is a long game, but getting this right is urgent so that millions can look forward to a higher income in retirement.' Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister who is now a partner at LCP (Lane Clark & Peacock), said: 'Whilst there are many worthy measures in the Bill, the biggest omission is action to get more money flowing into pensions.' He continued: 'This issue is unfortunately on the back burner. Measures such as consolidating tiny pension pots are helpful tidying up measures, but do nothing to tackle the fundamental problem that millions of us simply do not have enough money set aside for our retirement. 'With every passing year that this issue goes unaddressed, time is running out for people already well through their working life to have the chance for a decent retirement.' Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis, Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'The face of the UK pension landscape is changing, as this Bill ushers in transformative change. It seeks to deal with many of the issues that have dogged the industry over the years around cost, value, communication and performance. As MPs and Peers consider these changes, they must put the pension savers' interest at the forefront of their thinking. 'The coming years will usher in the pension mega fund era. This will shift the UK away from a plethora of small, fragmented schemes towards a streamlined set of pension mega funds able to boost retirement outcomes as well as the UK economy through increased efficiency, lower costs, and increased investment in UK assets. These are changes that the government estimates could put an extra £6,000 in people's pensions. 'These changes will be backed up by the Value for Money framework that seeks to shift the narrative away from cost as being the main determinant of value towards other issues such as investment performance and service. This will enable members to determine whether they are really getting value from their scheme.' She continued: 'The work around small pots has the potential to be a real gamechanger for people's retirements, with pensions worth less than £1,000 being brought together in a default consolidator model. This, alongside the incoming pension dashboard will have a huge impact on the ongoing issue of lost pensions. Helping people to keep track of pensions from old jobs can have a huge impact on their retirement decision making and really improve outcomes. 'However, these reforms could go even further with the default consolidator model being adapted for a Lifetime Pension model over the longer term. This would enable people to effectively decide which provider receives their pension contributions throughout their career, so they don't move between providers when they change jobs. "This could have a transformative effect on people's retirements and put the member at the centre of the industry. Having their pensions in the same place and watching them grow will really boost their engagement as well as competition across the industry." ‌ Ms Morrissey added: "Ensuring a competitive environment will also be key to the pension mega fund reforms. While scale is important in delivering better outcomes for savers, it must not come at the cost of reducing competition, member choice and much needed innovation. This has the ability to drive-up member engagement with their pensions, improve decision making and boost outcomes. "With the changes planned from the advice guidance boundary review and pensions dashboards coming on stream, there's also a big opportunity to transform how we all engage with our pensions. The push for scale shouldn't stifle the innovation that can flow from these regulatory changes.' Nausicaa Delfas, chief executive of the Pensions Regulator, said: 'Making sure all schemes are focused on delivering value for money, helping to stop small, and often forgotten pension pots forming, and guiding savers towards the right retirement products for them, will mean savers benefit from a system fit for the future.'

Wrexham Council Leader discusses budget report for 2024/25
Wrexham Council Leader discusses budget report for 2024/25

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Wrexham Council Leader discusses budget report for 2024/25

The report is set to be presented to the Executive Board next Tuesday (June 10), outlining the council's financial performance for Q4 of 2024/25. The final position represents a total net deficit compared to the budget of £1.7m It is recommended that the £1.7m is taken from the Budget Mitigation reserve as intended, to support the revenue budget in 2024/25. The council's general balances remain unchanged at £8.4m. Ahead of the meeting, Leader of the Council Mark Pritchard stated his concerns over potential National Insurance (NI) payments that local authorities are expected to pick up. The UK Government are expected to fund 75 per cent, with Welsh Government adding a top up of £36m, but that still leaves a gap of 15% that the council would need to cover. Mark Pritchard. (Image: Wrexham Council) The Leader of the Council said: "I'm really pleased with where we are at this moment in time with regards to the outturn. "There's been a lot of work to get us to this point and it hasn't been easy. One thing I must say is we can't rest on our laurels and we need to bring a budget in and we will continue to do in these extremely difficult times. "I do have concerns in the future over funding as there is an election coming and we don't know where we are on the NI side. "We feel we've been done to without consultation, this wasn't in any bodies manifesto, they've announced this, gone in another direction. They promised us they'd protect us between Wales and Westminster and they'd protect public services, if this is protecting public services – we've got a rough ride ahead of us. "It's unfair from a government that they are opposing NI on us, an example is the social care budget is £100m, £70m of that is paid to external providers, they will all have NI increases and they will all knock our door for it. "It's just extra pressure that we could do without at this moment in time. REALATED READING: Wrexham schools "overspending" making the council "uncomfortable", says leader "We're given a certain amount of money that we spend within the council and we make political decisions on where to spend it. "The general public are more understanding now, but we have a certain amount of money, we have a legal and statutory duty to deliver services, is a requirement and the other services have to wait in line to see if there's cuts or spending. "It's very, very difficult to bring in budget, echoed across the country, it's tough times." The council spent over £107m on social care in 2024/25, which was £6.5m over what they had budgeted for the financial year. The Leader of the council was quick to state that that level of spending is down to the current levels of demand for the service. He said: "These aren't overspends in the statutory services in terms of adult and children social services, these are demand led pressures with members of the public coming through the door needing help. "I believe that social care demand is going to increase, the demand is going to continue to come through the door. What I would say to anyone who challenges social care – what if it was your mother, what if it was your father, brother, sister who needed help in social care. "What would you expect? I would expect first class service and I would expect councils to make sure social care is safe and the most vulnerable people in society are looked after." When asked whether it's possible the council could become a statutory service only, Cllr Pritchard responded: 'Only time will tell, we are looking to remodel and change things, even if we do that the demand is still growing. "The more demand in statutory services, if we don't have money from government, we'll have to put more money in to meet the demand and then we're outstripping non-statutory services. MOST READ: Woman drove wrong way along A483 in Wrexham whilst 'very drunk,' court told Planning application submitted for huge new housing development in Wrexham Jealous thug headbutted ex after 'asking about her sex life with new man' "For some reason the governments aren't giving the money we require. None of us want any local authorities in Wales to go bankrupt. We're not asking great demands, only asking for local authorities delivering statutory services and safeguarding. "All we'll do is keep taking money from non statutory to put into statutory services. The frankness of it is in my opinion is the pressure is immense. When questioned on whether he believes it will take a Section 114 (bankruptcy) notice from a local authority in Wales for the Welsh Government to understand the current pressures, Cllr Pritchard said: "Honestly, yes, I think that's what it will take and I hope that never happens I wouldn't want to see it happen to any authority in Wales, I wouldn't. "I think if one goes, it will be a domino effect, let's hope that we never get there."

