logo
Labour's latest EPC idea would be laughable if it weren't so pernicious

Labour's latest EPC idea would be laughable if it weren't so pernicious

Telegraph5 hours ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again: sometimes I feel I live in an alternative reality.
I don't know how this escaped me, given how up to speed I am with all things EPC (I always need some good bedtime reading), but I can only think after my last painful and expensive experience where I tried to achieve a grade 'C' and failed, I switched off.
It's the only explanation I can find for how I missed the latest shenanigans when it comes to the EPC proposals for 2030 – they apply to all 'rentals'.
We're not just talking about private rentals now. Nope, these plans are so much wider reaching and damaging than I had ever realised, because the proposal is to also include all holiday lets, temporary accommodation such as immigrant housing and social housing.
Now, you may not know this, but holiday letting and social housing currently do not have to comply with any EPC regulation, so have been spared the burden while the private sector has had to carry it.
Anyway, the good news is that all of these rental sectors are apparently going to be measured by the same metric as the private sector. It's a surprise move given the level of outright discrimination landlords have had to suffer, but I can only surmise Labour wants to spread misery to every corner of the housing market for full impact.
It's also the only reason I can think of – apart from money making – for the fines increasing to £30,000 for non-compliance.
However, while I welcome the equality, I have no idea if Angela Rayner is secretly planning to bring a load of talented tradespeople over to fill the gaping skills gap. Currently, there's no way all rental properties can be retrofitted to meet the 'C' grade standard by 2030.
And anyway, does anybody care to remember that there is still a cost of living crisis going on? I'm not sure where all this extra cash is going to come from. Landlords have been squeezed in recent years and few are likely to have the sort of sums required for upgrades to hand. There are ways to improve your EPC rating, without breaking the bank, but the Government's target is still unrealistic.
But this is all before we even get to the heart of the matter, which is the unreliability of the EPC test in itself.
This has been proven time and time again to be defective – and yet still they persist. To give just one example, electricity is more expensive and so even though only using electricity to heat your home is better for energy efficiency, the expense means you will get a worse EPC score.
Last week Labour unveiled a reformed EPC assessment with more stringent criteria that is more expensive for landlords and could see properties drop a rating. What is it with brick walls and banging your head?
The worst thing is, I feel like a fool. I try to be a good landlord. I try to see what I can do to get to an EPC 'C' because even if I don't like all the noise and stuff going on, I know my tenants appreciate upgrades that make properties cheaper to run, particularly given the Government still hasn't got a handle on the utility bills crisis.
Such is the level of this eco Shakespearean farce that it's little wonder to learn about the lack of enforcement when it comes to EPC certificates.
Since 2020, private landlords have been unable to let a property unless it got an 'E' or was exempt. But – and here's the plot twist: a Freedom of Information request by technology provider Reapit has found only 147 fines were issued between October 2008 and August 2024, and only by Liverpool, Bristol and Newham for non-compliance.
Now, before you start getting all excited, I have to remind you – if you don't have a valid EPC, you'll get fined. But more importantly, for anybody thinking of flouting the law, if you don't have a valid EPC certificate at the start of the tenancy, trying to recover possession will be extremely difficult. Providing a tenant with an EPC is a legal requirement, and if landlords have not done this correctly, they will not be able to use a s21. notice to evict a tenant.
And that, dear reader, is the madness of the world we live in: the tenant may not be paying rent and may well have destroyed your property, but if you haven't got the right EPC and served it on the right day, you can kiss goodbye to what was once yours.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Middle East tensions keep FTSE 100 on back foot
Middle East tensions keep FTSE 100 on back foot

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Middle East tensions keep FTSE 100 on back foot

