
Austrian gunman was obsessed with school shootings, police say
According to police, the gunman was fascinated by school shootings, but his motive remains a mystery.
After killing 10 people at the BORG Dreierschützengasse high school in Graz, the perpetrator killed himself. He left the school three years earlier.
The incident in Austria's second-largest city was the deadliest mass shooting in the country's recent history.
Although his motive for the attack remains unclear, investigators can 'say with certainty that, over the years, he developed a passion for school shootings,' said Michael Lohnegger, the head of Styria province's criminal police office.
'He glorified not just the acts in general, but also the perpetrators who carried out these acts."
The gunman had planned the attack meticulously, according to investigators, but they did not know why he chose the date he did for the massacre or why he stopped shooting when he did - the gunman still had many additional bullets.
The shooter had no prior criminal record. During a search of his house, police found plans for an explosive attack as well as a non-functioning pipe bomb.
Officers also discovered a digital and handwritten suicide note addressed to his parents, although the Director of Public Security Franz Ruf said that it offered no motive.
Nine of the 11 people wounded in last week's attack remain in hospital, Lohnegger said on Tuesday, adding that they were not in critical condition.
The shooter used two firearms he legally owned to carry out the attack. On Monday, Chancellor Christian Stocker vowed to tighten Austria's gun laws.
In the wake of the attack, the mayor of Graz, Elke Kahr, called for a complete ban on private weapons. Gun licenses are "issued too quickly," she said last week.
The European Water Resilience Strategy presented this month by the European Commission aims to reduce water pollution, prevent waste and make water accessible to all. The EU's executive body promises to help member states better implement the 2000 Water Framework Directive and three related laws. It will also promote more investment, given the seriousness of the situation.
Only 37% of the EU's surface waters have a good ecological status and only 29% have a good chemical status. The continent is the fastest-warming region in the world due to climate change, which has increased the number of water-related natural disasters.
Currently, 30% of the EU suffers from water scarcity due to prolonged droughts. Meanwhile, devastating floods caused €325 billion in damage between 1980 and 2023.
"Everyone knows the emergency we are in and the investments needed in the sector. We have the numbers," said Hildegard Bentele (Germany/EPP), a centre-right lawmaker who chairs the MEP Water Group at the European Parliament.
"We can react with the next EU budget and make better use of Cohesion Policy, because we have seen that the funds have not been used for the necessary investments," she added.
According to the European Commission, around €55 billion is spent on water investments across Europe, but there is an annual gap of €23 billion additional funding needed.
To address this gap, the EU executive will allocate a larger share of the Cohesion Policy funds, which are intended for less wealthy regions, to water management.
In addition, the European Investment Bank will launch a new programme: €15 billion will be available over the period 2025-2027 and it aims to attract a further €25 billion from commercial investors.
Industry and agriculture are two sectors that use a lot of fresh water and also contribute to its pollution with chemicals. One of the main issues the Commission intends to address is water pollution, particularly caused by chemicals called PFAS or 'forever chemicals'.
"PFAS are substances dubbed forever pollutants because they don't easily break down. So they tend to accumulate over time in the environment. Research has shown that exposure to certain types of PFAS causes serious health problems," said Amandine Hess, Euronews reporter who covered the communication.
"The Commission is planning to launch a public-private partnership to support innovation, to clean up pollution from PFAS and other chemicals. The 'polluter pays' principle will be applied, so it means that public funding would be used only for the sites where it has not been possible to identify who is responsible for the pollution," she added.
NGOs and the European Green Party say the strategy falls far short of providing concrete answers to the complex problems surrounding water management, pointing to a lack of clear legal requirements and a failure to tackle pollution at source.
"The environmentalists are calling for strict management of fertilisers and chemicals. On the other hand, the Commission call to increase water efficiency by at least 10% by 2030 but does not set clear binding targets," said Amandine Hess.
MEP Hildegard Bentele admits that a 10% target for water efficiency is "a modest good intention" and acknowledges that member states are lagging behind in implementing legislation, going so far as to say that "we could sanction member states that do not meet the targets".
"We are behind schedule, we have not seen much progress in the last 20 years. That is why we need to move faster. I would like to see the Commission more rigorous in this regard in the coming years, including in the new strategy",said MEP Hildegard Bentele.
Watch the video here!