Revealed: Why Imane Khelif is set to KEEP Olympic boxing gold medal, despite calls for title to be stripped after 'leaked medical report proving champion is a biological male'
Revealed: Why Imane Khelif is set to KEEP Olympic boxing gold medal, despite calls for title to be stripped after 'leaked medical report proving champion is a biological male'

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Revealed: Why Imane Khelif is set to KEEP Olympic boxing gold medal, despite calls for title to be stripped after 'leaked medical report proving champion is a biological male'

A legal expert has revealed why Imane Khelif is unlikely to be stripped of her Olympic gold medal despite the emergence of a 'leaked' medical report. The alleged medical test on Khelif at the 2023 World Championships claimed that the boxer was in fact 'biologically male' and comes less than two days after World Boxing ruled Khelif would need to undergo sex screening to be eligible for any future appearances in female events. Last summer, Khelif was deemed eligible to compete in France despite World Boxing having known about the test, with IOC president Thomas Bach previously questioning the test's legitimacy. Despite the controversy surrounding Khelif, the 26-year-old went on to win a women's boxing gold medal representing Algeria boxing at the Paris Games. However, since the emergence of the reports about the 'leaked' medical report, critics have stepped forward and called for Khelif to be stripped of the medal. Now, a legal expert has revealed why that will not be the outcome and why Khelif will, instead, be allowed to keep the medal from Paris. Speaking to Newsweek, Doraine Lambelet Coleman, a Thomas L. Perkins Distinguished Professor of Laws at Duke Law School, explained: 'The IOC would not revoke medals won by athletes who were eligible according to the rules it set for the boxing competition in Paris. 'Unlike the eligibility rules set by the IBA and now WB, those rules did not require competitors to be biologically female.' One of those who called for Khelif to have the medal taken away was former Team GB star Sharron Davies who, during an interview with GB News, claimed: 'The truth was always there'. She explained: 'We all knew that this person had two positive sex screening tests. And the people that are to blame for all of this are the IOC. 'If you look back to those press conferences during the Olympic Games last summer, the things that Thomas Bach was saying are never excusable. They allowed male on female violence for the whole world to watch. 'The fact that they turned around and said that those tests that they had been informed about, a year prior, were not legitimate - when they were performed and accredited by the US College of Pathology. 'When people ask, do I have sympathy? No I don't because Khelif knew that they were biologically male. They knew they were cheating. 'They knew they had an unfair advantage and nobody cared. They didn't care what damage they might have inflicted on a female'. Davies also highlighted the moment which she believes proved that Khelif and her team 'knew' she was biologically male. During the interview, she said: 'All of that which you saw at the Olympic Games in Paris last year was an utter lie. 'You only had to see the pictures of Khelif up on the shoulders of their coaches afterwards to know this is not somebody they are treating as a female because they wouldn't have done that. 'Everyone knew and yet we were being lambasted. The people that were saying 'This is not fair and most importantly it's incredibly dangerous'. That's what - above and beyond everything - was criminal negligence, I think'. Khelif grew up in the northwestern rural town of Biban Mesbah in the Tiaret province of Algeria and was raised as a devout Muslim. In Islam it is forbidden for a believer to touch a member of the opposite sex that they are not related to. In a similar instance on Saturday night, UFC legend Khabib Nurmagomedov - who is also a devout Muslim - refused to shake the hand of female TV presenter Kate Scott at the UEFA Champions League. In a similar response to the news, JK Rowling branded the news 'a win for women'. The document seen by 3 Wire Sports via Telegraph Sport, states: 'Chromosome analysis reveals male karyotype.' Rowling, who has weighed in heavy on the debate in the past, has taken to social media to give her view on the news. 'It's a win for women because they won't be battered to death in the ring by men,' wrote the Harry Potter series author. 'If you had any idea what physical tests women go through routinely in their lives you'd know a cheek swab is no bigger deal than flossing your teeth. Any more moronic questions, wing them over.' Broadcaster Piers Morgan was among the first to respond to reports of the test, writing on social media site X: 'The biology-denying woke brigade abused and shamed me for saying it was outrageous and dangerous for Khelif to be beating up women at the Olympics. 