London's FTSE 100 closed lower on Tuesday, giving back Monday's gains, as hopes for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran faded. ' Middle East tensions are showing no signs of easing back, putting investors on high alert,' commented Russ Mould at AJ Bell. The FTSE 100 index closed down 41.19 points, 0.5%, at 8,834.03. The FTSE 250 ended 46.97 points lower, 0.2%, at 21,237.05, and the AIM All-Share fell 3.49 points, 0.5%, at 760.65. In European equities on Tuesday, the CAC 40 in Paris closed down 0.8%, while the DAX 40 in Frankfurt gave up 1.1%. Stocks in New York were lower at the time of the London close. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.2%, the S&P 500 index was 0.4% lower, as was the Nasdaq Composite. Donald Trump called for a 'complete give-up' by Iran and denied pursuing a ceasefire in the war between the Islamic republic and Israel. In comments after leaving the G7 summit early to focus on the conflict, the US president called for a 'real end' to the war rather than a temporary truce and predicted a further intensification of Israeli strikes. Mr Trump said on Air Force One that a satisfactory end to the war could consist of Iran 'giving up entirely' and added in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday that he had 'not reached out to Iran for 'Peace Talks' in any way, shape, or form'. Vice President JD Vance said that Mr Trump may decide that 'further action' is needed to stop Iran's nuclear programme, responding to speculation that the US could intervene in the conflict. Mr Vance said in a post on X: 'The president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens. He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.' Ipek Ozkardeskaya at Swissquote Bank said 'this is not a classic de-escalation story'. 'While Iran appears to be signalling restraint, former President Donald Trump urged the evacuation of Tehran, and Israel has vowed to continue its strikes. This makes it a one-sided de-escalation at best, and keeps risks across energy markets and haven assets tilted to the upside. If Iran fails to find room to manoeuvre diplomatically, it could easily make a U-turn.' Brent oil traded higher at 75.45 US dollars a barrel late on Tuesday from 72.79 dollars on Monday. The price rise boosted BP and Shell on London's FTSE 100 by 1.8% and 1.5% respectively. Elsewhere, US retail sales fell more than anticipated in May, data published by the US Census Bureau showed. The country's advance estimates of retail and food services sales edged down 0.9% monthly in May to 715.4 billion dollars from 722.0 billion dollars in April, when sales had declined by 0.1%. April's figure was downwardly revised from growth of 0.1%. May's contraction was sharper than a decline of 0.7% that had been pencilled in by the FXStreet-cited consensus. The headline sales were dragged lower by a drop in motor vehicle and parts sales, noted economists at TD Economics. 'A flurry of activity in anticipation of tariffs boosted consumer spending earlier this year, but that momentum is now looking to have run its course,' the broker added. The figures come ahead of Wednesday's interest rate decision by the Federal Reserve. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, it is near-certain that the Fed will maintain rates at the 4.25%-4.50% range this week. The Fed held in each of the first three meetings this year. Its last cut was in December, a 25 basis points trim to the federal funds rate range. 'We expect a unanimous decision to leave rates unchanged and look for only cosmetic changes to the post-meeting statement,' JPMorgan analysts said ahead of Wednesday's decision. JPMorgan expects the Fed's projections this week 'will likely push the growth and inflation outlooks in a stagflationary direction', showing weaker growth and hotter inflation. 'We expect the median estimate of GDP growth this year will be marked down from 1.7% to 1.4%, while the core PCE inflation forecast will be revised up from 2.8% to 3.2%. We expect more modest changes in the out years,' JPMorgan added. As for when the next change in the policy rate goes, JPMorgan expects the median dot-plot of policymaker projections to show only one cut in 2025. 'For the out years, we project two cuts per year, which would put the '27 year-end rate near neutral,' JPMorgan added. The pound was quoted down at 1.3502 dollars at the time of the London equities close on Tuesday, compared to 1.3594 dollars on Monday. The euro stood lower at 1.1522 dollars against 1.1591 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading at 145.07 yen, up compared to 144.09 yen. The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was quoted at 4.42%, narrowed from 4.43%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was quoted at 4.93%, stretching from 4.92%. On the FTSE 100, Ashtead rose 3.7% despite soft guidance accompanying 'solid' fourth-quarter and full-year results. Pretax profit fell 6.0% to 392 million dollars in the three months to April 30 from 417 million dollars a year prior. Adjusted pretax profit fell 3.6% to 430 million dollars in the quarter from 446 million dollars a year ago, beating the consensus of 409 million dollars. Revenue declined by 3.8% to 2.53 billion dollars in the quarter from 2.63 billion dollars a year before, although rental revenue rose 0.9% to 2.33 billion dollars from 2.31 billion dollars. Jefferies said the results were 'solid enough'. But guidance for between flat rental revenue and growth of 4% for the current financial year was softer-than-expected. Peel Hunt suggested 2026 earnings forecasts could be lowered by 5%. UBS said the outlook is slightly on the low side of consensus, meaning earnings momentum is therefore likely to remain under pressure for now. Bunzl fell 3.1% as RBC Capital Markets downgraded it to 'sector perform' from 'outperform'. On the FTSE 250, Morgan Sindall soared 15% after it upgraded its profit view, amid strong trading in its Fit Out division. The London-based construction and regeneration company said it expects group pretax profit for 2025 to be 'significantly ahead of previous expectations' as reported at its last update in May. Morgan Sindall back in March predicted adjusted pretax profit 'slightly ahead' of consensus at the time of £178.0 million. In May, it said it was confident of delivering a full-year performance in line with expectations at the time. Adjusted pretax profit in 2024 amounted to £172.5 million. Gold was quoted lower at 3,381.51 dollars an ounce against 3,403.81 dollars. The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Ashtead Group, up 162p at 4,544p; BT, up 3.2p at 188.2p; BP, up 6.4p at 389.1p; Shell, up 38.5p at 2,664p; and Unite Group, up 10.5p at 844.5p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were IAG, down 14.7p at 312.6p; Entain, down 31p at 835p; Bunzl, down 74p at 2,228p; WPP, down 15p at 531.2p; and easyJet, down 14.4p at 536.4p. Wednesday's global economic calendar has UK inflation figures and interest rate decisions in Sweden and the US. The domestic corporate calendar on Wednesday sees full-year results from electronics retailer AO World and tools and equipment hire company Speedy Hire.

PM denies coalition of the willing is dead as UK pushes for lower Russian oil cap
PM denies coalition of the willing is dead as UK pushes for lower Russian oil cap

South Wales Guardian

time30 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

PM denies coalition of the willing is dead as UK pushes for lower Russian oil cap

The Prime Minister said he 'strongly' believes that restrictions on the price of Russian crude oil should be strengthened to deplete the revenues Vladimir Putin uses to fund his war machine. The UK announced sanctions on 30 fresh targets linked to the Kremlin on Tuesday in a bid to ramp up pressure on Moscow as it continues resist calls for an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine. A wider package of measures which Sir Keir suggested would be forthcoming from allies gathered at the G7 summit in Canada is yet to materialise after splits opened up in the approach to Russia on Monday. Downing Street said Britain also plans to 'move with partners to tighten the oil price cap' after the group of the world's wealthiest countries agreed in 2022 to restrict the price Russian crude oil to 60 dollars a barrel. Speaking to reporters with him in Kananaskis, Sir Keir was asked whether such a move would be possible without the backing of the US, which has indicated its reluctance to impose further sanctions on Moscow. 'Obviously today we're going to focus on Ukraine,' Sir Keir said. 'We've got President (Volodymyr) Zelensky coming in. We're putting in extra sanctions today, including sanctions on the shadow fleet. 'Others will be doing, similar actions in coming days. And so that does ramp up the pressure. 'On the oil price, obviously, we're still looking at how we're going to make that work. But I strongly believe that we have to put those sanctions in place. We're having those discussions with President Zelensky today.' Before abruptly leaving the summit on Monday, US President Donald Trump suggested he wanted to wait to 'see whether or not a deal is done' with Ukraine before targeting the Kremlin with further action. His remarks are awkward for Sir Keir, with whom he appeared to announce the completion of the US-UK deal, after the Prime Minister said G7 allies would seek to target Russian energy revenues. Talks to broker a possible peace in Ukraine have stalled as Moscow continues to pound the country with missile and drone attacks and holds out on US-backed proposals for an unconditional truce. Meanwhile, the UK and France have been leading efforts to assemble a so-called 'coalition of the willing' made up of nations prepared to send peacekeeping troops to Kyiv to enforce a potential truce. Asked whether those plans were dead in the water, Sir Keir told reporters: 'On the coalition of the willing, no, not at all. That is obviously intended to answer the question, how do you ensure that if a deal is reached, a deal is kept so it's a lasting deal? 'Because the concern, has always been, that there have been deals, if you like, before, Putin has then subsequently breached them. 'So how do you stop that happening again? And the military planning is still going on, as you would expect, so that, when the time comes, we're ready to act.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is attending the G7 conference in Kananaskis, along with leaders from Canada, the US, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and Britain. The Russian invasion will be at the top of the agenda on Tuesday. Earlier, the UK announced sanctions targeting 20 oil tankers in Russia's shadow fleet, as well as measures to tighten the net around companies managing the vessels, Orion Star Group LLC and Valegro LLC-FZ. Britain also targeted two UK residents – Vladimir Pristoupa and Olech Tkacz – who the Government said had operated 'a shadowy network of shell companies' aiding Moscow. The branch of the Russian defence ministry leading the country's underwater intelligence gathering operations, known as Gugi, has also been sanctioned. Sir Keir said: 'These sanctions strike right at the heart of Putin's war machine, choking off his ability to continue his barbaric war in Ukraine. 'We know that our sanctions are hitting hard, so while Putin shows total disregard for peace, we will not hesitate to keep tightening the screws. 'The threat posed by Russia cannot be underestimated, so I'm determined to take every step necessary to protect our national security and keep our country safe and secure.'

