
Social Security Overpayment: The Repayment Rule Changes Once Again
Did you get an extra-large Social Security check? Are you wondering if you'll need to pay it back? The answer is, maybe.
Getty Images/CNET
If you receive more money than expected from your Social Security payment, don't assume it's a gift from the Social Security Administration. More than likely, you received an overpayment due to changes in your account that either weren't reported on time or to another mistake by the SSA itself. You will have to repay the overpayment amount.
It's understandable if you're confused about what's happening – there have been some back-and-forth changes. At first, the Social Security Administration rolled back rules so that if an overpayment occurred, it would withhold 100% of your payments until the overpayment was returned -- a full walkback from previous measures designed to ease the repayment timing for beneficiaries. Now those rules are changing again, and for the better.
Below, we'll go over why overpayments happen and what the updated rules are if you receive one.
For more, don't miss the Social Security payment schedule and how to apply for Social Security Retirement benefits.
How do Social Security overpayments even happen?
Social Security overpayments can happen in a few ways. If you start a new job while receiving benefits and report it to the administration, your monthly benefit check could be reduced -- and if you make over the yearly earnings limit, you may not get a check at all for that month.
But if you got a job and didn't notify the administration about it, you may receive an overpayment.
Another way overpayments could happen is if you've filed an appeal and are still receiving payments. More on appeals below. In other cases, overpayments are simply an error on the SSA's part.
The SSA issues "Emergency Message" to staff about overpayments
In March 2024, the SSA changed the amount taken from Social Security payments if an overpayment occurred – instead of withholding 100% of your next payment, it would withhold only 10%. This not only gave recipients more time to pay back the overpayment, but it eased the potential devastating financial consequences if your benefits payment was your only source of income.
However, in March of this year, those rules were erased (including the announcement of the updates) and the old policy was reinstated: retain 100% of a recipient's benefit payment until the overpayment was returned. The updated policy went into effect on March 27.
That's all changed yet again, with the SSA backing down on withholding 100% of a recipient's benefit payment. In an "Emergency Message" to staff late last month, the SSA announced that it would be changing the withholding percentages for individuals receiving Title II benefits (Retirement, Disability, or Survivors). Instead of retaining 100% of a payment, the SSA will now only withhold 50% until the overpayment is paid back. While this is certainly an improvement, the impact could still wreak havoc on beneficiaries financially.
There's one other wrinkle to be aware of: If you receive an overpayment, when the Administration sees the error it will send a formal notice for the overpayment. Beneficiaries have 90 days to contact the SSA to either request a lower withholding rate, reconsideration, or a waiver. If contact isn't made within this time, the 50% withholding will go into effect. These changes went into effect as of April 25.
Meanwhile, individuals receiving Supplemental Security Income will still only have 10% of their payments reduced when an overpayment occurs.
How do I request a waiver for a Social Security overpayment?
If you've been overpaid by over $1,000 and you don't believe you should have to repay the overage -- either because you don't think it's your fault or do not have the ability to repay it -- you can request a waiver. There's no time limit as to when you were overpaid and when you need to request a waiver -- you'll just need to show that the overpayment wasn't your fault or it would create a financial hardship for you.
To request a waiver for a payment over $1,000, fill out a SSA-632 form and either mail it or drop it off at a local Social Security office.
If you were overpaid less than $1,000 and you believe you were not at fault for it, you can request a waiver by calling 1-800-772-1213 or by visiting your local Social Security office to have the request processed over the phone or in person.
When to file an appeal vs. when to request a waiver for overpayments
If you don't believe you were overpaid, or if you receive a notice and you think the amount is incorrect, you can file an appeal. Unlike requesting a waiver, an appeal has a time limit for when you can file: You have 60 days from when you originally received the overpayment notice.
Before you can file an appeal, you'll need to have a few things ready. This will include the overpayment notice you received, along with any legal forms, documents or written statements you have related to the situation. If you have a personal appointed representative, have their contact information handy.
