Doctors Oppose Mental Health Detention Power Proposals
The amendments, tabled during the passage of the Mental Health Bill through Parliament, would empower 'authorised' individuals, including medical professionals, to detain someone undergoing a mental health crisis.
At present, only the police have these powers of detention under the Mental Health Act 1983.
Joint Statement Urges Caution
The nine groups, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Nursing, and the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, warned of the risk of "significant harm with dangerous consequences" from the proposals.
The joint statement focused on proposed changes in the Bill to sections 135 and 136 of the Mental Health Act. These sections cover the detention of people in crisis in public or private settings.
If passed, the amendments, introduced in the House of Lords, would authorise powers of detention for doctors, mental health nurses, and approved mental health professionals.
Police officers would only need to attend to investigate a crime or if there was an immediate risk to life.
Police Role is Vital, Say Signatories
The organisations warned that removing police involvement in mental health incidents could be unsafe.
According to the statement, 'instances of detentions under the Mental Health Act where there is no risk are almost non-existent.' It noted that 'the mere presence of uniformed officers can ensure that an otherwise risky situation remains contained and safe.'
The organisations also noted that police are essential in carrying out many tasks that medical practitioners cannot perform, such as checking whether it is safe to enter a home.
The Bill aims to deliver on the government manifesto commitment to modernise mental health legislation to give patients greater choice, autonomy, and enhanced rights and support, ensuring dignity and respect throughout treatment. It is intended to give effect to the policy approaches outlined in a 2018 independent review by Sir Simon Wessely.
The statement criticised the lack of consultation with frontline professionals and patients. It warned that the changes could increase the use of restrictive practices and limit patient autonomy, undermining the aims of the legislation.
Risk to Therapeutic Relationships
Transferring police powers to healthcare professionals could risk damaging their therapeutic relationships with patients, the statement said. It might also discourage people from seeking help.
Dr Lade Smith, president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, who worked on the 2018 review, echoed these concerns. "It is well known that at times, people experiencing a mental health crisis cannot be safely reached and cared for without the assistance of the police," she said.
Delegating police powers without proper consultation or planning "sets a dangerous precedent" and is likely to increase risk to patients and compromise the safety of others, Smith added.
Other signatories to the statement are the:
Association of Directors of Adult Social Services
Approved Mental Health Professional Leads Network
British Association of Social Workers
British Medical Association
College of Paramedics
Royal College of Emergency Medicine
As the Bill moves to the committee stage in the House of Commons, the signatories
called for joint working with police and government to improve crisis responses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Met urged to scrap Carnival facial recognition plan
Civil liberty and anti-racism groups have called on the Metropolitan Police to drop plans to use live facial recognition (LFR) technology at this year's Notting Hill Carnival. In a letter to Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, 11 organisations described LFR as "a mass surveillance tool that treats all Carnival-goers as potential suspects and has no place at one of London's biggest cultural celebrations". They said the decision to reintroduce the technology at Carnival was "deeply disappointing" and argued it could be "less accurate for women and people of colour". The Met Police says LFR is accurate and balanced across ethnicity and gender, and insists it will help keep people safe. The groups - which include Liberty, Big Brother Watch and the Runnymede Trust - highlighted an ongoing judicial review brought by Shaun Thompson, a black Londoner who says he was wrongly identified by the system and detained. The letter states: "There is no clear legal basis for your force's use of LFR. No law mentions facial recognition technology and Parliament has never considered or scrutinised its use. "Notting Hill Carnival is an event that specifically celebrates the British African Caribbean community, yet the [Metropolitan Police] is choosing to use a technology with a well-documented history of inaccurate outcomes and racial bias." The letter also raised concerns over a 2023 National Physical Laboratory study, which found the NeoFace system used by the Met was less accurate for women and people of colour depending on the algorithm that has been set. The study's authors found the system could show bias at lower thresholds, though at the higher settings the Met says it uses, performance was found to be equitable across ethnicity and gender. These thresholds are confidence levels the system uses to decide a match - lower ones flag more people but risk more mistakes and bias, while higher ones are stricter and more balanced. Campaigners said there was no legal obligation for the force to avoid the lower thresholds, and argued policing resources would be better spent on safety measures at the carnival. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward, who is leading this year's policing operation at the carnival, said LFR had led to more than 1,000 arrests since the start of 2024 and that independent testing showed the system was "accurate and balanced with regard to ethnicity and gender" at the thresholds used by the Met. Notting Hill Carnival takes place next weekend and has previously attracted up to two million people. It has come under increased scrutiny after two people were murdered at last year's event. Facial recognition tech for Notting Hill Carnival 'Cancelling Carnival won't stop knife crime' 'City Hall should run Notting Hill Carnival' Mr Ward said the force had received the letter and would respond in due course. "Carnival's growing popularity and size creates unique challenges. Around 7,000 officers and staff will be deployed each day," he said. "Their priority is to keep people safe, including preventing serious violence, such as knife crime and violence against women and girls. "It is right that we make the best use of available technology to support officers to do their job more effectively." Mr Ward said the LFR cameras will be used on the approach to and from Carnival and not within the event boundaries. He said they will "help officers identify and intercept those who pose a public safety risk before they get to the crowded streets". BBC News has contacted the carnival's organisers for comment. Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to Related internet links Liberty Human Rights Metropolitan Police
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People seeking woman after theft and assault at petrol station
GWENT Police are appealing for information following an alleged incident of theft and assault in Trecenydd. A Gwent Police spokesman said: 'We are investigating a report of theft and assault at a petrol station in Trecenydd at around 5.20pm on July 19." Officers are now looking to identify the woman pictured above, who was in the area at the time and could assist with police enquiries. If you know this woman, or you have any details you believe may assist officers investigating the report, please get in touch, Gwent Police said. You can contact Gwent Police on any of heir social media sites or by calling 101, quoting log number 2500230411.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
British horseracing to go on strike in protest against rise in betting taxes
LONDON (AP) — British horseracing will stage an unprecedented one-day strike on Sept. 10 to protest a proposed rise in taxes on race betting. The four scheduled meetings that day — at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Lingfield and Kempton — will not take place after agreements between the owners of the courses and the British Horseracing Authority, making it the first time the sport in Britain has voluntarily refused to race in modern history. The BHA set up the 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15% duty on racing could be increased to the 21% levied on games of chance. Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said the strike intends to 'highlight to (the) government the serious consequences of the treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport.' 'British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country," Dunshea said. 'This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture." The British government said it was bringing the 'treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy.' 'It is not about increasing or decreasing rates,' the government said, "and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals.' ___ AP sports:
