Austrian gunman was obsessed with school shootings, police say
After killing 10 people at the BORG Dreierschützengasse high school in Graz, the perpetrator killed himself. He left the school three years earlier.
The incident in Austria's second-largest city was the deadliest mass shooting in the country's recent history.
Although his motive for the attack remains unclear, investigators can 'say with certainty that, over the years, he developed a passion for school shootings,' said Michael Lohnegger, the head of Styria province's criminal police office.
'He glorified not just the acts in general, but also the perpetrators who carried out these acts."
The gunman had planned the attack meticulously, according to investigators, but they did not know why he chose the date he did for the massacre or why he stopped shooting when he did - the gunman still had many additional bullets.
The shooter had no prior criminal record. During a search of his house, police found plans for an explosive attack as well as a non-functioning pipe bomb.
Officers also discovered a digital and handwritten suicide note addressed to his parents, although the Director of Public Security Franz Ruf said that it offered no motive.
Nine of the 11 people wounded in last week's attack remain in hospital, Lohnegger said on Tuesday, adding that they were not in critical condition.
The shooter used two firearms he legally owned to carry out the attack. On Monday, Chancellor Christian Stocker vowed to tighten Austria's gun laws.
In the wake of the attack, the mayor of Graz, Elke Kahr, called for a complete ban on private weapons. Gun licenses are "issued too quickly," she said last week.
The European Water Resilience Strategy presented this month by the European Commission aims to reduce water pollution, prevent waste and make water accessible to all. The EU's executive body promises to help member states better implement the 2000 Water Framework Directive and three related laws. It will also promote more investment, given the seriousness of the situation.
Only 37% of the EU's surface waters have a good ecological status and only 29% have a good chemical status. The continent is the fastest-warming region in the world due to climate change, which has increased the number of water-related natural disasters.
Currently, 30% of the EU suffers from water scarcity due to prolonged droughts. Meanwhile, devastating floods caused €325 billion in damage between 1980 and 2023.
"Everyone knows the emergency we are in and the investments needed in the sector. We have the numbers," said Hildegard Bentele (Germany/EPP), a centre-right lawmaker who chairs the MEP Water Group at the European Parliament.
"We can react with the next EU budget and make better use of Cohesion Policy, because we have seen that the funds have not been used for the necessary investments," she added.
According to the European Commission, around €55 billion is spent on water investments across Europe, but there is an annual gap of €23 billion additional funding needed.
To address this gap, the EU executive will allocate a larger share of the Cohesion Policy funds, which are intended for less wealthy regions, to water management.
In addition, the European Investment Bank will launch a new programme: €15 billion will be available over the period 2025-2027 and it aims to attract a further €25 billion from commercial investors.
Industry and agriculture are two sectors that use a lot of fresh water and also contribute to its pollution with chemicals. One of the main issues the Commission intends to address is water pollution, particularly caused by chemicals called PFAS or 'forever chemicals'.
"PFAS are substances dubbed forever pollutants because they don't easily break down. So they tend to accumulate over time in the environment. Research has shown that exposure to certain types of PFAS causes serious health problems," said Amandine Hess, Euronews reporter who covered the communication.
"The Commission is planning to launch a public-private partnership to support innovation, to clean up pollution from PFAS and other chemicals. The 'polluter pays' principle will be applied, so it means that public funding would be used only for the sites where it has not been possible to identify who is responsible for the pollution," she added.
NGOs and the European Green Party say the strategy falls far short of providing concrete answers to the complex problems surrounding water management, pointing to a lack of clear legal requirements and a failure to tackle pollution at source.
"The environmentalists are calling for strict management of fertilisers and chemicals. On the other hand, the Commission call to increase water efficiency by at least 10% by 2030 but does not set clear binding targets," said Amandine Hess.
MEP Hildegard Bentele admits that a 10% target for water efficiency is "a modest good intention" and acknowledges that member states are lagging behind in implementing legislation, going so far as to say that "we could sanction member states that do not meet the targets".
"We are behind schedule, we have not seen much progress in the last 20 years. That is why we need to move faster. I would like to see the Commission more rigorous in this regard in the coming years, including in the new strategy",said MEP Hildegard Bentele.
Watch the video here!
Journalist: Isabel Marques da Silva
Content production: Pilar Montero López
Video production: Zacharia Vigneron
Graphism: Loredana Dumitru
Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
24 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU, US closer to clinching trade deal text as Washington shares update
The United States has reverted to the European Commission over the heavily-anticipated joint statement that underpins the trade agreement reached between Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump in late July, the EU's executive confirmed on Thursday. "I'm now happy to confirm that we have received a text from the US with their suggestions for, let's say, getting closer to that finalisation of the document," spokesperson Olof Gill told reporters. "So we're going to look at that now." The US and the EU reached a political agreement ending the trade dispute between the two blocs more than two weeks ago, when US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met in Scotland. The parties agreed that the US will set 15 % tariffs on EU goods, with the bloc also committing to purchasing US energy products worth €750 billion and to investing a further €600 billion Stateside before the end of Trump's term. But the two sides have since been making contradictory claims about the content and scope of the deal. The joint US-EU statement will not be legally-binding but it is highly important because it will set technical details and include the list of goods that will be exempt from tariffs. Gill would not be drawn to comment on when the text might be finalised, saying that "the speed with which that happens depends on both sides giving it full engagement and full focus and from our side we can certainly say that we will be doing so". Further technical and political engagement between the two sides should now take place, with the EU set to "make our own suggestions back", Gill said. "We ping pong it forward and back until we get to a final text, and I hope we can get there soon." Some European manufacturers have bemoaned the delays in the implementation of the deal, chief among them the automotive industry for which the tariff rate has not been reduced to 15% yet and remains at 27.5%. The EU Commission spokesman reiterated on Thursday that he is not concerned that the US president has not yet signed the executive order on car imports, arguing: "The US has made political commitments to us in this respect, and we look forward to them being implemented."