To file an appeal, head to the Non-Medical Appeal page on the SSA website, and click Start an Appeal and go through the steps.
For more, don't miss the reports that the SSA is harder to contact after the February 2025 layoffs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
31 minutes ago
- News24
'Very disappointed' Trump in stunning live break-up with Musk
Trump says he is 'very disappointed' in Elon Musk after criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hits back on X, calling Trump 'ungrateful' and claiming he helped him win the 2024 election. Tesla shares drop 8% as public fallout between the two billionaires rattles markets. Tensions between Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded into public view on Thursday, as the US president said he was 'very disappointed' by his billionaire former aide's criticisms and Musk hit back in real time on social media. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after Musk slammed his tax and spending mega-bill as an 'abomination'. The world's richest man responded by live-tweeting on his X social media platform as Trump spoke on television, saying that the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming him for 'ingratitude.' Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 In an extraordinary rant as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz sat mutely beside him, 78-year-old Trump unloaded on SpaceX and Tesla boss Musk in his first comments on the issue. 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here... All of a sudden, he had a problem,' Trump said when asked about Musk. The clash comes less than a week since Trump held a grand Oval Office farewell for Musk as he wrapped up his time leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). South African-born Musk, 53, hit back minutes later, saying Trump's claims he had advance sight of the bill were 'false.' 'Whatever,' he added above a video of Trump saying Musk was upset about the loss of subsidies for electric vehicles. Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful.… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk then ratcheted up the public spat even further, saying the Republican would have lost the election without his support. He was the biggest donor to Trump's campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Tesla shares fell sharply on Wall Street, down 8%, after his comments, in a sign of the huge stakes for a falling out between the world's richest man and its most powerful. 'A little make-up?' A wistful-sounding Trump took reporters through the break-up with Musk on live television, in what at times sounded more like a therapy session than a meeting with a foreign leader. Trump talked about Musk's farewell appearance in the Oval Office on Friday, when he turned up with a black eye that he said was caused by a punch from his son. Musk, at the time, was also facing reports of drug use on the Trump campaign trail. 'You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk, and even with the black eye. I said, you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup,' Trump said. 'But he said, 'No, I don't think so,' which is interesting and very nice. He wants to be who he is.' Trump said he could understand why Musk was upset with some of the steps he had taken, including withdrawing a nominee to lead the NASA space agency, which the tech tycoon had backed. Through it all, the visiting German chancellor sat silently. Merz had prepared to avoid a repeat of the ambushes that Trump unleashed on the Ukrainian and South African presidents in the Oval Office - but in the end it was Musk that the US president ambushed. At the center of the bitter row is Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on tax and spending. The centrepiece of his domestic agenda, it aims to continue tax cuts from his first term - and could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. Musk, however, called it a 'disgusting abomination' on Tuesday on the grounds that it will increase the US deficit. A day later, the magnate called for Republicans to 'kill the bill,' and for an alternative plan that 'doesn't massively grow the deficit.'


Bloomberg
34 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe
Sometimes a public company has a controlling shareholder who wants to take it private by buying out all of the other shareholders, and that's always messy. 1 The controlling shareholder will to some extent be negotiating with herself: She will want to buy the company for a low price, but the company's shareholders will want to get a high price, but she's the controlling shareholder and can vote for the low price. There are standard solutions to the problem, but they are only partial solutions: In the past few months, I have written a few times about 23andMe Holding Co. as an illustration of these problems. 23andMe is a publicly traded genetic testing company that was once worth about $6 billion, but it has now fallen on hard times. Its founder, Anne Wojcicki, owns about 49% of the voting power of the stock, making her effectively a controlling shareholder. She offered to buy all the stock she didn't own, to take the company private and fix its problems 'outside of the short term pressures of the public markets.' But the board of directors, whose job was to find an 'actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,' didn't think her offer was good enough.


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Trump-Musk Alliance Dissolves as They Hurl Personal Attacks
Pinned President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added, taking credit for Mr. Trump's election in a way that he never has before. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.