Journalist: Isabel Marques da Silva
Content production: Pilar Montero López
Video production: Zacharia Vigneron
Graphism: Loredana Dumitru
Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
EU chief says pressure off for lower Russia oil price cap
The European Commission, the EU's executive arm, had suggested cutting the current oil price cap from $60 to $45 as Moscow drags its feet on a ceasefire in Ukraine. The measure would have been a major component of a fresh wave of sanctions against Russia planned by the EU, with hopes that the United States would also commit. The EU had said it would make its case at the G7 summit being held at a wooded resort in Alberta, Canada, but the gathering was overshadowed by the conflict between Israel and Iran that sent US President Donald Trump home early to handle the crisis. The current $60 cap "had little effect, but in the last days, we have seen that the oil price has risen [and] the cap in place does serve its function," von der Leyen told reporters on the sidelines of the G7 meeting. "So for the moment, there's little pressure on lowering the oil price cap," she added. The existing cap was a G7 initiative aimed at limiting the amount of money Russia makes by exporting oil to countries across the world. It was designed to limit the price Moscow can get for oil by banning shipping firms and insurance companies from dealing with Russia to export above that amount. Under the leadership of the previous Biden administration, it was set at $60 by the G7 in late 2022, months after the invasion of Ukraine. To have the most impact, the EU and other G7 partners need to get the United States to follow suit and agree to the price cut. But Trump so far has frustrated Western allies by refusing to impose new sanctions on Russia despite President Vladimir Putin's failure to agree to a Ukraine ceasefire. Von der Leyen said the G7 leaders, with Trump still present, on Monday discussed coordinating on sanctions against Russia "to put more pressure" on Russian President Vladimir Putin. The EU's latest proposal for an 18th round of sanctions since Russia's invasion also includes measures to stop the defunct Baltic Sea gas pipelines Nord Stream 1 and 2 from being brought back online. "The fact that we have just put another hardened, biting package of sanctions on Russia is proof" of the EU's continued support for Ukraine, von der Leyen said.


Local France
3 hours ago
- Local France
Article 50: What the post-Brexit carte de séjour entitles you to in France
Once the dust settled after the torturous years of Brexit negotiations a distinct group emerged - Brits who were living in the EU before Brexit (and EU nationals living in the UK) and who were granted a sort of 'half and half' status by the Withdrawal Agreement. This group gets to keep some of their pre-Brexit rights, especially around residency, but loses some others - in particular around onward migration and voting rights. This group are in a totally different situation to Brits who moved to the EU after Brexit, who now come under general rules for non-EU nationals (sometimes referred to as third-country nationals). Advertisement Brits who fall into this group have a specific type of residency card - in France it is the Article 50 TUE carte de séjour , sometimes informally known as the WARP (Withdrawal Agreement Residency Permit). In the main, it is only available to people who were resident in France before December 31st 2020, although in some cases a spouse or family member of a card-holder is entitled to the card as well. This card proves that the holder is covered by the Withdrawal Agreement and has certain protected rights. However, as memories of Brexit fade, the exact rights of the Article 50 card are not always clearly understood , especially among French administration staff who are not specialists in immigration matters. READ ALSO : Brexit residency rights in France: Where to go for help✎ So here's a look at exactly what Article 50 card holders are entitled to, and what they aren't. What can you do with an Article 50 card? The Article 50 card is intended to enshrine the rights laid out in the Withdrawal Agreement, and replicates many of the rights that Brits enjoyed pre-Brexit as citizens of an EU country. Among them are; The right to live in France. There are two types of Article 50 card, a five-year card and a permanent (10-year) card. Holders of the 10-year card have the right to live in France permanently but must renew the card itself every 10 years. Holders of the five-year card can swap it for a permanent card once they have been legally resident in France for five years or more - in order to make the swap they should be required to provide proof only that they are still legally resident in France and are covered by the Withdrawal Agreement; READ ALSO : What are your responsibilities as a resident of France?✎ Language test exemptions - new rules on language tests for certain types of long-term residency permits exempt Article 50 card-holders; The right to undertake any type of professional activity in France. The wording on the back of the card reads Accord de retrait du Royaume-Uni de L'UE – séjour permanent toutes activités professionelles - unlike holders of other working residency permits, holders of the Article 50 card can be employees, self-employed, remote workers or unemployed and do not have to update their residency status if they change their work; The right to study in France; The right to live in France without working - eg for retirees. Unlike holders of the French 'visitor' visa, there is no requirement to regularly provide proof of financial means; The right to leave France - permit holders can leave France for between 10 months and two years (depending on card type) without losing residency status. It should be noted that Brits who do leave France long enough to lose their residency (eg going to university in another country) will have to go through the standard non-EU immigration channels if they want to come back; Pension rights - people who have worked in both the UK and an EU country have the right