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Requests for EU aid to battle wildfires reach entire 2024 tally
The number of requests for European solidarity to help tackle wildfires this week reached the same tally as for the entire 2024 fire season, the European Commission announced on Thursday. "Overall, the mechanism has been activated 16 times during the current season and we are in mid-August," European Commission spokesperson Eva Hrncirova told reporters on Thursday. "This is already equal to the total amount of activations during the whole summer season last year." Spain became the latest country on Wednesday to turn to the mechanism, making its first-ever request for European solidarity against wildfires. At least three people have died in Spain, including a volunteer firefighter, as wildfires sweep through the north-western Léon province. Two planes from the rescEU strategic reserve, currently stationed in France, were expected to be deployed to Spain on Thursday. Bulgaria, Montenegro, Albania and Greece also asked for assistance this week. Spain and Greece, which are traditionally heavily affected by wildfires, are among the EU member states that have had foreign firefighters pre-positioned on their soil since July. A total of 650 firefighters from 14 European countries were pre-deployed in high-risk areas - the highest number since the scheme was launched in 2022 - with France and Portugal also welcoming foreign teams. Among the other European countries that have activated the mechanism specifically for wildfires this year are Cyprus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and North Macedonia. Israel and Syria have also requested assistance. The way it works is that a country needing assistance tells the EU's Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC) what they need and other states that are part of the mechanism can then individually contribute by volunteering equipment and manpower. The EU's Civil Protection mechanism then coordinates the deployment of the various contributions and foots the bill. France, which battled its largest wildires in decade earlier this month in the southern coastal département of Aude, did not ask for further European assistance. "It's a decision of the member state to ask for assistance or not. Big countries usually have big capacities and they have increased their capacities in the past due to the effect of the global warming and more often wildfires," European Commission spokesperson Hrncirova explained on Thursday. "You can see that very often it's useful for smaller countries. We often have requests from Western Balkans, Albania, Montenegro. Macedonia. So for these countries, the assistance can be really crucial," she added. More than 511,000 hectares had been turned to ashes across the EU by 12 August according to the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), more than double the average tallied at the same time over the 2006-2024 period. The number of fires observed since the beginning of the year has reached over 1,600, a jump from the average of 717 seen by the same date over the past 20 years.
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Global plastics treaty talks stall as deadline approaches
Negotiators working on a treaty to address global plastic pollution discussed a new draft of the text on Wednesday that wouldn't limit plastic production or address chemicals used in plastic products. Talks stalled just one day before they are due to end after countries with very divergent views expressed disappointment with the draft. It could change significantly, and a new version is expected on Thursday, the last scheduled day of the negotiations. 'Unbalanced' or a 'good enough' starting point? When they convened on Wednesday night, Colombia's delegation said that the text was entirely unacceptable because it was unbalanced and lacked the ambition and global obligations needed to end plastic pollution. The delegation said that it wouldn't accept the wording as the basis for negotiations. The head of Panama's delegation to the talks, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, stood up and cheered. Many delegations made statements to agree, including Mexico, Chile, Ghana, Canada, Norway, the United Kingdom, the European Union and the group of small island developing states. "We have made clear that the text on the table is not acceptable for the EU," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience, and a Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall, said. EU representative Magnus Heunicke said in a post on social media that the text "doesn't meet the minimum needed to respond to the huge plastic challenge". 'Let me be clear, this is not acceptable for future generations,' said Erin Silsbe, representing Canada. Oil- and gas-producing nations raised other concerns, with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and others saying that the draft doesn't have the scope they want to set the parameters of the treaty or precise definitions. The United States said that six articles crossed red lines, but didn't say how. India's delegation, on the other hand, said that the draft is a 'good enough starting point.' What was included in the treaty draft? The draft contains one mention of plastic production in the preamble, reaffirming the importance of promoting sustainable production and consumption of plastics. It doesn't contain an article on production from a previous draft. There is no mention of chemicals. The new provisions seek to reduce the number of problematic plastic products that often enter the environment and are difficult to recycle, and promote the redesign of plastic products so that they can be recycled and reused. Parties to the treaty would improve their waste management. Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, drafted the document based on the views expressed by nations throughout the negotiations. He told them that he did it to move them closer to a legally-binding instrument, and they can shape and improve it, as well as add and delete wording. With little time left, he said, it's time to build bridges, not dig in over red lines. David Azoulay, Head of the delegation for the Centre for International Environmental Law, said the text makes "a mockery of a three-year-long consultative process" - one that included board support for a treaty addressing the full lifecycle of plastics. "This is a treaty that all but ensures that nothing will change. It gives in to petrostate and industry demands with weak, voluntary measures that guarantee we continue to produce plastic at increasing levels indefinitely, fail to safeguard human health, endanger the environment, and damn future generations," he adds. "It will be very difficult to come back from this, and we encourage Member States to reject the text." What is blocking progress on the plastics treaty? The biggest issue of the talks has been whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic or focus instead on things like better design, recycling and reuse. Around 100 countries want to limit production as well as tackle cleanup and recycling. Many have said it's essential to address toxic chemicals. Powerful oil and gas-producing nations and the plastics industry oppose production limits. They want a treaty focused on better waste management and reuse.
