Vault 21 licence suspended after 'extreme' ice sculpture stunt
One video, which showed a woman at Vault 21 drinking until she could not anymore, was labelled an act "at a high level of irresponsibility" by the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority.
The suspension of the Octagon bar and restaurant's on-licence was called for by the Dunedin City Council, a decision issued by the authority said.
Judge Robert Spear said it was alleged the bar and restaurant promoted alcohol irresponsibly through acts which likely encouraged people to consume alcohol to an excessive extent.
Those acts took place in November last year when, as part of a sponsored Moët et Chandon event, a large ice sculpture of a "hollow oversized champagne wine bottle" was set up on the footpath outside Vault 21.
Staff allowed alcohol to be poured freely through one end of the vessel and was drunk by people "crouched below the mouth of the ice sculpture", Judge Spear said.
"Three videos extracted from Facebook show that this large ice sculpture was in full view of the passing public which, of course, this being the Octagon is at the very centre of Dunedin city."
One video retrieved showed a woman "drinking directly from the ice sculpture until she could obviously drink no more".
"This was, without question, an act at a high level of irresponsibility in relation to the promotion of alcohol."
It appeared the people shown in the videos were not young people or students, and in two of the cases involved "people of more mature years", he said.
Vault 21 owner Andre Shi had accepted the promotion of alcohol was irresponsible.
The initial explanation was the promotion only involved champagne being poured down the ice sculpture into a glass, limiting the amount available for consumption, Judge Spear said.
"However, the Facebook video posts were subsequently found that showed that the promotion was far more extreme."
Mr Shi had been willing to accept a 48-hour suspension, but the authority considered this would be an insufficient response to the offence.
"Particularly because this promotion happened out on the footpath in accordingly in full view of the public.
"We could have accepted a 48-hour suspension if this had happened inside the premises and away from the eyes of the passing public, but that was not the case."
The authority was aware Vault 21 was a popular venue in the middle of the city, but other outlets needed to understand what standards were acceptable and what were not.
A 72-hour suspension was reluctantly accepted by Mr Shi, Judge Spear said.
Vault 21 would not be allowed to sell alcohol from 8am tomorrow until 8am Saturday.
Judge Spear said the authority's finding constituted a "negative holding" against the licensee company, AND Hospitality Group Ltd.
If the company received a total of three negative holdings within three years, an application would be made for the cancellation of its on-licence.
Vault 21 has been approached for comment.
tim.scott@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Conservative Party Of New Zealand To Advocate For Steve Howley
Conservative Party Law & Justice Spokesman Stephen Taylor says the party is supporting Steve Howley, the West Auckland lawn mowing contractor who was publicly accused by Maori Party President John Tamihere of defacing the Maori Party Tamaki Makaurau candidate's by-election signs in a Facebook post that went viral. Stephen is also the director of Litigation Support Services, an agency that supports Self-Represented Litigants to navigate the New Zealand judicial system, and will lead this advocacy in support of Mr Howley. 'Having met with Mr Howley, and after hearing his story, it is appalling to me that a private individual can be going about his business, only to be falsely accused of doing something that he hasn't done, and become the victim of a viral "dog-whistle" attack against himself, his business, and his family, as has happened to Mr Howley' says Mr Taylor. 'Having reviewed the relevant legislation, it is very clear to me that Mr Tamihere's reported action against Mr Howley, would meet the various criminal thresholds for a posting of a harmful digital communication causing serious emotional distress under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015'. "I will be approaching the Waitemata Police on behalf of Mr Howley regarding this matter, and walking them through these criminal thresholds, which themselves meet both police prosecutorial evidential and public interest guidelines for Police to be able to consider progressing with a prosecution against Mr Tamihere for posting a digital communication causing harm to Mr Howley'. 'Mr Howley reports that he did nothing wrong - in the process of cleaning his own defaced company signs, Mr Howley was photographed by a passerby in the vicinity of a Maori Party Election sign which had been similarly defaced. This person jumped to the erroneous conclusion that Mr Howley was defacing a the Maori Party sign, and somehow their photo and the corresponding post reached Mr Tamihere's Facebook page, and was allegedly shared at least 140 times, and attracted hundreds of comments. A number of these comments were allegedly threatening to Mr Howley to such an extent that Mr Howley feared for his safety, and declined to go back to work for several days, costing Mr Howley a significant loss of income, introducing service delays for Mr Howley's clients, and resulting in negative physical and psychological health effects upon Mr Howley, owing to the stress and trauma resulting from the alleged action of Mr Tamihere against Mr Howley'. 'In addition, Mr Howley allegedly had photos of his children lifted from his personal Facebook page and reposted onto Mr Tamihere's Facebook page'. 'In the material I have seen, I believe that the veracity of the available evidence in this matter can be reasonably sustained, and the Police should have no problem advancing this matter to a criminal prosecution'. 'However, if the Waitemata Police Prosecution Service decline to prosecute this matter, despite the overwhelming evidence that criminal thresholds for posting a digital communication causing harm against Mr Howley have been met, then the Conservative Party of New Zealand will assist Mr Howley in filing a private prosecution in this matter, under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015,' says Mr Taylor.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Tauranga crackdown: Stores sell alcohol to minors