to have their pensions combined into a single pension, as is standard practice for people who have worked in one or more EU country - full details here . Driving - this is not specific to Article 50 card holders, but people who have a UK or NI driving licence have a slightly different process when it comes to exchanging for a French one. Full details here . Advertisement Professional qualifications - the Withdrawal Agreement doesn't specifically address the mutual recognition of professional qualifications. The deal that was eventually worked out meant that Brits could apply to have their qualifications recognised before the end of the Brexit transition period. Those who did not do so in time, however, must now abide by the standard non-EU rules around professional qualifications, which may mean taking French exams in order to be able to practise certain professions. And what doesn't it entitle holders to? Voting - French rules state that EU citizens can vote in local or European elections, can hold elected office at a local level and can take on fonctionnaire roles. Those rights were all lost to Brits in France after Brexit Advertisement Onward migration - the carte de séjour entitles holders to live in France, but only in France. Card holders who want to move to another EU country have no special status and must follow the same rules as all other non-EU citizens moving to that country. Citizenship - Article 50 card-holders are entitled to apply for French citizenship if they meet the criteria around residency or family ties, but they get no special privileges and apply under the sale rules as everyone else. Unlike with residency cards, there is no language test exemption for British Article 50 card-holders seeking French citizenship. READ ALSO : Quick guide: Who is eligible for French citizenship?✎


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
G7 rallies behind Ukraine after abrupt Trump exit
The US president, who has had a volatile relationship with Zelensky and had been due to meet him, flew out of the summit in the Canadian Rockies late Monday to return to Washington to focus on the Israel-Iran conflict. Zelensky arrived at the wooded mountain resort of Kananaskis after Russia ravaged Kyiv with one of the worst bombardments since it invaded in February 2022, killing at least 10 people in the capital. Prime Minister Mark Carney, the host of the summit, welcomed Zelensky and announced Can$2 billion ($1.47bn) of military support, including drones and helicopters, for Ukraine. "This underscores the importance of standing in total solidarity with Ukraine," Carney told him. "We underscored the importance of using maximum pressure against Russia, who has refused to come to the table," Carney said. Carney also announced a new Can$2.3 billion loan to Ukraine to help rebuild its infrastructure and public systems and joined Britain in tightening sanctions on Russia's so-called shadow fleet of ships used to circumvent international sanctions on its oil sales. Britain said it wanted to ramp up economic pressure to show Russian President Vladimir Putin it was in his interest to end the war. "These sanctions strike right at the heart of Putin's war machine, choking off his ability to continue his barbaric war in Ukraine," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. US holding out US lawmakers have also drafted a package of new sanctions on Russia but Trump has been hesitant, saying he wants to preserve relations with Putin, whom he spoke to by telephone on the eve of the G7 summit. Trump infamously berated Zelensky in the Oval Office on February 28, saying he was ungrateful for US aid, but has since voiced disappointment that Putin has rebuffed a US proposal for at least a temporary ceasefire. Zelensky, his voice choked with emotion, told Carney that the latest Russian attack was a "big tragedy" for Ukrainian families and it showed the need for allies' support -- and made clear that he still backed Trump-led calls for negotiations. "It's important for our soldiers to be strong in the battlefield -- to stay strong until Russia will be ready for the peace negotiations," Zelensky said next to Carney. "We are ready for the peace negotiation -- unconditional ceasefire. For this we need pressure." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters that despite the attention to the Middle East crisis, "our focus on Ukraine will also persist and stay strong." Tough trade talks The G7 -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States -- was holding its first summit since the return to power of Trump, who is fond of assailing allies when they cross him. Trump appeared in good spirits during his abbreviated visit, with no public dust-ups. "Obviously with Trump gone the discussions might be a bit smoother, but they also have less impact with the most powerful nation not there," a diplomat from a G7 nation said on condition of anonymity. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained to represent the United States at the summit, where discussions have also focused heavily on Trump's attempts to radically overhaul the world's trading system. Trump has vowed to slap sweeping tariffs on friends and foes alike on July 9, although he has postponed once. The US president, speaking to reporters on his way back from the summit, complained that the European Union was not yet offering a "fair deal" on trade. "We're either going to make a good deal or they'll just pay whatever we say they will pay," he said. Von der Leyen said she still hoped for a negotiated solution and that talks were "intense and demanding." Trump's negotiators have already sealed a deal with Britain and, outside of the G7, reached an agreement to lower tariffs with rival China. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he had "frank" discussions with Trump on Monday but made clear the importance of automobile exports to the world's second-largest developed economy. "As there are still some points where both sides disagree, we have not reached an agreement on the package as a whole," Ishiba told reporters. © 2025 AFP