'I'm ready for their apology, but won't hold my breath.' Former Olympian Sharron Davies was similarly convinced by the report, writing: 'When did we stop believing in our eyes & gut! Oh yeah when we decided women's sport didn't matter…' Conservative activist Riley Gaines also weighed in, referring to Khelif with male pronouns and saying: 'To all the people that insisted Imane Khelif was a woman because his passport said so, 'You were wrong. We were right. Sincerely, People with functioning eyes and a shred of honesty.' The results reportedly have a date of being collected of March 17, 2023 - the same year that Khelif was disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA), the former governing body for the sport for 'failing gender eligibility tests'. It's a win for women because they won't be battered to death in the ring by men. If you had any idea what physical tests women go through routinely in their lives you'd know a cheek swab is no bigger deal than flossing your teeth. Any more moronic questions, wing them over. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 2, 2025 The document claims to have come from Dr Lal PathLabs in New Delhi, a laboratory which is accredited by the American College of Pathologists and certified by the International Organisation for Standardisation. The report was initially published by the journalist Alan Abrahamson, who first brought reports of Khelif's alleged failed gender eligibility test to public attention at the Paris Games. Mail Sport has contacted Khelif's representatives for comment. Khelief has previously stated that she planned to defend her gold medal at the Los Angeles Olympics in three years time. World Boxing does have some Olympic authority, as they have been announced to provisionally run testing for the Los Angeles games, with any person over 18 required to undergo PCR testing to determine their sex. The governing body said the PCR test is a laboratory technique used to detect specific genetic material, with the SRY gene revealing the presence of the Y chromosome, which is an indicator of biological sex. The test can be conducted by nasal/mouth swab, saliva or blood. The governing body said the testing will be part of a new policy on 'Sex, Age and Weight', which it claims will ensure a safe and competitive playing field. World Boxing revealed the contents of a letter sent to the Algerian Boxing Federation, confirming Khelif is unable to compete in the female category at the Eindhoven Box Cup or any World Boxing event until she undergoes sex testing. 'Imane Khelif may not participate in the female category at the Eindhoven Box Cup, 5-10 June 2025 and any World Boxing event until Imane Khelif undergoes genetic sex screening in accordance with World Boxing's rules and testing procedures,' the letter read. 'In accordance with the World Boxing Statutes, amendments to the Competition Rules are typically made by Congress. However, under special or emergency circumstances, the World Boxing Executive Board holds the authority to make immediate amendments when a rule is deemed no longer functional or when evolving conditions necessitate a change. 'In May 2025, the Executive Board exercised this authority and adopted new eligibility criteria for participation in sex-specific boxing categories. These new eligibility rules were developed with the express purpose of safeguarding athletes in combat sports, particularly given the physical risks associated with Olympic-style boxing. 'Please be advised that, per World Boxing policy, '…in the event the athlete's sex certification is challenged by the athlete's federation or by World Boxing, the athlete shall be ineligible to compete until the dispute is resolved…' Khelif was not the only controversial boxer in Paris, as Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting also won a gold medal in women's boxing despite having been banned by the IBA in 2023. Morgan previously weighed in on Khelif's alleged gender ineligibility in November, when a 'leaked' report published in German outlet Bild claimed that she was a 'biological male'. He posted to his 8.8m followers at the time: 'Confirmation of what some of us said at the time: Khelif is a biological man. The gold medal should now be stripped and awarded to the best actual woman.' It remains unclear whether the report was legitimate, with Algerian Olympic Committee calling out 'unsubstantiated allegations (which aimed) to tarnish the image of an athlete who has brought honor to our nation on the international stage.' Piers Morgan, Sharron Davies, and Riley Gaines were all quick to weigh in on the alleged results The report was initially put together in 2023 via collaboration between French and Algerian expert endocrinologists working at the Kremlin-Bicetre hospital in Paris, and the Mohamed Lamine Debaghine hospital in Algiers. The unverified report alleges that Khelif has male characteristics. But Jacques Young, an endocrinologist at Bicetre Hospital in Paris who reportedly co-authored the document, has told DW in Germany that he feels his name is being used to spread false information. Young also hinted he had been used to disseminate an anti-trans agenda. 'I think your statement perfectly reflects reality,' when he was asked whether his name was being used for those purposes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store