Government recognises financial challenge in mitigating two-child cap
Government recognises financial challenge in mitigating two-child cap

South Wales Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Government recognises financial challenge in mitigating two-child cap

Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said applications will open for mitigation of the welfare policy on March 2, with payments being made 'as soon as possible' afterwards – meaning it will likely take place just ahead of the Scottish Parliament election. She said the move will lift 20,000 children out of relative poverty, according to Scottish Government estimates. However the minister also told MSPs she is 'deeply disappointed' that Scotland's interim child poverty targets have not been met, saying there is no single reason for them being missed. Plans to mitigate the two-child cap were first announced last year but First Minister John Swinney said his Government needed time to set up the system. Introduced under the Conservatives, the two-child cap limits benefits in most cases to the first two children born after April 2017. Labour has cited fiscal constraints for keeping the cap, but in May the Prime Minister said he will be 'looking at all options' to tackle child poverty. Ms Somerville said Scotland cannot wait for a decision at Westminster and implementing it in March – 15 months after the initial announcement – will be the fastest a new social security has even been introduced in Scotland. Following an announcement on Tuesday morning, Ms Somerville addressed MSPs on the Government's 'tackling child poverty delivery plan'. She said it is 'deeply disappointing' that interim child poverty targets have not been met, but rates are nevertheless coming down, and she pledged to 'build on that progress' ahead of 2030 targets. Conservative MSP Liz Smith pressed the minister on how the mitigation policy will be funded, saying the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) has noted a 'widening gap' between the Scottish Government's welfare spending and its funding. She said: 'Can I ask where the other cuts will be made to pay for that mitigation?' Ms Somerville said her Government is 'resolute' in tackling economic inactivity, saying people should not be punished for having children. Decisions from the UK Government have pushed more people into poverty, she claimed. Discussing the SFC's forecasts, she said: 'Those are choices that we have taken – to ensure that we are protecting disabled people and children. 'Because we need to protect them from the effects of poverty. 'Those are decisions which will obviously be set out in the work that is being taken forward by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance as we look to the sustainability of our finances. 'We recognise that challenge.' She said the 'easiest way to deal with that challenge' would be for the UK Government to scrap the two-child cap and proposals to cut disabled benefits. Scottish Labour's Paul O'Kane said: 'For all the rhetoric we've had from the First Minister and the Cabinet Secretary after 18 years in office, relative child poverty after housing costs has only fallen by 1%. 'When the Cabinet Secretary says rates are broadly stable, what she means is that the dial hasn't shifted.' The Scottish Fiscal Commission said the mitigation will cost around £150 million next year, before rising to nearly £200 million by the end of the decade. Ms Somerville said around 43,000 children would benefit initially, rising to 50,000 by the end of the decade. In March, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned the policy could harm incentives to work because some of the lowest-paid workers could earn more on welfare than in employment. The move has been welcomed by anti-poverty charities, who have urged the UK Government to scrap the cap, with the Child Poverty Action Group saying the move would lift 350,000 children across the UK out of poverty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store