Council alcohol licensing team leader Sam Kemp said alarmingly, eight establishments sold alcohol without verifying the buyer's age or requesting any form of identification. 'When questioned by alcohol licensing inspectors, the duty managers admitted they had not verified the minor's age or, in some cases, not requested appropriate identification and, instead, they completed the sale and allowed the purchase to proceed,' Kemp said. This latest operation followed a sting in March that also caught eight licensed premises. 'The continued non-compliance highlights serious shortcomings in the in-store training and policies of some premises,' Kemp said. The council would continue to take 'firm action' to ensure public safety and uphold the law. Kemp said Tauranga alcohol licensing inspectors and police would be submitting suspension applications to the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority. These applications would target the duty managers at the time of the breaches and the off-licenses of the non-compliant premises. The council declined to name the premises as it worked through the process. According to authority decisions, all eight premises caught out in the March operation went on to lose their right to sell liquor for 48 hours. They were Liquorland CBD Tauranga, Bottle Craft Te Puna, Avenue Liquor Centre, Papamoa Liquor Centre, Mount Boutique Liquor, Papamoa Beach Liquor Centre, Super Liquor Te Puke and Harties Liquor Store. Most also had a duty manager's certificate suspended for 28 days. In a decision posted yesterday, BottleZone Papamoa East had its off-license suspended for 48 hours after selling to a minor in a separate incident. Police investigating an assault by two youths, aged 16 and 17, on an elderly man discovered one of the youths had bought alcohol from the store. The duty manager involved confirmed this. The decision said that person no longer worked in the industry. In March the Welcome Bay Sports Bar and Grill and attached bottle store lost their liquor licenses because of Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act breaches.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Judge ruled to split Patterson trial to avoid prejudice
Triple murderer Erin Patterson would have been unfairly prejudiced if a jury heard allegations she tried to kill her ex-husband in the years before a deadly mushroom lunch. Victorian Supreme Court Justice Christopher Beale made the decision on March 14, ruling Patterson would have to face a separate trial for the three attempted murder offences. Prosecutors ultimately dropped the charges in relation to Simon Patterson just before the triple-murder trial started in Morwell. Patterson was found guilty on July 7 of killing Simon's parents, Don and Gail, 70, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, along with the attempted murder of her husband Ian Wilkinson. Justice Beale's redacted pre-trial rulings were released to media on Monday evening after Patterson lost her bid to keep the evidence a secret to preserve her appeal rights. ADVERTISEMENT The details around the alleged attempted murders of Simon Patterson were revealed for the first time on Friday. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including poll numbers paint grim picture for leaders, Trump sending the National Guard into Washington, and where have all the coaches gone? (Source: 1News) Prosecutors had alleged Patterson tried to poison Simon several times between 2021 and 2022. The first was a penne pasta Patterson cooked for him before leaving for a camping trip in November 2021, which led to a five-day hospital stay for Simon. He also ended up in a coma after a camping trip in late May 2022 where he allegedly ate a chicken korma curry Patterson had made him. Simon had to undergo surgery to remove a large portion of his bowel after eating the curry, he told the Supreme Court during pre-trial hearings. It was also alleged he fell ill in September 2022 after eating a wrap Patterson prepared for him while camping together at Wilson's Promontory. ADVERTISEMENT The prosecution claimed the allegations could be used as coincidence evidence to show the similarities between what allegedly happened to Simon and the mushroom lunch guests. But Justice Beale ruled the charges should be heard in a separate trial to prevent jurors from "misusing or overvaluing" the evidence in relation to Simon. He determined if a jury found Patterson had deliberately poisoned her four lunch guests in July 2023, there was a risk they would wrongly assess the charges relating to Simon. "I am not persuaded that its probative value substantially outweighs the significant danger or risk of unfair prejudice to the accused," Justice Beale said in his written reasons. The judge also made pre-trial rulings in relation to documents about poisoning found on devices police seized from Patterson's home. Justice Beale ruled the documents failed the relevance test because the evidence could only go as high as Patterson possibly accessed the file. The judge also stopped the jury from seeing a Facebook post Patterson made to a poisons page, where she claimed her cat had chewed on a mushroom and was vomiting. ADVERTISEMENT Justice Beale noted the post was made 18 months before the first allegation in relation to Simon. "In my view, even if the evidence of this post shows an interest in poisons, it is temporally remote," the judge said in his reasons. Patterson will face a two-day pre-sentence hearing later in August, during which she will listen to statements from the Pattersons and Wilkinsons. She will have 28 days to appeal after she is sentenced.
